Labial-Nasal Evaluation for Nasal Floor Reconstruction With the New Triangular Flap in Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair

Outcome Comparisons of Two Different Orbicularis Oris Muscle Reconstruction Techniques in Patients with Unilateral Incomplete Cleft Lip

BACKGROUND

The long-term postoperative outcomes of two different orbicularis oris muscle reconstruction techniques in patients with unilateral incomplete cleft lip were compared.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with unilateral incomplete cleft lip were assessed in this study, where 23 underwent a traditional method of reconstruction and 24 underwent a novel method. Preoperative measurements, postoperative results, and 3-year follow-up outcomes were measured by photographic anthropometric analysis. Five upper lip measurement indices and 8 nostril indices were included.

RESULTS

The postoperative outcomes showed that the shape of the lip and nose was more symmetric with the new surgical method compared with the conventional technique. Long-term outcomes after 3 years, although characterized by minimal changes during maxillofacial development, showed better maintenance of lip and nostril symmetry in the novel-method group.

CONCLUSION

The novel technique seeks to balance the perinasal and perioral muscles, resulting in improved symmetry compared with the traditional reconstruction technique.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Current Treatment Progress of Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformities

INTRODUCTION

Secondary nasal deformity following unilateral cleft lip is a common facial congenital malformation. Due to its complex treatment, there is currently no unified treatment plan in clinical practice. Dysplasia of cartilage, dislocation of muscles, and dysplasia of maxilla are the main causes of secondary nasal deformities of unilateral cleft lip. This article provides a comprehensive summary of the perioperative period and treatment process of unilateral cleft lip nasal deformities, aiming to find better clinical treatment guidance for patients with unilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity.

METHODS

A review of numerous previous studies on unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity, particularly within the last five years, was conducted to gather information on treatment strategies and perioperative care for unilateral cleft lip rhinoplasty.

CONCLUSION

Currently, there is still no unified final surgical method for the correction and treatment of unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. In terms of surgical timing, simultaneous primary rhinoplasty and lip repair are gradually being recognized internationally, while intermediate rhinoplasty can be considered when it affects the patients social and psychological life. Patients with severe initial nasal deformity require multiple revisions. Secondary rhinoplasty remains the ideal treatment for final correction of secondary nasal deformities in unilateral cleft lip.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Prognostic Factors for Speech Outcome among Patients with Submucous Cleft Palate Managed by Furlow Palatoplasty or Posterior Pharyngeal Flap

BACKGROUND

Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is a particular subtype of cleft deformity for which the optimal surgical timing and technique are still under debate. This study aimed to identify potential prognostic factors for the speech outcome of patients with SMCP and provide evidence for further management strategy optimization.

METHODS

The authors reviewed patients with nonsyndromic SMCP who received either Furlow palatoplasty (FP) or posterior pharyngeal flap (PPF) between 2008 and 2021 in a tertiary hospital-based cleft center. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to screen preoperative variables, including cleft type (overt or occult), age at surgery, mobility of velum and pharyngeal wall, velopharyngeal closure ratio, and pattern. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the cutoff value of the significant predictors for subgroup comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were enrolled, with 92 receiving FP and 39 receiving PPF. Age at operation and cleft type were identified as having significant effects on FP outcome. Patients operated on before 9.5 years of age had a significantly higher velopharyngeal competence (VPC) rate than those operated on after that age. The speech outcome among patients with occult SMCP was significantly worse than that of patients with overt SMCP after FP treatment. No preoperative variable was found to be correlated with PPF outcome. PPF yielded a higher VPC rate than did FP among patients operated on after 9.5 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with SMCP treated with FP is sensitive to age at surgery and cleft type. PPF may be considered for older patients in settings with limited access to multiple surgical procedures, especially when occult SMCP is diagnosed.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.