Incidence of Drug Interactions Identified by Clinical Pharmacists in Veterans Initiating Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection

Adherence to Hepatitis C Treatment Among Underserved Patients With Substance Use Disorder in a Pharmacist-led Treatment Model

BackgroundTreatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) may improve hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment outcomes by providing additional contact with health care professionals to support patient engagement. Objective: We describe a pharmacist-led HCV treatment model and assessed the effect of MOUD on adherence to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in an underserved patient population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults (age≥18 years) treated for HCV infection with DAAs at a Federally Qualified Health Center in Portland, Oregon, between March 1, 2019, and March 16, 2020. Patients were followed to 12 weeks to assess adherence to DAAs by MOUD status. Results: Among 59 eligible patients, 16 (27%) were prescribed MOUD. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients who did and did not receive MOUD. Adherence to DAAs was overall high and not significantly different between the groups (median: 98.5% vs median: 100%; P = .06). Five patients missed at least one dose due to an adverse drug effect and two of these patients discontinued HCV therapy due to these effects. Conclusion: Adherence to HCV therapy was nearly 100% among underserved patients in a pharmacist-led HCV treatment model and did not differ by MOUD engagement.

Lipid Profile and Cardiovascular Risk Modification after Hepatitis C Virus Eradication

The eradication of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has revolutionized the hepatology paradigm, halting the progression of advanced liver disease in patients with chronic infection and reducing the risk of hepatocarcinoma. In addition, treatment with direct-acting antivirals can reverse the lipid and carbohydrate abnormalities described in HCV patients. Although HCV eradication may reduce the overall risk of vascular events, it is uncertain whether altered lipid profiles increase the risk of cerebrovascular disease in certain patients. We have conducted a review on HCV and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, as well as new scientific advances, following the advent of direct-acting antivirals.

Primary care electronic medication record discrepancies in patients starting treatment at a hospital-based ambulatory care pharmacy and impact on prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of discrepancies between primary care electronic medication records (EMR) and patient reported medication (PRM) in ambulatory patients starting a hospital dispensing treatment (HDT) at a hospital-based ambulatory care pharmacy (HACPh). Our secondary aims were to analyse factors associated with the presence of discrepancies and their impact on the prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with the HDT.

METHODS

Retrospective study including 230 patients starting a HDT at the HACPh. Pharmacists interviewed patients and PRM was compared with EMR. Discrepancies were classified as omissions (medication in the PRM not present in the EMR) and commissions (medication active in the EMR that the patients were not taking). Potential DDIs with the HDT were screened, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect factors associated with the presence of discrepancies.

RESULTS

We identified 221 discrepancies in 116 (50.4%) patients. Being visited by three or more medical specialties (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.37) and attending private healthcare (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.14 to 16.72) in the 12 months before the study inclusion were the factors independently associated with the presence of discrepancies. Among patients with commissions (n=91), 15.4% had a potential DDI between the HDT and one medication from the EMR that they were not taking at that moment. Among patients with omissions (n=45), 11.1% had a potential DDI between the HDT and a medication in the PRM not present in the EMR.

CONCLUSIONS

About 40% of patients had one or more medications in the EMR which they were not taking and one fifth used medications that were not listed in the EMR. EMR should not be used as the only source of information when screening for DDIs, especially in patients followed by different medical specialties or combining private and public healthcare.

Evaluation of a specialty hepatitis C virus telephone pharmacy service

PURPOSE

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are associated with significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Pharmacists are well positioned to identify and mitigate these DDIs. Data to guide assessment of the impact of HCV specialty pharmacy services on identifying and addressing DDIs with DAAs are lacking. The overall purpose of the study described here was to determine the incidence and severity of DDIs identified by specialty pharmacists among patients treated with DAAs prior to and 1 month into therapy.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of specialty pharmacy services in mitigating DDIs associated with use of DAAs. Adult patients with HCV infection (n = 200) who received DAAs and were enrolled with a specialty pharmacy service over a 1-year period were included. Endpoints included number, severity, and type of DDIs and DDIs per patient at baseline and 1 month into therapy, pharmacists' interventions, and safety and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine percent of patients had at least 1 DDI. A total of 170 DDIs were identified (137 at baseline and 33 at 1-month follow-up), and the mean number of DDIs per patient significantly decreased from baseline to 1-month follow-up (from 1.38 to 0.16, P < 0.0001). The rate of "potentially clinically significant" or "critical" interactions was significantly lower at 1-month follow-up vs baseline assessment (69.6% vs 81.7%, P < 0.0001). The most commonly identified DDIs involved acid suppressive medications (49.6% and 66.6% of DDIs at baseline and follow-up assessment, respectively) and cardiovascular medications (26.2% and 21.2%, respectively). Total number of DDI interventions was 131, with an acceptance rate of 85%. Most common intervention was patient education and monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 60% of patients had DDIs with DAAs. Implementing HCV specialty pharmacy services significantly decreased DDIs while maintaining SVR12.

Metabolism of Direct-acting Antiviral Agents (DAAs) in Hepatitis C Therapy: A Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is still one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease, with chronically infected making up approximately 1% of the global population. Of those infected, 70% (55-85%) will develop chronic HCV infection. Chronic HCV infection causes substantial morbidity and mortality, with complications including cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, and eventually death.

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic options for chronic HCV infection have evolved dramatically since 2014, with a translation from pegylated interferon and ribavirin (associated with suboptimal cure and high treatment-related toxicity) to oral direct-acting antiviral treatment. There are four classes of direct-acting antivirals which differ by their mechanism of action and therapeutic target. They are all pointed to proteins that form the cytoplasmic viral replication complex. Multiple studies have demonstrated that direct-acting antiviral therapy is extremely well tolerated, highly efficacious, with few side effects.

METHODS

We performed an indexed MEDLINE search with keywords regarding specific direct-acting antiviral regimes and their pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and metabolism in specific settings of pregnancy, lactation, liver cirrhosis, liver transplantation and HCC risk, kidney failure and kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

We present a comprehensive overview of specific direct-acting antiviral metabolism and drug-drug interaction issues in different settings.

CONCLUSION

Despite its complex pharmacokinetics and the possibility of drug-drug interactions, direct-acting antivirals are highly efficacious in providing viral clearance, which is an obvious advantage compared to possible interactions or side effects. They should be administered cautiously in patients with other comorbidities, and with tight control of immunosuppressive therapy.

Direct antiviral agents for hepatitis C and drug interaction risk: A retrospective cohort study with real and simulated data on medication interaction, prevalence of comorbidities and comedications

Introduction and aim

Comorbidities and comedication are common in patients with hepatitis C, which could result in a risk of drug-drug interaction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of comorbidities, comedication and drug-drug interactions involving direct-acting antivirals in this population.

Methods

Comorbidities and comedications were evaluated in a retrospective cohort of hepatitis C patients. Drug-drug interactions were estimated in real life and with simulated data on comedications following drug regimens: telaprevir; elbasvir/grazoprevir, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r/ritonavir (2D regimen), and sofosbuvir/simeprevir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir; 2D/dasabuvir (3D regimen); glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. The interactions were evaluated according to the University of Liverpool database. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS^® 18.0.

Results

Data from 1433 patients with hepatitis C were evaluated. The mean patient age was 51.7 years (SD ± 10.7), and 50.6% were female. Direct-acting antivirals were prescribed for 345 (24.1%) patients, and a sustained virological response occurred in 264 (76.5%). The main comorbidities were systemic arterial hypertension [436 (30.4%)], diabetes mellitus [352 (24.6%)] and depression [130 (9.1%)]. The mean number of comorbidities was 1.52 (median [IQR] of 1.00 [1.00–2.00]). The mean number of comedications was 3.16 (median [IQR] of 3.00 [1.00–5.00]). A total of 12916 drug-drug interactions were found, of which 1.859 (14.4%) were high risk, with a mean of 1.29 ± 3.13 per patient. The 3D regimen, as well as glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, presented the highest drug-drug interaction indexes.

Conclusion

Comorbidities and comedications are common in patients with hepatitis C, as are drug-drug interactions. Even when second generation drugs are used, the occurrence of drug-drug interactions still presents a significant risk.

Influence of drug-drug interactions on effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals against hepatitis C virus

OBJECTIVES

Direct-acting antivirals are the recommended treatment for hepatitis C-infected patients. Drug-drug interactions with concomitant treatments can cause lack of effectiveness and/or safety. The objective of this study is to characterise drug-drug interactions of direct-acting antivirals and to analyse their influence both on the effectiveness of antiviral treatment and on the overall safety of pharmacological treatment in hepatitis C-infected patients.

METHODS

Observational and prospective cohort study for 3 years in the pharmaceutical care outpatient consultation of a general hospital, undertaking detection, evaluation and management of drug-drug interactions by clinical pharmacists and physicians. The main outcome measures were sustained virologic response at week 12 for effectiveness and serious drug-related adverse events for safety. Multivariate statistical analysis applied to: (a) patient basal characteristics related to presence of drug-drug interactions; (b) previous antiviral treatments, viral genotype, cirrhosis, decompensations and presence of drug-drug interactions related to the effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals.

RESULTS

Of a total of 1092 patients, the majority of them were men, around 60 years old and HCV-genotype 1 mono-infected, with a high basal viral load, naive to antiviral treatment, treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and without cirrhosis. 24.5% had drug-drug interactions. Proton pump inhibitors were the concomitant drugs that caused the most drug-drug interactions. Age ≥65 years and direct-acting antivirals based on protease inhibitors were independently related to the presence of drug-drug interactions (p≤0.012). All (100%) of the therapeutic recommendations based on detected drug-drug interactions were implemented; 97.7% of patients with interactions versus 99.0% without them reached sustained virologic failure (p=0.109). The serious adverse events rates were 1.5% and 1.3% in patients with and without drug-drug interactions, respectively (p=0.841).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-drug interactions are frequent among hepatitis C-infected patients receiving treatment with direct-acting antivirals. However, the collaboration between physicians and clinical pharmacists makes it possible to detect, evaluate, avoid or clinically manage these drug-drug interactions, in order to maintain whole treatment therapeutic safety and the effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals.

Comorbidities and concomitant medications in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection receiving second-generation direct-acting antiviral regimens in Belgium: an observational study

Objective

To describe comorbidities and concomitant medications in patients initiating treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens in Belgium.

Methods

This was a noninterventional, observational, multicenter study of data from patient charts. Adult patients with HCV infection receiving second-generation DAA therapy were included. Comorbidities were assessed at the time of HCV treatment initiation. Concomitant medications were recorded at the time of diagnosis and at treatment initiation. Potential clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were assessed based on information available at www.hep-druginteractions.org. The primary objective was to describe concomitant medication use ; secondary objectives were to describe modifications in concomitant therapies and comorbidities.

Results

405 patients were included. A total of 956 comorbidities were reported by 362 patients (median, 2 ; range, 0-15). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (27.2%) ; HIV coinfection (22.5%), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (14.3%). Overall, 1455 concomitant medications were being taken by 365 patients (90.1% ; median, 3 ; range 0-16). The most common concomitant medications were psycholeptics (28.6%), antiviral agents (24.2%), and medications for acid-related disorders (21.0%) Overall, 74/365 (20.3%) patients receiving a concomitant medication required an adaptation to their concomitant medication. The medications that most frequently required change were drugs for acid-related disorders (n = 14) and antiviral drugs (n = 5) ; those that were most frequently stopped were lipid-modifying drugs (n = 25) and drugs for acid-related disorders (n = 13).

Conclusion

Physicians are aware of the potential for DDIs with DAAs, but improved alignment between clinical practice and theoretical recommendations is required.

Sustained Virologic Response of Patients Hospitalized Compared With Those Not Hospitalized During Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus With Direct-Acting Antivirals

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have resulted in great success through high attainment of sustained virologic response (SVR). Risk factors for DAA treatment failure are important to identify because of worsened outcomes with failure and high treatment cost.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify whether hospitalization during treatment affects SVR. The primary outcome was the difference in SVR at 12 weeks after treatment.

METHODS

This multicenter, single health system retrospective cohort review compared achievement of SVR between patients hospitalized during DAA treatment for HCV with those not hospitalized during treatment.

RESULTS

Patients in the hospitalized cohort (n = 94) had more severe disease at baseline than nonhospitalized patients (n = 167) as indicated through higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, Fibrosis-4 scores, and imaging-suggested or biopsy-confirmed cirrhosis. Patients hospitalized during treatment had lower SVR rates compared with those not hospitalized (87.2% vs 95.2%; P = 0.043) but failed to reach significance when inpatient mortality was excluded on secondary analysis (91.1% vs 95.2%; P = 0.195). Patients who were hospitalized and did not achieve SVR had higher MELD scores, were more likely to have intensive care unit stay, and had longer hospital stay compared with those who achieved SVR. Of 94 patients, 93 provided home supply of DAAs during hospitalization.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Patients hospitalized during DAA treatment for HCV had reduced rates of SVR. This reduced SVR rate may be driven by inpatient mortality and severity of liver disease. Patient education to bring home supply of medication for use during admission is an effective intervention.

Drug Interactions with Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: Focus on Antiretrovirals and Direct Acting Antivirals

INTRODUCTION

Gender-affirming care may include hormonal therapy to attain desired health outcomes in transgender (trans) individuals. To provide safe, affirming medical care for trans patients, health care providers must identify and manage drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between gender affirming hormonal therapy (GAHT) and other medication therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes available data on DDIs between GAHT and antiretrovirals (ARVs) or hepatitis C direct acting antivirals (DAAs). Potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic DDIs are predicted based on GAHT, ARV, and DAA pharmacology and adverse event profiles. Clinical management strategies are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

GAHT may be involved in pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic DDIs. Certain ARV classes (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors) may alter GAHT disposition, whereas selected ARVs (unboosted integrase inhibitors, doravirine, or rilpivirine) may have less impact on GAHT. DAAs may interact with GAHT, but the clinical relevance is unclear. ARV- and/or DAA-associated side effects (including depression, cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia) are important to consider in the clinical management of trans patients. Clinicians must evaluate potential DDIs and overlapping side effects between ARVs, DAAs and GAHT when providing care for trans patients.

Drug-drug interactions between direct-acting antivirals and statins in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C

As the first line of treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have greater efficacy and fewer adverse effects than other treatments; however, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) must be avoided when used in combination with other medications, such as statins. HCV patients are mostly in the need for polypharmacy, particularly the comedication of DAAs and cardiovascular drugs such as statins. This poses a risk of pharmacokinetic interactions between the two classes of drugs that may lead to severe myopathy or even rhabdomyolysis. Therefore, evaluating the severity of the DDIs and managing them is important. A multidisciplinary team-based model of care for HCV patients receiving DAAs can review the pharmacology profiles of other drugs for relevant DDIs with the DAAs, before prescription. Such a model can also follow the patients through the therapeutic cycle to make sure that their medical regimen is safe and effective. This article reviews the comedication rate and DDI-prevalence in HCV patients receiving statins along with the DAAs, details the mechanisms involved, gives recommendations for management, and shares our experience with a multidisciplinary team-based care program for the treatment of HCV patients.

Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ± ribavirin vs glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infected patients

Objectives

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir±ribavirin (SOF/VEL±RBV) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) are the drug combinations of choice for treating individuals with genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (G3-HCV) infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL±RBV compared with GLE/PIB for treating G3-HCV infection under routine clinical practice conditions.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of individuals with G3-HCV infection who initiated treatment with SOF/VEL +/-RBV or GLE/PIB between April 2017 and July 2018. Prisoners and children were excluded. The outcome variable of effectiveness was sustained virological response 12 weeks after completing treatment (SVR12). The safety variable was withdrawal secondary to severe adverse events (SAEs). Covariates included sex, age, HIV co-infection, previous liver transplant, cirrhosis, hepatic fibrosis and previous antiviral treatment. Statistical significance was calculated using Fisher's exact test or the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results

A total of 76 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 46 were treated with SOF/VEL±RBV and 30 were treated with GLE/PIB. No baseline differences were observed between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, HIV co-infection, fibrosis stage, cirrhosis and previous antiviral treatment. Of the patients treated with SOF/VEL±RBV and GLE/PIB, 95.7% and 96.7% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.7). Of patients with and without cirrhosis, 83.3% and 98.4% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.09). Of the patients with low-grade hepatic fibrosis (F0-2) and advanced fibrosis (F3-4), 100% and 85.7% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.03). In treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients, 95.7% and 100% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.57), without significant differences independent of the treatment group (P=0.28 for SOF/VEL±RBV; P=0.18 for GLE/PIB). The incidence of AEs was 21.1% (95% CI 11.3% to 30.9%). None of the patients developed an SAE or required antiviral treatment withdrawal.

Conclusions

SOF/VEL±RBV or GLE/PIB are safe and effective for treating G3-HCV-infections, with a lower effectiveness in patients with advanced fibrosis F3-4.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Children and Adolescents Receiving Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Drug-drug interactions need to be considered to optimize the pharmacotherapeutic outcome of direct-acting antivirals. The aim of this study was to report on possible drug-drug interactions between ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and other medications received by children and adolescents with hepatitis C virus, in addition to suggested management for these drug-drug interactions.

METHODS

Hepatitis C virus-infected children and adolescents, 12-17 years of age and/or weighing ≥ 35 kg, who presented to the Pediatric Hepatology Unit at Cairo University Pediatric Hospitals for ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment were included. Medication history was taken including long-term medications for chronic conditions and on-demand medications for inter-current illnesses. Medications were reviewed by the Kasr Alainy Drug Information Center to identify possible drug-drug interactions with prescribed ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and their management. HEP Drug Interactions provided by the University of Liverpool, Lexicomp^®, and Medscape were the utilized references. Each drug-drug interaction was assigned a risk rating of A, B, C, D, or X.

RESULTS

Sixty hepatitis C virus-infected children and adolescents assigned to receive ledipasvir/sofosbuvir were enrolled. Thirty percent of patients had associated chronic co-morbid conditions. The overall number of medications received was 48; 39 were prescribed as long-term medications with a median of 3 (interquartile range 4.24) medications per patient. Proton pump inhibitors, antacids, histamine H₂ receptor antagonists, sodium bicarbonate, and colchicine were reported to be associated with a drug-drug interaction risk D necessitating therapy modification, which occurred prior to administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Early identification and prompt response to drug-drug interactions with the aid of pharmacists optimize the pharmacotherapeutic outcome and eliminate possible morbidities when using direct-acting antivirals in children and adolescents with hepatitis C virus.

Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Selection, Treatment Failure, and Use of Drug-Drug Interactions in a State Medicaid Program

BACKGROUND

Newer hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments often provide high success rates with fewer adverse events, although the extent of all potential drug interactions is not fully known.

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes of receiving HCV treatment and subsequent sustained virologic response (SVR) based on patient and clinical characteristics, including direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drug-drug interactions (DDIs), in Medicaid members with chronic HCV.

METHODS

Comprehensive medical and pharmacy claims and prior authorization data were collected for HCV patients requesting treatment between January 2014 and June 2015. Outcomes of receiving treatment with DAAs and treatment failure based on SVR were analyzed according to demographics, prior/current HCV treatment, severity of DDIs, advancing liver disease, and comorbidities. Multivariable generalized linear models were employed, including a Bayesian sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Among 3,412 Medicaid members with HCV, 13.6% received DAAs (n = 464), averaging 53.6 ± 10.0 years, with 52.8% female. Multivariable analyses indicated that higher odds of DAA treatment initiation were associated with older age, prior HCV treatment, and advancing liver disease. Some 4.8% of treatment failures occurred among 168 patients with reported SVRs, wherein a 3.218 times higher adjusted odds of treatment failure was associated with concomitant use of medications with DDIs classified as significant or potentially clinically significant by the University of Liverpool HEP Drug Interactions resource (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of state Medicaid members with chronic HCV, a markedly higher adjusted odds of treatment failure was independently associated with DDIs classified as significant or potentially clinically significant, warranting continued inquiry and potential alternate treatments concerning conditions that require their use.

DISCLOSURES

This research was funded by an unrestricted research grant by Gilead Sciences. During the course of this study, all authors were either employed by the Oklahoma HealthCare Authority or engaged in contractual work for this employer. Keast, Holderread, and Skrepnek report unrelated research grants from AbbVie, Otsuka, and Amgen. Keast and Skrepnek acknowledge funding from Purdue Pharma for an unrelated research fellowship grant. Posters based on this work were presented at HepDart 2015 on December 6-10, 2015, in Grand Wailea, HI, and at Academy of Managed Care Nexus 2015 on October 26-29, 2015, in Orlando, FL.

Pharmacist-led pre-treatment assessment, management and outcomes in a Hepatitis C treatment patient cohort

Background Medication reconciliation and drug-drug interaction management represent important patient safety processes completed by pharmacists as part of Hepatitis C patient care. Objectives To describe the pharmacist-led interventions of medication reconciliation and drug-drug interaction assessment, grading and management in a real-world Hepatitis C treatment cohort and to assesses the impact on patient outcomes. Setting Two Hepatitis C hospital outpatient clinics at St. James's Hospital, Dublin. Method Patients treated with Hepatitis C direct acting anti-viral agents between December 2014 and February 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The study employed a standardised medication reconciliation proforma and drug-drug interaction reference list. Main outcome measures Analyse medication variances identified during pharmacist-led medication reconciliation. Assess the prevalence, type and severity of drug-drug interactions between direct acting anti-virals and co-medications. Assess the rate of prescriber acceptance of the pharmacist-developed drug-drug interaction management strategies. Results Among the 300 patients in this study, medication reconciliation identified 1543 co-medications, with 71% of patients prescribed co-medications which were subject to a potential drug-drug interaction. Drug-drug interaction assessments assigned a rating of severe to 68 interaction episodes. At least one co-medication was stopped during treatment in 25% of patients to facilitate drug-drug interaction management. Pharmacist proposed management recommendations were accepted by prescribers in 96.9% of cases. The sustained virological response rate among the cohort was 92.7%. Conclusions In this Hepatitis C pre-treatment pharmacist assessment analysis, a significant number of medication reconciliation variances and clinically significant drug-drug interactions were identified which present unique and important patient safety risks. Pharmacist-led management strategies aided the achievement of optimum treatment response while promoting patient safety and antiviral stewardship.

Expanding Hepatitis C Virus Care and Cure: National Experience Using a Clinical Pharmacist-Driven Model

Background

The US National Viral Hepatitis Action Plan depends on additional providers to expand hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment capacity in order to achieve elimination goals. Clinical pharmacists manage treatment and medication within interdisciplinary teams. The study’s objective was to determine sustained virologic response (SVR) rates for clinical pharmacist–delivered HCV therapy in an open medical system.

Methods

Investigators conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients initiating direct-acting antivirals from January 1, 2014, through March 12, 2018. Data included demographics, comorbidities, treatment, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome of SVR was determined for patients initiating (intent-to-treat) and those who completed (per-protocol) treatment. Chi-square tests were conducted to identify associations between SVR and adverse reactions, drug–drug interactions, and adherence.

Results

A total of 1253 patients initiated treatment; 95 were lost to follow-up, and 24 discontinued therapy. SVR rates were 95.1% (1079/1134) per protocol and 86.1% (1079/1253) intent to treat. The mean age (SD) was 57.4 (10.1) years, the mean body mass index (SD) was 28.7 (6.2) kg/m², 63.9% were male, 53.7% were black, 40.3% were cirrhotic, 88.4% were genotype 1, and 81.6% were treatment-naïve. Patients missing ≥1 dose had an SVR of 74.9%; full adherence yielded 90% (P < .0001).

Conclusions

HCV treatment by clinical pharmacists in an open medical system resulted in high SVR rates comparable to real-world studies with specialists and nonspecialists. These findings demonstrate the success of a clinical pharmacist–delivered method for HCV treatment expansion and elimination.