State-Mandated Coverage of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Treatment

Dental Rehabilitation of the Unilateral Cleft Dental Gap: A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the management of the cleft dental gap after alveolar bone grafting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus or palate who had successful alveolar bone grafting. Our primary study outcome was alveolar cleft management (orthodontic closure or space maintenance). Our secondary study outcome was the rate of fixed dental rehabilitation. Univariate comparisons were made with SAS 9.4.

RESULTS

The final study sample consisted of 54 patients. Most patients were treated with orthodontic closure (55.6%). Patients missing multiple teeth ( P < 0.01) were less likely to receive orthodontic closure. Orthodontic closure was not associated with differences in intermaxillary midline coincidence ( P = 0.22) or the need for LeFort advancement ( P = 0.15). Only 41.7% of patients who were managed with space maintenance obtained a fixed prosthesis. Hispanic ethnicity ( P < 0.01) and Medicaid insurance ( P < 0.01) were associated with lower rates of fixed dental rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthodontic closure was the most common approach, and it did not result in significant maxillary midline distortion. Less than half of patients treated with space maintenance obtained fixed restorations. Socioeconomic barriers are likely preventing access to definitive dental rehabilitation in patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus or palate.

The Reality of Commercial Payer-Negotiated Rates in Cleft Lip and Palate Repair

BACKGROUND

Commercial payer-negotiated rates for cleft lip and palate surgery have not been evaluated on a national scale. The aim of this study was to characterize commercial rates for cleft care, both in terms of nationwide variation and in relation to Medicaid rates.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was performed of 2021 hospital pricing data from Turquoise Health, a data service platform that aggregates hospital price disclosures. The data were queried by CPT code to identify 20 cleft surgical services. Within- and across-hospital ratios were calculated per CPT code to quantify commercial rate variation. Generalized linear models were used to assess the relationship between median commercial rate and facility-level variables and between commercial and Medicaid rates.

RESULTS

There were 80,710 unique commercial rates from 792 hospitals. Within-hospital ratios for commercial rates ranged from 2.0 to 2.9 and across-hospital ratios ranged from 5.4 to 13.7. Median commercial rates per facility were higher than Medicaid rates for primary cleft lip and palate repair ($5492.20 versus $1739.00), secondary cleft lip and palate repair ($5429.10 versus $1917.00), and cleft rhinoplasty ($6001.00 versus $1917.00; P < 0.001). Lower commercial rates were associated with hospitals that were smaller ( P < 0.001), safety-net ( P < 0.001), and nonprofit ( P < 0.001). Medicaid rate was positively associated with commercial rate ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Commercial rates for cleft surgical care demonstrated marked variation within and across hospitals, and were lower for small, safety-net, or nonprofit hospitals. Lower Medicaid rates were not associated with higher commercial rates, suggesting that hospitals did not use cost-shifting to compensate for budget shortfalls resulting from poor Medicaid reimbursement.

Third-party Compliance With State-Mandated Orthodontic Coverage for Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Care in California: An Insurance Claim Thematic Analysis

BACKGROUND

California Senate Bill 630 (SB630) enacted statutorily mandated health plan coverage for orthodontic care of patients with cleft palate and craniofacial anomalies in 2009, which was effective from July 1, 2010. In this qualitative analysis, third-party compliance with SB630 in a university-based cleft and craniofacial orthodontic program is evaluated.

METHODS

Privately insured patients that experienced a coverage delay or denial of orthodontic treatment for cleft lip and palate in the University of California, San Francisco Cleft and Craniofacial Orthodontic Program between July 1, 2010 and October 28, 2020 were identified. A thematic analysis of reasons for delay or denial was conducted.

RESULTS

Nearly three quarters of patients experienced coverage delay and/or denials. The most common reason given was that services were not covered.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite state-mandated coverage, inappropriate denials of orthodontic care for patients with cleft lip and palate by private insurers persist in California.

Thai Universal Health Care Coverage scheme promotes the accessibility to cleft lip/palate treatment: the result of cleft care provision assessment using modified Geographic Information System

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the cleft lip/palate (CL/P) healthcare provision using data from the Thailand National Health Security Office from fiscal years 2012-2016.

METHODS

Four national databases of Thailand comprising 1) admitted patient visit, 2) non-admitted patient visit, 3) birth defects registry and 4) civil registration databases were analyzed. All duplicate records were removed by a matching process using national identity number and date of birth prior to data extraction. Modified Geographic Information System was also used to compare each provincial patients with CL/P of Thailand to the number of provincial live births with CL/P.

RESULTS

The results showed that the number of live births with CL/P during this period was 7,775 cases (1,555 cases/fiscal year). While the number of cases with CL/P registered under the Universal Health Care Coverage with hospital stay was 6,715 (86.37%), 927 cases (11.92%) visited hospitals without a stay, and the remaining 133 cases (1.71%) never visited any hospital. Modified Geographic Information System result showed that the provincial CL/P healthcare was relatively well-balanced with the provincial live births with CL/P (r = 0.92, p < 0.05). Moreover, provinces with CL/P tertiary care centers attracted more patients from the surrounding provinces.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the percentage of patients with CL/P receiving hospital treatment was 98. The Thai Universal Health Care Coverage scheme has promoted the accessibility to CL/P treatment. In order to achieve the best possible comprehensive cleft care coverage, periodical assessment and improvement of the function and accuracy of the national database registry are recommended.

Diagnostic Protocols for Alveolar Clefting and Barriers to Acquiring Imaging: A Survey of ACPA-Approved Cleft Teams in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To report current diagnostic protocols, practices, and barriers related to imaging of alveolar clefting among American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA)-approved cleft/craniofacial teams.

METHODS

An electronic survey was sent to 162 ACPA-approved teams in the United States. Key items were team location, venue of orthodontic treatment, imaging modality(s) and access, barriers to imaging, billing, imaging protocols including team members involved in decisions pre- and post-alveolar bone grafting (ABG), and craniofacial fellowship status of team orthodontist(s).

RESULTS

A total of 66 responses were received (40.7%). Responding teams were university-based (47%), hospital-based (42.4%), and independent clinics (10.6%). Orthodontic treatment for most patients was in private practice (53%). On-site 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) dental imaging capabilities were reported by 42% of teams; 29% have no on-site imaging. One or more barrier(s) to acquiring imaging were reported by 67%, with insurance challenges reported by 47%. Most teams bill medical payors for cleft-related dental imaging (58%). Pre- and post-ABG imaging was most frequently 3D (35% and 36%, respectively). Surgeons and orthodontists commonly evaluate ABG timing and outcome together (53%-65%). Periapical radiographs were included significantly more often in cleft imaging protocols by orthodontists with versus without fellowship training (P = .011, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers to acquiring imaging are frequent. 3D is the most common imaging pre- and post-ABG. Our study endorses multi-level advocacy for improved medical insurance coverage of diagnostic cleft-related dental imaging to decrease barriers to providing timely care.

The Geographic Availability of Certified Cleft Care in the United States: A National Geospatial Analysis of 1-Hour Access to Care

PURPOSE

Children with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) require longitudinal multidisciplinary care. Travel distance to comprehensive cleft centers may be a barrier for some families. This study evaluated the geospatial availability of certified cleft teams across the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A geographic catchment area within a 1-hour travel radius of each American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-certified cleft center was mapped using TravelTime distance matrix programming. The proportion of children located within each catchment area was calculated using county-level data from the National Kids Count Data Center, with aggregate estimates of patients with CLP based on state-level data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. One-hour access was compared across regions and based on urbanization data collected from the US Census.

RESULTS

There were 182 American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-certified centers identified. As per study estimates, 28,331 (27.3%) children with CLP did not live within 1-hour travel distance to any center. One-hour access was highest in the Northeast (84.2% of children, P < .001) and lowest in the South (65.7%) and higher in states with the greatest urbanization in comparison with more rural states (85.1 vs 37.4%, P < .001). Similar patterns were seen for access to 2 or more cleft centers. The number of CLP children-per-center was highest in the West (775) and lowest in the Northeast (452).

CONCLUSIONS

Travel distances of more than 1 hour may affect more than 25,000 (1 of 4) CLP children in the US, with significant variation across geographic regions. Future studies should seek to understand the impact of and provide strategies for overcoming geographic barriers.

The effects of state facial surgery mandates on timeliness of primary cleft repair surgery in the United States

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the effects of state facial surgery mandates on the timeliness of primary cleft repair surgery for privately insured children with oral clefts in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using IBM Health MarketScan^® Database from 2001 to 2017, we estimate regression models separately for age at cleft lip repair and cleft palate repair by having a mandate while considering child-level factors and other state differences. The sample includes 1,451 children who had primary cleft lip repair by age 12 months, and 1,402 children who had primary cleft palate repair by age 18 months.

RESULTS

A mandate was associated with earlier cleft lip repair by 13 days (95% CI, -21.5 to -4.7 days) when controlling for state differences, regardless if the child had other birth defects. For children needing cleft palate repair, a mandate was associated with earlier surgery by 87 days (95% CI, -136.1 to -38.4 days) only when no other birth defects were present.

CONCLUSIONS

State facial surgery mandates were associated with earlier cleft lip repair for children with or without other birth defects, and earlier cleft palate repair for children without other birth defects (besides oral clefts). Findings suggest benefits to privately insured children with oral clefts from state mandates to cover needed services.