Assisting Older Adults to Communicate Their Postoperative Pain

Effects of Nurse-Led Pain Management Interventions for Patients with Total Knee/Hip Replacement

BACKGROUND

A literature review was conducted to assess nurse-led nonpharmacologic pain management interventions intended for total knee/hip replacement patients.

DESIGN

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify relevant studies.

REVIEW METHODS

The systematic review was conducted based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and all Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Two reviewers independently selected the studies and appraised their quality. Thereafter, the effects of all described nurse-led nonpharmacologic pain management interventions were estimated regarding pain, anxiety, and satisfaction through a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 219 relevant studies were found through a search. Finally, 23 studies were selected for review, with 17 included in the meta-analysis. Nurse-led nonpharmacologic pain management was effective for pain relief (effect size, -0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.42 to -0.02), and educational interventions were especially effective (effect size, -0.36; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.03). Although interventions reduced anxiety and improved satisfaction, these results were not statistically significant based on the analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support that nurse-led nonpharmacologic pain management interventions could help reduce pain in patients with total knee/hip replacement by supplementing pharmacologic pain management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurse-led nonpharmacologic pain interventions should be considered to reduce patient pain with total knee/hip replacement.

Psychological preparation and postoperative outcomes for adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

In a review and meta-analysis conducted in 1993, psychological preparation was found to be beneficial for a range of outcome variables including pain, behavioural recovery, length of stay and negative affect. Since this review, more detailed bibliographic searching has become possible, additional studies testing psychological preparation for surgery have been completed and hospital procedures have changed. The present review examines whether psychological preparation (procedural information, sensory information, cognitive intervention, relaxation, hypnosis and emotion-focused intervention) has impact on the outcomes of postoperative pain, behavioural recovery, length of stay and negative affect.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effects of psychological preparation on postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthetic.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE (OVID SP) (1950 to May 2014), EMBASE (OVID SP) (1982 to May 2014), PsycINFO (OVID SP) (1982 to May 2014), CINAHL (EBESCOhost) (1980 to May 2014), Dissertation Abstracts (to May 2014) and Web of Science (1946 to May 2014). We searched reference lists of relevant studies and contacted authors to identify unpublished studies. We reran the searches in July 2015 and placed the 38 studies of interest in the `awaiting classification' section of this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials of adult participants (aged 16 or older) undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. We excluded studies focusing on patient groups with clinically diagnosed psychological morbidity. We did not limit the search by language or publication status. We included studies testing a preoperative psychological intervention that included at least one of these seven techniques: procedural information; sensory information; behavioural instruction; cognitive intervention; relaxation techniques; hypnosis; emotion-focused intervention. We included studies that examined any one of our postoperative outcome measures (pain, behavioural recovery, length of stay, negative affect) within one month post-surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author checked titles and abstracts to exclude obviously irrelevant studies. We obtained full reports of apparently relevant studies; two authors fully screened these. Two authors independently extracted data and resolved discrepancies by discussion.Where possible we used random-effects meta-analyses to combine the results from individual studies. For length of stay we pooled mean differences. For pain and negative affect we used a standardized effect size (the standardized mean difference (SMD), or Hedges' g) to combine data from different outcome measures. If data were not available in a form suitable for meta-analysis we performed a narrative review.

MAIN RESULTS

Searches identified 5116 unique papers; we retrieved 827 for full screening. In this review, we included 105 studies from 115 papers, in which 10,302 participants were randomized. Mainly as a result of updating the search in July 2015, 38 papers are awaiting classification. Sixty-one of the 105 studies measured the outcome pain, 14 behavioural recovery, 58 length of stay and 49 negative affect. Participants underwent a wide range of surgical procedures, and a range of psychological components were used in interventions, frequently in combination. In the 105 studies, appropriate data were provided for the meta-analysis of 38 studies measuring the outcome postoperative pain (2713 participants), 36 for length of stay (3313 participants) and 31 for negative affect (2496 participants). We narratively reviewed the remaining studies (including the 14 studies with 1441 participants addressing behavioural recovery). When pooling the results for all types of intervention there was low quality evidence that psychological preparation techniques were associated with lower postoperative pain (SMD -0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.35 to -0.06), length of stay (mean difference -0.52 days, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.22) and negative affect (SMD -0.35, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.16) compared with controls. Results tended to be similar for all categories of intervention, although there was no evidence that behavioural instruction reduced the outcome pain. However, caution must be exercised when interpreting the results because of heterogeneity in the types of surgery, interventions and outcomes. Narratively reviewed evidence for the outcome behavioural recovery provided very low quality evidence that psychological preparation, in particular behavioural instruction, may have potential to improve behavioural recovery outcomes, but no clear conclusions could be reached.Generally, the evidence suffered from poor reporting, meaning that few studies could be classified as having low risk of bias. Overall,we rated the quality of evidence for each outcome as 'low' because of the high level of heterogeneity in meta-analysed studies and the unclear risk of bias. In addition, for the outcome behavioural recovery, too few studies used robust measures and reported suitable data for meta-analysis, so we rated the quality of evidence as `very low'.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggested that psychological preparation may be beneficial for the outcomes postoperative pain, behavioural recovery, negative affect and length of stay, and is unlikely to be harmful. However, at present, the strength of evidence is insufficient to reach firm conclusions on the role of psychological preparation for surgery. Further analyses are needed to explore the heterogeneity in the data, to identify more specifically when intervention techniques are of benefit. As the current evidence quality is low or very low, there is a need for well-conducted and clearly reported research.

Measures of clinical accuracy and indicators of the nursing diagnosis of delayed surgical recovery

Delayed surgical recovery is a phenomenon of global concern that affects the results and costs of postoperative care. The aim of this study was to verify the accuracy of the defining characteristics of the diagnosis of delayed surgical recovery in patients after the fifth day in postoperative care. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 72 surgical patients to measure sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive likelihood ratios and negative odds ratios. Diagnoses and the area under the ROC curve were analysed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of each defining characteristic. Most patients were male (65.3%) with an average length of education of 17.4 years (SD = 1.88) and a mean age of 57.39 years (SD = 16.04), and 55 (76.4%) had the diagnosis of delayed surgical recovery. The variable time after surgery showed a statistical relationship with the diagnosis of delayed surgical recovery (p = .012). Seven characteristics showed high positive predictive values: postpones resumption of work/employment activities, fatigue, perception of needing more time to recover, requiring help to complete self-care, report of discomfort, evidence of interrupted healing of the surgical area, and difficulty in moving about. The only factor in the study that was associated with the diagnosis was postoperative surgical site infection (p = .028).

Effect of a virtual pain coach on older adults' pain communication: a pilot study

A randomized posttest-only double blind design was used to pilot test the effect of a virtual practitioner pain communication coach on older adults' communication of their osteoarthritis pain. Baseline pain intensity and pain interference with activities were measured using the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form. Thirty older adults watched a video of a practitioner describing important osteoarthritis pain information followed by either a virtual practitioner coach, a video practitioner coach, or no coach. Participants were next asked, via a videotaped health care practitioner, to orally describe their pain as if speaking to their own practitioner. The amount of important distinctive pain information described by the older adults was audiotaped, transcribed, content analyzed, and summed using a priori criteria from the American Pain Society osteoarthritis pain management guidelines. Older adults described M=6.3 (SD=3.17), M=3.0 (SD=2.08), and M=5.2 (SD=2.40) items of important pain information as a result of the virtual coach, video coach, and no coach conditions, respectively; F(2,25)=3.17, p=.06, η²=.01. Older adults who practiced talking with the virtual coach described more than one additional item of important pain information. The clinically significant group difference supports the need to test the intervention in a randomized clinical trial. The virtual coaching and education intervention might enable older adults to communicate their pain management information more effectively to their practitioners.

Evaluation of night-time pain characteristics and quality of sleep in postoperative Turkish orthopedic patients

This descriptive, correlational study was conducted to determine orthopedic patients' night-time pain characteristics, their quality of sleep and the contributing factors to poor sleep experiences, and the relationship between pain and sleep. Data were collected by using the McGill Pain Questionnaire-SF (MPQ-SF) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) on the second postoperative day. Data were analyzed using the SPSS version 10.0 for Windows. Mean age of the 75 patients was 49.55 ± 21.10 years and were hospitalized in the orthopedic wards for 10.56 ± 14.74 days. Of the sample, 65.3% were female and 36% had hip/knee arthroplasty surgery. Pain (45%) and noise (23%) were found to be the most cited factors affecting the sleep of patients in postoperative periods. They experienced "external" pain at the surgical site and verbalized their pain as "stabbing" and "tiring-exhausting." Patients' night-time pain was determined to be severe (6.59 ± 1.62); their quality of sleep was also poor (9.24 ± 3.53). A statistically significant correlation was found between patients' pain intensity and quality of sleep (p≤.05).

Hispanic older adults' osteoarthritis pain communication

Better understanding of how Hispanic older adults describe their chronic pain might suggest ways to support Hispanic older adults to talk about important pain information with their practitioner. The study aim was to describe how Hispanic older adults communicate pain information, including the amount of pain information and communication processes employed. A secondary analysis with a descriptive design was used. The data were from a larger primary study that tested the effect of practitioner pain question phrasing on the amount of pain information described by older adults with osteoarthritis pain. The sample for this secondary analysis was composed of the 24 Hispanic older adults with chronic osteoarthritis pain. In the primary study older adults watched and orally responded to a videotape of a practitioner asking about their pain. Pain content from the patient responses was content analyzed by two independent raters. Communication processes were also content analyzed by two independent raters using a priori criteria from communication accommodation theory (clarity, syntax, complexity, explicitness, and staying on topic). Participants described a mean of 5.5 (SD 3.39) items of pain information. The majority stayed on topic, and one-half spoke clearly and explicitly. Hispanic older adults with osteoarthritis pain concisely describe clinically important pain information when given the opportunity to do so.

Factors associated with increased pain communication by older adults

The purpose of this secondary analysis study was to identify factors associated with increased pain communication by older adults. Data were obtained from 312 older adults with osteoarthritis pain. Content analysis was conducted using criteria from the American Pain Society's "Guidelines for the Management of Pain in Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Juvenile Chronic Arthritis" to identify important pain management information described by the older adults in response to general questions about their pain. Gender was the only factor associated with increased pain communication from the predictor variables of age, education, gender, ethnicity, race, marital status, pain intensity, functional pain interference, treatment from a practitioner for arthritis and for pain, and pain relief. The lack of association between pain communication and factors such as pain intensity suggests that practitioners should routinely elicit specific pain information from older adults who have a history of chronic painful conditions such as osteoarthritis.

The effect of pain question phrasing on older adult pain information

The aim of this study was to test how practitioners' pain communication affected the pain information provided by older adults. A post-test only, double-blind experiment was used to test how the phrasing of practitioners' pain questions-open-ended and without social desirability bias; closed-ended and without social desirability bias; or open-ended and with social desirability bias-affected the pain information provided by 312 community-living older adults with osteoarthritis pain. Older adults were randomly assigned to one of the three pain phrasing conditions to watch and orally respond to a computer-displayed videotape of a practitioner asking about their pain. All responded to a second videotape of the practitioner asking if there was anything further they wanted to communicate. Lastly, all responded to a third videotape asking if there was anything further they wanted to communicate about their pain. Transcripts of the audiotaped responses were content analyzed using 16 a priori criteria from national guidelines to identify important pain information for osteoarthritis pain management. Older adults described significantly more pain information in response to the open-ended question without social desirability. The two follow-up questions elicited significant additional information for all three groups, but did not compensate for the initial reduced pain information from the closed-ended and social desirability-biased groups. Initial use of an open-ended pain question without social desirability bias and use of follow-up questions significantly increase the amount of important pain information provided by older adults with osteoarthritis pain.

Use of recommended osteoarthritis pain treatment by older adults

AIM

This paper reports on a study conducted to describe what traditional and non-traditional treatments older adults with osteoarthritis use for pain management, their reported pain relief, and factors associated with use of recommended initial gold standard treatment (acetaminophen/paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and exercise and/or physical therapy) as designated by conventional western medicine.

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis is characterized by joint pain, stiffness and limited range of motion and has been designated an international health burden by the World Health Organization. Demographic and cultural factors have been shown to affect both traditional and non-traditional osteoarthritis treatment decisions.

METHOD

A descriptive correlational design was used, with secondary analysis of data collected between July 2006 and July 2007 in two randomized controlled studies using the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form and testing older adults' pain communication.

RESULTS

The frequency of use of gold standard treatment was 28.0% (n = 128). Both traditional and non-traditional treatments were used by 46.4% (n = 212) of the participants. Logistic regression revealed that those with higher education (odds ratio 1.56, CI 1.24-1.96, P = 0.001), and non-White race, regardless of educational level (odds ratio 2.02, CI 1.20-3.40, P = 0.008), were more likely to use gold standard treatment.

CONCLUSION

Factors influencing older adults' use of gold standard treatment for their osteoarthritis pain need to be identified so that greater numbers of older adults can be supported to use recommended treatment to obtain greater pain relief.

Older adults' pain descriptions

The purpose of this study was to describe the types of pain information described by older adults with chronic osteoarthritis pain. Pain descriptions were obtained from older adults' who participated in a post-test-only double-blind study testing how the phrasing of health care practitioners' pain questions affected the amount of communicated pain information. The 207 community-dwelling older adults were randomized to respond to either the open-ended or the closed-ended pain question. They viewed and orally responded to a computer-displayed videotape of a practitioner asking them the respective pain question. All of them then viewed and responded to the general follow-up questions, "What else can you tell me?" and lastly, "What else can you tell me about your pain, aches, soreness or discomfort?" Audiotaped responses were transcribed and their content analyzed by trained independent raters using 16 a priori criteria from the American Pain Society's Guidelines for the Management of Pain in Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Juvenile Chronic Arthritis. Older adults described important but limited types of information primarily about pain location, timing, and intensity. Pain treatment information was elicited after repeated questioning. Therefore, practitioners need to follow up older adults' initial pain descriptions with pain questions that promote a more complete pain management discussion. Routine use of a multidimensional pain assessment instrument that measures information such as functional interference, current pain treatments, treatment effects, and side effects would be one way of ensuring a more complete pain management discussion with older adults.

Translating best practices in nondrug postoperative pain management

BACKGROUND

The research-to-practice gap is at the heart of the problem in the underuse of nondrug complementary methods to manage postoperative pain.

PURPOSE

To show how the six steps of the Collaborative Research Utilization (CRU) model can be used to translate research into practice, using an example of nondrug pain management protocols.

METHODS

The CRU model was used to translate empirically tested nondrug interventions for surgical pain management enhancement into cost-effective, easy-to-use, best-practice nursing interventions, using tailored patient teaching.

RESULTS

The preliminary findings of the substudy in the context of the CRU model are reported.

DISCUSSION

The CRU model was successful in changing patients' knowledge, attitudes, and use of nondrug interventions for pain management. Further research is needed in heterogeneous populations. Organization receptivity to research and a well-integrated computerized documentation system for cueing clinicians' pain management practices are key for effectiveness of change.

Assisting Older Adults With Orthopaedic Outpatient Acute-Pain Management

Management of acute pain by older adults with orthopaedic conditions in their community setting after surgical procedures or injury can be challenging. As older adult orthopaedic outpatients have unique requirements in their pain management, nurses and advanced practice nurses must be cognizant of these needs and intervene when needed to promote a satisfactory recovery. This article will focus on the older adults experiences of orthopaedic pain, barriers to their pain reporting and relief, and acute pain management considerations for the older adult in the home setting.