A Review of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Stage 5 or End-Stage Kidney Disease

The Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Kidney Injury

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over warfarin for many indications, though their safety has not been well established in patients with acute renal impairment.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of bleeding complications associated with DOACs compared with warfarin in patients admitted to the hospital with acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients admitted to the Penn Medicine Lancaster General Hospital with a diagnosis of AKI from October 2017 through September 2021 and receiving therapy with oral anticoagulants. Comparing DOACs with warfarin, the primary endpoint was the percent frequency of composite major and minor bleeding during the admission and within 30 days of discharge.

RESULTS

There were 112 hospitalization encounters included in the study. Of these, 42 (37.5%) patients were receiving warfarin and 70 (62.5%) patients were receiving DOAC therapy before admission. There was a higher frequency of the primary endpoint of bleeding in patients receiving DOACs as compared with warfarin, though this was not statistically significant (18.5% vs. 11.9%, respectively, P = 0.432). There were no differences between groups in the frequency of major bleeding, minor bleeding, or transfusions. Patients receiving DOAC therapy were more likely to experience anticoagulation-related readmissions or emergency department visits compared with patients on warfarin therapy (11.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin were associated with statistically similar rates of bleeding in patients presenting with AKI. Further research is necessary to elucidate if DOACs are safer than warfarin in this patient population.

Phenotype-directed clinically driven low-dose direct oral anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation

Clinically-driven dose reduction of direct oral anticoagulants in individuals with atrial fibrillation is prevalent worldwide. However, a paucity of evidence to tailor dose selection remained as clinical unmet need. Current doses of anticoagulant were determined largely by landmark clinical trials, in which the enrolled subjects were carefully selected and without major comorbidities. Our study reviewed the relevant real-world studies in specific patient phenotypes, including renal and hepatic diseases, elderly, low body weight, Asians and presence of concomitant drug-drug interactions. Thorough investigations toward the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in reduced doses will facilitate substituting current universal approach with individualized prescriptions.

Pharmacist Practice Patterns Regarding Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, little is known regarding pharmacists' practice patterns and preferences in clinical areas of contention, such as initiation dosing, obesity, and renal impairment. Objective: To determine pharmacist trends in practice regarding DOACs for the treatment of VTE overall and within areas of clinical controversy. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to pharmacists in the United States through national and state pharmacy organizations. Responses were collected for 30 days. Results: One hundred fifty-three complete responses were submitted. The majority of pharmacists preferred apixaban (90.2%) for the oral treatment of venous thromboembolism. When initiating apixaban or rivaroxaban for a new VTE, 76% and 64% of pharmacists surveyed, respectively, state the duration of the initiation dose phases are reduced if the patient received parenteral anticoagulation. Fifty-eight percent of pharmacists used body mass index to evaluate the appropriateness of DOACs in obese patients whereas 42% used total body weight. Preference for rivaroxaban (31.4%) was higher in this population compared to the global population (10%). Apixaban was preferred for patients with renal impairment (92.2%). However, as creatinine clearance as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation (CrCl) reduced to ≤15 milliliters/minute (mL/min), preference for warfarin increased (36%). Conclusion: This national survey of pharmacists demonstrated an overall preference for apixaban and significant variability in practice patterns regarding DOACs for patients with new VTE, patients with obesity, and patients with renal impairment. Further research is warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOAC initiation dosing phase modifications. Prospective evaluations of DOACs in obese and renal dysfunction populations would confirm the safety and efficacy of DOACs in these populations.

Wearables in Nephrology: Fanciful Gadgetry or Prêt-à-Porter?

Telemedicine and digitalised healthcare have recently seen exponential growth, led, in part, by increasing efforts to improve patient flexibility and autonomy, as well as drivers from financial austerity and concerns over climate change. Nephrology is no exception, and daily innovations are underway to provide digitalised alternatives to current models of healthcare provision. Wearable technology already exists commercially, and advances in nanotechnology and miniaturisation mean interest is also garnering clinically. Here, we outline the current existing wearable technology pertaining to the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with a spectrum of kidney disease, give an overview of wearable dialysis technology, and explore wearables that do not yet exist but would be of great interest. Finally, we discuss challenges and potential pitfalls with utilising wearable technology and the factors associated with successful implementation.

Evaluation of standard versus reduced dose apixaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe renal disease (ESRD-VTE)

BACKGROUND

There are no clear dosing recommendations when using apixaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in patients with severe or end-stage renal disease; clinical trials excluded patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) <25 mL/min or on dialysis. This study compares bleeding rates in patients with severe or end-stage renal disease taking standard versus reduced dose apixaban for VTE treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records between January 1, 2013, and August 31, 2021. This study included patients 18 years or older who had severe or end-stage renal disease when prescribed apixaban for VTE treatment. Severe or end-stage renal disease was defined as at least one of the following: CrCl <25 mL/min, SCr >2.5 mg/dL, CKD stage 4 or 5, or on dialysis. The primary endpoint was rate of clinically relevant bleeding within six months of starting apixaban. Secondary endpoints were VTE recurrence within six months of starting apixaban, time to clinically relevant bleed, and time to VTE recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients were included in the final analysis (n = 125 on 5 mg; n = 78 on 2.5 mg). Clinically relevant bleeding rate was significantly higher in the standard dose group (14.4 % vs 3.8 %, p = 0.02). Rates of VTE recurrence appear similar (6.4 % vs 7.7 %, p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

A reduced dose of apixaban may be considered when treating VTE in patients with severe or end-stage renal disease.