Gastric Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma Harboring a Rare FUS-CREM Fusion

Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma and sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma, outcome of advanced disease: retrospective study from the Ultra-Rare Sarcoma Working Group

BACKGROUND

To present findings from a retrospective study conducted by the Ultra-Rare Sarcoma Working Group on metastatic low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS), sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF), and hybrid (H)-LGFMS/SEF across 28 global centres.

METHODS

Patients treated at participating institutions from January 2000 to September 2022 were retrospectively selected. Diagnosis was confirmed by expert pathologists. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS-1) from metastasis detection to first progression or death. PFS-2 was calculated from therapy initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were identified (32 LGFMS, 50 SEF, 19 H-LGFMS/SEF). Median (m) follow-up was 62.1 months. mPFS-1 was 28.7, 11.8, and 20.3 months for LGFMS, SEF, and H-LGFMS/SEF, respectively. mOS was 145.8, 41.9, and 113.5 months, respectively. Treatments included anthracycline-based chemotherapy, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (G), pazopanib, trabectedin, others. mPFS-2 was: 20.1, 5.5, and 3.5 months in H-LGFMS/SEF, SEF, and LGFMS, respectively, with anthracyclines; 19.5, 7.7, and 6.9 months in LGFMS, SEF, and H-LGFMS/SEF, respectively, with pazopanib; 12.0, 9.7, and 3.1 months in H-LGFMS/SEF, LGFMS, and SEF, respectively. Occasional responses occurred with ifosfamide/oral cyclophosphamide, and prolonged stable disease with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the largest available, metastatic LGFMS, SEF, and H-LGFMS/SEF showed different courses. Systemic agents have modest efficacy, informing future trials of novel agents for these tumours.

Atypical vulvar lipoma - A case report and literature review

Atypical spindle cell lipomatous tumors of the vulva are rare masses. We report a case of atypical spindle cell lipoma of the vulva and provide a succinct review of the current understanding of these benign masses. Specifically, this report describes a case of a 20-year-old nulligravid female who presented for evaluation of a labial mass that had been growing for one year. A pelvic MRI revealed a 7 cm fatty growth. The vulvar mass was surgically resected. This case report describes the pathologic staining pattern for these masses and reviews characteristics of these benign tumors such that they are not mistaken for malignancy.

EWSR1::ATF1 fusions characterize a group of extra-abdominal epithelioid and round cell mesenchymal neoplasms, phenotypically overlapping with sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas, and intra-abdominal FET::CREB fusion neoplasms

With the increasing use of next generation sequencing in soft tissue pathology, particularly in neoplasms not fitting any World Health Organization (WHO) category, the spectrum of EWSR1 fusion-associated soft tissue neoplasms has been expanding significantly. Although recurrent EWSR1::ATF1 fusions were initially limited to a triad of mesenchymal neoplasms including clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma and malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor (MGNET), this family has been expanding. We herein describe 4 unclassified extra-abdominal soft tissue (n = 3) and bone (n = 1) neoplasms displaying epithelioid and round cell morphology and carrying an EWSR1::ATF1 fusion. Affected were 3 males and 1 female aged 20-56 years. All primary tumors were extra-abdominal and deep-seated (chest wall, mediastinum, deltoid, and parapharyngeal soft tissue). Their size ranged 4.4-7.5 cm (median, 6.2). One patient presented with constitutional symptoms. Surgery with (2) or without (1) neo/adjuvant therapy was the treatment. At last follow-up (8-21 months), 2 patients developed progressive disease (1 recurrence; 1 distant metastasis). The immunophenotype of these tumors is potentially misleading with variable expression of EMA (2 of 3), pankeratin (2 of 4), synaptophysin (2 of 3), MUC4 (1 of 3), and ALK (1 of 3). All tumors were negative for S100 and SOX10. These observations point to the existence of heretofore under-recognized group of epithelioid and round cell neoplasms of soft tissue and bone, driven by EWSR1::ATF1 fusions, but distinct from established EWSR1::ATF1-associated soft tissue entities. Their overall morphology and immunophenotype recapitulate that of the emerging EWSR1/FUS::CREB fusion associated intra-abdominal epithelioid/round cell neoplasms. Our cases point to a potentially aggressive clinical behavior. Recognizing this tumor type is mandatory to delineate any inherent biological and/or therapeutic distinctness from other, better-known sarcomas in the differential diagnosis including sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma.

Intra-Abdominal Epithelioid Neoplasm With EWSR1::CREB Fusions Involving the Kidney: A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characterization With an Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis

Soft tissue neoplasms, harboring fusions between EWSR1 and FUS with genes encoding CREB transcription factors family (ATF1, CREB1, and CREM), are an emerging heterogeneous group of mesenchymal tumors that differ significantly in morphology, immunophenotypes, and behavior. Recently, EWSR1/FUS::CREB fusions have been recognized to define a group of aggressive neoplasms of epithelioid morphology with multiple growth patterns and a striking predilection for mesothelial-lined cavities. These neoplasms presenting as a primary neoplasm of intra-abdominal visceral organs are rare, which could elicit a wide range of differential diagnoses because of their diverse morphologies and immunohistochemical profiles. We report 3 cases of intra-abdominal epithelioid neoplasms with EWSR1::CREB fusions involving the kidney. This study included 2 female patients and 1 male patient, with age at presentation ranging from 17 to 61 years (mean: 32 years). All the patients underwent radical nephrectomy without adjunctive therapies. Grossly, the tumors were large, and all were solitary masses with sizes ranging from 5.6 to 30.0 cm (mean: 14.5 cm). Histologically, the neoplasms showed infiltrating and indistinct borders and were composed predominantly of monomorphic round-to-epithelioid cells with variable amounts of pale-to-clear cytoplasm, arranged in cords, nests, and sheets and embedded in a sclerotic hyalinized stroma with variable lymphoid cuffing either intermixed or at the periphery. Notably, a hemangiopericytomatous growth pattern was commonly seen. Nuclear atypia was mild, and mitotic activity was scarce. Immunohistochemically, all 3 cases were at least focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen and keratin AE1/AE3, with 2 tumors showing focal MUC4 expression and 1 case displaying diffuse CD34 and focal CAIX positivity. Targeted RNA sequencing identified EWSR1::CREM fusion in 2 cases and EWSR1::ATF1 fusion in 1 case. Subsequent fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis confirmed the RNA sequencing results. On follow-up, 1 patient developed multiple spinal bone metastases 5 months after the surgery while the other 2 patients were free of disease 9 and 120 months after diagnosis, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that intra-abdominal epithelioid neoplasms with EWSR1::CREB fusions may rarely occur primarily in the kidney and should be included in the differential diagnosis of primary renal epithelioid mesenchymal neoplasms.

The clinicopathological spectrum of sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: report of an additional series with review of the literature

We present a case series of sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF) to further characterise its clinical and pathological features. Twenty-one patients with SEF were included in this study. There were 12 males and nine females (range 25-63 years; median 38 years). Tumours were located in the kidney (n=5), thigh (n=3), chest wall (n=3), head and neck (n=2), bone (n=2), abdominal wall (n=1), psoas major (n=1), retroperitoneum (n=1), omentum (n=1), popliteal space (n=1) and lung (n=1). Tumour sizes ranged from 2.5 to 16 cm (median 7 cm). Microscopically, epithelioid tumour cells were arranged in nests and cords and embedded in a dense sclerotic stroma. Some tumours showed myxoid areas, fibroma-like areas, acinar growth patterns and haemangiopericytoma-like appearance. A few tumour cells presented a rhabdomyoid shape. Calcification, ossification, cystic and necrosis were observed in some cases. The diagnosis was confirmed by immunoreactivity for MUC4, and by further fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) or next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. Clinical follow-up was available for 16 cases (median, 24 months; range 6-62 months). Seven patients developed metastases to lung (n=3), bone (n=3), brain (n=2) and back (n=1). Four patients developed a local recurrence. Three patients died of disease. Overall survival (OS) of SEF was related to patient age (p=0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) was related to tumour size (p=0.046). In addition to soft tissue, SEF is more likely to involve the viscera and the abdominal cavity and has morphological variants. Familiarity with its distinctive clinical and pathological features helps avoid misdiagnosis.

Mesenchymal/non-epithelial mimickers of neuroendocrine neoplasms with a focus on fusion gene-associated and SWI/SNF-deficient tumors

Mimickers of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) include a number of important pitfall tumors. Here, we describe our experience with mesenchymal mimics of NENs to illustrate their spectrum and draw the attention particularly to a group of mesenchymal/non-epithelial neoplasms (MN) that combine epithelioid histology with neuroendocrine (NE-) features and peculiar genetic abnormalities. In a consultation series of 4498 cases collected between 2009 and 2021, 2099 neoplasms expressing synaptophysin and/or chromograninA were reviewed and analyzed. A total of 364 (18%) were diagnosed as non-NENs, while the remaining tumors were NEN. The group of mesenchymal/non-epithelial neoplasms with NE-features (MN-NE) included 31/364 (8%) cases. These mostly malignant neoplasms showed an epithelioid morphology. While all but one tumor expressed synaptophysin, mostly patchy, only 10/29 (34%) co-expressed chromograninA. A total of 13/31 (42%) of the MN-NE showed EWSR1-related gene fusions (6 Ewing sarcomas, 5 clear cell sarcomas, and 1 desmoplastic small round cell tumor, 1 neoplasm with FUS-CREM gene fusion) and 7 (23%) were SWI/SNF (SMARCB1 or SMARCA4)-deficient neoplasms. The remaining MN-NE included synovial sarcoma, sclerosing epithelioid mesenchymal neoplasm, melanoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, and chordoma. A total of 27/31 MN-NE were from the last 8 years, and 6 of them were located in the pancreas. Eleven MN-NE were initially diagnosed as neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). MN-NE with epithelioid features play an increasing role as mimickers of NECs. They mostly belong to tumors with gene fusions involving the EWSR1 gene, or with SWI/SNF complex deficiency. Synaptophysin expression is mostly patchy and chromograninA expression is infrequent in MN-NE of this series and data extracted from literature.

Intra-abdominal EWSR1/FUS-CREM-rearranged malignant epithelioid neoplasms: two cases of an emerging aggressive entity with emphasis on misleading immunophenotype

CREB family (CREB1, ATF1, and CREM) gene fusions are defining markers in diverse mesenchymal neoplasms (clear cell sarcoma, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, and others). However, neoplasms harboring EWSR1-CREM/FUS-CREM fusions are rare and poorly characterized. We describe two cases (55-year-old male with 7.5 cm renal mass and 32-year-old female with 5.5 cm mesenteric mass) illustrating their misleading immunophenotypes. Histologically, both showed eosinophilic and focally clear epithelioid cells arranged into sheets, nests, and trabeculae. Immunohistochemistry showed ALK, EMA, and AE1/AE3 immunoreactivity suggesting ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (Case 1) and coexpression of keratin, EMA, synaptophysin, and chromogranin-A, suggesting neuroendocrine neoplasm (Case 2). Targeted RNA sequencing revealed EWSR1-CREM (Case 1) and FUS-CREM (Case 2) fusions. These cases add to the spectrum of CREM fusion-positive intra-abdominal epithelioid neoplasms. Their unusual immunophenotype and unexpected sites represent major pitfalls, underline a wide differential diagnosis, and emphasize the value of molecular testing in correctly diagnosing them.