Direct comparison two fixed-ratio combination glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist and basal insulin on glycemic and non glycemic parameters in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Two types of fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) have been approved for use in type 2 diabetes. One is insulin degludec/liraglutide (iDergLira), and the other is insulin glargine/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi). Direct comparisons between these two combination is not available.

METHODS

The retrospective study included 186 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with inadequate glycemic control on metformin and basal insulin (degludec, glargine 100, glargine 300) who were switched to fixed-ratio combination GLP-1 RA and basal insulin. Patients were divided into two groups based on the basal insulin before study: group I (n = 86) treated with degludec were switched to iDegLira and patients group II (n = 99), treated with glargine were switched to iGlarLixi. The aim of this study was to directly compare the effects between two fixed - ratio combination on glycemic parameters and non glycemic parameters. Follow up was 6 months.

RESULTS

Mean HbA1c decreased similarly (- 1.2% vs.-1.1%). Higher percentage patients in iDegLira group had reached the HbA1c < 7% after 6 months (22% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.05). The mean change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was comparable for the two groups, while mean decrease postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) level were lower in iGlarLixi group (2 vs 1.8 mmol/l, p > 0.05). Change in body weight was significant in iDegLira group (1.8 kg vs. 0.7 kg, p < 0.001). At the end of the study patients showed decrease in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) for 0.2 mmol/L in iDegLira, 0.1 mmol/l in iGlarLixi, triglycerides decreased 0.3 mmol/l in both groups, high-density lipoprotein(HDL) increased 0.1 mm/l in iGlarLixi.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that more patients with iDegLira had HbA1c less than 7% and these combination had better effect on weight loss. There was no difference observed in FPG and PPG, lipid profile and rate of hypoglycemia.

Degree of obesity and gastrointestinal adverse reactions influence the weight loss effect of liraglutide in overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes

Background

Liraglutide can effectively reduce the weight of patients with type 2 diabetes. Nonetheless, its weight loss effect was highly heterogeneous in different patients in the clinical practice.

Objective

To identify the factors most associated with the weight loss effect of liraglutide in obese or overweight patients with type 2 diabetes with poorly controlled oral medication in northeast China.

Design

A prospective study.

Methods

A prospective study was performed in subjects with type 2 diabetes who were taking oral medication and had a body mass index (BMI) of ⩾24 kg/m². Liraglutide was administered for at least 12 weeks, while the original hypoglycemic regimen was kept unchanged (Phase I). Later, liraglutide treatment was continued or stopped as necessary or as subjects thought fit in the 13-52 weeks that followed (Phase II), and the potential factors affecting the effect of weight loss of liraglutide were analyzed.

Results

Of the 127 recruited subjects, 90 had comprehensive follow-up data at week 12. In Phase I, the subjects' blood sugar levels and weight decreased significantly(P < 0.001). Among all the significant factors, the gastrointestinal adverse reactions score (GARS) was more correlated with BMI change (ΔBMI; r = 0.43) and waist circumference change (ΔWC; r = 0.32) than the baseline BMI (BMI₀) and WC (WC₀). At week 12, linear regression showed that BMI₀ independently affected ΔBMI and ΔWC, whereas WC₀ only affected ΔWC. The GARS was significantly associated with ΔBMI and ΔWC, and this association continued until week 52, even after most subjects had discontinued liraglutide treatment.

Conclusion

The degree of obesity and gastrointestinal adverse reactions were the most promising predictors of weight loss in liraglutide treatment.

Liraglutide in Combination with Insulin Has a Superior Therapeutic Effect to Either Alone on Fracture Healing in Diabetic Rats

Purpose

Fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at a high risk of delayed union or non-union. Previous studies have shown a protective effect of liraglutide on bone. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of a combination of liraglutide and insulin on fracture healing in a rat model of diabetes and the mechanisms involved.

Materials and Methods

Closed femoral mid-shaft fractures were established in male Sprague-Dawley rats with or without diabetes mellitus, and the diabetic rats were administered insulin and/or liraglutide. Six weeks after femoral fracture, the femoral callus was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, histology, and micro-computed tomography. Additionally, the effects of liraglutide on high-glucose-stimulated MC3T3-E1 cells were analyzed by Western blotting.

Results

Micro-computed tomography and safranin O/fast green staining showed that fracture healing was delayed in the diabetic rats, and this was accompanied by much lower expression of osteogenic markers and greater osteoclast activity. However, treatment with insulin and/or liraglutide prevented these changes. Liraglutide in combination with insulin treatment resulted in lower blood glucose concentrations and significantly higher osteocalcin (OCN) and collagen I (Col I) expression six weeks following fracture. Western blot analysis showed that liraglutide prevented the low expression of the bone morphogenetic protein-2, osterix/SP7, OCN, Col I, and β-catenin in high-glucose-stimulated MC3T3-E1 cells.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate that insulin and/or liraglutide promotes bone fracture healing in the DF model. The combination was more effective than either single treatment, which may be because of the two drugs' additive effects on the osteogenic ability of osteoblast precursors.

Incretin-based medications (GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors) as a means to avoid hypoglycaemic episodes

Hypoglycaemia is common in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes and has both acute and long-term consequences. Therefore, a key to proper glucose-lowering therapy in diabetes is to avoid or prevent hypoglycaemia. Incretin therapy (DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists) offers an advantage in this respect, because it reduces glucose with a low risk of hypoglycaemia, both in monotherapy and in combination with other therapies. The reason for this low risk of hypoglycaemia is the glucose dependency of action of incretin therapy and the sustainment of glucose counter-regulatory hormone responses to hypoglycaemia, in particular the glucagon response. Incretin therapy is also associated with a low risk of hypoglycaemia in patient groups which are especially vulnerable and susceptible for hypoglycaemia, e.g., subjects with renal impairment, elderly subjects and subjects with on-going insulin therapy. This review summarizes how incretin therapy may meet the challenges of hypoglycaemia and suggests that incretin therapy is a therapy of choice to avoid hypoglycaemia, both in the general diabetes population and in subjects with increased risk or vulnerability for hypoglycaemia.

Real-world clinical experience of Xultophy in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes in a secondary care clinic

AIMS

Xultophy is the first fixed co-formulation pen containing insulin degludec and the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue liraglutide, authorized for type 2 diabetes patients since 2014. The aim was to review the clinical effectiveness of Xultophy across two hospitals in Wales.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients commenced on Xultophy between April 2016 and January 2018 was taken. Data related to glycemic control, weight and medication use were collected.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were initiated on Xultophy, and 60 patients had follow-up for at least 6 months with a mean age of 57.3 years (47% male). Xultophy was well-tolerated, however, abdominal cramps and nausea limited use in three patients. Baseline HbA1c and weight were 84.7 mmol/mol and 101.5 kg. There were significant HbA1c reductions of 9.9 mmol/mol (p < 0.0001) and 13.4 mmol/mol (p < 0.008) at 6 and 12 months, and non-significant changes in weight. Patients with an HbA1c over 84 mmol/mol showed the greatest HbA1c improvement over 6-months. Those prescribed insulin prior to Xultophy had less significant improvements in HbA1c than those previously prescribed GLP-1 analogues.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant reductions in HbA1c and statistically insignificant weight gain over 12 months. Switching from GLP-1 analogues to Xultophy was associated with a greater HbA1c reduction compared to switching from insulin.

Combination of basal insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist: is this the end of basal insulin alone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes?

Glycemic control has been considered a major therapeutic goal within the scope of diabetes management, as supported by robust observational and experimental evidence. However, the coexistence of micro and macrovascular disease is associated with the highest cardiovascular risks which highlights the importance that pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus provides not only glycemic control, but also cardiovascular safety. Basal insulin is a highly effective treatment in reducing fasting blood glucose, but it is associated with considerable risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain. Glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are also effective in terms of glycemic control and associated with weight loss and low risk of hypoglycemia. The potential benefits of combining GLP-1RAs with basal insulin are contemplated in the current position statement of several different position statement and guidelines. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of different strategies to initiate and intensify basal insulin, with focus on new fixed ratio combinations of basal insulin with GLP-1 RAs available for use in a single injection pen (insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine/lixisenatide).