Marked Variation Exists Among Surgeons and Hospitals in the Use of Secondary Cleft Lip Surgery

Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of the Evidence Base for Nasoalveolar Molding (NAM)

OBJECTIVE

To critically appraise the body of scientific literature supporting the risks and efficacy of nasoalveolar molding (NAM), specifically in contrast to alternative methods of presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO) or to treatment without PSIO.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Five outcome domains were considered: nasolabial aesthetics; dentoalveolar relationship; midfacial growth; cost and burden of care; and number of anesthetic events.

DESIGN

MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were queried for articles from the first description of the Grayson-Santiago NAM technique (1993) through December 13, 2021. After the application of inclusionary and exclusionary criteria, selected articles were critically appraised using a systematic framework that included risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools.

RESULTS

A total of 88 studies were included. Level-I and -II evidence showed on par or better approximation and alveolar alignment achieved by NAM compared to other PSIO. Level-II and -III evidence showed improved nasolabial aesthetics compared to other PSIOs. Level-II and -III evidence supported no harm to maxillofacial skeletal growth through age 12. Sparse level-III evidence supported a reduced number of labial or nasal revisions following NAM. Level-II and -III evidence showed NAM requiring upfront cost and frequent appointments but reducing caregiver psychosocial burden and reducing long-term costs compared to select alternatives. Many studies carried a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports the overall efficacy of NAM regarding short/mid-term outcomes, with a low risk of negative effects on midfacial growth or dental development. The high risk of bias discovered in many papers underscores the need for robust study design in future research.

A Master Mind Game Code Algorithm Approach to Help Surgical Decision-Making between Retropharyngeal Fat Grafting and Pharyngoplasty for the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Incompetence

Introduction Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is a controversial pathology with many surgical options.

Objective To compare pharyngoplasty and retropharyngeal fat grafting and to build a prognostic tool to achieve perfect speech.

Methods Retrospective observational cohort study of 114 patients operated for VPI from 1982 to 2019 in a single tertiary center. The instrumental assessment was made using an aerophonoscope and nasofibroscopy. The variables sex, age, genetic syndromes, and type of diagnosis were analyzed with logistic regression model adjusted with propensity score. To generalize results and to build a surgical predictive tool, a marginal analysis concludes the study.

Results Among the patients (median [range] age 7 [4–48]), 63 (55.26%) underwent pharyngoplasty and 51 (44.74%) graft. The graft group had no complication, but it had a failure rate of 7.84%. The pharyngoplasty group had no failure, but one patient had postoperative obstructive sleep apnea. The marginal analysis demonstrated that age lower than 7 years, cleft lip and palate, absence of syndrome, and intermittent VPI were important predictive factors of good result regardless of surgical technique.

Conclusions Without a statistical demonstration of the superiority of pharyngoplasty over graft, and in the uncertainty of literature background, our perfect-speech patient profile represents an important tool for a postoperative forecast of results in which, like in the Master Mind game, every feature has to be considered not individually but as a pattern of characteristics whose association contributes to the outcome.

Reviewing ACGME Plastic Surgery Fellowship Case Logs: Is Surgical Experience Increasing?

INTRODUCTION

Over the last decade, there has been a 32% decrease in independent plastic surgery fellowships. The growing prevalence of 6-year integrated plastic surgery residencies, duty hour restrictions, and new subspecialty training fellowships for general surgeons have changed the training experience of plastic surgery fellows.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for graduating fellows of independent plastic surgery fellowships in the United States was conducted from 2011 to 2019. A linear regression analysis was conducted for each case log code and category, and a 95% level of confidence was assumed (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

In 2011, 141 residents from 69 programs graduated with an average of 1469.7 cases. In 2019, 84 residents from 47 programs graduated with an average of 1952 cases. Index procedures significantly increased overall during the 9 y (P < 0.001). Categorical cases increased in esthetics (P < 0.001), including facelift, browlift, blepharoplasty, and more. Categorical cases increased in reconstructive surgery (P < 0.001), including treatment of deformities of the skin, lower extremities, and trunk, nerve decompression, and hand reconstruction. In breast procedures, an increase was seen in the reduction of mammoplasty, reconstruction, and treatment of other breast deformities. In head and neck procedures, an increase was seen in resection of head and neck neoplasms and secondary cleft lip repair. Decreases in procedural numbers were seen in primary cleft lip repair and hand reconstruction by primary closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a 32% decline in the number of independent plastic surgery fellowships over the last 9 y, plastic surgery fellows are obtaining significantly more surgical experience, both in esthetic and reconstructive surgery.