Mason KN, Hanson B, Black JS. Measurement Matters: MRI Analysis of Differing Anatomic Measurement Techniques for Velar Length and the Velopharyngeal Needs Ratio.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024;
12:e5617. [PMID:
38375369 PMCID:
PMC10876255 DOI:
10.1097/gox.0000000000005617]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Background
Advances in imaging tools provide opportunities to enhance how velopharyngeal (VP) variables are quantified to facilitate surgical decisions. The purpose of this study was to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine if quantitative differences were present between measures of linear and curvilinear velar length, and subsequently, the VP needs ratio.
Methods
Data were prospectively collected from patients presenting with repaired cleft palate and/or congenital palatal insufficiency with or without VPI at a single center tertiary children's hospital. Quantitative measures of the velopharynx using a novel nonsedated MRI protocol were obtained. Paired samples t tests were conducted to assess if differences were present between the VP needs ratio and measurements of linear and curvilinear velar length at rest and during sustained phonation. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess intra/inter-rater reliability.
Results
Significant differences were present between measurements of linear and curvilinear velar length at rest (P ≤ 0.001) and during sustained phonation (P ≤ 0.001). Significant differences were also present in the VP needs ratio (P ≤ 0.001). Curvilinear velar length at rest and during sustained phonation was longer than that of linear velar length at rest and during sustained phonation. No significant differences were observed between measures of effective velar length (P = 0.393).
Conclusions
Measurement differences influence the VP needs ratio. This may have implications for comparisons to previously reported normative reference values and for those who are anatomically at risk for VPI. MRI provides an enhanced imaging modality to assess normative benchmarks and the anatomic variables used to define VP anatomy for clinical decision-making.
Collapse