Medial incision approach in modified small double-opposing Z-plasty for Veau II cleft repair

An encouraging outcome was described for the use of modified Furlow small double-opposing Z-plasty (sDOZ) using the medial incision (MIsDOZ) approach in repair of Veau type I cleft palate. This retrospective study assessed early results of using extended indication criterion of MIsDOZ for the management of consecutive non-syndromic patients with Veau II cleft palate treated by a single surgeon. Bardach two-flap plus sDOZ (two-flap approach) or medial incision approach with a tension-driven stepwise application of lateral palatal incisions (soft palate only, von Langenbeck type, or two-flap type) were applied. Surgical (age, cleft width, operative time, hospital stay, and complication)- and auditory-perceptual assessment-related data were collected. Two-flap approach (n = 21) demonstrated a significantly (p < 0.001) increased operative time (132.8 ± 12.2 versus 114.8 ± 19.9 min, respectively) and higher use of lateral incisions (100% versus 44.4%) than medial incision approach (n = 27), with no significant (p > 0.05) difference for age at surgery (13.0 ± 6.1 versus 13.6 ± 5.8 months), cleft width (8.5 ± 4.1 versus 8.7 ± 3.8 mm), hospital stay (1.0 ± 0 versus 1.0 ± 0 day), and complication (0% versus 0%) and hypernasality (9.5% versus 7.4%) rates. In conclusion, the medial incision approach for Veau II cleft repair resulted in reduced need for lateral palatal incision with no increase of complication or hypernasality rates.

Speech Outcomes Following Operative Management of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction (VPD) in Non-Syndromic Post-Palatoplasty Cleft Palate Patients

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 30% of patients with a history of repaired cleft palate (CP) go on to suffer from velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD). This study discusses the operative management of VPD and postoperative speech outcomes in a cohort of CP patients.

SETTING

An academic tertiary pediatric care center.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Patients with history of repaired CP (Veau I-IV) who underwent operative management of VPD between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2020. Operative modalities were posterior pharyngeal flap (PPF), sphincter pharyngoplasty (SPP), Furlow palate re-repair, and buccal myomucosal flap palate lengthening (PL).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure is postoperative speech improvement evaluated by the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale (PWSS).

RESULTS

97 patients met inclusion criteria. 38 patients with previous straight-line primary palatoplasty underwent Furlow re-repair; these patients were significantly younger (7.62 vs 11.14, P < .001) and were more likely to have severe VPD per PWSS (OR 4.28, P < .01, 95% CI 1.46-12.56) when compared to VPD patients with previous Furlow repair. 21.1% of these patients required an additional non-revisional VPD procedure. The remaining patients underwent a non-revision procedure (26 PPF, 22 SPP, 11 PL); all experienced significant (P < .001 on paired t-test) reductions in PWSS total and subgroup VPD severity scores without difference in improvement between operation types. SPP was statistically associated with all-cause complication (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.03-7.59, P < .05) and hyponasality (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.112-9.630, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Furlow re-repair reduced need for additional VPD operations. Speech outcomes between non-revisional operations are comparable, but increased complications were seen in SPP.

Secondary Procedures on the Palate to Correct/Improve Speech: Past, Present and Future

Speech production in general and in patients with cleft palate in particular is multifactorial. In addition to the complex velopharyngeal mechanism, all structures of the oral cavity have some contribution for correct speech production. Therefore, in addition to the velopharynx the surgeons and other cleft/craniofacial team members need to perform a thorough and complete evaluation of all structures to fully appreciate the causative factor(s) responsible for inadequate speech production after palatoplasty and to prescribe the most appropriate, personalized management plan. The purpose of this communication is to stress the importance of areas other than the velopharyngx that could have a negative impact on speech. More specifically, the issues of palatoplasty failures and palatal revisions will be presented. This is an area of significant importance and could represent the first line of defense before considering procedures altering the anatomy of the velopharynx, such as pharyngeal flaps, pharyngoplasties, and others. Issues covering the effects of skeletal and dental problems, such as malocclusion, partial or complete edentulism can also affect speech but are outside the scope of this communication.

Effectiveness of secondary furlow palatoplasty with buccal myomucosal flap in correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate

OBJECTIVES

The main purpose of this study was evaluation of the effectiveness of secondary furlow palatoplasty with buccal myomucosal flap (FPBF) for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in patients with a cleft palate who were treated with two flap palatoplasty (TFP) in their primary palate repair.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-three medically free children aged 4-8 years with non-syndromic and previously repaired cleft palate via TFP participated in the study. All patients received secondary surgery following the technique of FPBF. Preoperative speech evaluation was done before the secondary repair and 3 months after the surgery using a hypernasal speech scale, speech intelligibility scale, and nasopharyngoscopy.

RESULTS

A statistically significant improvement was observed regarding the degree of hypernasality and speech intelligibility while comparing the preoperative scores after the primary surgery to the postoperative scores after the secondary surgery. In addition, a statistically significant improvement was found in the nasopharyngoscopic assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The incorporation of a buccal myomucosal flap with Furlow palatoplasty was successful in improving hypernasality, speech intelligibility, and nasopharyngoscopic scores in patients with cleft palate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05626933).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This technique might be the surgical technique of choice while treating patients who are suffering from VPI after cleft palate repair.

Modified Medial Incision Small Double-Opposing Z-Plasty for Treating Veau Type I Cleft Palate: Is the Early Result Reproducible?

OBJECTIVE

An inspiring early result with no oronasal fistula formation was recently described for a modified medial incision small double-opposing Z-plasty (MIsDOZ) for treating Veau type I cleft palate. This study describes an early single-surgeon experience in applying this newly proposed surgical approach.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-surgeon study.

PATIENTS

Consecutive nonsyndromic patients (n  =  27) with Veau I cleft palate.

INTERVENTIONS

Topographic anatomical-guided MIsDOZ palatoplasty with pyramidal space dissection (releasing of the ligamentous fibers in the greater palatine neurovascular bundle and pyramidal process region, in-fracture of the pterygoid hamulus, and widening of space of Ernst) performed by a novice surgeon (RD).

MEAN OUTCOME MEASURES

Age at surgery, the presence of cleft lip, palatal cleft width, use of lateral relaxing incision, and 6-month complication rate (bleeding, dehiscence, fistula, and flap necrosis). A published senior surgeon-based outcome dataset (n  =  24) was retrieved for comparison purposes.

RESULTS

Twenty-two (81.5%) and 5 (18.5%) patients received the medial incision only technique and lateral incision technique, respectively (P  =  .002). Age, presence of cleft lip, and cleft width were not associated (all P > .05) with the use of lateral incision. Comparative analysis between the novice surgeon- and senior surgeon-based datasets revealed no significant differences for sex (females: 74.1% vs 62.5%; P  =  .546), age (10.2  ±  1.7 vs 9.6  ±  1.2 months; P  =  .143), rate of lateral incision (18.5% vs 4.2%; P  =  .195), and postoperative complication rate (0% vs 0%).

CONCLUSION

This modified DOZ palatoplasty proved to be a reproducible procedure for Veau I cleft palate closure, with reduced need for lateral incision and with no early complication.

Single Oral Z-Plasty: A Clinical Validation of a Technique for Palatal Lengthening in Primary and Secondary Cleft Palate Repair

BACKGROUND

In cleft palate repair, palate length is associated with improved speech outcomes. Although direct closure offers poor palatal lengthening, use of two opposing Z-plasties may reorient palatal musculature and lengthen the velum. The authors previously described a novel overlapping intravelar veloplasty to achieve longitudinal closure of the nasal mucosa with a single oral Z-plasty (1ZP), lengthening the palate in cadaver studies. This study aims to corroborate this finding in clinical cases.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study of patients with a cleft palate was conducted. Patients underwent cleft palate closure with 1ZP or intravelar veloplasty with straight-line closure. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of the palate along four dimensions were recorded. Analysis was conducted on preoperative and postoperative measurements within and between groups using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon or chi-square test.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included (1ZP, n = 65; straight-line closure, n = 20). 1ZP increased soft palate length (SPL) by 33% ( P < 0.001) and total palate length (TPL) by 10% ( P < 0.001). Primary 1ZP increased SPL by 33% ( P < 0.001) and TPL by 10% ( P < 0.001). Secondary 1ZP increased SPL by 28% ( P < 0.001) and TPL by 8% ( P < 0.001). When comparing between primary and secondary 1ZP, 1ZP was equal with regard to percentage lengthening in SPL ( P > 0.9) and TPL ( P > 0.3). When compared with straight-line closure, 1ZP showed superior percentage lengthening in SPL ( P < 0.001) and TPL ( P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

1ZP results in a statistically significant increase in palate length in both primary and secondary cleft palate repair. This technique provides an effective alternative in patients for whom 2ZP is not feasible.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

D. Hybrid Palatoplasty: A Simplified DOZ (Double Opposing Z Plasty) with Palatal Myoplasty for Primary Palate Repair

Introduction  Surgical techniques for soft palate repair aiming for zero velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) are still not achieved. Straight line closure of the soft palate by various techniques of intravelar veloplasty (IVVP) leads to higher incidence of VPI due to scar contracture. Furlow's Z plasty has long, narrow, thin mucosal flaps and mucomuscular flaps with malaligned muscle closure. We present a technique of "hybrid palatoplasty" which borrows from and adds to the existing methods, is robust, is easy to replicate, and results in normal speech consistently. Aim  (1) To design a technique of "hybrid palatoplasty"-combining double opposing Z (DOZ) plasty and IVVP, which is applicable to all types of cleft palate. (2) To evaluate the results of cleft palate children operated using the technique of "hybrid palatoplasty" from 2014 to 2015 in terms of surgical complications (fistulae and dehiscence) and incidence of VPI. Methods  Our procedure combines aspects of both DOZ and IVVP. It is simplified with design of smaller Z plasties. On one side, from the oral Z plasty muscle is dissected off and sutured to the nasal mucomuscular flap of the opposite side to complete the palatal sling. Oral Z plasty is purely mucosal and reverse of the nasal side. A total of 123 cases, operated below 5 years of age were followed up. Speech was assessed by direct evaluation and tele-evaluation. Results  A total of 123 cases, below 5 years of age, were operated between 2014 and 2016 with at least 5 years of follow-up. Note that 120 had normal speech, and 3 had VPI of which 2 were subsequently corrected and went on to develop normal speech. Conclusion  This novel "hybrid palatoplasty" is a simple technique with good speech outcome as it combines the principles of Z plasty and direct muscle repair with palatal sling formation.

Current Concepts and Challenges in the Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients-A Comprehensive Review

Cleft lip and cleft palate has one of the highest incidences in the malformations of the oral cavity, that varies between populations. The background underlying the issue of cleft lip and palate is multifactorial and greatly depends on the genetic factors and environmental factors. The aim of this nonsystematic narrative review is to present the cleft palate and or lip pediatric population as target for interdisciplinary treatment. The purpose of this narrative review is to sum up the modern knowledge on the treatment of patients with clefts, as well as to highlight the importance of the great need for cooperation between different dental specialists along with medical professionals such as oral surgeons, prosthodontists, orthodontists along with medical professions such as pediatricians, speech therapists and phoniatrics, and laryngologist.

Quantitative Evaluation of Palatal Lengthening After Cleft Palate Repair When a Buccal Flap Is Routinely Combined With Furlow's Z-Plasty

INTRODUCTION

The use of a buccinator myomucosal flap in combination with Furlow's Z-plasty during primary and secondary palatal repairs has been proposed by many authors to overcome some of the limitations of Furlow's technique. However, there have been no studies that quantitatively measured the effective palatal lengthening when the buccal flap is added.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The buccal flap is routinely used during primary palate repair in order to fill the gap between the hard palate and reoriented palatal muscle sling. The soft palatal length was measured in the midline from the posterior edge of the hard palate to the base of the uvula. All patients were measured before starting the surgery and just after palatal closure in the standard position for cleft palate repair.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients with cleft palate who were candidates for primary repair were included. The mean age at the time of operation was 11.4 ± 3.5 months. The mean preoperative palatal length was 21.36 ± 3.529 mm, whereas the mean postoperative palatal length was 29.64 ± 4.171) mm. The mean palatal length change was 8.29 ± 2.514 mm (P < 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The Combined use of a buccinator myomucosal flap with modified Furlow's Z-plasty in primary cleft palate repair has proven effective for palatal lengthening and achieved tensionless closure without the need for relaxing incision. It also provided a pliable soft tissue attachment of the palatal muscles to the hard palate allowing for better muscle function and mobility.

A procedure combining double opposing Z-plasty with buccal flap and skin graft for a cleft palate patient with short palate

Cleft palate patients with a short palate are sometimes encountered and it is difficult to achieve effective primary palatoplasty and good speech in these cases. Our purpose was to establish an effective palatoplasty for a cleft palate patient with Randall type III short palate. Buccal musculomucosal flap on the nasal side and skin graft on the oral side were performed, along with double opposing Z-plasty. Speech improved postoperation. This procedure brought the nasopharyngeal area closer to the normal anatomical state. In terms of disadvantages, the procedure is rather complicated and depends on the engraftment rate.

A Comparative Study Evaluating Speech Outcomes in Classic versus Occult Submucous Cleft Palate Using a Primary Furlow Palatoplasty Technique

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on the selection of procedures for the treatment of submucous cleft palate, with scarce reports on long-term outcomes from single-surgeon experience. This study assessed the outcomes of using extended indication criteria of Furlow palatoplasty as the first-line procedure for the management of submucous cleft palate-associated velopharyngeal insufficiency.

METHODS

Consecutive nonsyndromic patients with submucous cleft palate (n = 216) treated by a single surgeon between 1998 and 2018 were reviewed. Furlow palatoplasty was performed in all patients diagnosed with submucous cleft palate-associated velopharyngeal insufficiency, regardless of the age cutoff, number of Calnan triad features, or velopharyngeal gap size and pattern. Postoperative velopharyngeal function outcome (adequate, marginal, or inadequate) and the need for secondary surgery were investigated. Age at surgery, sex, submucous cleft palate type (classic and occult), and presence of complication were evaluated for potential associations with this outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients aged 8.3 ± 4.6 years with occult submucous cleft palate were significantly (p < 0.001) older than those with the classic type (n = 169; 5.6 ± 3.1 years). Most (p < 0.001) of the included patients [n = 181 (83.8 percent)] achieved adequate postoperative velopharyngeal function outcome. Three patients (1.4 percent) presented surgery-related complications, including bleeding and partial wound disruption. Secondary speech surgery was recommended in 24 patients (11.1 percent). In the bivariate and multivariate analyses, none of the tested variables was found to be associated (all p > 0.05) with the postoperative velopharyngeal function outcome.

CONCLUSION

The extended indication criteria of Furlow palatoplasty provided adequate velopharyngeal insufficiency management with a low complication rate and satisfactory speech outcome.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Modified double-opposing Z-plasty for patients with Veau I cleft palate: Are lateral relaxing incisions necessary?

Low fistula rate and a satisfactory speech outcome were previously reported by adopting a modified Furlow palatoplasty using small double-opposing Z-plasty (DOZ). The purposes of this study were to (1) describe the technical standardization of further modification of this small DOZ using the medial incision (MIDOZ) approach for Veau I cleft repair; (2) assess the early postoperative outcomes of a single surgeon's experience using this technique; and (3) evaluate the temporal association of this standardization with the necessity of lateral relaxing incisions.A prospective study (n = 24) was performed consecutively to non-syndromic patients with Veau I cleft palate who underwent MIDOZ approach. Patients with similar characteristics who underwent small DOZ were included as a retrospective group (n = 25) to control for the potential effect of the standardization of surgical maneuvers (including the hamulus fracture) on the rate of lateral relaxing incisions. Six-month complication rate was collected.No postoperative complications, such as bleeding, flap necrosis, dehiscence or fistula were observed. The prospective group had a significantly (all P < .05) higher rate of hamulus fractures (n = 48, 100%) and a lower rate of lateral relaxing incisions (n = 1, 2%) than the retrospective group (n = 16, 32%; n = 26, 52%).This technical standardization for performing palatoplasty using MIDOZ approach provided adequate Veau I cleft palate closure, without fistula formation, and with a low need of lateral relaxing incisions.