Aminoglycoside dosing considerations in intensive care unit patients

Aminoglycoside Dosing and Volume of Distribution in Critically Ill Surgery Patients

Background: At a tertiary referral and Level I trauma center, current institutional guidelines suggest initial aminoglycoside doses of gentamicin or tobramycin 4 mg/kg and amikacin 16 mg/kg for patients admitted to surgical intensive care units (SICUs) with suspected gram-negative infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate initial aminoglycoside dosing and peak serum drug concentrations in critically ill surgery patients to characterize the aminoglycoside volume of distribution (V_d) and determine an optimal standardized dosing strategy. Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study included adult SICU patients who received an aminoglycoside for additional gram-negative coverage. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the patient population, aminoglycoside dosing, and V_d. Multivariable linear regression was applied to determine variables associated with greater aminoglycoside V_d. The mortality rate was compared in patients who achieved adequate initial peak concentrations versus those who did not. Results: One hundred seventeen patients received an aminoglycoside in the SICUs, of whom 58 had an appropriately timed peak concentration measurement. The mean Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 27.8 ± 8.9. The V_d in patients receiving gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin was 0.49 ± 0.10, 0.41 ± 0.09, and 0.53 ± 0.13 L/kg, respectively. Together, the mean aminoglycoside V_d was 0.50 ± 0.12 L/kg. Gentamicin or tobramycin 5 mg/kg achieved goal peak concentrations in 24 patients (63.2%), and amikacin 20 mg/kg achieved the desired concentrations in nine patients (50.0%). Net fluid status, Body Mass Index, and vasopressor use were not predictive of V_d. There was no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate in patients who achieved adequate peak concentrations versus those who did not (26.8% versus 26.7%; p = 0.99). Conclusion: High aminoglycoside doses are needed in critically ill surgery patients to achieve adequate initial peak concentrations because of the high V_d. Goal peak concentrations were optimized at doses of gentamicin or tobramycin 5 mg/kg, and amikacin 20 mg/kg.

Neurological and Psychiatric Adverse Effects of Antimicrobials

Antimicrobials are a widely used class of medications, but several of them are associated with neurological and psychiatric side effects. The exact incidence of neurotoxicity with anti-infectives is unknown, although it is estimated to be < 1%. Neurotoxicity occurs with all classes of antimicrobials, such as antibiotics, antimycobacterials, antivirals, antifungals and antiretrovirals, with side effects ranging from headaches, anxiety and depression to confusion, delirium, psychosis, mania and seizures, among others. It is important to consider these possible side effects to prevent misdiagnosis or delayed treatment as drug withdrawal can be associated with reversibility in most cases. This article highlights the different neurotoxic effects of a range of antimicrobials, discusses proposed mechanisms of onset and offers general management recommendations. The effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiome and how they may ultimately affect cognition is also briefly examined.

Extended-Interval Dosing of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients

Although aminoglycosides remain an essential part of therapy of severe gram-negative infections in critically ill patients, the use of extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing (EIAD) in this population is highly controversial. The rationale for EIAD is based on major pharmacodynamic characteristics of the aminoglycosides, which include concentration-dependent bactericidal effects, postantibiotic effect, and adaptive resistance. Alterations in the pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides in the critically ill have been well documented, including changes in both drug distribution and elimination. These pharmacokinetic alterations may prevent critically ill patients from realizing the potential benefits of EIAD by reducing serum concentrations achieved by recommended EIAD regimens and may perhaps place patients at risk of therapeutic failure. Although numerous studies of EIAD have been conducted, there is a lack of data specifically concerning the efficacy and safety of EIAD in the critically ill. The most appropriate methods for monitoring EIAD in this population are also not clearly established. There are thus many questions regarding the suitability of EIAD in the critically ill. This article briefly reviews the rationale for EIAD and data related to the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and clinical monitoring of EIAD in critically ill patients. Considerations and recommendations for use of EIAD in the critically ill are provided.

Plasma Peak and Trough Gentamicin Concentrations in Hospitalized Horses Receiving Intravenously Administered Gentamicin

Background

Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antimicrobial commonly used in horses at 6.6 mg/kg IV once daily. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can confirm desired peak concentration is reached for common bacterial isolates, and detect toxicosis associated with high trough values.

Objectives

Determine the relationship between gentamicin dose and plasma concentration in hospitalized horses, and identify a starting dose range to achieve peaks > 32 μg/mL.

Animals

Sixty‐five horses (2002–2010) receiving once‐daily gentamicin with TDM performed (N = 99 sets).

Methods

Retrospective study. Data from hospitalized horses including weight, dose, plasma peak, and trough gentamicin concentration, creatinine concentrations and presence of focal or systemic disease were collected from medical records. Peak concentrations measured 25–35 minutes after administration were included (N = 77). Data were divided into low (<7.7 mg/kg), medium (7.7–9.7 mg/kg) and high (>9.7 mg/kg) dose groups, and were grouped by the horse having focal or systemic disease.

Results

Peak concentrations resulting from doses ≥7.7 mg/kg were 5.74 μg/mL (SE 2.1 μg/mL) greater than peaks from doses <7.7 mg/kg (P = .007). Peak concentrations was 3.6 times more likely to be >32 μg/mL if dose was ≥7.7 mg/kg (P = .04). There were no significant effects of dose on trough or creatinine concentration. At a given dose, horses with focal disease had higher peaks than those with systemic disease (P = .039).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

These data suggest gentamicin dosage should be individually determined in horses using TDM, but support an initial once‐daily dose of 7.7–9.7 mg/kg IV to achieve peaks >32 μg/mL and trough concentrations <2 μg/mL. Further studies evaluating the safety of doses >6.6 mg/kg are required.

Dose derivation of once-daily dosing guidelines for gentamicin in critically ill pediatric patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine dose and eligibility criteria for once-daily dosing (ODD) of gentamicin in critically ill pediatric patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit or Cardiac Critical Care Unit at The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) who received traditionally dosed intravenous (IV) gentamicin (January 2008 to June 2010). Statistically significant patient characteristics associated with gentamicin pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined by multiple linear regression. Binary partitioning was used to set critical values for these characteristics to derive dose for ODD of gentamicin. Feasibility of implementing ODD of gentamicin in critically ill children was assessed using individualized PK parameters to simulate area under the concentration-time curves and drug-free intervals while targeting a maximum concentration (C(max)) of 16-20 mg/L. Eligibility criteria were determined by patient characteristics that had a statistically significant impact on gentamicin PK.

RESULTS

Volume of distribution (V(d)) and elimination rate constant (k(e)) were calculated for 140 patients. Weight and admission unit were significantly associated with weight-normalized V(d) (Vd/kg), whereas age and serum creatinine (SCr) were significantly associated with k(e). Weight <5 kg and SCr ≥20% over age-specific upper normal limit before gentamicin initiation were associated with prolonged gentamicin elimination. Gentamicin 6 mg/kg IV every 24 hours, the dose at which the highest percentage of patients achieved C(max), area under the curve, and drug-free interval within target ranges simultaneously, was selected as the proposed ODD regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen of gentamicin 6 mg/kg IV every 24 hours for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit/Cardiac Critical Care Unit patients at SickKids weighing ≥5 kg with SCr <20% above age-specific upper normal limit before initiation of gentamicin is proposed.

Aminoglycoside-induced nephrotoxicity

Aminoglycosides are among the oldest antibiotics available to treat serious infections caused by primarily, Gram-negative bacteria. The most commonly utilized parenteral agents in this class include gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin. Aminoglycosides are concentration-dependent, bactericidal agents that undergo active transport into the cell where they inhibit protein synthesis on the 30S subunit of the bacterial ribosome. As the use of aminoglycosides became more widespread, the toxic effects of these agents, most notably ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity, became more apparent. When other, safer, antimicrobial agents became available, the use of aminoglycosides sharply declined. The development of multi-drug resistance among bacteria has now lead clinicians to reexamine the role of the aminoglycosides in the treatment of serious infections. This review will revisit the mechanism and risk factors for the development of aminoglycoside-induced nephrotoxicity, as well as strategies to prevent patients from developing nephrotoxicity.

Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Isepamicin in Febrile Neutropenic Cancer Patients and in Women with Acute Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of isepamicin were studied in 8 febrile neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancy and in 20 young women with acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Isepamicin was given as a slow intravenous infusion over 30 min at a dose of 15 mg/kg once daily (OD). Serum levels of isepamicin were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and PK analyses were obtained based on a one-compartment open model after 24 hours (steady state) and after 7 days. On day 1, the volume of distribution (Vd) of isepamicin, for both populations, appeared about 30% higher than classically reported in healthy individuals: 0.31 and 0.36 L/kg for neutropenic and PID patients respectively. However on day 7, Vd displayed significant reduction (0.28 and 0.27 L/kg, respectively for neutropenic and PID patients). A reduction of isepamicin clearance was also observed between day 1 and day 7 (137 vs 120 mL/min and 130 vs 101 mL/min for neutropenic and PID populations, respectively). Such changes are consistent with a significant increase in the Cmax concentrations (45 vs 50 mg/L, and 38 vs 49 mg/L) and in the AUC (136 vs 158 and 137 vs 162 mg/L.h) observed after a week of treatment in neutropenic and PID patients, respectively. In conclusion, taking into account the importance of reaching early active concentrations, we recommend the use of higher loading dose of isepamicin (>15 mg/kg) in neutropenic cancer patients and in women with PID, particularly in case of a combination with a possibly ineffective antibacterial agent, in case of infection with bacteria at upper limit of susceptibility, in the presence of high infectious inoculum or in the presence of sequestered sites of infection.

Once versus individualized multiple daily dosing of aminoglycosides in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the once daily dosing (ODD) program in critically ill Egyptian patients compared to individualized multiple daily dosing (MDD) in terms of clinical and bacteriological efficacy. In addition, the incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with both regimens in this specific group of patients was assessed.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with suspected or confirmed bacterial infections admitted to the Critical Care Medicine Department, Kasr El-Aini-Cairo University Hospitals comprised the study population. The amikacin group (30 patients) was sub-divided into 14 patients receiving amikacin ODD (1 g i.v.) and 16 patients receiving amikacin in MDD (500 mg i.v./dose). The gentamicin group (22 patients) was sub-divided into 10 patients receiving the drug ODD (240 mg i.v.) and 12 patients receiving gentamicin MDD (80 mg i.v./dose). Amikacin or gentamicin serum levels were determined by the enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique using Emit 2000. MDD regimen was adjusted based on the individual pharmacokinetic parameters using the Sawchuk-Zaske method.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two dosing regimens with regard to clinical and antibacterial efficacy or incidence of nephrotoxicity of both gentamicin and amikacin groups. In the ODD regimen, duration of treatment had no effect on increasing incidence of nephrotoxicity unlike the individualized MDD regimen. No dose adjustments were needed in the once daily dosing regimen since trough concentrations have never been above toxic level.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that the ODD regimen is preferred in critically ill patients to individualized MDD as shown by comparable efficacy, nephrotoxicity and lesser need for therapeutic drug monitoring and frequent dose adjustments required in the individualized MDD regimen.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterial agents

This article reviews pharmacodynamics of antibacterial drugs, which can be used to optimize treatment strategies, prevent emergence of resistance and rationalize the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility. Important pharmacodynamic concepts include the requirements for bactericidal therapy for endocarditis and meningitis, for synergistic combinations to treat enterococcal endocarditis or to shorten the course of antimicrobial therapy, for obtaining maximal plasma concentration/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratios that are greater than 10 or 24 hour-area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC)/MIC ratios that are greater than 100-125 for concentration-dependent agents against gram-negative bacilli and 25-35 against Streptococcus pneumoniae, and for obtaining percent of time that drug levels are greater than the MIC that is at least 40% to 50% of the dosing interval for time-dependent agents.

Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in critically ill patients: pilot study evaluating the first dose

Gentamicin is extensively used in the treatment of severe Gram-negative bacterial infections. A loading dose of 7 mg/kg is recommended to achieve a maximum concentration (C(max)) above 16 mg/L. We studied gentamicin pharmacokinetic data from patients treated between January 2006 and June 2008 in two intensive-care units. The Sawchuk and Zaske one-compartment pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate the gentamicin volume of distribution (the 32 patients had a median age of 68 years (23 men)). The median volume of distibution (V(d)) per kilogram of body weight (V(d)/kg) was 0.41 L/kg (interquartile range of 0.36-0.46 L/kg), with no correlations with age, Charlson comorbidity score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and creatinine serum level (r(2) = 0.016, 0.058, 0.037, and 0.067, respectively). Women had a significantly higher median V(d)/kg (0.50 vs. 0.40 L/kg, p 0.002) and lower C(max) (15.2 vs. 18.5 mg/L, p 0.016), despite similar dose/kg. In a logistic regression model, only sex (female: OR 0.032; 95% CI 0.03-0.387) and dose/kg (per mg/kg: OR 3.21; 95% CI 1.17-8.79) were significantly associated with the achievement of C(max) above 16 mg/L. Gentamicin clearance was 57 mL/min (interquartile range of 44.7-78 mL/min) and decreased with age (r(2) = 0.178, p 0.016), SOFA score (r(2) = 0.199, p 0.011) and creatinine clearance (r(2) = 0.258, p 0.003). Gentamicin V(d) was increased in critically ill patients, particularly in women. Therefore, high gentamicin loading doses should be given to all patients, especially women, independently of organ failure. Gentamicin clearance decreases with age, SOFA score, and renal failure.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of antibacterials in the Intensive Care Unit: setting appropriate dosing regimens

Patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are at very high risk of developing severe nosocomial infections. Consequently, antimicrobials are among the most important and commonly prescribed drugs in the management of these patients. Critically ill patients in ICUs include representatives of all age groups with a range of organ dysfunction related to severe acute illness that may complicate long-term illness. The range of organ dysfunction, together with drug interactions and other therapeutic interventions (e.g. haemodynamically active drugs and continuous renal replacement therapies), may strongly impact on antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. In the last decade, it has become apparent that the intrinsic pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties are the major determinants of in vivo efficacy of antimicrobial agents. PK/PD parameters are essential in facilitating the translation of microbiological activity into clinical situations, ensuring a successful outcome. In this review, we analyse the typical patterns of antimicrobial activity and the corresponding PK/PD parameters, with a special focus on a PK/PD dosing approach of the antimicrobial agent classes commonly utilised in the ICU setting.

Medication-related complications in the trauma patient

Trauma patients are twice as likely to have adverse reactions to medication as nontrauma patients. The need for medication in trauma patients is high. Surgery is often necessary, and immunosuppression and hypercoagulability may be present. Adverse drug events can be caused in part by altered pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and polypharmacy. Medications may also have serious long-term adverse effects, which must be considered. It is not the purpose of this review article to discuss all adverse effects of all medications. This article will discuss the more common adverse effects of medications for trauma patients in the acute care setting, in the following categories: pain control, sedation, antibiotics, seizure prophylaxis in head trauma, atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism prophylaxis, hemodynamic support, adrenal insufficiency, factor VIIa.

Audiologic monitoring of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis patients on aminoglycoside treatment with long term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis has emerged as a significant problem with the resurfacing of tuberculosis and thus the need to use the second line drugs with the resultant increased incidence of adverse effects. We discuss the effect of second line aminoglycoside anti-tubercular drugs on the hearing status of MDR-TB patients.

METHODS

Sixty four patients were put on second line aminoglycoside anti-TB drugs. These were divided into three groups: group I, 34 patients using amikacin, group II, 26 patients using kanamycin and group III, 4 patients using capreomycin.

RESULTS

Of these, 18.75% of the patients developed sensorineural hearing loss involving higher frequencies while 6.25% had involvement of speech frequencies also. All patients were seen again approximately one year after aminoglycoside discontinuation and all hearing losses were permanent with no threshold improvement.

CONCLUSION

Aminoglycosides used in MDR-TB patients may result in irreversible hearing loss involving higher frequencies and can become a hearing handicap as speech frequencies are also involved in some of the patients thus underlining the need for regular audiologic evaluation in patients of MDR-TB during the treatment.

Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial drugs

Knowledge of the antimicrobial pharmacodynamic characteristics of a drug (inhibition of growth, rate and extent of bactericidal action, and postantibiotic effect) provides a more rational basis for determination of optimal dosing regimens in terms of the dose and the dosing interval. This article reviews concepts of antimicrobial pharmacodynamics, the effect of pharmacodynamics on the emergence of resistant bacterial subpopulations, and the development of pharmacodynamic breakpoints for use in the design of trials of these drugs and in treatment of infected patients.

Comparison of two methods to obtain a desired first isepamicin peak in intensive care patients

A randomized multicenter study in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, evaluated the capacity of a Bayesian method to obtain an optimal first isepamicin (ISP) peak of 80 mg/L in comparison to a fixed loading dose (LD). Patients (n=236) over 18 years of age were enrolled from 6 September 1997 to 17 July 1999 and randomly assigned to received ISP in a calculated dose (CD) or a loading dose (LD) of 25 mg/kg body weight. The CD was estimated using a specific population model with Bayesian methodology implemented in the PKS program (Abbott PKS, Abbott Diagnostics, Rungis, France). The data required included age, body weight, height, gender and serum creatinine. ISP disposition is described by a one-compartment model. Blood samples were drawn 1 and 24 h after the start of infusion for fluorescence polarization immunoassay measurement of serum ISP concentrations. The predictive performance was assessed by computing bias and precision. Peak concentrations were significantly higher in CD group than the LD group (84.2 +/- 28.6 vs. 74.7 +/- 24.1 mg/L, respectively; P=0.008), but trough levels were comparable. The optimal ISP peak was attained by a significantly higher percentage of CD patients (P=0.018), and by significantly more CD patients on mechanical ventilation (P=0.025), and with simplified acute physiological scores (SAPS) > 35 (P=0.002). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for the two groups with large interindividual variations. Mean (+/- SD) volume of distribution of ventilated patients (72%) was significantly higher than of nonventilated patients (23.31 +/- 7.35 vs. 20.60 +/- 6.30 L, respectively; P=0.001). No relationship was found between the volume of distribution and SAPS. Total clearance was significantly correlated with estimated CLCR (creatinine clearance) (P=0.0001). Precision (RMSE) is better for CD than for LD strategy, respectively 27.96 and 28.66 mg/L. The Bayesian method was significantly more accurate and performed particularly well in ventilated patients and patients with high SAPS, compare to an LD of 25 mg/kg to obtain a first ISP peak of 80 mg/L in ICU patients. Therefore, a fixed dose of 28.5 mg/kg would be also adequate to reach a peak of 80 mg/L.

Gentamicin for the practicing urologist: review of efficacy, single daily dosing and "switch" therapy

PURPOSE

We review the literature on gentamicin, including single daily dosing and "switch" therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used MEDLINE to search the literature from 1966 to June 1997, and then manually searched bibliographies to identify studies that our initial search might have missed.

RESULTS

Gentamicin has attractive characteristics, including wide spectrum, infrequent resistance, economy and familiarity. Although limited by well known toxicities, gentamicin remains a drug of choice for serious Gram-negative infections. Dosing strategies, such as single daily dosing and switch therapy, have renewed enthusiasm for this time-honored drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin remains a valuable drug in urology. Once daily dosing and switch therapy offer the potential to increase effectiveness and convenience while decreasing toxicity and costs.

Prospective evaluation of the effect of an aminoglycoside dosing regimen on rates of observed nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity

The nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity associated with once-daily versus twice-daily administration of aminoglycosides was assessed in patients with suspected or proven gram-negative bacterial infections in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients who received therapy for >/=72 h were evaluated for toxicity. Patients also received concomitant antibiotics as deemed necessary for treatment of their infection. Plasma aminoglycoside concentrations, prospective aminoglycoside dosage adjustment, and serial audiologic and renal status evaluations were performed. The probability of occurrence of a nephrotoxic event and its relationship to doses and daily aminoglycoside exposure served as the main outcome measurement. One hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled in the study, with 83 patients receiving therapy for at least 72 h. For 74 patients plasma aminoglycoside concentrations were available for analysis, and the patients formed the group evaluable for toxicity. The primary infectious diagnosis for the patients who were enrolled in the study were bacteremia or sepsis, respiratory infections, skin and soft tissue infections, or urosepsis or pyelonephritis. Of the 74 patients evaluable for toxicity, 39 received doses twice daily and 35 received doses once daily and a placebo 12 h later. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 6 of 39 (15.4%) patients who received aminoglycosides twice daily and 0 of 35 patients who received aminoglycosides once daily. The schedule of aminoglycoside administration, concomitant use of vancomycin, and daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for the aminoglycosides were found to be significant predictors of nephrotoxicity by multivariate logistic regression analysis (P Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Aged
• Aged, 80 and over
• Aminoglycosides
• Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage
• Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects
• Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics
• Double-Blind Method
• Drug Administration Schedule
• Female
• Hearing/drug effects
• Humans
• Kidney/drug effects
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Prospective Studies

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

M J Rybak The Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Services, Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center, College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
B J Abate
S L Kang
M J Ruffing
S A Lerner
G L Drusano

Collapse

Population pharmacokinetics of aminoglycoside antibiotics in patients with cystic fibrosis

The population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin and tobramycin were investigated in a group of 51 young adults with cystic fibrosis. Their ages ranged from 14-35 years, weights from 38-82 kg, and 27 of the patients were female. None of the patients had renal impairment, but 3 patients were treated in the intensive therapy unit (ITU) during one of their courses of therapy. Data comprised 219 courses of therapy and 544 concentrations (mean: 11 per patient). Concentration-time data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model package (NONMEM) and were best described by a one-compartment model. Factors identified as potentially influencing aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics were added in a stepwise fashion and the best model found that drug clearance and volume of distribution were related to body surface area and admission to ITU. The mean population estimates were a clearance of 2.89 L/hr/m2 and a volume of distribution of 9.21 L/m2 with a 60% increase in patients who were admitted to ITU. Interpatient variability in clearance and volume were 14% and 8%, respectively. The results suggested that a dose of 120 mg/m2 should achieve an average 1 hour postdose peak of 10 mg/L and trough of <1 mg/L and that higher doses might be required in ITU patients.

The use of antimicrobials in ten Australian and New Zealand intensive care units. The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Multicentre Studies Group Investigators

A prospective standardized collection of clinical, microbiological and pharmaceutical information on antibiotic use was conducted in Australia and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs) involving 481 consecutive critically ill patients who were receiving antibiotics for any reason while in ICU. Patients had a mean SAPS II score of 34.1 +/- 17.8 with an expected mortality of 15.6% (actual mortality 12%). Of these, 292 (60.8%) were admitted to the ICU within 72 hours of surgery. Among such surgical patients, 233 (79.9%) received antibiotics for "surgical prophylaxis" while in ICU (48% of sample population). The second largest group of patients treated with antibiotics in ICU included those with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and clinical suspicion of infection (38%). Antibiotics were prescribed for the treatment of clinically diagnosed infection in 268 patients. Clinical response was apparent in 62.6% and in most (71%) was achieved in the first 72 hours of treatment. The incidence of antimicrobial-related side-effects was 4%, mostly in the form of diarrhoea or rash (75% of all side-effects). The most commonly prescribed antimicrobials were gentamicin (n = 146), ceftriaxone (n = 98), vancomycin (n = 94) and metronidazole (n = 111). Three times daily prescription of aminoglycosides was uncommon (< 1%). Forty-one patients had a documented infection (positive culture) with a gram-negative organism. Of these, 17 received therapy with a single antibiotic and 24 received therapy with two antibiotics. Despite similar illness severity, there were six deaths in the former group and only two in the latter.

Review of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents

Pharmacokinetics is a science that has long been used in ascertaining the appropriate antimicrobial dose. It refers to the disposition of drugs in the body and includes absorption, bioavailability, distribution, protein binding, metabolism, and elimination. Pharmacodynamics is a newer science that relates to the interaction between the drug concentration at the site of action over time and the desired antimicrobial effect. This article reviews the principles of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as well as the clinical application of these two sciences to design antimicrobial dosing regimens for optimal results in individual patients.

Validation of the Hartford nomogram in trauma surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Hartford nomogram for once-daily aminoglycoside dosing in trauma surgery patients.

METHODS

A chart review was performed in trauma surgery patients who were started on once-daily aminoglycoside therapy. A peak aminoglycoside concentration was drawn 30 minutes after the end of the first or second infusion, and a random concentration was drawn approximately 10 hours after the dose. The 10-hour random concentration was used to validate the Hartford nomogram by predicting the actual dosing interval (determined by extrapolating the peak and random concentrations to achieve a trough concentration <1 mg/L). The percentage of intervals accurately predicted by the nomogram was determined.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (34 men and 15 women), age 43.0+/-15.9 y, total body weight 81.3+/-24.5 kg, ideal body weight 68.1+/-10.7 kg, dosing body weight (DBW) 72.0+/-14.4 kg, and estimated creatinine clearance [Cl(cr)] 89.5+/-20.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 were evaluated. Patients received 505+/-105 mg (7.0+/-0.4 mg/kg) of either gentamicin or tobramycin per dose. The concentration 30 minutes after the infusion was 22.4+/-5.9 mg/L, the concentration at the end of the dosing interval was 0.20+/-0.46 mg/L, the 10-hour random concentration was 2.6+/-1.8 mg/L, the elimination rate constant was 0.26+/-0.08 h(-1), the elimination half-life was 3.0+/-1.2 hours, and the volume of distribution was 19.9+/-7.9 L (0.28+/-0.09 L/kg of DBW). Ninety-eight percent (48/49) of the intervals were accurately predicted by the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

In trauma surgery patients with Cl(cr) of more than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the Hartford nomogram using a single random aminoglycoside concentration accurately predicted the same once-daily aminoglycoside intervals as determined by two concentrations. Less aggressive therapeutic drug monitoring in this patient subpopulation can lead to significant cost savings.

Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults

Critically ill patients exhibit a range of organ dysfunctions and often require treatment with a variety of drugs including sedatives, analgesics, neuromuscular blockers, antimicrobials, inotropes and gastric acid suppressants. Understanding how organ dysfunction can alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs is a vital aspect of therapy in this patient group. Many drugs will need to be given intravenously because of gastrointestinal failure. For those occasions on which the oral route is possible, bioavailability may be altered by hypomotility, changes in gastrointestinal pH and enteral feeding. Hepatic and renal dysfunction are the primary determinants of drug clearance, and hence of steady-state drug concentrations, and of efficacy and toxicity in the individual patient. Oxidative metabolism is the main clearance mechanism for many drugs and there is increasing recognition of the importance of decreased activity of the hepatic cytochrome P450 system in critically ill patients. Renal failure is equally important with both filtration and secretion clearance mechanisms being required for the removal of parent drugs and their active metabolites. Changes in the steady-state volume of distribution are often secondary to renal failure and may lower the effective drug concentrations in the body. Failure of the central nervous system, muscle, the endothelial system and endocrine system may also affect the pharmacokinetics of specific drugs. Time-dependency of alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters is well documented for some drugs. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology in the critically ill and applying pharmacokinetic principles in selection of drug and dose regimen is, therefore, crucial to optimising the pharmacodynamic response and outcome.

Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in intensive care unit patients

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and to analyse whether these patients show different kinetic behaviour on the basis of their clinical diagnoses.

METHOD

The patient population comprised 104 medical ICU patients on amikacin treatment for several presumed or documented Gram-negative infections. Four study groups were defined according to patients' clinical diagnosis: sepsis group (n = 39), trauma group (n = 20), pneumonia group (n = 21) and 'other diagnosis' group (n = 24). The pharmacokinetic parameters for amikacin in these patients were then compared.

RESULTS

The ICU patients were found to have increased values for the amikacin volume of distribution (0.52 +/- 0.21 litres/kg), whereas total amikacin clearance expressed as a linear function of creatinine clearance was Cl (ml/min/kg) = 0.13 +/- 0.86 ClCR, which is not significantly different from other estimations reported in the literature. However, this relationship revealed statistically significant differences among the four groups of ICU patients. Moreover, the septic and trauma patients showed higher (but not statistically significant) values for the amikacin volume of distribution.

CONCLUSION

The amikacin pharmacokinetic parameters obtained should allow Bayesian individualization of amikacin doses in patients admitted to medical ICUs, on the basis of their clinical diagnoses.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily amikacin in combination with ceftazidime in critically ill adults with severe gram-negative infections

Forty critically ill adult patients with severe Gram-negative infection were treated with once-daily amikacin combined with ceftazidime. The mean age was 56.6 +/- 19 years and mean APACHE II score was 22.7 +/- 6.6. Forty percent of patients required mechanical ventilation. The mean creatinine clearance at onset of therapy was 59.4 +/- 28 ml/min. All bacterial isolates were sensitive to amikacin. Fixed doses of amikacin 15 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, and 8 mg/kg body weight were given once daily to patients with estimated creatinine clearance of > 80 ml/min., 50-80 ml/min., and < 50 ml/min, respectively. Forty-two causative gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 40 patients. The most common bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18), and Escherichia coli (10). Overall clinical success and bacteriological eradication occurred in 85% and 87.5% of patients; 78.9% and 79% of patients with hospital-acquired infections; 90.5% and 95.2% of patients with community-acquired infections; and 62.5% and 81.3% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, respectively. Therapeutic failure was documented in 15% of patients. Death due to infection was scored in two patients. The remaining were all due to persistence of the initial causative bacteria in patients with hospital-acquired infections. Persistence was documented with Ps. aeruginosa (2), Serratia spp. (1), and Acinetobacter spp. (1). Overall mortality occurred in 22.5% patients. Death unrelated to infection occurred in 7 patients. There was no clinical evidence of ototoxicity in any of our patients, however, nephrotoxicity was documented in 5%. In conclusion, once-daily amikacin combined with ceftazidime is practical, efficacious and probably safe in critically ill infected patients.

Antibiotic use in the emergency department. II The aminoglycosides, macrolides, tetracyclines, sulfa drugs, and urinary antiseptics

The aminoglycoside, macrolide, tetracycline, and sulfa classes of antibiotics provide antimicrobial coverage pertinent to many infectious diseases diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). The aminoglycosides are parenteral agents that are useful in Gram-negative infections and as synergistic drugs in the management of some Gram-positive infections. The macrolides, of which erythromycin is the prototype, are used for a number of Gram-positive and atypical bacterial infections, while the tetracyclines are appropriate for ED treatment of a diverse group of infections such as chlamydiae, spirochetes, and rickettsiae. The sulfa agents are appropriate for many urinary and respiratory tract infections, and also have particular utility in some infections encountered primarily in patients with AIDS. The urinary antiseptics are a group of antimicrobials that may be effective for cystitis but have no systemic efficacy. This article, which is the second in a four-part series on antibiotic use in the ED, reviews the pharmacology and clinical utility of these diverse agents for the emergency physician.

Population pharmacokinetic study of isepamicin with intensive care unit patients

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of isepamicin, a new aminoglycoside, were studied in 85 intensive care unit (ICU) patients and were compared with those observed in 10 healthy volunteers. A parametric method based on a nonlinear mixed-effect model was used to assess population PK. Isepamicin was given intravenously over 0.5 h at dosages of 15 mg/kg once daily or 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. The data were fitted to a bicompartmental open model. Compared with healthy volunteers, the mean values of the PK parameters were profoundly modified in ICU patients: elimination clearance was reduced by 48%, the volume of distribution in the central compartment (Vc) was increased by 50%, the peripheral volume of distribution was 70% higher, the distribution clearance was 146% lower, and the elimination half-life was ca. 3.4 times higher. The interindividual variability in PK parameters was about 50% in ICU patients. Five covariates (body weight [BW], simplified acute physiology score [SAPS], temperature, serum creatinine level, and creatinine clearance [CLCR]) were tentatively correlated with PK parameters by multivariate linear regression analysis with stepwise addition and deletion. The variability of isepamicin clearance was explained by three covariates (BW, SAPS, and CLCR), that of Vc was explained by BW and SAPS, and that of the elimination half-life was explained by CLCR and SAPS. Simulation of the concentration-versus-time profile for 500 individuals showed that the mean peak (0.75 h) concentration was 18% lower in ICU patients than in healthy volunteers and that the range in ICU patients was very broad (28.4 to 95.4 mg/liter). Therefore, monitoring of the isepamicin concentration is in ICU patients is mandatory.

Aminoglycosides

Despite their nephrotoxic and ototoxic side effects, AG remain useful antibiotics because of their major, rapid, and dose-dependent bactericidal effects. Combination therapy with an AG appears particularly important in neutropenic and other high-risk patients to provide broad-spectrum bactericidal activity, synergism, and reduction of emergence of resistant pathogens. OD AG therapy is associated with high peak levels in serum that maintain efficacy and low-to-undetectable trough levels in serum that attenuate the risk of toxicity. Administration of short-term OD AG therapy to patients not at risk without renal impairment may not absolutely require dosing monitoring. This therapeutic strategy has been proved useful in clinical trials, now including febrile episodes in neutropenic patients, but it should be avoided during infections in which antimicrobial synergism is required, such as enterococcal endocarditis.