Outcomes after implementing a heart failure diuretic pathway in an emergency department setting

BACKGROUND

Among patients with acute decompensated heart failure (HF), national and international loop diuretic therapy recommendations may not be followed in the emergency department (ED).

OBJECTIVES

To examine if loop diuretic treatment and patient disposition from the ED differed after implementing a clinical pathway based on national HF guidelines.

METHODS

Using an observational, pre- and post-intervention design, after clinical pathway implementation, loop diuretic medications and clinical outcomes were retrieved from medical records. Analyses included Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, 2-sample T-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Of 182 pre- and 122 post-intervention patients, mean (SD) patient age was 67.9 (13.4) years and 44.2% were Caucasian. There were no between-group differences in pre-ED visit loop diuretic prescription or dosages. More post-intervention ED patients received at least one dose of loop diuretic (94.3% vs. 81.9%, p = 0.010); however, the overall dose (mg) across groups was lower than the home dose and was not based on national guideline expectations. Doses from home to ED decreased less in the post-intervention group for patients who received doses at both time points and for all patients: p = 0.047 and p = 0.048, respectively. There was no between-group differences in short-stay unit (SSU) admissions, p = 0.33. Post-intervention patients were hospitalized from the ED (p = 0.050) and SSU (p = 0.005) less often than pre-intervention patients. Discharge to home from the ED or SSU increased in the post-intervention period; 16.4% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.009.

CONCLUSIONS

Among ED patients treated for HF, diuretic dosing was non-optimized. New interventions are needed to enhance adherence to national guidelines.

The Art and Science of Using Diuretics in the Treatment of Heart Failure in Diverse Clinical Settings

It is important to understand the rationale for appropriate use of different diuretics, alone or in combination, in different heart failure patients, under diverse clinical settings. Clinicians and nurses engaged in heart failure care, must be familiar with different diuretics, their appropriate doses, methods of administration, monitoring of the responses, and the side-effects. Inappropriate use of diuretics, both under-treatment and overtreatment, and poor follow-up can lead to failures, and adverse outcomes. Adequate treatment of congestion, with rather aggressive use of diuretics, is necessary, even if that may worsen renal function temporarily in some patients. Diuretic treatment should later be titrated down, by early recognition of the euvolemic sate, which can be assessed by clinical examination, measurement of the natriuretic peptides, and when possible, echocardiographic estimation of the left ventricular filling pressure. You need to treat patients, who are truly resistant to the loop diuretics, by administering the diuretics as intravenous bolus injection followed by continuous infusion, and/or by sequential nephron blockade by adding the thiazide diuretics. You need to use the diuretics based on a sound understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease process, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the diuretics, even when strong evidences for your choices might be lacking. Some patients may benefit from injection of loop diuretics together with hypertonic saline, and others from injection of loop diuretics with albumin. Patient education, and regular follow up of the treatment of heart failure patients, in out-patient settings are important for reducing the rates of complications, and for reducing the needs for urgent hospitalizations.