Usefulness of the Biomarker TIMP-2•IGFBP7 for Acute Kidney Injury Assessment in Critically Ill Patients: A Narrative Review

Urinary biomarkers for diagnosing acute kidney injury in sepsis in the emergency department

Background

Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with sepsis is associated with increased mortality, highlighting the importance of early detection and management. However, baseline creatinine or urine output measurements are required for AKI diagnosis, which can be challenging in emergency departments (EDs). We aimed to evaluate the association between urinary biomarkers and the AKI diagnosis or 30-day survival status in patients with sepsis in the ED.

Methods

This prospective observational study enrolled patients from a single ED. We enrolled adult patients presenting to the ED with symptoms suggestive of infection and an initial quick sequential organ failure assessment score ≥2. Initial urine samples were collected, and urinary biomarkers (dickkopf-3, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1, kidney injury molecule-1, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7 (IGFBP-7), and TIMP-2 × IGFBP-7) were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate biomarker performance.

Results

Of 84 patients, 63 (75.0 %) were diagnosed with AKI and 16 (19.0 %) died within 30 days. None of the urinary biomarkers demonstrated significant differences between the survivors and non-survivors. NGAL (p = 0.014) and TIMP-2 × IGFBP-7 (p = 0.027) levels were different between the AKI and non-AKI groups. The multivariable logistic regression model suggested a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for models, including TIMP-2 × IGFBP-7 (from 0.853 to 0.889, p = 0.018).

Conclusion

None of the urinary biomarkers in the initial urine sample demonstrated an independent association with AKI diagnosis or 30-day survival status in patients with sepsis presenting to the ED. Further studies with larger population are necessary to confirm its clinical utility and explore its role.

Moving toward a contemporary classification of drug-induced kidney disease

Drug-induced kidney disease (DIKD) accounts for about one-fourth of all cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients, especially in critically ill setting. There is no standard definition or classification system of DIKD. To address this, a phenotype definition of DIKD using expert consensus was introduced in 2015. Recently, a novel framework for DIKD classification was proposed that incorporated functional change and tissue damage biomarkers. Medications were stratified into four categories, including "dysfunction without damage," "damage without dysfunction," "both dysfunction and damage," and "neither dysfunction nor damage" using this novel framework along with predominant mechanism(s) of nephrotoxicity for drugs and drug classes. Here, we briefly describe mechanisms and provide examples of drugs/drug classes related to the categories in the proposed framework. In addition, the possible movement of a patient's kidney disease between certain categories in specific conditions is considered. Finally, opportunities and barriers to adoption of this framework for DIKD classification in real clinical practice are discussed. This new classification system allows congruencies for DIKD with the proposed categorization of AKI, offering clarity as well as consistency for clinicians and researchers.

The value of urinary interleukin-18 in predicting acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

The aim of this study was to systematically review relevant studies to evaluate the value of urinary interleukin-18 (uIL-18) in predicting acute kidney injury (AKI).

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for literature published up to 1 August 2022. Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was applied to assess the literature quality. Then, relevant data were extracted from each eligible study and a random-effects regression model was utilized to pool sensitivity, specificity, and construct summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) and area under curve (AUC).

Results

Twenty-six studies with 7183 patients were enrolled and relevant information was extracted. The estimated sensitivity and specificity of uIL-18 in the diagnosis of AKI were 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54–0.73) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.71–0.83), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 6.08 (95%CI: 3.63–10.18), and the AUC of uIL-18 in predicting AKI was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.74–0.81). Subgroup analysis showed that uIL-18 in pediatric patients was more effective in predicting AKI than in adults (DOR: 7.33 versus 5.75; AUC: 0.81 versus 0.77).

Conclusions

Urinary IL-18 could be a relatively good biomarker with moderate predictive value for AKI, especially in pediatric patients. However, further research and clinical settings are still needed to validate our findings.

The Issue of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients after Cardiac Surgery

Cardiac surgery associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is a common complication of cardiac surgery resulting from the patient's exposure to a complex combination of factors in the perioperative period. Current diagnostic criteria for AKI may underestimate the incidence of this complication due to certain specific features of cardiac surgery patients. The introduction of new diagnostic biomarkers of kidney injury into clinical practice has shown the prospective of identifying patients in the early stages of CSA-AKI development. Accurate and timely identification of patients at high risk of developing CSA-AKI can also allow performing comprehensive interventions to prevent it. When diagnosed, CSA-AKI management limited to symptomatic treatment.

Nephrology Considerations in the Management of Durable and Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

Durable and temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use is growing for a range of cardiovascular indications. Kidney dysfunction is common in people evaluated for or receiving durable or temporary MCS and portends worse outcomes. This kidney dysfunction can be due to preexisting kidney chronic kidney disease (CKD), acute kidney injury (AKI) related to acute cardiovascular disease necessitating MCS, AKI due to cardiac procedures, and acute and chronic MCS effects and complications. Durable MCS, with implantable continuous flow pumps, is used for long-term support in advanced heart failure refractory to guideline-directed medical and device therapy, either permanently or as a bridge to heart transplantation. Temporary MCS-encompassing in this review intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP), axial flow pumps, centrifugal flow pumps, and venoarterial ECMO-is used for diverse situations: high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), acute decompensated heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and resuscitation after cardiac arrest. The wide adoption of MCS makes it imperative to improve understanding of the effects of MCS on kidney health/function and of kidney health/function on MCS outcomes. The complex structure and functions of the kidney, and the complex health states of individuals receiving MCS, makes investigations in this area challenging, and current knowledge is limited. Fortunately, the increasing nephrology toolbox of noninvasive kidney health/function assessments may enable development and testing of individualized management strategies and therapeutics in the future. We review technology, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical considerations, and future directions in MCS and nephrology.