Desogestrel, norgestimate, and gestodene: the newer progestins

The progestin revolution 2: progestins are now a dominant player in the tight interlink between contraceptive protection and bleeding control-plus more

The interlink between bleeding control and contraceptive development has always been an important factor. But after many years of advances in contraceptive technology, this interplay has resulted in development of safer and better contraceptive methods that often offer significantly less bleeding for women with both normal bleeding patterns as well as in those suffering from heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Recognition of the success of progestin-only methods, such as the hormonal IUDs, progestin dominant oral contraceptives, and the high dose progestin-only pill in substantially decreasing and controlling menstrual bleeding has led the way. This recognition also led to the development of many [non-contraceptive] protocols to stop acute heavy bleeding as well as manage long-term bleeding [using contraceptive methods as well; as non-contraceptive methods].But even better, there is a new PLUS. The distinct benefit and risk profiles of the many different progestins now available are intentionally being used either in combination contraceptive pills [COCPs] or alone, to add additional benefits, to decrease side effects and risks, and increase effectiveness and bleeding control.

The potent contraceptive gestodene exerts insulinotropic effects through its a-ring reduced metabolites with intrinsic estrogen-like activity in pancreatic β-cells

PURPOSE

The contraceptive gestodene is a potent synthetic progestin used in several low-dose contraceptive formulations. Clinical studies reported a relationship between long-term use of combined oral contraceptives containing gestodene (GDN) and profound alterations in glucose metabolism in women. The observation that contraceptive synthetic progestins exert hormone-like effects other than their progestational activities, prompted us to investigate whether GDN may induce estrogen-like effects, even though GDN does not interact with estrogen receptors. The aim of this study was to investigate whether GDN affect pancreatic β-cell activity, directly or through its conversion to other bioactive metabolites.

METHODS

The effects of GDN and its two derivatives 3β,5α-tetrahydro-GDN and 3α,5α-tetrahydro-GDN on insulin 2 (Ins II) and glucokinase (Gk) expression and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion were determined in pancreatic islets from female rats.

RESULTS

Gestodene did exert significant effects on islet β-cells activity. The most striking finding was that 3β,5α-tetrahydro-GDN and 3α,5α-tetrahydro-GDN had greater stimulatory effects on Ins II and Gk expression than that observed with GDN, consistent with their effects on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. The effects on gene expression induced by GDN-derivatives were abolished by ICI 182,780 and MPP. In addition, the presence of inhibitors of androgen and progestin-metabolizing enzymes eliminated gene expression induced by GDN. These results indicated that GDN is metabolized to A-ring reduced metabolites with estrogen-like activities and through this mechanism, GDN may affect β-cell activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, the data suggest that 19-nortestosterone-derived contraceptives such as GDN, possess insulinotropic effects through their conversion into metabolites with intrinsic estrogen-like activity in pancreatic β-cells.

Combined oral contraceptives and mental health: Are adolescence and the gut-brain axis the missing links?

Combined oral contraceptives (containing synthetic forms of estradiol and progestins) are one of the most commonly used drugs among females. However, their effects on the gut-brain axis have not been investigated to a great extent despite clear evidence that suggest bi-directional interactions between the gut microbiome and endogenous sex hormones. Moreover, oral contraceptives are prescribed during adolescence, a critical period of development during which several brain structures and systems, such as hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, undergo maturation. Considering that oral contraceptives could impact the developing adolescent brain and that these effects may be mediated by the gut-brain axis, further research investigating the effects of oral contraceptives on the gut-brain axis is imperative. This article briefly reviews evidence from animal and human studies on the effects of combined oral contraceptives on the brain and the gut microbiota particularly during adolescence.

Emerging concepts in male contraception: a narrative review of novel, hormonal and non-hormonal options

Access to reliable contraception is a pillar of modern society. The burden of unintended pregnancy has fallen disproportionately on the mother throughout human history; however, recent legal developments surrounding abortion have sparked a renewed interest in male factor contraceptives beyond surgical sterilization and condoms. Modern efforts to develop reversible male birth control date back nearly a century and initially focused on altering the hypothalamic-pituitary-testes axis. These hormonal contraceptives faced multiple barriers, including systemic side effects, challenging dosing regimens, unfavorable routes of delivery, and the public stigma surrounding steroid use. Novel hormonal agents are seeking to overcome these barriers by limiting the side effects and simplifying use. Non-hormonal contraceptives are agents that target various stages of spermatogenesis; such as inhibitors of retinoic acid, Sertoli cell-germ cell interactions, sperm ion channels, and other small molecular targets. The identification of reproductive tract-specific genes associated with male infertility has led to more targeted drug development, made possible by advances in CRISPR and proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs). Despite multiple human trials, no male birth control agents have garnered regulatory approval in the United States or abroad. This narrative review examines current and emerging male contraceptives, including hormonal and non-hormonal agents.

The effectiveness of desogestrel for endometrial protection in women with abnormal uterine bleeding-ovulatory dysfunction: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Women with chronic abnormal uterine bleeding-ovulatory dysfunction (AUB-O) are at increased risk of endometrial neoplasia. We conducted a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of two cyclic-progestin regimens orally administered 10 d/month for 6 months on endometrial protection and menstruation normalization in women with AUB-O. There were 104 premenopausal women with AUB-O randomized to desogestrel (DSG 150 µg/d, n = 50) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA 10 mg/d, n = 54) group. Both groups were comparable in age (44.8 ± 5.7 vs. 42.5 ± 7.1 years), body mass index (24.8 ± 4.7 vs. 24.9 ± 4.7 kg/m2), and AUB characteristics (100% irregular periods). The primary outcome was endometrial response rate (the proportion of patients having complete pseudodecidualization in endometrial biopsies during treatment cycle-1). The secondary outcome was clinical response rate (the proportion of progestin withdrawal bleeding episodes with acceptable bleeding characteristics during treatment cycle-2 to cycle-6). DSG was not inferior to MPA regarding the endometrial protection (endometrial response rate of 78.0% vs. 70.4%, 95% CI of difference − 9.1–24.4%, non-inferiority limit of − 10%), but it was less effective regarding the menstruation normalization (acceptable bleeding rate of 90.0% vs 96.6%, P = 0.016).

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02103764, date of approval 18 Feb 2014).

Trends and Factors Associated with Oral Contraceptive Use among Korean Women

Although oral contraceptives (OC) are widely used, few national-level epidemiologic studies have evaluated the prevalence of OC use and factors related to their use in Korea. We performed a population-based cross-sectional study on OC use by premenopausal women aged 20–59 years residing in Korea. We used secondary data from the 2010–2019 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to examine trends in the annual prevalence of OC use between 2010 and 2019, and factors influencing OC use. Based on data from 14,386 premenopausal women, the average annual prevalence of OC use was 8.2–10.7% between 2010 and 2014; it increased to 12.6–14.4% during 2015–2019. The prevalence of OC use was significantly higher in women with higher (≥5) than lower gravidity (<5). In addition, among sociodemographic factors, education level, household income, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking were significantly associated with OC use in Korean women. As OC use is affected by sociodemographic factors, a contraceptive plan that considers sociodemographic factors is needed to establish an effective family planning policy.

Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release

The stress response differs between women using hormonal contraception and naturally cycling women. Yet, despite ample evidence showing that the stress response differs across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, limited work has investigated whether the stress response differs across the hormonal contraceptive cycle, during which synthetic hormones are taken most of the month but not all of it. To induce a stress response, women using hormonal contraception completed the cold pressor test during either the active phase, when hormones are present, or during the inactive phase, when hormones are not present. Saliva was collected and assayed for free cortisol and progesterone levels prior to stress onset, immediately after stress termination, and 15-min post stress onset. Free cortisol and progesterone increased to a similar degree across both hormonal contraceptive phases in response to the cold pressor test. Post-hoc investigation indicates that the progestin “generation” (classification of synthetic progestins based on the compounds they are derived from) can differentially affect the free steroid response to cold pressor test stress, with the largest effects observed in women using formulations containing second-generation progestins. These findings indicate that progestin generation, particularly second-generation progestins, may have a more impactful influence on the stress response than hormonal contraceptive cycle phase. Potential mechanisms driving this effect and need for additional research are discussed.

Androgens in women: Hormone-modulating therapies for skin disease

Androgen-mediated cutaneous disorders (AMCDs) in women, including acne, hirsutism, and female pattern hair loss, can be treated with hormone-modulating therapies. In the second article in this Continuing Medical Education series, we discuss the hormone-modulating therapies available to dermatologists for the treatment of AMCDs, including combined oral contraceptives, spironolactone, finasteride, dutasteride, and flutamide. Available hormone-modulating treatments used for each AMCDs are reviewed, along with mechanisms of androgen modulation, safety profile, contraindications, monitoring parameters, and evidence of efficacy. Medications discussed include those that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for certain AMCDs and some that are used off-label. Despite the ubiquity of hormone-modulating therapies used for AMCDs, this review highlights the need for more rigorous studies to evaluate these therapies for acne, hirsutism, and female pattern hair loss.

Consensus Statement on the Use of Oral Contraceptive Pills in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Women in India

Objective:

To provide consensus recommendations for health-care providers on the use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) women in India.

Participants:

Extensive deliberations, discussions, and brainstorming were done with different fraternities (specialists) being involved. These included endocrinologists, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, dermatologists, public health experts, researchers, and a project manager with a team to develop the guideline.

Evidence:

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline and The Cochrane Database from January 2003 to December 2017 using appropriate-controlled vocabulary (e.g., oral contraceptive pills, polycystic ovarian syndrome, long term outcomes, infertility). Clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies' publications and data were also reviewed to suggest the recommendations.

Process:

The working group for guideline committee included members from the PCOS Society (India), Indian Society for Assisted Reproduction, The Mumbai Obstetric and Gynecological Society, The Endocrine Society of India, Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists, Cosmetic Dermatology Society (India), Academicians from Medical Colleges, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, and a Research Associate. The core team included five reproductive endocrinologists, five gynecologists, five dermatologists, three endocrinologists, two public health experts and one research associate.

Conclusions:

This consensus statement provides the guidance/recommendations for Indian practitioners regarding the use of OCP in women with PCOS. PCOS is one of the common endocrinopathies encountered in gynecological/endocrine practice. The spectrum of this disorder may range from prepubertal girls with premature pubarche, young girls with hirsutism, acne and anovulatory cycles, married women with infertility, and elderly women. Although obesity is a common feature for most PCOS patients, 'lean PCOS' also exists. For several years, OCPs have played an important role in the symptom management of PCOS women. This is due to the fact that OCPs decrease the luteinizing hormone, reduce androgen production, and increase sex hormone-binding globulin, which binds androgens. Several new formulations of OCPs have been developed to decrease the side effects. This includes use of less androgenic progestins and lower doses of ethinyl estradiol. These consensus recommendations help the health provider to choose the right type of OCPs, which will alleviate the symptoms with least side effects. It also gives insight into the indications, contraindications, and concerns regarding its short, intermediate and long-term use.

Development of a high-yielding bioprocess for 11-α hydroxylation of canrenone under conditions of oxygen-enriched air supply

A high yielding bioprocess for 11-α hydroxylation of canrenone (1a) using Aspergillus ochraceus ATCC 18500 was developed. The optimization of the biotransformation involved both fermentation (for achieving highly active mycelium of A. ochraceus) and biotransformation with the aim to obtain 11-α hydroxylation with high selectivity and yield. A medium based on sucrose as C-source resulted particularly suitable for conversion of canrenone into the corresponding 11-hydroxy derivative, whereas the use of O₂-enriched air and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a co-solvent for increasing substrate solubility played a crucial role for obtaining high yields (>95%) of the desired product in high chemical purity starting from 30mM (10.2g/L) of substrate. The structure of the hydroxylated product was confirmed by a combination of two-dimensional NMR proton-proton correlation techniques.

Pharmacokinetics and adhesion of a transdermal patch containing ethinyl estradiol and gestodene under conditions of heat, humidity, and exercise: A single-center, open-label, randomized, crossover study

In this open-label, randomized study, 36 women (18-45 years) applied an ethinyl estradiol/gestodene contraceptive patch once-weekly for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week, patch-free interval, in 3 treatment periods. The primary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and gestodene under conditions of heat, humidity, and exercise. The secondary objective was to evaluate patch adhesion under the same conditions. Weeks 1 and 2 of each period comprised "standardized normal activity" (SNA); in week 3, SNA continued or women used a sauna, whirlpool, swimming pool, or performed an exercise combination. Thirty-one women completed the study; 23 yielded evaluable pharmacokinetic data. Analyses were exploratory and conducted using an analysis of variance. Area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 168 hours (AUC0-168 ) for gestodene and ethinyl estradiol during sauna, swimming, and whirlpool was equivalent to previous SNA recordings. For exercise combination, the gestodene AUC0-168 was 12% lower compared with SNA, albeit not considered clinically relevant. Two women lost a total of 3 patches during sporting activities; other detachments during this week were not correlated with sporting activity. Overall, hormone delivery using the ethinyl estradiol/gestodene patch under conditions of heat, humidity, and exercise corresponded to delivery under normal conditions.

Efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active combined oral contraceptive with continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol

OBJECTIVE

Substituting low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) for the hormone-free interval in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) may enhance ovarian suppression and improve tolerability. This noncomparative phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of desogestrel (DSG)/EE followed by 7days of EE.

STUDY DESIGN

This multicenter, open-label, phase 3, single-arm study enrolled sexually active women aged 18-40years at risk for pregnancy. Women received up to 1year, or 13 consecutive 28-day cycles, of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg for 21days and EE 10mcg alone for 7days. Participants kept diaries to record compliance, bleeding/spotting and other contraceptive use. Efficacy was measured using the Pearl Index (PI) and life-table approach. Safety and tolerability were assessed primarily through reported adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 2858 women enrolled and 1680 completed the study. Forty-six pregnancies in 2401 women aged 18-35years occurred after COC initiation and up to 7days after last DSG/EE or EE-only tablet was taken. When cycles in which another contraceptive method was used were excluded, the PI was 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-3.57]. The cumulative pregnancy rate after 1year of treatment was 2.47% (95% CI, 1.85-3.29) for all users aged 18-35years. When only cycles during which women considered compliant were included, the PI was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.39-2.80). AEs were similar to those seen with other oral contraceptives.

CONCLUSIONS

This 21/7-active DSG/EE COC with 7days of low-dose EE was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

This phase 3 open-label study demonstrated that a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg and 7days of EE 10mcg was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention.

Bleeding pattern and cycle control of a low-dose transdermal contraceptive patch compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a randomized study

OBJECTIVE(S)

The aim of this study was to investigate the bleeding pattern and cycle control of a contraceptive patch containing 0.55 mg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 2.1 mg gestodene (GSD) compared with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 0.02 mg EE and 0.1 mg levonorgestrel (LNG).

STUDY DESIGN

In this phase III, randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial, healthy women aged 18-45 years (smokers aged 18-35 years) received either the EE/GSD patch and a placebo tablet (n=171), or a placebo patch and the COC (n=175) for seven 28-day cycles. Bleeding control was assessed in two 90-day reference periods.

RESULTS

Mean number of bleeding/spotting days was comparable across treatment groups in both reference periods (p>.05). Mean number of bleeding/spotting episodes was also comparable in reference period 1; however, there were fewer bleeding/spotting episodes for COC in reference period 2 (3.4 versus 3.1; p=.01). Mean length of bleeding/spotting episodes was comparable across treatment groups for both reference periods (p>.05). Withdrawal bleeding occurred consistently in both groups over the entire treatment period, but its absence was more common in the COC group in cycles 4 and 6 of reference period 2 (p<.01). Intracyclic bleeding was comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Bleeding pattern and cycle control with the EE/GSD patch was comparable to an EE/LNG-containing COC.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

The findings suggest that bleeding patterns with the EE/GSD patch are similar to an EE/LNG-containing COC, except for absence of withdrawal bleeding, which was less common in patch users. The EE/GSD patch may constitute an additional contraceptive option for women.

A comparison of bleeding patterns and cycle control using two transdermal contraceptive systems: a multicenter, open-label, randomized study

OBJECTIVE(S)

To investigate the bleeding pattern and cycle control parameters of a contraceptive patch containing 0.55 mg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 2.1 mg gestodene (GSD) compared with a patch containing 0.6 mg EE and 6 mg norelgestromin (NGMN).

STUDY DESIGN

In this phase III, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial, healthy women aged 18-35 years (smokers aged 18-30 years) received either the EE/GSD patch (n=200) or the EE/NGMN patch (n=198). Treatment consisted of one patch per week for 3 weeks followed by a 7-day, patch-free interval for seven cycles. Bleeding control was assessed in two 90-day reference periods.

RESULTS

In reference period 1, mean number of bleeding/spotting days was comparable across treatment groups (p>0.05). However, in reference period 2, there were fewer bleeding/spotting days in the EE/GSD patch group (15.7 versus 18.4; p<0.0001). Mean number of bleeding/spotting episodes was comparable across groups for both reference periods, but bleeding/spotting episodes were shorter for the EE/GSD patch than the EE/NGMN patch during reference period 1 (5.13 days versus 5.53 days, respectively; p<0.05) and reference period 2 (5.07 versus 5.66; p=0.0001). Both treatment groups showed a similar frequency of withdrawal bleeding episodes; however, across all seven cycles, the length of these episodes was consistently shorter with the EE/GSD patch (p<0.01). There were no notable treatment differences in intracyclic bleeding.

CONCLUSION(S)

Bleeding pattern and cycle control achieved with the EE/GSD patch was similar to that of the EE/NGMN patch.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

The paper presents data on the bleeding pattern and cycle control parameters of an investigational transdermal contraceptive patch containing EE and GSD compared with an approved contraceptive patch containing EE and NGMN. This descriptive study found that bleeding patterns associated with the EE/GSD patch were similar to those of an EE/NGMN patch providing higher EE exposure.

The safety and contraceptive efficacy of a 24-day low-dose oral contraceptive regimen containing gestodene 60 µg and ethinylestradiol 15 µg

OBJECTIVE

The safety and contraceptive efficacy of a new 24-day regimen of an oral contraceptive combination containing gestodene (GTD) 60 microg and ethinylestradiol (EE) 15 microg was evaluated in an open-label, multicenter study.

METHODS

Adult women received GTD 60 microg/EE 15 microg from day 1 to 24 and 4 days of placebo during a 28-day cycle for either 13 or 19 cycles.

RESULTS

Of the 1515 subjects enrolled, 1496 were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. A total of three pregnancies were reported during the 18 194 treatment cycles of the study, yielding a Pearl index of 0.21. Life-table analysis, based on 16 954 cycles, gave an accidental pregnancy rate of 0.0033. The most frequent adverse events were headache (reported in 35% of subjects), absence of bleeding (16%), flu-like syndrome (15%), pharyngitis (15%) and abdominal pain (15%). The most frequent reasons for withdrawal from the study were metrorrhagia, flu syndrome and absence of bleeding. Analyses of withdrawal and intermenstrual bleeding and spotting indicated acceptable cycle control.

CONCLUSIONS

The 24-day GTD 60 microg/EE 15 microg regimen appears to be a well-tolerated and effective method for low-dose oral contraception. The current formulation offers an ultra-low steroidal dosage combined with a reduced pill-free interval to improve contraceptive efficacy.

An open-label study of the effects of a 24-day regimen of gestodene 60 µg/ethinylestradiol 15 µg on endometrial histological findings in healthy women

OBJECTIVES

This open-label, non-comparative study was conducted at a single center to evaluate the effects on the endometrium of a 24-day regimen of a combined oral contraceptive containing gestodene (GTD) 60 microg and ethinylestradiol (EE) 15 microg.

METHODS

Healthy parous women who were > or = 18 years old and had had regular menstrual cycles for the prior 3 months were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Subjects in group A underwent endometrial biopsies during the late luteal phase of the pretreatment cycle and between days 15 and 24 of cycle 6. Subjects in group B had biopsies between days 15 and 24 of cycle 3 and during the late luteal phase of the post-treatment cycle. GTD 60 microg/EE 15 microg was taken for the first 24 days of a 28-day cycle, followed by placebo pills for 4 days, for a total of six cycles.

RESULTS

Data from 27 women were included in the analyses. Eleven of the 13 evaluable baseline biopsies were classified as secretory. Three of nine subjects with evaluable biopsies at cycle 3 and four of nine subjects with evaluable biopsies at cycle 6 had an atrophic endometrium. Post-treatment biopsies showed a typical secretory endometrium in seven of 11 subjects with evaluable biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that the 24-day regimen of GTD 60 microg/EE 15 microg produced effective endometrial suppression.

Impact of body mass index on suppression of follicular development and ovulation using a transdermal patch containing 0.55-mg ethinyl estradiol/2.1-mg gestodene: a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled study over three treatment cycles

BACKGROUND

Body mass index (BMI) may influence ovulation inhibition resulting from transdermal hormone delivery. Investigation of this effect is important given the high prevalence of obesity in the US.

STUDY DESIGN

This open-label, uncontrolled, Phase 2b trial stratified 173 women (18-35 years) according to three BMI groups (Group 1, n = 56, ≤ 30 kg/m²; Group 2, n = 55, > 30 kg/m² and ≤ 35 kg/m²; and Group 3, n = 47, > 35 kg/m²). Women used a contraceptive patch containing 0.55-mg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 2.1-mg gestodene (GSD). The EE/GSD patch was used weekly for three 28-day cycles (one patch per week for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a 7-day, patch-free interval), and its effect on ovulation was assessed by the Hoogland score, a composite score that comprises transvaginal ultrasound and estradiol (E₂) and progesterone levels every 3 days in Cycles 2 and 3. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters was a secondary aim of the study, and blood samples for analytic determination of EE, GSD and sex hormone-binding globulin were taken during the pretreatment cycle, Cycle 2 and Cycle 3. Compliance was assessed using diary information and serum drug levels.

RESULTS

In the per-protocol set, there were only six ovulations during the study, and no participant ovulated in both study cycles. One ovulation occurred in Group 1, three in Group 2 and two in Group 3. Ovulation inhibition was unaffected by BMI; in all groups, most participants had Hoogland scores of 1 or 2 (i.e., follicle-like structures < 13 mm: Group 1, ≤ 30 kg/m², 80.0% in Cycle 2, 85.7% in Cycle 3; Group 2, > 30 kg/m² and ≤ 35 kg/m², 61.4% in Cycle 2, 75.0% in Cycle 3; Group 3, > 35 kg/m², 78.0% in Cycle 2, 72.5% in Cycle 3). Serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, E2 and progesterone were similar between groups. Body weight had a limited effect on EE clearance that was unlikely to be clinically relevant.

CONCLUSION

The EE/GSD patch provided effective ovulation inhibition, even in women with higher BMI.

IMPLICATIONS

This is the largest-to-date study of physiologic endpoints and found no clinically important differences in ovarian suppression among obese and normal-weight users of the EE/GSD contraceptive patch, thus providing reassurance that obese women can achieve the same high level of contraceptive protection as normal-weight users.

Effect of a low-dose contraceptive patch on efficacy, bleeding pattern, and safety: a 1-year, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled study

This Phase III, uncontrolled, open-label, multicenter study was conducted to investigate the contraceptive efficacy, bleeding pattern, and cycle control of a novel once-a-week contraceptive patch, delivering low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) and gestodene (GSD) at the same systemic exposure seen after oral administration of a combined oral contraceptive containing 0.02 mg EE/0.06 mg GSD. Participants were women aged 18 to 35 years, all of whom received the EE/GSD patch for 13 cycles each of 21 treatment days (one patch per week for 3 weeks) followed by a 7-day, patch-free interval. The primary efficacy variable was the occurrence of unintended pregnancies during the study period as assessed by life table analysis and the Pearl Index. Secondary efficacy variables were days with bleeding during four 90-day reference periods and during 1 treatment year, bleeding pattern, and cycle control. The Kaplan-Meier probability of contraceptive protection after 364 treatment days was 98.8% and the adjusted Pearl Index was 0.81. The percentage of participants with intracyclic bleeding/spotting decreased over time, from 11.4% to 6.8% in cycles 1 and 12, respectively. Almost all participants (range: 90.8%-97.6%) experienced withdrawal bleeding across the study period. Compliance was very high (mean: 97.9%; median: 100%). The most frequent adverse events were headache (9.5%) and application site reaction (8.5%); no clinically significant safety concerns were observed. Results suggest the EE/GSD patch is highly effective in preventing pregnancy. Menstrual bleeding pattern was favorable and within the ranges expected of a healthy female population. The patch was well tolerated and treatment compliance was high.

Investigation of the hemostatic effect of a transdermal patch containing 0.55 mg ethinyl estradiol and 2.1 mg gestodene compared with a monophasic oral contraceptive containing 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel: an open-label, randomized, crossover study

Background

Transdermal delivery of contraceptives offers several advantages over combined oral contraceptives (COCs), including effective absorption and the provision of relatively constant serum concentrations. Ethinyl estradiol (EE) and the progestin gestodene are well-absorbed through the skin and, therefore, well-suited for use in a transdermal contraceptive patch.

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of a once-weekly transparent, transdermal patch delivering low doses of EE and gestodene equivalent to a COC containing 0.02 mg EE and 0.06 mg gestodene on hemostasis parameters compared with a monophasic COC containing 0.03 mg EE and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel.

Methods

In this single-center, open-label, randomized, crossover study, 30 women (aged 18–35 years) received three cycles of each treatment, separated by a two-cycle washout period. The primary outcome measure was the absolute change from baseline in prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 and d-dimer.

Results

For both treatments, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 remained stable during the first treatment period, and increased only slightly in the second period (mean absolute change 0.025 and 0.028 nmol/L in the novel Bayer patch and COC groups, respectively). Increases in d-dimer were observed in both periods (mean absolute change 107.0 ± 147.2 ng/L for the novel Bayer patch and 113.7 ± 159.0 ng/L for the COC). There were no statistically significant treatment differences in prothrombin 1 + 2 or d-dimer (p = 0.667 and p = 0.884, respectively) and no statistically significant treatment sequence or period effects.

Conclusion

A COC containing 0.03 mg EE and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel and the novel Bayer patch have comparable influence on hemostatic endpoints. Both treatments were well-tolerated by subjects.

Berberine and monacolin effects on the cardiovascular risk profile of women with oestroprogestin-induced hypercholesterolemia

INTRODUCTION

One of the most frequent side effect of oral contraceptives use is a stable alteration of the lipid profile. This could be even more relevant in women affected by polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

AIM

Considering the importance of a balanced lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention and that the exposure to the drugs could be many years long, our aim was to investigate the possible beneficial effect of a largely tested low-dosed combined lipid-lowering nutraceutical on dyslipidemias induced by oestroprogestins prescribed to young women for different indications.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 84 patients in primary cardiovascular disease prevention, with low estimated cardiovascular disease risk (<5 % according to the ESC/EAS guidelines), and LDL-C increased above normal value (LDL-C >130 mg/dL) after the use of at least two different oral oestroprogestins treatments. Forty-four women were prescribed oral oestroprogestins for PCOS, while 40 for pure contraception. The tested nutraceutical contained berberine 500 mg/tab and monacolins 3 mg/tab was prescribed to all enrolled patients, associated the previously prescribed standard lipid-lowering diet.

RESULTS

After 3 months of nutraceutical treatment, we observed a significant improvement in BMI (-1.5 ± 0.8 %, p < 0.001), FPG (-6.9 ± 5.8 %, p < 0.001), HOMA index (-3.5 ± 5.6 %, p < 0.001), TC (-20.1 ± 6.6 %, p < 0.001), LDL-C (-25.3 ± 8.9 %, p < 0.001), HDL-C (+14.1 ± 2.2 %, p < 0.001), TG (-29.9 ± 25.2 %, p < 0.001) and hsCRP (-2.5 ± 2.4 %, p = 0.019). Similar results have been obtained even repeating the analysis by subgroups, beyond hsCRP that significantly improved in PCOS patients compared to both the baseline and the non-PCOS group.

CONCLUSION

It appears that the tested combined lipid-lowering nutraceutical is able to equally improve lipid metabolism in oral contraceptive induced hypercholesterolemia in women affected or not by PCOS.

Effects of an ethinyl estradiol/gestodene transdermal contraceptive patch on the endometrium: a single-center, uncontrolled study

AIM

This study aims to investigate the effect of a transdermal contraceptive patch containing ethinyl estradiol and gestodene on endometrial proliferation over 1 year.

MATERIALS & METHODS

In this open-label, uncontrolled, Phase IIb study, women (aged 18-35 years) used the patch for 13 cycles of 28 days. The primary variable was histologic endometrial effects at cycle 13. Secondary objectives included contraceptive efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 89 women were treated. At all visits, endometrial biopsies were devoid of any abnormalities. One woman became pregnant. The patch was well tolerated, with no safety concerns.

CONCLUSION

The ethinyl estradiol and gestodene patch had an endometrial effect consistent with suppression of endometrial proliferation in most patients. No endometrial abnormalities or other concerns were reported; compliance was good.

Endometrial preparation with desogestrel before Essure hysteroscopic sterilization: preliminary study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of desogestrel on endometrial preparation for transcervical sterilization using the Essure device.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized clinical study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

Acute-care university-affiliated hospital in Barcelona, Spain.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing sterilization using the Essure device between January 2010 and January 2011.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were offered desogestrel, 75 μg/d, for 6 weeks before the procedure. Sixteen who accepted were included in the desogestrel group, and 18 who refused were allocated to the no-treatment group. Endometrial biopsy samples were also obtained.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In women who received desogestrel, decidual transformation was observed in eight, glandular atrophy in three, and proliferative endometrium in five. In the no-treatment group, two women had menstruation, nine had proliferative endometrium, and seven had secretory endometrium. In the desogestrel group, the procedure was successful in all women. In the no-treatment group, the procedure was cancelled in two women because of menstruation and in four women with secretory endometrium in whom the tubal ostia were difficult to visualize because of endometrial thickness and bleeding. The median (interquartile range, 25th-75th percentile) duration of the procedure was shorter in the desogestrel group than in the no-treatment group (7 [6-7] minutes vs 8 [7-12] minutes; p = .002).

CONCLUSION

Desogestrel, 75 μg/d, could be an alternative to combined hormonal contraception before placement of Essure inserts, facilitating the procedure and serving as a contraceptive method during the following 12 weeks until occlusion of the tubes.

Pharmacokinetic profile of nomegestrol acetate and 17β-estradiol after multiple and single dosing in healthy women

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics of the monophasic oral contraceptive nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) plus 17β-estradiol (E(2)) were investigated after a single dose and multiple dosing.

STUDY DESIGN

NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) was administered daily to healthy women (18-50 years, n=23) for 24 days; blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained on Day 24 and again, after a 10-day pill-free interval, on Day 35 after a single dose.

RESULTS

NOMAC reached steady state after 5 days with mean ±standard deviation (SD) trough NOMAC concentration (C(av)) of 4.4±1.4 ng/mL. On Day 24, mean±SD peak NOMAC concentration (Cmax, 12.3±3.5 ng/mL) was reached in mean 1.5 h (t(max)); the mean±SD elimination half-life (t(½)) was 45.9±15.3 h. After a single dose, NOMAC mean±SD C(max) was 7.2±2.0 ng/mL and mean±SD t(½) was 41.9±16.2 h. On Day 24, E2 mean±SD C(av) was 50.3±25.7 pg/mL; mean±SD Cmax was 86.0±51.3 pg/mL. After a single dose, mean±SD E2 Cmax was 253±179 pg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that NOMAC/E2 has a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with once-daily dosing.

Effect of oral contraceptive use on lipid profile in Korean women aged 35-55 years

BACKGROUND

Although oral contraceptives (OCs) are widely used, their effects on lipid profile need monitoring according to current usage in different populations.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from 1541 participants aged 35-55 years collected by the 2005-2009 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. OC use, demographic characteristics and dietary intake were obtained from the participants by questionnaire, and lipid levels were determined by analysis of blood samples.

RESULTS

Longer duration of OC use was positively associated with increasing levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and decreasing levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). After adjusting for demographic and dietary factors, the odds ratio (OR) of low HDL-C (<50 mg/dL) was significantly decreased in the longer-term (>12 months) OC users (OR=0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.52) compared with those who never used OCs. However, use of OCs was not associated with a risk of high total cholesterol (≥ 240 mg/dL), high LDL-C (≥ 130 mg/dL), high triglycerides (≥ 150 mg/dL) or high ratio of triglycerides to HDL-C (>3.8).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the use of OCs may reduce the risk of dyslipidemia, mainly due to the decreased risk of low HDL-C, in Korean women.

Combined hormonal contraceptives: is it time to reassess their role in migraine?

OBJECTIVE

This paper will review the extensive array of hormonal contraceptives. It will examine the benefits and risks associated with them - particularly with regard to stroke risk - and shed light on divergent findings in the literature.

BACKGROUND

Menstrual-related migraine is a particularly disabling presentation of migraine often deserving of specific prevention. There is accumulating evidence that hormonal preventives may offer such protection. Although a legacy of research shows an increased risk of stroke with high-dose oral contraceptives (OCs) (those containing 50-150µg of estrogen), there is evidence to suggest that this does not apply to ultralow-dose OCs - those containing <25µg ethinyl estradiol - when used in appropriate populations (ie, normotensive non-smokers). Migraine with aura (MwA) increases stroke risk, and that risk is directly correlated to the frequency of aura, a factor that can be modified - either upward or downward - by combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs). The argument against using CHCs in MwA is based on the concerns that (1) OCs increase stroke risk, (2) MwA increases stroke risk, and (3) combining these risk factors might produce additive or synergistic risk. Evidence does not support concerns (1) and (3), and suggests otherwise.

SUMMARY

The risk/benefit analysis of CHCs is shifting. There is growing evidence for a potential role for CHCs in the prevention of menstrual-related migraine. At the same time, the risk of these products is declining, as newer and lower dose formulations replace their historical predecessors. And although migraine aura is a risk factor for stroke, there is not convincing evidence to suggest that the addition of a low-dose CHC alters that risk in non-smoking, normotensive users. Selected hormonal preventives could potentially decrease stroke risk in MwA via reduction in aura frequency achieved by reducing peak estrogen exposure. With this shift in risk/benefit analysis, it is time to reconsider the role of CHCs in migraine - both with and without aura.

Tailoring combination oral contraceptives to the individual woman

BACKGROUND

Over the last 50 years, there has been intense interest in the type of progestin used in combined oral contraceptives (COC) in an attempt to exploit novel properties and minimize adverse events. At the same time, the dose of synthetic estrogen, ethinylestradiol, in COC pills has been reduced to minimize risks for ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and venous thromboembolism. New formulations, including extended-cycle or continuous-use COCs or those that use a natural estrogen, estradiol, may offer improvements over their predecessors.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed to encompass studies published since 1990 that pertain to the pharmacology of estrogens and progestins used in COCs, risks and adverse events associated with COCs, and extended or continuous-use COCs.

RESULTS

New progestins structurally related to progesterone and spironolactone may exhibit more selective binding to the progesterone receptor and lack androgenic adverse effects associated with progestins structurally related to testosterone. Recently, COCs containing natural (17β-estradiol) or conjugated estrogen (estradiol valerate) rather than ethinylestradiol have been developed in order to move to a more natural estrogen. Although many of the new progestins incorporated into COCs have not demonstrated the negative effects on lipid metabolism and other adverse events associated with the traditional progestins, the goal of attaining good cycle control has yet to be achieved. Extended-cycle and continuous-use regimens are now available that reduce the frequency of menses, but breakthrough bleeding remains a problem.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate counseling to raise awareness of the specific characteristics of the different COC options available may optimize adherence and patient acceptability.

Effect of injectable and oral contraceptives on serum lipids

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effects of using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or oral contraceptives (OCs) containing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 0.15 mg desogestrel on serum lipid levels.

METHODS

Serum lipids were measured at baseline and every 6 months thereafter for 3 years in 703 white, African-American, and Hispanic women using DMPA, OC, or nonhormonal birth control. Those who discontinued DMPA were followed for up to 2 additional years. Participants completed questionnaires containing demographic and behavioral measures every 6 months and underwent 24-hour dietary recalls annually. Mixed-model regression analyses and general-estimating-equations procedures were used to estimate changes over time in lipids by method along with their predictors.

RESULTS

Users of OCs experienced significantly greater increases in levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol than did nonhormonal-contraceptive users (P<.001). However, no difference was noted in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol:HDL ratio between OC users and nonhormonal-contraceptive users. Among DMPA users, HDL levels initially decreased for 6 months but then returned to baseline. The LDL:HDL ratio rose in the first 6 months of DMPA use but then dropped back to baseline over the next 24 months. After DMPA was discontinued, triglyceride, VLDL, and HDL levels were significantly higher in women who used OCs than in those who chose nonhormonal (P<.05) methods.

CONCLUSION

Use of very-low-dose OCs containing desogestrel can elevate lipid levels. Users of DMPA were at increased risk of developing an abnormally low HDL level as well as an abnormally high LDL level and an increase in the LDL:HDL cholesterol ratio, although these effects appeared to be temporary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing oestradiol valerate and dienogest

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive (OC) containing oestradiol valerate/dienogest (E2V/DNG) administered according to a four-phasic dosing regimen with an oestrogen step-down and a progestin step-up over 26 days of active treatment.

METHODS

This Phase I, open-label study included healthy women aged 18-50 years. Treatment consisted of the administration of E2V 3 mg for 2 days, E2V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg for 5 days, E2V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg for 17 days, E2V 1 mg for 2 days, and placebo for 2 days.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic data were analysed in 15 women. Stable E2 concentrations were maintained throughout the study. Minimum mean serum E2 levels were 33.6-64.7 pg/ml during E2V administration. The ratio of oestrone:E2 in serum was approximately 5:1. Minimum mean serum DNG levels were 6.8-15.1 ng/ml during DNG administration. Minimum concentrations of DNG increased only slightly during each phase of the regimen during which DNG was being administered. On day 24 the geometric mean C(max), C(ave) and t((1/2)) of DNG were 82.9 ng/ml, 33.7 ng/ml and 12.2 hours, respectively; the median t(max) was 1.5 hours. Serum sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations increased by 40% (within the normal range). Cortisol binding-globulin levels remained almost unchanged. Treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with an OC containing E2V and DNG was well tolerated and was associated with stable E2 concentrations over 28 days. The pharmacokinetics of DNG were consistent with previous findings. Minimum serum concentrations of DNG increased only slightly during phases of the regimen during which DNG was administered.

Clinical profile of contraceptive progestins

The term progestogen has been widely utilized to indicate the general class of agents that includes both progesterone and its synthetic analogs, whereas the term progestin refers only to synthetic progestational steroids. The development of progestins has been influenced in a major way by the search for orally active hormonal contraceptives, since it is likely that hormonal contraceptives will continue to utilize a progestin, the only possible alternative being represented by the utilization of antiprogestins. Synthetic progestogens in clinical use today belong to three main chemical families: progesterone derivatives (progesterone, retro-progesterone, 19-norprogesterone and 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone); gonane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives (norethisterone, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate); a spironolactone derivative. Biological potency of progestogens varies depending on the end-point measured, usually ovulation inhibition and endometrial transformation; with both these tests, the most active compounds are all gonane derivatives, with a potency over a 100 times that of the natural hormone. When administered in adequate doses, a progestin inhibits fertility by inhibiting ovulation. This action is mainly exerted at the hypothalamic level where, physiologically, progesterone decreases the number of LH pulses. When progestogens are delivered directly to the uterine cavity, their action seems to be purely local. It has been amply proven that--even when administered in doses that do not constantly inhibit ovulation--a progestin can still remain effective as a contraceptive by acting at the level of the cervical mucus and, at least in part, of the endometrium. Progestogens utilized today differ largely in their pharmacokinetics. In general, after intake, these compounds are rapidly absorbed and distributed so that peak serum concentrations are reached between 1 and 4 h. Third-generation progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate) have common characteristics: a higher affinity for progesterone receptors than their predecessors, a lower affinity for androgen receptors, a higher selectivity of action, a higher central inhibitory activity, a higher potency at the level of the endometrium, and an overall metabolic neutrality, in terms of effects on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. In general, progestins can induce two types of adverse effects: changes in lipid metabolism and bleeding irregularities. Whereas the newer compounds seem to have overcome the first of these adverse effects, the second remains untouched: to this day, proper cycle control can only be achieved with combined hormonal contraceptives.

Comparison of metabolic and inflammatory outcomes in women who used oral contraceptives and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in a general population

OBJECTIVE

We compared the metabolic and cardiovascular parameters of a reference group of women with those of women who used 2 contraceptive regimes that are used worldwide: the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and oral contraceptives.

STUDY DESIGN

We investigated a cohort of 2814 women at age 31 years from the general population-based Northern Finland Birth Cohort who were born in 1966. Women were classified as oral contraceptive users (n = 687 women), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device users (n = 168 women), or no use of hormonal contraception (reference group; n = 1959 women). The analyses were adjusted for body mass index, current alcohol use, household income, and area of residence.

RESULTS

Compared with the reference group, oral contraceptive users had higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, raised levels of inflammatory indices (C-reactive protein), and impaired insulin sensitivity. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device users displayed a lower high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, but a similar cholesterol/ high-density lipoprotein ratio, and higher leukocyte count compared with the reference group. Oral contraception users were insulin-resistant compared with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device users with higher blood pressure, raised lipid levels (such as total cholesterol and triglycerides) and insulin levels, and lower homeostasis model assessment and insulin sensitivity, despite smaller waist and lower waist-hip ratio.

CONCLUSION

Oral contraception usage was associated with adverse findings in several metabolic, cardiovascular, and inflammatory parameters, which is consistent with an increased future risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disease. These findings should invite more criticism of recent trends that encourage the prescription of oral contraceptives for years during reproductive life and especially in premenopausal women. In contrast, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device or progestin-only pills may offer long-term health benefits over oral contraceptives and should be preferred to oral contraceptives for women in their forties and/or with metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Birth control pills and nonprofessional voice: acoustic analyses

PURPOSE

Two studies are presented here. Study 1 was aimed at evaluating whether the voice characteristics of women who use birth control pills that contain different progestins differ from the voice characteristics of a control group. Study 2 presents a meta-analysis that combined the results of Study 1 with those from 3 recent studies that compared voices of women who use and do not use birth control pills.

METHOD

In Study 1, voice samples from 30 women with no history of voice training, who use pills with different progestins (drospirenone, desogestrel, gestodene), and 10 women who do not use the pill were recorded at specific time points across the menstrual cycle and were analyzed acoustically. In Study 2, results from Study 1 were analyzed jointly with results from three recent studies, which used similar methodologies.

RESULTS

Results of Study 1 did not reveal acoustic differences in sustained phonation of vowels across the pill groups and controls. Results of the meta-analysis performed in Study 2 indicated that pill users exhibited lower jitter and shimmer values on sustained vowels, whereas no difference of fundamental frequency was observed among women who use the pill.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support findings from previous studies, which suggested that no adverse effect on voice was detected among nonprofessional speakers who use new-generation monophasic birth control pills, for the measures studied. Furthermore, results of the meta-analysis suggested that some acoustic properties of the voice, which are reflected in perturbation measures in sustained vowels, may be improved among women who use the pill.

Androgenic progestins in oral contraceptives and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Oral contraceptives (OCs) have been consistently linked to reduced risk of ovarian cancer. Oral contraceptive formulations display varying degrees of androgenicity. Data linking androgens to ovarian cancer suggest that OC androgenicity may impact efficacy in preventing ovarian cancer. The authors investigated whether OC efficacy might differ according to androgenicity by using data from a large, population-based, case-control study (the Steroid Hormones and Reproductions [SHARE] Study).

METHODS

Detailed data on OC formulation was obtained by an in-person interview for 568 cases and 1,026 controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of OC androgenicity with ovarian cancer while controlling for the known potential confounders of age, parity, family history of ovarian cancer, and tubal ligation.

RESULTS

Androgenic and nonandrogenic OCs conferred a similar and significant reduction in ovarian cancer risk (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.76 and odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.78, respectively). No differences in duration of use, age at first use, and time since last use were found between androgenic and nonandrogenic formulations.

CONCLUSION

In general, the androgenicity of an OC does not alter chemopreventive efficacy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-2.

Different oral contraceptives and voice quality — an observational study

The classical literature on endocrine effect on voice considers oral contraceptives (OCs) as a risk factor for voice. However, recent studies revealed no adverse effect of new-generation OCs on voice. It was also suggested that OCs could improve specific voice characteristics via different mechanisms. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of OCs on voices of women who use different formulations containing drospirenone (n=10), desogestrel (n=9) and gestodene (n=10). Acoustic voice measures of the 29 women were evaluated twice during the menstrual cycle. Fundamental frequency, frequency as well as amplitude stability and noise characteristics were measured using a computerized voice analysis program. Results indicated that vocal stability and quality were similar in the three groups tested. Marginal differences were observed between the drospirenone group and the other two groups. This preliminary observational study indicates that although drospirenone was previously shown to reduce water retention, this effect was not found to directly influence voice characteristics of women who use OCs.

Enhancing oral contraceptive success: the potential of new formulations

Reductions in oral contraceptive (OC) estrogen dose and the development of new progestins have resulted in formulations that maintain acceptable cycle control while improving safety. However, the potential safety benefits of low-estrogen doses may be offset by less acceptable cycle control. These observations have led to the development of 2 triphasic OC formulations containing norgestimate and desogestrel in combination with 25 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE). Both of these 25-microg EE triphasic OCs balance fewer estrogen-related side effects with good cycle control comparable to OCs containing higher estrogen doses. However, questions remain about the risk of venous thromboembolism associated with OCs containing desogestrel. A new monophasic 30-microg EE OC contains drospirenone, a spironolactone analogue with which there is limited experience. Although initial data with this OC are intriguing, product labeling highlights safety issues related to its antimineralocorticoid effects and the potential for hyperkalemia. Further experience with this formulation will determine its role in contraceptive practice.

A comparative study of the effects of gestodene 60 microg/ethinylestradiol 15 microg and desogestrel 150 microg/ethinylestradiol 20 microg on hemostatic balance, blood lipid levels and carbohydrate metabolism

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label study was conducted to compare the effects of gestodene (GTD) 60 microg/ethinylestradiol (EE) 15 microg and desogestrel (DSG) 150 microg/EE 20 microg (Mercilon) on selected metabolic measurements during six cycles in 124 healthy women.

METHODS

GTD/EE subjects received a single pill once daily from days 1 to 24 of a 28-day cycle, followed by placebo pills daily for the last 4 days of the cycle. DSG/EE subjects received a single pill daily from days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, followed by a 7-day pill-free interval. Safety was assessed from changes in hemostatic measurements, lipid profile, glucose tolerance and adverse events.

RESULTS

Both GTD/EE and DSG/EE groups exhibited minimal effects on the lipid profile. An increased glucose response was noted with both treatments and an increased insulin response was noted with GTD/EE. Hemostatic activity was increased in both groups but a counteracting increase in fibrinolytic activity occurred together with an increase in coagulatory activity. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups, and no significant differences in cycle control were observed between groups. No pregnancies occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The 24-day GTD 60 microg/EE 15 microg formulation and DSG/EE produced similar effects on hemostatic balance, lipid metabolism and glucose tolerance, and exhibited comparable efficacy and tolerability.

Matrix metalloproteinase 2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 expression is not regulated by norgestimate or norelgestromin

Steroid hormones regulate endometrial expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors. Synthetic progestins are widely used in oral contraceptives and for hormone replacement therapy. To assess whether the synthetic progestins norgestimate and its derivative norelgestromin (17-deacetylnorgestimate) modulate the expression of MMPs, Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells were separately treated with 17 beta-estradiol, 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, norgestimate and norelgestromin. Culture supernatants were assayed for MMPs 2, 3 and 9, and for tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). No marked modulation of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 expression was observed upon incubation of the cells with the synthetic progestins. By ELISA, neither MMP-3 or MMP-9 nor TIMP-1 immunoreactivity was detected. Interestingly, TIMP-2 expression was down-regulated by 17 beta-estradiol and 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone.

Therapie der Akne mit Antiandrogenen - Eine evidenzbasierte Ubersicht. Treatment of acne with antiandrogens - an evidence-based review

BACKGROUND

Increased sebaceous gland activity with seborrhea is one of the major pathogenetic factors in acne. Antiandrogen treatment targets the androgen-metabolizing follicular keratinocytes and the sebaceous gland leading to sebostasis, with a reduction of the sebum secretion rate of 12.5-65%. Antiandrogens can be classified based on their mechanism of action as androgen receptor blockers, inhibitors of circulating androgens by affecting ovarian function (oral contraceptives), inhibitors of circulating androgens by affecting the pituitary (gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and dopamine agonists in hyperprolactinemia), inhibitors of adrenal function, and inhibitors of peripheral androgen metabolism (5alpha-reductase inhibitors, inhibitors of other enzymes).

METHODS

All original and review publications on antiandrogen treatment of acne as monotherapy or in combination included in the MedLine system were extracted by using the terms "acne", "seborrhea", "polycystic ovary syndrome", "hyperandrog", and "treatment" and classified according to their level of evidence.

RESULTS

The combinations of cyproterone acetate (2 mg)/ethinyl estradiol (35 microg), drospirenone (3 mg)/ethinyl estradiol (30 microg), and desogestrel (25 microg)/ ethinyl estradiol (40 microg) for 1 week followed by desogestrel (125 microg)/ethinyl estradiol (30 microg) for 2 weeks showed the strongest anti-acne activity. Gestagens or estrogens as monotherapy, spironolactone, flutamide, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, and inhibitors of peripheral androgen metabolism cannot be endorsed based on current knowledge. Low dose prednisolone is only effective in late-onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia and dopamine agonists only in hyperprolactinemia. Treatment with antiandrogens should only be considered if none of the contraindications exist.

CONCLUSION

Antiandrogen treatment should be limited to female patients with additional signs of peripheral hyperandrogenism or hyperandrogenemia. In addition, women with late-onset or recalcitrant acne who also desire contraception can be treated with antiandrogens as can those being treated with systemic isotretinoin. Antiandrogen treatment is not appropriate primary monotherapy for noninflammatory and mild inflammatory acne.

Hormonal therapies in acne

Hormones, in particular androgen hormones, are the main cause of acne in men, women, children and adults, in both normal states and endocrine disorders. Therefore, the use of hormonal therapies in acne is rational in concept and gratifying in practice. Although non-hormonal therapies enjoy wide usage and continue to be developed, there is a solid place for hormonal approaches in women with acne, especially adult women with persistent acne. This review covers the physiological basis for hormonal influence in acne, the treatments that are in use today and those that show promise for the future. The main treatments to be discussed are oral contraceptives androgen receptor blockers like spironolactone and flutamide, inhibitors of the enzyme 5 alpha-reductase and topical hormonal treatments.

Triphasic oral contraceptives: review and comparison of various regimens

OBJECTIVE

To review and compare the risk-benefit profile of triphasic oral contraceptives with that of low-dose monophasic oral contraceptives.

DESIGN

Literature on currently marketed triphasics and monophasics.

PATIENT(S)

Healthy women of reproductive age.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Comparison of the rationale for development, composition, mechanism, efficacy, menstrual cycle control, side effects, health benefits, and risk-benefit profile.

RESULT(S)

All triphasics contain ethinyl estradiol (0.025-0.040 mg/d) and one of several progestins in doses (0.05-1.0 mg/d) related to their relative potencies, which are substantially lower overall (total dose) than those in monophasics. The triphasics are highly efficacious. In general, menstrual cycle control and side effects are similar in both types, but triphasics containing the newer progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, and norgestimate) have better cycle control and a reduced incidence of androgenic side effects compared with those with norethindrone or levonorgestrel. Both triphasics and monophasics have minimal effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and hemostasis parameters, and therefore comparable low risks of coronary heart disease. The health benefits of triphasics and monophasics are similar and include decreased incidence of unwanted and ectopic pregnancies, ovarian cysts, endometrial and ovarian cancers, benign breast disease, and acute pelvic inflammatory disease; less menstrual blood loss and iron deficiency anemia; and lower frequency of irregular bleeding and menorrhagia.

CONCLUSION(S)

The risk-benefit profiles of both triphasics and monophasics are favorable and similar.

Pharmacodynamics of oestrogens and progestogens

The ovaries cyclically secrete estradiol and progesterone. Cyclic ovarian estradiol secretion is associated with a bone-saving and vascular protection effect. Endogenous progesterone does not modify the vasodilator effect of oestrogens. At physiological concentrations, the natural sex steroids have low antigonadotropic effects. More potent synthetic derivatives with more antigonadotropic effects were synthesized in the 1950s. After the menopause, there is no longer any need to use hormonal steroids as antigonadotropics. In addition, vascular contraindications are more common in an older population. Contraceptive steroids (particularly ethinyl estradiol) are therefore rarely used. The oestrogen that is most widely prescribed for post-menopausal replacement is a complex formulation of conjugated oestrogens of equine origin that is administered orally in a single daily dose. Improvements in hormone replacement therapy may result from the use of parenteral estradiol (providing sufficient doses are reached) and of a progestogen chemically more similar to progesterone.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between oral contraceptives and second-generation anticonvulsants

Drug interactions between oral contraceptives (OCs) and traditional anticonvulsants have been well described. However, in the past decade, a number of new anticonvulsants have been developed, as well as modifications made in the composition of the OC preparations themselves. Additionally, anticonvulsants are increasingly employed in the therapy of nonseizure-related disorders, placing more women at risk of potential drug interactions that may lead to contraceptive failure. Second-generation anticonvulsants include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. Most have been approved for adjunctive management of seizures refractory to therapy with traditional anticonvulsants. On the basis of available study data in women receiving concomitant OC preparations, gabapentin, lamotrigine, tiagabine and vigabatrin may be administered without significant pharmacokinetic interactions that potentially diminish contraceptive efficacy. However, additional or alternative contraceptive measures, including using OCs with higher estrogen content, are recommended when using felbamate, oxcarbazepine and topiramate, as these agents have demonstrated enzyme-inducing activity leading to reduced plasma steroid concentrations. The effects of zonisamide in women receiving OCs have yet to be reported. It is important to characterise the properties [e.g. substrate and enzyme activity (particularly cytochrome P450 3A4 induction)] of new anticonvulsants and recognise their potential to interfere with OCs. However, a pharmacokinetic interaction does not in itself indicate loss of OC efficacy. Contraceptive failure should be measured by changes in ovarian hormone concentrations, maturation of ovarian follicle(s) or ovulation.

Drugs causing dyslipoproteinemia

Diuretics and beta-blockers have a strong tendency to affect serum lipids adversely, whereas the peripherally acting alpha-blocking agents consistently result in beneficial effects. Most of the other antihypertensive agents (calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and drugs that act centrally) are lipid neutral. The effect of steroid hormones varies with the drug, dose, and route of administration. In general, androgens lower HDL-C and have a variable effect on LDL-C. The effects of progestins vary greatly depending on their androgenicity, and estrogens are beneficial except when hypertriglyceridemia occurs with oral estrogens. Glucocorticoids raise HDL-C and may also increase triglycerides and LDL-C. Retinoids increase triglycerides and LDL-C and also reduce HDL-C. Interferons can cause hypertriglyceridemia. Following organ transplantation, a dyslipidemia often ensues. This is caused in part by the medications used to prevent rejection (glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, and FK-506) and requires close attention and, in some patients, drug therapy to prevent coronary artery disease.

An open-label, multicenter, noncomparative safety and efficacy study of Mircette, a low-dose estrogen-progestin oral contraceptive. The Mircette Study Group

OBJECTIVE

The primary efficacy and safety of Mircette (brand of desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol and ethinyl estradiol), an oral contraceptive containing 150 microg desogestrel and 20 microg ethinyl estradiol given for 21 days, followed by 2 days of placebo and then 5 days 10 microg ethinyl estradiol, was evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

In a large, open-label, 18-month, multicenter trial, a total of 1143 of 1250 healthy female subjects contributed to the determination of extent of exposure, for an equivalent of 1080.8 woman-years of use.

RESULTS

Absence of withdrawal bleeding occurred in 5.5% of total cycles and intermenstrual bleeding occurred in 12.0% of total cycles. Breakthrough spotting was more common than breakthrough bleeding. The Pearl Index for total pregnancies during treatment was 1.02/100 woman-years. Fewer than 3% of subjects discontinued study participation, primarily because of menstrual problems, indicating that Mircette was an oral contraceptive acceptable to the women studied. Overall 73.6% of all subjects reported one or more adverse events, and a total of 43.9% of subjects reported drug-related adverse events. The most common drug-related adverse events reported included headache (8.5%), breast pain (7.3%), dysmenorrhea (4.2%), and menstrual disorder (4.2%). There were no reports of venous thromboembolic events or of significant changes in blood pressure, lipid metabolism, or serum glucose level.

CONCLUSION

The study confirmed that Mircette is a safe and efficacious oral contraceptive that is well tolerated and acceptable to women who have previously used oral contraceptives, as well as first-time users.