Introduction to coronary artery stents and their pharmacotherapeutic management

Post-procedural Anticoagulation With Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insight from the STOPDAPT-3 Trial

The current guidelines for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) discourage the use of anticoagulation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without specific indications, although the recommendation is not well supported by evidence. In this post hoc analysis of the ShorT and OPtimal Duration of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy-3 (STOPDAPT-3) trial, 30-day outcomes were compared between the 2 groups with and without post-PCI heparin administration among patients with ACS who did not receive mechanical support devices. The co-primary end points were the bleeding end point, defined as the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding, and the cardiovascular end point, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke. Among 4,088 patients with ACS, 2,339 patients (57.2%) received post-PCI heparin. The proportion of patients receiving post-PCI heparin was higher among those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared with others (72.3% and 38.8%, p <0.001), and among patients with intraprocedural adverse angiographic findings compared with those without (67.6% and 47.5%, p <0.001). Post-PCI heparin compared with no post-PCI heparin was associated with a significantly increased risk of the bleeding end point (4.75% and 2.52%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.46, p = 0.007) and a numerically increased risk of the cardiovascular end point (3.16% and 1.72%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 2.46, p = 0.06). Higher hourly dose or total doses of heparin were also associated with higher incidence of both bleeding and cardiovascular events within 30 days. In conclusion, post-PCI anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin was frequently implemented in patients with ACS. Post-PCI heparin use was associated with harm in terms of increased bleeding without the benefit of reducing cardiovascular events. Trial identifier: STOPDAPT-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04609111.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the management of myocardial infarction

The pharmacological treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including unstable angina, non-ST- and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) is dynamic and continues to evolve. Expert guidelines based on the results of clinical trials for the management of different types of ACS have been published. In both ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation MI, aspirin/clopidogrel, heparin/low molecular weight heparin/direct thrombin inhibitors, beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are part of the routine regimens. In patients with ST-segment elevation MI, eligibility for thrombolytic therapy needs to be determined and utilised as soon as possible. In patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI, the risks of thrombolytic therapy outweigh the benefits. The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors has become increasingly important. The use of antihyperlipidaemic agents for the prevention of secondary events in both types of patients continue to be essential and the early aggressive use of lipid-lowering therapy also plays a role in improving endothelial function and stabilising atherosclerotic plaques.

Cilostazol for prevention of thrombosis and restenosis after intracoronary stenting

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential use of cilostazol in intracoronary stenting.

DATA SOURCES

Clinical literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1966-March 2001). Key search terms included cilostazol, intracoronary stenting, and coronary angioplasty. Abstracts of clinical trials presented at major cardiology professional association meetings were also reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Intracoronary stent placement represents the fastest growing medical device implant. Complications of stent implantation include acute and subacute vessel closure, as well as late restenosis. Currently, antiplatelet agents are used for preventive therapy. Cilostazol is a vasodilating antiplatelet agent that reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation induced by many factors. In seven randomized trials comparing cilostazol with either aspirin or ticlopidine, cilostazol was found to be superior to aspirin and equivalent to ticlopidine in decreasing both cardiac events and rates of restenosis. In addition, cilostazol was found to be well tolerated, with no reports of adverse hematologic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further comparative trials are required, cilostazol appears to be a safe and effective alternative to clopidogrel and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists following intracoronary stent implantation.

New recommendations from the 1999 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association acute myocardial infarction guidelines

OBJECTIVE

To review literature relating to significant changes in drug therapy recommendations in the 1999 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for treating patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

DATA SOURCES

1999 ACC/AHA AMI guidelines, English-language clinical trials, reviews, and editorials researching the role of drug therapy and primary angioplasty for AMI that were referenced in the guidelines were included. Additional data published in 2000 or unpublished were also included if relevant to interpretation of the guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

The articles selected influence AMI treatment recommendations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Many clinicians and health systems use the ACC/AHA AMI guidelines to develop treatment plans for AMI patients. This review highlights important changes in AMI drug therapy recommendations by reviewing the results of recent clinical trials. Insights into evolving drug therapy strategies that may impact future guideline development are also described.

CONCLUSIONS

Several changes in drug therapy recommendations were included in the 1999 AMI ACC/AHA guidelines. There is emphasis on administering fibrin-specific thrombolytics secondary to enhanced efficacy. Selection between fibrin-specific agents is unclear at this time. Low response rates to thrombolytics have been noted in the elderly, women, patients with heart failure, and those showing left bundle-branch block on the electrocardiogram. These patient groups should be targeted for improved utilization programs. The use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in non-ST-segment elevation MI was emphasized. Small trials combining reduced doses of thrombolytics with GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors have shown promise by increasing reperfusion rates without increasing bleeding risk, but firm conclusions cannot be made until the results of larger trials are known. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials suggest lower mortality rates for primary PCI when compared with thrombolysis alone. However, primary PCI, including coronary angioplasty, is only available at approximately 13% of US hospitals, making thrombolysis the preferred strategy for most patients. Clopidogrel has supplanted ticlopidine as the recommended antiplatelet agent for patients with aspirin allergy or intolerance following reports of a better safety profile. The recommended dose of unfractionated heparin is lower than previously recommended, necessitating a separate nomogram for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Routine use of warfarin, either alone or in combination with aspirin, is not supported by clinical trials; however, warfarin remains a choice for antithrombotic therapy in patients intolerant to aspirin. Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers continue to be recommended, and emphasis is placed on improving rates of early administration (during hospitalization), even in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction. New recommendations for drug treatment of post-AMI patients with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and/or elevated triglycerides are included, with either niacin or gemfibrozil recommended as an option. Supplementary antioxidants are not recommended for either primary or secondary prevention of AMI, with new data demonstrating lack of efficacy vitamin E in primary prevention. Estrogen replacement therapy or hormonal replacement therapy should not be initiated solely for prevention of cardiovascular disease, but can be continued in cardiovascular patients already taking long-term therapy for other reasons. Bupropion has been added as a new treatment option for smoking cessation. As drug therapy continues to evolve in treating AMI, more frequent updates of therapy guidelines will be necessary.

Pharmacology of the low-molecular-weight heparins

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is widely used to both treat and prevent venous thromboembolism. More recently, UFH has been used to prevent death and myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction and acute occlusion in those undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization. However, its poor bioavailability (when administered in low doses subcutaneously), its mechanism of clearance, and its short half-life make its anticoagulant activity difficult to predict and maintain. To overcome these limitations, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been developed that have greater bioavailability and a longer half-life in plasma. Because LMWHs provide more predictable anticoagulant activity compared with subcutaneous UFH, it is not necessary to monitor the activated partial thromboplastin time during treatment. These newer agents are as effective as UFH in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic and cardiac disorders and, by allowing shorter hospital stays, are more cost effective. Thus LMWHs offer clear pharmacokinetic advantages over UFH. More studies are needed to determine the extent to which clinically available LMWHs can be used in place of UFH.