Feeding and Growth in Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Relationships With Maternal Distress

Breastfeeding and Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) and breastfeeding (BF).

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed based on studies published in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, BBO, and Embase databases, and in the gray literature. The search occurred in September 2021 and was updated in March 2022. Observational studies evaluating the association between BF and CL/P were included. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Frequency of BF in relation to the presence or absence of CL/P, as well as to the type of CL/P. The association between cleft type and BF challenges was also evaluated.

RESULTS

From a total of 6863 studies identified, 29 were included in the qualitative review. Risk of bias was moderate and high in most studies (n = 26). There was a significant association between the presence of CL/P and absence of BF (OR = 18.08; 95% CI 7.09-46.09). Individuals with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP ± L) had a significantly lower frequency of BF (OR = 5.93; 95% CI 4.30-8.16) and a significantly higher frequency of BF challenges (OR = 13.55; 95% CI 4.91-37.43) compared to individuals with CL. Certainty of the evidence was low or very low in all analyses.

CONCLUSION

The presence of clefts, especially those with palate involvement, is associated with higher chances of absence of BF.

Early Follow-up of Parents by a Specialized Cleft Nurse After the Birth of an Infant with Cleft lip and/or Palate

OBJECTIVE

To document the impact of early follow-up by specialized cleft nurses (SCNs) to families of infants with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P).

DESIGN

Prospective inclusion of a control group, which received standard care alone, followed by an intervention group, which in addition received early SCN follow-up.

SETTING

The cleft lip and palate team at a University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

70 families (69 mothers and 57 fathers); control group (n = 38); intervention group (n = 32).

INTERVENTION

SCNs offered a consultation at the maternity ward and follow-ups by phone or face-to-face at one, three, eight weeks and six months after birth.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Use of Internet-Questionnaire, Quality of discharge teaching scale (QDTS), Post discharge coping difficulty scale (PDCDS), Response on follow-up by health professionals.

RESULTS

Infants in the intervention group were admitted less frequently to a Neonatal Intensive Care unit (NICU); 21.9% vs 51.4%, P = .012. Parents in the intervention group used internet for cleft-related reasons less frequently (74.6% vs 85.9%), P = .112 and the mothers benefitted less from cleft-related activity on the internet (P = .013). The intervention group reported higher mean score for satisfaction with total cleft care (P = .001). There were no significant group differences regarding mean total score for discharge teaching (P = .315) and coping difficulties (P = .919).

CONCLUSION

Early follow-up by a SCN with expertise in cleft care is highly valued by parents. Closer cooperation between the cleft team and health professionals at birth hospitals and Child health centers is necessary for optimal follow-up.

A Dedicated Multidisciplinary Growth and Feeding Clinic for Infants with Cleft Lip and/or Palate Demonstrates Need for Intervention

OBJECTIVE

A Growth and Feeding Clinic (GFC) focused on early intervention around feeding routines in patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) was implemented.

DESIGN

This study assessed the effect of preoperative feeding interventions provided by the GFC.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

METHODS

This study evaluated patients with CL/P who were cared for by the GFC and a control group of patients with CL/P. Weight-for-age (WFA) Z-score of less than -2.00 was used as a cutoff to classify patients who were underweight during the preoperative period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The number of underweight patients who were able to reach normal weight by the time of their cleft lip repair was used as the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Within both the GFC and control groups, 25% of patients with CL/P were underweight as determined by WFA Z-score. GFC patients who were underweight received more clinic visits (P < .001) and GFC interventions (P < .001) compared to GFC patients who were normal weight. At the time of cleft lip surgery, 64.1% of GFC underweight patients were normal weight compared to 31.8% of control group underweight patients (P = .0187).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that multidisciplinary care provided by the GFC was able to target preoperative nutritional interventions to the highest-risk patients, resulting in double the percentage of patients who were of normal weight at the time of their cleft lip repair. These results provide objective proof supporting the assertion that multidisciplinary team care of the infant with cleft leads to measurable improvement in outcomes.

A Geospatial Analysis of Barriers to Cleft Lip and Palate Care in the United States

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the geospatial distribution of cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) care in the United States, assesses disparities between families with and without one-hour proximity to CL/P care, and recommends interventions for improving access.

DESIGN

We identified American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association-approved CL/P teams and calculated a one-hour driving radius around each clinic. We then used census data to compare risk factors for developing cleft (i.e., incidence risk factors) and obstacles to care (i.e., access risk factors) between counties with and without one-hour proximity.

RESULTS

We identified 187 CL/P teams in 45 states. Most were in the South (n = 60, 32.0%), though children in the Middle Atlantic had the greatest access to care. Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Kentucky had the least access. Children without access were 39% more likely to have gestational tobacco exposure, 8% more likely to have gestational obesity exposure, and 28% less likely to have health insurance (p < 0.01). Children without access in the South were 29% more likely to have a low birth weight and 46% more likely to be living below the poverty line (p < 0.01). Children with access were twice as likely to live in immigrant families and 7-times more likely to speak English as a second language.

CONCLUSIONS

Pronounced disparities affect patients with and without one-hour access to CL/P care. Interventions should address care costs for patients living furthest without access and language barriers for patients with access that speak English as a second language.

Growth Patterns Between Ages 0 and 36 Months Among US Children With Orofacial Cleft: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how young children with orofacial cleft grow over time.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize longitudinal growth patterns from ages 0 to 36 months in US children with an orofacial cleft.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Children with cleft lip, cleft lip and palate, or cleft palate who were younger than age 36 months at a hospital encounter between 2010 and 2019 (N = 1334) were included. The setting was a US tertiary care children's hospital with a cleft center that serves a 5-state region.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Weight-for-age z scores (WAZ) and length-for-age z scores (LAZ).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Longitudinal growth patterns were characterized using generalized linear mixed models to estimate mean WAZ and LAZ from age 0 to 36 months.

RESULTS

Growth in infants with cleft slowed dramatically during the first 3 to 4 months of life, rebounded with catch-up growth until age 12 months for cleft lip and cleft palate and until age 36 months for cleft lip and palate. When comparing populations, children with any type of cleft demonstrated subpar growth compared with World Health Organization standards. Growth deficits were more common in those with cleft lip and palate and cleft palate compared with those with cleft lip. The intraclass coefficient showed that most of the variability in the WAZ (65%) was between individuals, whereas 35% was within an individual. The intraclass coefficient for LAZ showed that most of the variability in the LAZ (74%) was between individuals, whereas 26% was within an individual. The proportion of variance attributable to cleft type and/or comorbidities accounted for <5% of the variance for WAZ and LAZ. WAZ and LAZ were lower in children with comorbidities than those without comorbidities with cleft and World Health Organization standards.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with cleft lip and palate, cleft palate, and a cleft with comorbidities have higher rates of poor growth than peers with cleft lip and a cleft with no comorbidities, respectively.

Comparison of two Specialized Cleft Palate Feeders

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate feeding efficiency and weight gain in infants with cleft palate fed using 1 of the 2 specialty feeders.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Cleft palate clinic in a tertiary pediatric hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Infants with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) fed using the Medela SpecialNeeds® Feeder (n = 39) or the Dr. Brown's® Specialty Feeding System (n = 16) and who had documented feeding and growth data available from the time of initial assessment in the first month of life and at subsequent follow-up between 2 and 4 months.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Feeding velocity (mL/min).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES

Calorie velocity (kcal/min), weight gain, and complications associated with poor feeding.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in feeding or calorie velocities were identified between infants with cleft palate fed with the Medela SpecialNeeds® feeder and those fed with the Dr. Brown's® feeder. Mean weight z-scores by month did not differ significantly between the 2 bottle groups at the time of initial assessment (P = .84) and follow-up (P = .20). Mean weight z-scores by month for the infants included in this study fell below the 50th percentile. The proportion of infants who developed otitis media, reflux requiring treatment, or who required hospital admission for nasogastric (NG) feeds did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being adequately powered for the primary outcome, no significant differences were identified between infants fed with the Medela or the Dr. Brown's feeders in terms of feeding velocity, calorie velocity, weight gain, or complications.

Parental Stress, Infant Feeding and Well-being in Families Affected by Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate: The Impact of Early Follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To document the impact of early follow-up by specialized cleft nurses (SCNs) provided to families affected by cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and the status of parental stress, infant feeding and well-being.

DESIGN

Prospective inclusion of a control group, which only received standard care, followed by an intervention group that also received early SCN follow-up.

SETTING

The cleft lip and palate team at Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy families (69 mothers and 57 fathers) distributed into an intervention group (n = 32) and a control group (n = 38).

INTERVENTION

SCNs provided a consultation at the maternity ward and a follow-up conversation by phone or face-to-face at scheduled times for six months.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Parental Stress Index (PSI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), feeding questionnaire, survey of infant diets, weight percentiles.

RESULTS

The mothers reported higher stress scores than the fathers, but in the control group only in the PSI parent domain at T2 and T3 (P = .007, P = .018). Infants in the intervention group used pacifiers less frequently than in the control group (55.2% vs. 81.1%, P = .023). Otherwise, no significant differences were found between the groups. Overall, the infants received less breast milk than norms.

CONCLUSION

Contextual strategies for early follow-up of families affected by clefts need to be developed, with an emphasis on involving fathers and those parents reporting elevated stress and/or feeding difficulties. There is a need for diagnosis-specific guidelines about the use of pacifiers as well as collaboration between the health professionals involved to increase breastmilk feeding.

Comparison of conventional impression making and intraoral scanning for the study of unilateral cleft lip and palate

Patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) encounter various problems, including disorders related to feeding, esthetics, and pronunciation. We compared two impression methods, conventional impression making and intraoral scanning, to study unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Patients with UCLP (n = 7) were selected, and palatal impressions were taken by two steps: (1) impressions were obtained using an addition silicone rubber impression material, and a plaster model was prepared and (2) optical impressions were obtained using a desktop three-dimensional (3D) scanner and stereolithography (STL). Data were generated by two impression system combinations through STL. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney U test. There were no significant differences in the dimensions of the models between both groups. The measured depth of the alveolar cleft defects was deeper in the plaster model group (STL) than in the intraoral scanner group (STL). Digital models may prevent the risk of aspiration and respiratory disorders by using impression materials for preoperative jaw treatment of newborns and infants. We compared the results of both impression methods in the same patient and found that a shift to the 3D printer model is a safe alternative for preoperative jaw correction, as evidenced from the amount of tissue displaced due to the pressure applied during impression taking. In the future, we would like to conduct clinical research with a larger sample size of CLP patients to further corroborate these findings.