Nasal Obstruction in Children With Cleft Lip and Palate: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study Utilizing the NOSE Scale

Alar Asymmetry in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip: Implications for Secondary Rhinoplasty

OBJECTIVE

Alar asymmetry in unilateral cleft lip (UCL) nasal deformity is a well-recognized clinical feature. However, there is a lack of comprehensive quantitative analysis of this asymmetry. This study compares the shape, volume, and axis rotation between the cleft and non-cleft ala in skeletally mature patients with UCL.

DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study utilizing three-dimensional rendered CT scans.

SETTING

Tertiary care pediatric institution.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

This study included 18 patients with UCL nasal deformity at skeletal maturity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Cleft and non-cleft side ala volume, surface area, and axis to the midsagittal plane.

RESULTS

The cleft-side ala was significantly lesser in volume by 27.3%, significantly lesser in surface area by 17.6%, and significantly greater in surface area to volume ratio by 14.6% than the non-cleft ala. The cleft-side ala was significantly greater by 43.1% horizontal axis to the midsagittal plane. In patients with primary rhinoplasty, the cleft-side ala had 28.0% less volume and 18.7% less surface area. In intermediate rhinoplasty, the cleft-side ala had 39.1% less volume and 23.5% less surface area than the non-cleft ala.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant asymmetry exists between the cleft-side and non-cleft ala in patients with UCL. The cleft-side ala is significantly smaller in volume and surface area than the non-cleft ala. Additionally, the cleft-side ala demonstrates a significantly greater horizontal axis that contributes considerably to nasal asymmetry, supporting the need to restore a normal vertical axis to the clef-side ala.

Nasal airway resistance in patients with different degrees of operated unilateral cleft lip: Evaluation of ventilation in 112 patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the nasal airway resistance between the cleft and non-cleft sides in operated unilateral cleft lip (UCL) patients with varying severities at birth, as well as to assess the differences in nasal airway resistance between UCL patients and healthy individuals.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on 112 UCL patients who have undergone primary lip reconstructions but not advanced surgeries as the study group and 20 healthy participants as the control group between February 2023 to March 2024. The study group patients were grouped based on the severity of their cleft lip at birth, divided into occult cleft lip group, incomplete cleft lip group, and complete cleft lip group. The anterior rhinomanometry was used to evaluate nasal resistance, including unilateral effective resistances during inspiration (Reffin), expiration (Reffex), and the entire breath (ReffT), as well as unilateral vertex resistance during inspiration (VRin) and expiration (VRex). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess normality. Paired t-tests were utilized to analyze the differences in nasal resistance between the healthy and affected sides within the same group of patients. Student's t-test was used to analyze the differences in nasal resistance among patients with different degrees of cleft lip. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The nasal resistances of the occult cleft and incomplete cleft lip groups showed no significant differences between the cleft and non-cleft sides, and were similar to the control group. However, in the complete cleft lip group, the cleft side nasal resistance was significantly higher than the non-cleft side and control group. Among the groups, the complete cleft lip group had significantly higher nasal resistances on the cleft side for Reffin, VRin, and ReffT compared to the occult cleft group.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the nasal resistance of different degrees of operated UCL patients can benefit clinical diagnosis and treatment. Patients with complete cleft lip have more severe nasal obstruction on the cleft side, with greater impact on inhalation than exhalation. For these patients, treatment by an otolaryngologist is recommended to improve nasal airflow.

Nasal airway obstruction in patients with cleft lip nasal deformity: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip nasal deformity (CLND)-associated nasal airway obstruction (CL-NAO) may be inadequately characterized, with its functional implications subsequently underappreciated and neglected. The purpose of this systematic review is to (1) summarize the available assessment results in CL-NAO, (2) evaluate the reliability of current assessment tools, and (3) identify ongoing gaps and inconsistencies for future study.

METHODS

A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was performed for articles studying CL-NAO. Articles focusing on noncleft populations or surgical techniques were excluded. Extracted data included information about study design, patient demographics, medical history, and assessment scores.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles met criteria for inclusion. Assessments included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), anatomic characterizations of CLND, and nasal airflow and resistance studies. Objective assessments were generally more reliable than subjective assessments in CLND. Unilateral CLND was better represented in the literature than bilateral CLND. For unilateral CLND, the cleft side was more obstructed than the noncleft side, with stereotyped patterns of anterior nasal deformity but varied middle and posterior deformity patterns. Overall, there was considerable heterogeneity in study design regarding stratification of CLND cohorts by age, cleft phenotype and laterality, and surgical history.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of subjective and objective assessment tools were used to characterize CL-NAO, including PROMs, anatomic measurements, and airflow and resistance metrics. Overall, objective assessments of CL-NAO were more reliable than subjective surveys, which may have resulted from variable expectations regarding nasal patency in the CLND population combined with large heterogeneity in study design.

Improvement in nasal airway obstruction after secondary rhinoplasty for cleft lip: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to comprehensively review the improvement in nasal airway obstruction after secondary rhinoplasty for cleft lip.

METHODS

The search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant studies published within the past twenty years. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients undergoing secondary rhinoplasty with cleft lip nasal deformity and some evaluation of the nasal outcome.

RESULTS

A thorough analysis of available studies identified 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria for final assessment. Seven (24.1%) studies were classified as Therapeutic Ⅱ (T II) according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons level of evidence scale, while the majority were categorized as T III (17.2%), T IV (51.7%), and T V (6.9%). Subjective methods were employed in 21 articles to measure nasal ventilation outcomes, whereas 8 studies utilized objective methods. Overall findings from all included studies consistently indicated an improvement in nasal ventilation post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no consensus regarding the impact of secondary rhinoplasty on nasal airway obstruction in cleft lip patients, this review suggests that it can effectively alleviate such obstructions. We conducted an anatomical analysis to investigate the impact of various surgical techniques on nasal ventilation to provide recommendations for postoperative ventilation assessment.

Characterizing Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformities

Background: Unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity (uCLND) is associated with olfactory dysfunction, but the underlying etiology remains poorly understood. Objective: To investigate the etiology of uCLND-associated olfactory dysfunction using clinical, computational, and histologic assessments. Methods: Inclusion criteria: uCLND patients >16 years undergoing septorhinoplasty. Exclusion criteria: prior septoplasty or rhinoplasty, pregnancy, sinusitis. Measured outcomes: patient-reported scores, rhinomanometry, smell identification and threshold tests, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) airflow simulations, and histologic analysis of olfactory epithelium. Results: Five uCLND subjects were included: 18-23 years, three male and two female, four left-sided cleft and one right-sided cleft. All subjects reported moderate to severe nasal obstruction. Smell identification and threshold tests showed varying degrees of hyposmia. Nasal resistance was higher on the cleft side versus noncleft side measured by rhinomanometry (median 3.85 Pa-s/mL, interquartile range [IQR] = 21.96, versus 0.90 Pa-s/mL, IQR = 5.17) and CFD (median 1.04 Pa-s/mL, IQR = 0.94 vs. 0.11 Pa-s/mL, IQR = 0.12). Unilateral olfaction varied widely and was dependent on unilateral percentage olfactory airflow. Biopsies revealed intact olfactory neuroepithelium. Conclusions: uCLND-associated olfactory dysfunction appears to be primarily conductive in etiology and highly susceptible to variations in nasal anatomy. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT04150783.

A 3-Dimensional Measurements of Bone and Airway Variables After Le Fort I Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate-Induced Midface Hypoplasia: A Retrospective Study

The authors retrospectively analyzed the effects of Le Fort I advancement with distraction osteogenesis on skeletal and airway variables in patients with midfacial hypoplasia induced by cleft lip and/or palate using 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions. The authors enrolled 23 subjects with moderate-to-severe midface hypoplasia induced by cleft lip and palate who were treated with Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis (mean age, 19.22±3.48 y; male/female ratio, 20/3); computed tomography images (1 before distraction and another at completion of distraction) were acquired. A 3-dimensional craniometric findings and airway volumes for the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, velopharynx, and upper and lower oropharynx were compared before and after distraction. The relationships between craniofacial morphology and changes in airway volume were also assessed ( P <0.05 was considered significant). Significant increases were observed in airway volumes for the nasal cavity (13.85%), nasopharynx (50.82%), velopharynx (29.57%), and upper oropharynx (36.92%) ( P =0.007, P <0.001, P =0.023, and P <0.001, respectively), whereas no significant changes were observed for the lower oropharynx ( P =0.117). Maxillary horizontal advancement was positively correlated with the airway volumes of the nasopharynx and upper oropharynx after distraction osteogenesis ( rs =+0.451, P =0.031; rs =+0.548, P =0.007); however, no significant correlations were observed for the nasal cavity and velopharynx. The authors' finding indicate that despite rotation of the mandible along with the maxilla, this change does not impact airway volume at the mandibular level. Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis can be feasible for patients with cleft lip and palate-induced midface hypoplasia, with satisfactory appearance and occlusion. Long-term detailed follow-up of the patients postdistraction osteogenesis is warranted.

A Longitudinal Study of Improvement in Nasal Airway Obstruction after Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Nasal airway obstruction is an increasingly recognized phenomenon in patients with cleft lip and/or palate and has the potential to significantly affect quality of life in this patient population. To date, the effect of secondary cleft rhinoplasty on cleft-related nasal airway obstruction has not been studied.

METHODS

Patients undergoing secondary cleft rhinoplasty at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from 2015 to 2021 were identified. Preoperative and postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores were recorded. Alterations in scores were evaluated for variation depending on patient characteristics, operative maneuvers, and postoperative nasal stenting.

RESULTS

Nasal airway obstruction was present in mild to moderate severity in patients before secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Postoperatively, obstruction improved or resolved in the domains of nasal blockage/obstruction, trouble breathing through the nose, and ability to get enough air through the nose during exertion (P < 0.05). Overall composite Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores improved (P < 0.05). Lateral crural strut grafting was associated with improvement in nasal blockage, whereas alar revision and tip sutures were associated with worsening in specific nasal symptoms. Patients who underwent nasal stenting were found to report less trouble breathing after surgery than patients who did not (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal airway obstruction is present in mild to moderate severity in patients with cleft lip and/or palate, and the subjective severity of obstruction is decreased by secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Specific operative maneuvers are associated with alterations in nasal airway obstructive symptoms, and nasal stenting is associated with an improvement in trouble breathing after secondary cleft rhinoplasty.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

A Single Stage Composite Cleft Septorhinoplasty for Correction of the Mature Unilateral Cleft Nose Deformity - The Gujrat Technique

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of a single stage composite cleft septorhinoplasty procedure ("The Gujrat Technique") to correct the exaggerated cleft nose deformity after completion of nasal growth in an adult patient cohort.

METHODS

Adult patients with a residual unilateral cleft nasal deformity were deemed eligible for the proposed "Gujrat Technique". Over a 10-year period (2007-2017), 96 adult patients underwent this composite cleft septorhinoplasty as a single stage operation. Post-operative nasal symmetry evaluation was undertaken using the validated computer program 'SymNose'. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction were assessed using Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaires respectively. Various statistical analysis methods were used to validate the obtained results.

RESULTS

Due to poor compliance with follow-up, post-operative assessments were undertaken in only 32 patients. The single group study design using the non-parametric matching pairs Wilcoxon Sign test (p < 0.001) showed overall good to excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes and higher scores of the digital SymNose grading system. There was a significant improvement in ROE scores (from 26.4 ± 2.9 to 85.9 ± 4.7, p < 0.001). There were no major complications or revisions needed in our series.

CONCLUSION

The individual components of "The Gujrat Technique" are not novel but their combination in this adult unilateral cleft rhinoplasty cohort has demonstrated a high patient satisfaction with its aesthetic appeal and functional versatility. In the background of limited resources and unpredictable patient follow up, the simplicity, reproducibility and cost effectiveness of this technique make it a practical reconstructive option.

Nasal Obstruction Evaluation After LeFort I Osteotomy: A Pilot Study

ABSTRACT

Previous literature has documented changes in nasal obstruction after acute LeFort I osteotomy. However, there is a paucity of studies that evaluate distraction-mediated LeFort I (DO-LFI) without concomitant intranasal interventions using the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale in Class III patients. The purpose of this study is to objectively evaluate nasal obstruction quality of life through the NOSE scale in patients undergoing DO-LFI. Inclusion into the study required both a preoperative (1 year ≤ date of service) and postoperative (≥6 months and ≤2 years) NOSE scale administration. Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scales were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. There was a significant difference in composite NOSE scales, x̃ = 8.0 (interquartile range: 4.0-11.0), x̃ = 1.0 (interquartile range: 1.0-3.0), P < 0.017, preoperatively and postoperatively respectfully. Additionally, when looking at individual components of the NOSE scale, nasal congestion or stuffiness, and trouble breathing through nose were significantly improved after DO-LFI (P < 0.017). Nasal blockage or obstruction (P > 0.084) and trouble breathing when exercising (P > 0.076) trended towards significant improvement, as well. Trouble sleeping did not differ, P > 0.611. We elucidate, in this pilot study, that there is an association between DO-LFI and patient reported nasal obstructive symptoms. Future prospective studies utilizing the NOSE scale are needed to determine causality.

Core Outcome Set for Reporting Outcomes of Interventions for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: Final Results of the COS-VPD Initiative

OBJECTIVE

To date, the recording of outcomes of interventions for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) has not been standardized. This makes a comparison of results between studies challenging. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for reporting outcomes in studies examining the management of VPD.

DESIGN

A two-round Delphi consensus process was used to develop the COS.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

The expert Delphi panel comprised patients and caregivers of patients with VPD, surgeons and speech and language therapists specializing in cleft palate, and researchers with expertise in VPD.

INTERVENTIONS

A long list of outcomes was derived from the published literature. In each round of a Delphi survey, participants were asked to score outcomes using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scale of 1 to 9, with 1 to 3 labeled "not important," 4 to 6 labeled "important but not critical," and 7 to 9 labeled "critical."

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Consensus criteria were specified a priori. Outcomes with a rating of 75% or more of the panel rating 7 to 9 and 25% or fewer rating 1 to 3 were included in the COS.

RESULTS

A total of 31 core outcomes were identified from the Delphi process. This list was condensed to combine topic areas to produce a final COS of 10 outcomes, including both processes of care and patient-reported outcomes that should be considered for reporting in future studies of VPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the COS-VPD will facilitate consistency of outcomes data collection and comparison of results across studies.

Rasch Analysis of Patient- and Parent-Reported Outcome Measures in the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Standard Set for Cleft Lip and Palate

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric performance of the patient- and parent-reported measures in the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Standard Set for Cleft Care, and to identify ways of improving concept coverage.

METHODS

Data from 714 patients with cleft lip and/or palate, aged 8 to 9, 10 to 12.5, and 22 years were collected between November 2015 and April 2019 at Erasmus University Medical Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Duke Children's Hospital, and from participating sites in the CLEFT-Q Phase 3 study. The Standard Set includes 9 CLEFT-Q scales, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire, the Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Oral Symptoms Scale (COHIP-OSS), and the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS). Targeting, item-fit statistics, thresholds for item responses, and measurement precision (PSI) were analyzed using Rasch measurement theory.

RESULTS

The proportion of the sample to score within each instruments range of measurement varied from 69% (ICS) to 92% (CLEFT-Q teeth and COHIP-OSS). Specific problems with individual items within the NOSE and COHIP-OSS questionnaires were noted, such as poor item fit to the Rasch model and disordered thresholds (6 of 10). Reliability measured with PSI was above 0.82 for the ICS and all but one CLEFT-Q scale (speech distress). PSIs were lowest for the COHIP-OSS (0.43) and NOSE questionnaire (0.35).

CONCLUSION

The patient- and parent-reported components within the facial appearance, psychosocial function, and speech domains are valid measures; however, the facial function and oral health domains are not sufficiently covered by the CLEFT-Q eating and drinking, NOSE, and COHIP-OSS, and these questionnaires may not be accurate enough to stratify cleft-related outcomes.

Challenges in the Successful Reconstruction of Cleft Lip and Palate: Managing the Nasomaxillary Deformity in Adolescence

The surgical techniques and execution of primary cleft lip and palate repair are no longer the greatest challenge to achieving successful rehabilitation for those born with facial clefting (i.e., bilateral and unilateral cleft lip and palate). Despite a surgeon's best efforts, when cleft palate repair is carried out during infancy, by the mixed dentition, a majority will demonstrate nasomaxillary deficiency. The cleft team's commitment to a family under their care is to ensure that the newborn reaches adulthood reconstructed without need for special regard to their original birth malformation. Guiding principles are provided for the accurate diagnosis and reliable reconstruction of the bilateral and unilateral cleft lip and palate adolescent/adult who presents with nasomaxillary deficiency and any residual oronasal fistula, bony defects, cleft dental gap(s), nasal obstructions, and associated facial dysmorphology. Successful orthognathic surgery provides a stable foundation on which any remaining soft-tissue cleft lip or cleft nasal deformities can be accurately assessed and then reconstructed.