Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis for talonavicular arthritis

Influence of Isolated Talonavicular and Subtalar Joint Arthrodesis on Hindfoot Kinematics and Range of Motion During Cadaveric Gait Simulation

BACKGROUND

Isolated subtalar and talonavicular joint arthrodeses have been associated with adjacent joint arthritis and altered hindfoot kinematics during simplified loading scenarios. However, the effect on kinematics during dynamic activity is unknown. This study assessed changes in subtalar and talonavicular kinematics after isolated talonavicular (TNiso) and subtalar (STiso) arthrodesis, respectively, during stance simulations.

METHODS

Fourteen midtibia specimens received either a TNiso or STiso arthrodesis, with 7 randomized to each group. A 6-degree-of-freedom robot sequentially simulated the stance phase for the intact and arthrodesis conditions. Bootstrapped bias-corrected 95% CIs of the talonavicular and subtalar joint kinematics were calculated and compared between conditions.

RESULTS

The TNiso decreased subtalar inversion, adduction, and plantarflexion in late stance (P < .05). The subtalar range of motion in the sagittal and coronal planes decreased by 40% (P = .009) and 46% (P = .002), respectively. No significant changes in talonavicular joint kinematics were observed after isolated subtalar arthrodesis; however, the range of motion was reduced by 61% (P = .007) and 50% (P = .003) in the coronal and axial planes, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this model for arthrodesis, changes in subtalar kinematics and motion restriction were observed after isolated talonavicular arthrodesis, and motion restriction was observed after isolated subtalar arthrodesis. Surprisingly, talonavicular kinematics did not appear to change after isolated subtalar arthrodesis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Both joint fusions substantially decrease the motion of the reciprocal adjacent joint. Surgeons should be aware that the collateral costs with talonavicular fusion appear higher, and it has a significant effect on subtalar kinematics during the toe-off phase of gait.

Normal and malaligned talonavicular fusion alters cadaveric foot pressure and kinematics

Talonavicular (TN) fusion is a common treatment for TN arthritis or deformity correction. There is incongruous evidence regarding remaining motion at the talocalcaneal and calcaneocuboid joints after TN fusion. Additionally, the effects of a malaligned TN fusion are not well understood and alignment of the fusion may be important for overall foot integrity. This project assessed the kinematic and kinetic effects of neutral and malaligned TN fusions. Ten cadaveric feet were tested on a gait simulator in four conditions: unfused, fused in neutral, fused in varus, and fused in valgus. The fusions were simulated with external fixation hardware. An eight-camera motion analysis system and a 10-segment foot model generated kinematic data, and a pressure mat captured pressure data. Simulated TN fusion was achieved in eight feet. From unfused to fused-neutral, range of motion (ROM) was not eliminated in the adjacent joints, but the positions of the joints changed significantly throughout stance phase. Furthermore, the ROM increased at the tibiotalar joint. Plantar pressure and center of pressure shifted laterally with neutral fusion. The malalignments marginally affected the ROM but changed joint positions throughout stance phase. Pressure patterns were shifted laterally in varus malalignment and medially in valgus malalignment. The residual motion and the altered kinematics at the joints in the triple joint complex after TN fusion may subsequently increase the incidence of arthritis. Clinical significance: This study quantifies the effects of talonavicular fusion and malalignment on the other joints of the triple joint complex.

Comparison of the Acute Postoperative Complications Between Isolated Talonavicular Versus Talonavicular and Subtalar (Double) Arthrodesis in Flatfoot Deformity

BACKGROUND

Both isolated talonavicular arthrodesis and talonavicular and subtalar (such as double) arthrodesis can be effective treatments for adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) with good success rates, but double arthrodesis has become more commonly performed in recent years. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether isolated talonavicular versus talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis led to significantly different 30-day postoperative complication rates in patients with AAFD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to identify a large cohort of adult patients with the diagnosis of AAFD or posterior tibial tendon deformity (PTTD) who underwent isolated talonavicular or talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis between 2006 and 2020 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). To investigate whether there was a difference in complication rate between the 2 surgical cohorts, we estimated logistic regression models and log-binomial models on each of the outcomes while also adjusting for sex and age.

RESULTS

We found that there was no significant difference in the rate of major complications (P = .567) or readmissions (P = .567) between patients who underwent isolated talonavicular versus talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis for AAFD. However, there was a significantly higher rate of minor complications in patients who underwent isolated talonavicular arthrodesis when compared with patients who underwent talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis (P = .009).

CONCLUSION

This study found that there was no increased risk of 30-day postoperative complications or readmissions with talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis when compared with isolated talonavicular arthrodesis for AAFD. In addition, there was no increased risk of major complications for talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis when compared with isolated talonavicular arthrodesis, and isolated talonavicular arthrodesis actually carried a higher risk of minor complications for this surgical cohort. This may provide valuable information for surgeons considering surgical treatment for a particular case of AAFD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Hindfoot Arthrodeses and the Order of Joint Fixation Influence Tibiotalar Kinematics During Simulated Stance

BACKGROUND

Although hindfoot arthrodeses relieve pain and correct deformity, they have been associated with progressive tibiotalar degeneration. The objective was to quantify changes in tibiotalar kinematics after hindfoot arthrodeses, both isolated subtalar and talonavicular, as well as double arthrodesis, and to determine if the order of joint fixation affects tibiotalar kinematics.

METHODS

Hindfoot arthrodeses were performed in 14 cadaveric mid-tibia specimens. Specimens randomly received isolated fixation of the subtalar or talonavicular joint first, followed by fixation of the remaining joint for the double arthrodesis. A 6-degree-of-freedom robot sequentially simulated the stance phase of level walking for intact, isolated, and double arthrodesis conditions. Tibiotalar kinematic changes were compared for the intact and arthrodesis conditions. A subsequent analysis assessed the effect of the joint fixation order on tibiotalar kinematics.

RESULTS

Isolated and double hindfoot arthrodeses increased tibiotalar plantarflexion, inversion, and internal rotation during late stance. Tibiotalar kinematics changes occurring after isolated arthrodesis remained consistent after the double arthrodesis for both the subtalar- and talonavicular-first conditions. The order of joint fixation influenced tibiotalar kinematics through some portions of stance, where the talonavicular-first double arthrodesis increased tibiotalar plantarflexion, eversion, and internal rotation compared to the subtalar-first double.

CONCLUSION

Tibiotalar kinematics were modestly altered for all conditions, both isolated and double hindfoot arthrodeses. Changes in tibiotalar kinematics were consistent from the isolated to the double arthrodesis conditions and varied depending on which isolated hindfoot arthrodesis was performed first. Further research is needed to assess the clinical implications of the observed changes in tibiotalar kinematics, particularly as it pertains to the development of adjacent joint arthritis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings may correlate with clinical research that has cited hindfoot arthrodesis as a risk factor for adjacent tibiotalar arthritis. Once either the subtalar or talonavicular joint is fused, avoiding the arthrodesis of the second joint may not necessarily protect the tibiotalar joint.

Surgical Construct Type Is Associated With Time to Fusion and Reoperation Rate in Double and Isolated Talonavicular Arthrodeses

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the effect of surgical construct on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing isolated talonavicular (TN) or double (TN and subtalar ST) arthrodesis. TN constructs included plate and screw, screw and staple, and isolated staple constructs. Subtalar constructs included 1- and 2-screw constructs.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified 52 patients who underwent double or isolated TN arthrodesis between 2016 and 2021 by a single fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon with minimum 6 months of follow-up (mean = 1.62 years, range = 0.50-4.39 years). Data collected included demographics, medical history, surgical indication, surgical constructs used, complications, reoperations, patient-reported outcome measures, and radiographic measures.

RESULTS

Overall complication and reoperation rates were 26.3% and 12.3%, respectively. Among TN constructs, time to ST (P = .026) and TN (P = .018) fusion was significantly slower among patients receiving a plate and screw construct. Complication rate did not differ, but reoperation rate was significantly higher for plate and screw TN constructs (P = .039). Postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) Quality of Life (P = .028) and Total (P = .016) scores were significantly better among plate and screw TN constructs.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of screw and staple or isolated staple construct have significantly quicker time to fusion and lower reoperation rates than plate and screw constructs for the TN joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective cohort study.

What is the best fixation technique for isolated talonavicular arthrodesis? - A systematic review

Talonavicular arthrodesis is associated with a rate of non-union that ranges from 3 % to 37 %. Various fixation devices have been reported for talonavicular arthrodesis including screws, staples, plates, K-wires and intraosseous fix systems, however there is no definitive gold standard. This systematic review aims to compare clinical outcomes between different fixation devices for talonavicular arthrodesis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Google Scholar were reviewed for studies reporting on outcomes of different fixation techniques for talonavicular arthrodesis indicated for osteoarthritis, inflammatory and post-traumatic arthritis from 1946 to 2021. The primary outcome measure was union rate. Secondary outcome measures included functional improvement, cost, quality of life and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

9 articles involving 141 cases of talonavicular arthrodesis were identified. Fusion rates were as follows: screw fixation (n = 75): 87.5 % to 100 %, staple fixation (n = 13): 100 %, intraosseous fix system (n = 16): 100 %, and K-wire fixation (n = 2): 100 %. One study utilised a dorsal locking plate with two supplemented compression screws (n = 9, fusion rate= 100 %) and two studies used a combination of screws with staples (n = 26, fusion rate= 96 %). 7 of 9 studies measured functional outcomes and pain relief with improvement demonstrated in all fixation techniques. Quality of life, satisfaction and cost were inadequately reported amongst the included studies. All studies were rated as serious risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review consolidates the evidence for outcomes of different fixation techniques for TN arthrodesis, however a definitive judgement regarding the best fixation technique is unobtainable from current clinical evidence, due to lack of high-quality studies. With review of biomechanical studies and the limited clinical data, fixation with plate plus screw is most promising and would warrant further comparative study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Biomechanical comparison of nitinol compression staples versus fully threaded lag screws for talonavicular arthrodesis

Background

Talonavicular arthrodesis (TNA) is indicated for treatment of disorders that require immobilization of the hindfoot. Lag screw fixation is considered the reference standard technique for TNA. Despite consistently favorable clinical results using lag screw fixation, it is still associated with higher than desired complication and failure rates. Nitinol compression staples have been used for TNA based on potential advantages over lag screw fixation. However, functional biomechanical data comparing lag screw and nitinol compression staples for TNA are lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare nitinol compression staples to fully threaded lag screws for use in TNA with respect to their biomechanical properties during functional robotic testing.

Methods

TNA was performed on cadaveric feet (n = 12; 6 matched pairs) using either two nitinol compression staples (Arthrex, Naples, FL) or two fully threaded lag screws (Arthrex, Naples, FL) in random order, alternating between paired left and right feet. After instrumentation, specimens were mounting in a robotic testing system and loaded at 89 N/sec from 30 N to 445 N for 1 min. Then, continuous compressive load of 445 N was applied while cycling from 30° plantarflexion to 15° dorsiflexion for 10 cycles. Optical tracking markers attached to the talus and navicular bone tracked displacements. Translation data were recorded along the X, Y, Z planes. Rotation data were recorded for roll, pitch, and yaw. Significant (p < 0.05) differences between fixation methods were determined using paired t-Tests for each measured variable.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between staples and screws for translation in X, Y, or Z planes. When comparing rotation (roll, pitch, and yaw), there were no statistically significant differences with the exception of increased roll rotation for staple fixation versus lag screw fixation during static compression testing (p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Based on comparison to the reference standard lag screw fixation for clinically relevant biomechanical properties measured during functional robotic testing of the hindfoot, nitinol compression staples are a viable option for talonavicular arthrodesis.

Talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion with PEEK H-pode™ vs. Titanium Maxlock™ locking plates: Comparison of functional and radiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Locking plates are increasingly used to achieve hindfoot fusion. The objective of this study was to compare hindfoot fusion outcomes with the PEEK H-pode™ (Biotech™) locking plate and the titanium Maxlock™ (Tornier-Wright™) locking plate.

HYPOTHESIS

A polyetheretherketone (PEEK) H-pode™ locking plate provides similar fusion rates to a titanium Maxlock™ locking plate for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid arthrodesis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective comparative study in 39 patients (including 21 [54%] with pes planovalgus and 11 [28%] with neurological equinovarus deformities) who underwent talo-navicular and/or calcaneo-cuboid fusion, usually combined with subtalar fusion. The first 17 patients (January 2014-February 2016) were managed with Maxlock™ locking plates and the next 22 patients (March 2016-August 2018) with H-pode™ locking plates. These two cohorts of consecutive patients were comparable regarding age, sex distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. At last follow-up more than 1year after surgery, we compared functional scores, pain intensity, and fusion assessed by radiographs and computed tomography (CT) (threshold set at 33%).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 42months (range: 34-63months) in the Maxlock™ group and 25months (range: 12-36months) in the H-pode™ group. At last follow-up, the two groups were not significantly different for the mean values of the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society score, European Foot & Ankle Society score, and visual analogue scale pain score. Neither were the two groups significantly different for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion by CT. In the Maxlock™ group, we found non-significant trends towards a higher proportion of patients with talo-navicular nonunion (18% vs. 5% in the H-pode™ group) and weaker talo-navicular fusion in patients with pes planovalgus (60.8% vs. 82.0%, respectively). Radiographic results overestimated the fusion rates.

DISCUSSION

Talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion was not significantly different with H-pode™ and Maxlock™ locking plates. CT was more accurate than standard radiography to assess fusion. These results underline the usefulness of PEEK locking plates for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion; moreover, the radiolucency of PEEK facilitates the interpretation of radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Screw only versus screw plus plate in isolated talonavicular arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare outcomes of treatment of isolated talonavicular arthrodesis (ITNA) with screw only or screw plus plate, respectively.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 40 consecutive cases of ITNA [two-screw fixation patients: Group 1 (23 cases); screw-plus-plate fixation patients: Group 2 (17 cases)]. Outcome measures included radiographic findings, Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores.

RESULTS

Nonunion occurred more frequently in group 1 (21.7%) than in group 2 (5.9%), but there was no statistical significance (p = 0.216). Although the preoperative FAOS and VAS score showed similar results between both groups, there were significantly better clinical outcomes in two of five FAOS domains and VAS scores at 3 months postoperative and final follow-up (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although union rates were not significantly different, nonunion occurred more frequently in screw only group and we obtained more favorable clinical outcomes in screw plus plate group.

Radiographic Outcomes of Talonavicular Joint Arthrodesis With Varying Fixation Techniques in Stage III Adult Acquired Flatfoot Reconstruction

Utilization of the talonavicular joint (TN) arthrodesis as an isolated procedure or in combination with hindfoot arthrodesis has been described in the literature for treatment of numerous hindfoot conditions. When used in isolation or with concomitant hindfoot arthrodesis, the TN joint has demonstrated nonunion rates reported as high as 37% in the literature. Despite previous research, there remains a lack of agreement upon the ideal fixation technique for TN joint arthrodesis with and without concomitant subtalar joint arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the radiographic and clinical results of TN joint arthrodesis as part of double arthrodesis procedure utilizing 4 separate fixation constructs in the treatment of advanced hindfoot malalignment in stage III adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients who underwent TN joint arthrodesis as part of double arthrodesis procedure utilizing 4 separate fixation constructs. Our results demonstrated a nonunion rate of 16.2%, with 17 nonunions identified within our patient population. One (2.4%) nonunion was observed in the 3-screw cohort, 7 (33.3%) nonunions were observed in the 2-screw cohort, 4 (16.0%) nonunions were observed in the 2-screw plus plate cohort, and 5 (29.4%) nonunions were observed in the 1-screw plus plate cohort. The difference in nonunion rate between the 4 cohorts was statistically significant. Based on these results, we conclude that the use of a 3-screw construct for TN joint arthrodesis as part of double arthrodesis procedure demonstrates a statistically significant reduction in nonunion rate and should be considered a superior fixation construct for this procedure.

Which surgical approach is optimal for joint preparation in talonavicular fusion - A cadaver study

BACKGROUND

Fusion of the talonavicular joint has proven challenging in literature. The optimal surgical approach for talonavicular arthrodesis is still uncertain. This study compares the amount of physical joint preparation between dorsal and medial approaches to the talonavicular joint.

METHODS

Twenty fresh frozen cadaver specimens were randomly assigned to receive either a dorsal or medial operative approach to the talonavicular joint. The joint surface was prepared, and the joint was disarticulated. Image analysis, using ImageJ, was performed by two blinded reviewers to assess the joint surface preparation and this was compared by surgical approach.

RESULTS

The dorsal approach had a higher median percentage of talar and total talonavicular joint surface area prepared (75% vs. 59% (p = .007) and 82% vs. 70% (p = .005)). Irrespective of approach, the talus was significantly more difficult to prepare than the navicular (62% vs 88% (p = .001)).

CONCLUSION

The dorsal approach provides superior talonavicular joint preparation. The lateral ¼th of the talar head was the most difficult surface to prepare, and surgeons performing double or triple arthrodesis may prepare the lateral talar head from the lateral approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Persistent Pain After Hindfoot Fusion

One of the most challenging problems facing orthopedic surgeons is persistent pain after surgery and certainly is just as frustrating following hindfoot fusion. The hindfoot joints consist of the subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid (CC) joints. These joints are commonly fused for degenerative changes, deformity correction, inflammatory or neuropathic arthropathy, tarsal coalition, or primarily after trauma. Goals of hindfoot fusion are a painless plantigrade foot capable of fitting in shoes without orthotics or a brace. Many believe that deformity correction is achievable without inclusion of the CC joint. Managing patient expectations is important when counseling a patient especially regarding potential complications.

Isolated Talonavicular Arthrodesis for Traumatic Talonavicular Arthritis: Report of 2 Cases With Gait Analyses

Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis is one of the surgical procedures for patients with talonavicular arthritis. However, the 3-dimensional kinematic behavior of the hip, knee, and foot/ankle complex during walking after the arthrodesis remains unclear. The clinical outcomes and gait analyses of 2 cases who underwent isolated arthrodesis for talonavicular osteoarthritis with chronic dislocated navicular fracture are presented. Gait analysis was carried out in both cases 1 year after surgery to clarify the side-to-side differences in the ranges of motion of the hip, knee, and foot/ankle complex during walking. Both cases showed good clinical results and radiographic bone union. The kinematic data of the gait analyses showed considerable restriction in the range of motion of the ankle in all 3-dimensional planes for the fused foot compared with the contralateral side. Additionally, hyperextension of the knee in the late stance of gait on the operated side was observed in both cases. When talonavicular arthrodesis was performed for talonavicular osteoarthritis with chronic dislocated navicular fracture, postoperative generalized stiffness of the ankle and future disorder of the knee should be considered.Levels of Evidence: Level V: Case report.

Severe Talonavicular Osteoarthritis After a Neglected Navicular Stress Fracture: A Case Report

CASE

A 17-year-old high school rugby player complained of right midfoot pain for 18 months. Radiographs showed severe osteoarthritic changes in the right talonavicular joint. A navicular fracture, talonavicular joint narrowing, a talar head cyst, and proximal navicular fragmentation were detected on computed tomography (CT). The patient underwent removal of the osteochondral fragments and fracture reduction and returned to rugby 8 months postoperatively. CT showed a remodeling of the talonavicular joint 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

In a young athlete, reconstruction of the talonavicular joint should be attempted before joint fusion, even if the joint shows signs of secondary osteoarthritis.

A cadaveric comparison of two methods for isolated talonavicular arthrodesis: Two-screws versus plate with integrated compression screw

BACKGROUND

This study compared stiffness between two constructs for talonavicular arthrodesis: a dorsomedial plating system and two partially threaded cannulated cancellous screws. We hypothesized that the plate would exhibit greater stiffness and resistance to deformation during cyclic loading.

METHODS

The constructs were implanted in eight matched pairs of cadaveric feet and subjected to axial torsion, cantilever bending in two directions, and cyclic loading to failure.

RESULTS

The two-screw constructs were significantly stiffer in plantar-dorsal bending (p = .025) and trended towards a higher number of cycles before failure than the plate group (p = .087). No significant differences were observed in internal torsion (p = .620), external torsion (p = .165), or medial-lateral bending (p = .686).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided the first biomechanical assessment of a plating system with an integrated compression screw, which was significantly less stiff than a two-screw construct when loaded from plantar to dorsal.

Staple-Plate Plus Screw vs Screw Alone in Talonavicular Arthrodesis: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated whether the addition of a nitinol staple-plate to a single cannulated screw increased the mechanical stability for a talonavicular fixation construct.

METHODS

Twenty matched pairs of cadaveric feet were randomized to fusion with either a single 5.5-mm cannulated screw or a screw and a plate with 2 screws and a slot with an 18-mm nitinol staple. After in situ fusion procedure, the talonavicular joint complex was dissected free and the ends were embedded in epoxy. The specimens were then cyclically loaded on a servohydraulic load frame (1000 cycles at 20 N, increasing at intervals of 20 N until failure), half of them for cantilever bending and the other half for torsion.

RESULTS

In the bending arm of the study, the staple-plate group showed significantly higher stiffness, failure load, and cycles to failure. In the torsion arm of the study, the staple-plate group also had higher cycles to failure, stiffness in external rotation, and torque to failure. No significant difference was noted in stiffness in internal rotation.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant increase in stability of the talonavicular joint when a nitinol staple-plate construct was placed to augment a single cannulated screw for the purpose of a talonavicular fusion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This information may be helpful to surgeons in implant selection for this common arthrodesis procedure.

Post-Traumatic Hindfoot Arthritis

The hindfoot is functionally defined as the articulations between the talus, calcaneus, navicular, and cuboid. It is a biomechanically important peritalar unit for shock absorption and propulsion with the subtalar and talonavicular joint essential to its function. The primary cause of hindfoot arthritis is post-traumatic. Other causes include long-term misalignment such as adult-acquired flatfoot, cavus foot, and inflammatory arthritis. Prevention of post-traumatic hindfoot arthritis is the primary objective. Anatomical reduction and fixation of articular hindfoot fractures is the preferred pathway. This article discusses the principles of treatment of hindfoot arthritis. When post-traumatic changes cannot be managed by nonsurgical means, an anatomical well-aligned arthrodesis is indicated. This article addresses the principles of managing this condition, which have been championed by Professor Sigvard T. Hansen. New approaches and techniques are discussed that achieve the goals of a stable, functional plantigrade foot.

Biomechanical Considerations in Rearfoot Fusions

This article discusses rearfoot fusions for foot and ankle surgeons. It establishes normal foot and ankle function primarily in the stance phase of gait. The foot is greatly affected by external and internal forces, which contribute to normal function or the need for compensatory mechanisms. As a result of compensation, many symptoms develop, often leading to debilitating disorders such as degenerative joint disease. The interaction of the ankle, subtalar, and midtarsal joints are outlined. Congenital deformities, trauma and abnormal compensation are reviewed along with corresponding sequelae. Surgery is often indicated to reduce symptoms, improve position, and help stabilize the foot.

Derotation of the Talus and Arthrodesis Treatment of Stages II-V Müller-Weiss Disease: Midterm Results of 36 Cases

BACKGROUND

Various operative procedures have been reported for the treatment of Müller-Weiss disease (MWD). This study reports the midterm operative treatment results for stages II to V MWD with derotation of the talus and arthrodesis.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients (36 feet) with MWD were treated by talonavicular (TN) or talonavicular-cuneiform (TNC) arthrodesis in our center from 2008 to 2015. The affected feet were staged according to the Maceira staging system (stage II: 9; stage III: 10; stage IV: 9; stage V: 8). The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scale, the visual analog scale (VAS), and relative radiologic parameters were evaluated preoperatively and also during follow-up. The mean follow-up duration was 38.2 (range, 25-113 months).

RESULTS

The final follow-up showed satisfactory outcomes. Overall, the AOFAS scores improved from 41.5 (range, 20-56) to 85.3 (range, 68-100) points ( P <.001), and the VAS score decreased from 5.7 (range, 3-8) to 0.9 (range, 0-4) points ( P <.001). The Tomeno-Méary angle decreased from -6.7 (range, -26.4 to 17.7) to 0.7 (range, -5.3 to 7) degrees ( P=.001). The calcaneal pitch angle increased from 13.7 (range, 4.1-26.2) to 22.0 (range, 13.3-28.9) degrees ( P < .001). The anteroposterior (AP) talar-first metatarsal angle decreased from -15.8 (range, -30.1 to -13.7) to -7.0 (range, -25.9 to -8.9) degrees ( P < .001), and the AP talocalcaneal angle increased from 14.7 (range, 4.7-22.3) to 22.1 (range, 13.4-29.5) degrees ( P=.005). The AP talonavicular coverage angle decreased from -27.0 (range, -40.4 to -13.3) to -7.8 degrees (range, -20.7 to -1.8) degrees ( P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The midterm results found that the TN or TNC joint fusion could achieve a favorable clinical and radiologic outcome for patients with MWD. Even for the patients with severe deformities (stages IV-V), this treatment strategy could also achieve satisfactory deformity correction and functional improvement. Intraoperative restoration of talus rotation was the key to normal alignment of the subtalar joint/TN joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Light Bulb Procedure for the Treatment of Tarsal Navicular Osteonecrosis After Failed Percutaneous Decompression: A Case Report

Tarsal navicular osteonecrosis in adults is a rare condition with unclear etiology, and the optimal treatment has not been established. Here we report a case of tarsal navicular osteonecrosis with a complete course of treatment and comprehensive imaging studies starting at an early stage. A 37-year-old female diagnosed with tarsal navicular osteonecrosis was first treated with percutaneous decompression, but her symptoms persisted postoperatively. The tarsal navicular showed no further collapse, but follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 months postoperatively revealed persistent osteonecrotic changes. Debridement of the necrotic bone with preservation of the cortical shell and bone substitute packing for the defect (light bulb procedure) were performed. The symptoms resolved by 3 months postoperatively, and the patient could return to work. At a 6-year follow-up visit, the patient was free of symptoms, and MRI showed remodeling of the tarsal navicular without further collapse.

Structures at Risk During Percutaneous Screw Fixation for Talonavicular Fusion

BACKGROUND:

Talonavicular (TN) fusion using screws dorsomedially and dorsolaterally can cause neurovascular injury. The purpose of our cadaveric study was to evaluate the safety of percutaneous screw insertion in relation to dorsal neurovascular structures.

METHODS:

Ten fresh-frozen cadaver legs were used for this study. Percutaneous cannulated screws were inserted to perform isolated TN arthrodesis. The screws were inserted at 3 consistent sites: a "medial screw" at the dorsomedial navicular where it intersected at the medial plane of the first cuneiform, a "central screw" at the edge of the dorsal navicular between the medial and intermediate cuneiforms, and a "lateral screw" at the edge of the dorsal navicular between the intermediate and lateral cuneiforms. Superficial and deep dissections were carried out to identify any injured nerves, arteries, and/or tendons.

RESULTS:

The medial screw injured the anterior tibialis tendon in 2 cases (20%), the central screw injured the extensor hallucis longus tendon in 3 cases (30%), and the lateral screw injured the anterior branch of the superior peroneal nerve (SPN), the lateral branch of the SPN, and the medial branch of the distal peroneal nerve (DPN) once each in a total of 3 cases (30%). Despite no direct injury, the central screw indicated a potential risk of neurovascular injury: closest distance to the anterior SPN was 2 mm and to the medial DPN 2 mm.

CONCLUSION:

Although neurovascular injury risk exists for all of these screw placements, TN fusion with a central screw introduced a potentially decreased risk of neurovascular injury at the expense of increased risk of tendon injury compared to the lateral screw.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:

Based on these results, we recommend a careful dissection be performed prior to percutaneous screw insertion.

Role of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 on Hindfoot Arthrodesis

Despite advances in understanding bone healing physiology and surgical techniques, delayed union and nonunion still occur after the treatment of hindfoot arthrodesis. There is increasing appeal of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) owing to the innate osteoinductive abilities of BMPs. Effective treatment with BMPs has been shown in animal studies. Human clinical studies have also shown success. The only study investigating the use of recombinant human BMP (rhBMP)-2 in hindfoot arthrodesis found a significant increase in fusion rate. Treatment cost effective. Complications from their use remain low. rhBMP-2 is a safe and effective bone-healing adjunct in hindfoot arthrodesis surgery.

Dual Window Approach With Two-Side Screw Fixation for Isolated Talonavicular Arthrodesis

Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis is a commonly performed surgical intervention. Nonunion is a dreaded complication. The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical and radiologic outcome of talonavicular arthrodesis using a dual approach with 2-side screw fixation. From February 2012 to September 2014, isolated talonavicular arthrodesis was performed on 17 joints of 16 patients (mean age 59.12 years). All procedures were performed by a single surgeon. The incidence of union, visual analog scale scores, and complications were analyzed. Radiographic union was achieved in all 17 cases (100%) at a mean period of 13.12 weeks. The visual analog scale scores had improved significantly (p < .001) at a mean follow-up of 48.53 weeks. One patient (6%) had minimal wound problems, and one (6%) showed prolonged swelling postoperatively. We have concluded that the dual window approach with 2-side screw fixation for isolated talonavicular arthrodesis results in excellent clinical and radiographic results and high fusion rates.

Efficiency of locking-plate fixation in isolated talonavicular fusion

INTRODUCTION

Talonavicular (TN) fusion is an effective means of treating hindfoot deformity and pain. At the cost of a certain limited morbidity, it allows lasting stabilization of all of the torque joints. Non-union rates, however, are high, due to insufficient mechanical stability of the fixation. The present study assessed radiological and clinical results in TN fusion fixed by two retrograde compression screws and a dorsal locking plate.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective single-surgeon study recruited 26 TN fusions performed in 25 patients (13 male, 12 female; mean age, 54.6±15.4years) between March 1st, 2010 and February 28th, 2014. Mean follow-up was 14.9±8.7months. Bone fusion and anatomic results were assessed on dorsoplantar, lateral and Méary weight-bearing radiographs.

RESULTS

Radiologic fusion was achieved in all cases, at a mean 2.7±0.7months. Mean TN coverage angle was 21.7±10.5° preoperatively and 3.8±1.8° at follow-up. Mean AOFAS score improved significantly, from 37.2±11.8 (range, 20-53) preoperatively to 79.4±11.4 (range, 45-98) at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

TN fusion fixed by two retrograde compression screws and a dorsal locking plate provided a high rate of consolidation without loss of angular correction and with satisfactory clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective.

Case Series Using a Novel Implant and Accelerated Rehabilitation for Patients Undergoing an Isolated Talonavicular Arthrodesis

Talonavicular (TN) arthrodeses for TN arthritis have a high rate of nonunions for an essential hindfoot joint. In this case series, 12 patients underwent an isolated TN arthrodesis using a novel implant (IO FiX) by a single surgeon with a minimum 1-year follow-up (30.1 ± 14.7 months; mean ± SD). All patients (62 ± 12 years) underwent an aggressive rehabilitation protocol given the strength and compression of the implant. There were no nonunions, nor were there any patients lost to follow-up. Time to radiographic union was 9.6 ± 1.4 weeks. The Visual Analog Scale pain level decreased from 7.3 ± 0.9 preoperatively to 2.1 ± 0.7 postoperatively (P < .001). The Short-Form-12 physical component improved from 27.9 ± 4.2 preoperatively to 42.2 ± 3.5 postoperatively (P < 0.001), while the Short-Form-12 mental component did not change from 50.8 ± 6.9 preoperatively to 54.4 ± 3.8 postoperatively (P > .05). Use of the novel fixation device for TN arthrodesis by a single surgeon with an accelerated rehabilitation protocol significantly decreased patients' pain and improved their physical functional outcomes (P < .001). The IO FiX implant can potentially improve TN arthrodesis fusion rates and surgical outcomes.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV: Case series.

Does autogenous bone graft work? A logistic regression analysis of data from 159 papers in the foot and ankle literature

BACKGROUND

While autogenous cancellous iliac crest bone graft is the gold standard for foot and ankle surgery, it lacks Level I evidence. Although one third of all graft cases performed in the United States today rely on allograft, some surgeons believe no graft is necessary. We hypothesized that a systematic review of the foot and ankle literature would reveal that (1) autogenous bone graft during foot and ankle arthrodesis would demonstrate healing rates that were superior to the use of either using allograft or no bone graft at all, and (2) these differences would be even more dramatic in patients having risk factors that impair bone healing. To our knowledge, neither of these assessments to date has ever been performed with this body of literature. The goal of this study was to review the use and union rates of bone graft during foot and ankle arthrodesis and determine if autogenous bone graft was superior.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to include articles between 1959 and 2012 using autograft, allograft, and/or no bone graft for foot and/or ankle arthrodesis. Case reports involving fewer than four patients, investigations failing to incorporate outcome data, those involving orthobiologic augmentation, and those including vascularized graft, xenograft, or pediatric patients were excluded. Recorded search results included patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-operative diagnosis, surgical procedure, bone graft type and indication, union rate, method of fixation, patient satisfaction, all outcome scores, definition of healing/success, and any listed complications including revision. Final data were stratified based upon the type of graft material.

RESULTS

This search generated 953 related articles, of which 159 studies (5327 patients) met inclusion criteria. The majority (153/159) were retrospective case series. Systematic review demonstrated a trend toward higher union rates for cancellous autograft (OR 1.39, p=0.11), structural autograft (OR 1.52, p=0.09), and cancellous allograft (OR 1.31, p=0.52) relative to no graft material, but none reached statistical significance. Compared to no graft, structural allograft trended toward worse performance (OR 0.62, p=0.17). The overall probability of union was 93.7% for cancellous autograft, 94.2% for structural autograft, 93.3% for cancellous allograft, 91.4% for no graft, and 86.9% for structural allograft. When only comparing the 19 papers that included a no graft arm (91.9% union rate), data revealed the highest union using cancellous autograft (95.1%, OR 1.73, p=0.09) and structural autograft (96.3%, OR 2.33, p=0.06) while only 76% for structural allograft. No significant statistical association existed between union rates and other recorded variables.

CONCLUSION

Systematic analysis of bone graft use in foot and ankle fusions favors the use of autograft and cancellous allograft for optimized healing rates, although no differences were statistically significant. If we assume that graft material been chosen for more complex procedures having lower anticipated union rates, then these data lend further support to the use of autograft and cancellous allograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Isolated talonavicular joint arthrodesis through minimal incision surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze bony fusion and functional outcomes after talonavicular arthrodesis (TNA) using an original minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

METHODS

There was a total of 11 feet in 11 patients who underwent TNA and were followed up for 47 months (range 40.8-53.1). Functional outcomes were measured by AOFAS and quality of life by eight sections of SF-36.

RESULTS

Radiographic and clinical consolidation was achieved in 10 of 11 cases. In the AOFAS score, physical function improved a mean of 34.4 points (95% CI: 23.2-45.6; p<.0001) and pain improved a mean of 23.6 points (95% CI: 17.4-29.8; p<.0001). One osteoporotic and rheumatic patient had a non-union. No cases of early complications, such as wound infections, neurovascular damage or delayed wound healing, occurred.

CONCLUSION

Isolated TNA by MIS could be an option for the treatment of TN arthritis, especially for patients at greater risk of wound healing complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

A new method for achieving compression in hindfoot arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

When performing hindfoot arthodeses, one goal of fixation is often to achieve compression across the joint. Traditional lag screws are applied eccentrically, providing compression more on the edge of the fusion. A new technique, using a post in one bone and a lag screw through the post to the other bone, may offer better compression across more of the joint.

METHODS

There are three parts to this study comparing a post-and-screw construct to traditional lag screws. Synthetic bone models, representative of the talonavicular joint, were created and assessed for biomechanical measures of compression. Next, the post-and-screw construct was tested in cadavers, under conditions representing early weight bearing after arthrodesis surgery. Finally, 18 patients who had a talonavicular fusion with a post-and-screw construct with one surgeon were compared to the previous 18 patients fixed with traditional screws.

RESULTS

In the synthetic bone model, the post-and-screw construct brought the centre of compression closer to the centre of the joint, suggesting compression was less eccentric. Neither traditional screws nor the post-and-screw construct were sufficiently strong to resist early weight bearing forces in cadaver specimens. In the clinical comparison, four patients had a painful nonunion when fixed with traditional screws, compared to none in the post-and-screw construct.

CONCLUSIONS

A post-and-screw construct spreads the forces of compression more uniformly across an arthrodesis, even when placed eccentrically. Although not all the biomechanical measures were superior, the post-and-screw construct achieved higher levels of successful fusion in patients. This technology may offer improved outcomes in some clinical scenarios and deserves further study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Reconstruction of the medial talonavicular joint in simulated flatfoot deformity

BACKGROUND

Reconstructing the ligamentous constraints of the medial arch associated with adult acquired flatfoot deformity remains a challenge. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of several reconstruction techniques of the medial arch. We hypothesized that an anatomic reconstruction of the spring ligament complex would correct the deformity better than other techniques tested.

METHODS

Three reconstructions of the medial support structures were performed on each specimen to recreate the different lines of action and insertions of the medial ligamentous complex in 12 specimens with a simulated flatfoot deformity. Talonavicular and tibiocalcaneal (hindfoot) orientations were measured in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes in the intact, flatfoot, and reconstructed conditions.

RESULTS

While each reconstruction technique corrected the deformity (P < .05), proximal fixation of the graft corrected the greatest amount of talonavicular deformity while also correcting hindfoot valgus (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The fixation points and lines of action of a medial arch reconstruction have important implications on deformity correction in a flatfoot model. Despite its fidelity to the native structure, the anatomic spring ligament reconstruction provided the least amount of correction. These findings suggest that other ligamentous structures of the medial arch are critical in supporting the midfoot.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Reconstruction of the ligamentous supports of the medial arch might be able to correct substantial amounts of deformity without osseous procedures like calcaneal osteotomies or midfoot fusions.

An anatomical study comparing two surgical approaches for isolated talonavicular arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Two operative approaches are commonly used for isolated talonavicular arthrodesis: the medial and the dorsal approach. It is recognized that access to the lateral aspect of the talonavicular joint can be limited when using the medial approach, and it is our experience that using the dorsal approach addresses this issue. We performed an anatomical study using cadaver specimens, to compare the amount of articular surface that can be accessed by each operative approach.

METHODS

Medial and dorsal approaches to the talonavicular joint were performed on each of 11 cadaveric specimens (10 fresh frozen, 1 embalmed). Distraction of the joint was performed as used intraoperatively and the accessible area of articular surfaces was marked for each of the 2 approaches using a previously reported technique. Disarticulation was performed and the marked surface area was quantified using an immersion digital microscribe, allowing a 3-dimensional virtual model of the articular surfaces to be assessed.

RESULTS

The median percentage of total accessible talonavicular articular surface area for the medial and dorsal approaches was 71% and 92%, respectively (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study provides quantifiable measurements of the articular surface accessible by the medial and dorsal approaches to the talonavicular joint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These data support for the use of the dorsal approach for talonavicular arthrodesis, particularly in cases where access to the lateral half of the joint is necessary.

Triple arthrodesis: tips and tricks to navigate trouble

Triple arthrodesis is a powerful corrector of hindfoot deformity related to trauma, rheumatoid arthritis, and long-standing peritalar subluxation with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. To avoid the common postoperative complications related to triple arthrodesis, one must be meticulous in preoperative evaluation as well as surgical technique. Presented are some tips and tricks to avoid the common complications and provide the patient with a plantigrade, stable foot, as well as some salvage options for triple arthrodesis in a malunited position.

Talonavicular arthroscopy for osteochondral lesions: technique and case series

BACKGROUND

Traditional treatment of talonavicular osteochondral lesions (OCLs) requires an open procedure. Arthroscopic microfracture of talonavicular OCLs may provide a viable, minimally invasive approach. The purpose of this study was to describe an arthroscopic approach for treatment of talonavicular OCLs, describe the proximity of arthroscopic portals to important structures in cadaver specimens, and report magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical outcomes of this technique.

METHODS

Five cadaver specimens were dissected so proximity of portals to adjacent tendons and neurovascular structures could be assessed. Subsequently, 3 athletic patients with OCLs of the talonavicular joint were treated with arthroscopic debridement and microfracture. Patient records and imaging studies were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

In the cadaver specimens, the mean distance between the neurovascular bundle and the medial border of the extensor hallucis longus (EHL) was 9.0 (range, 8 to 10) mm. The saphenous nerve was located a mean of 6.8 (range, 6 to 7) mm from the medial border of the tibialis anterior tendon. Therefore, portals were placed just medial to the EHL and tibialis anterior tendon to avoid the neurovascular bundle and saphenous nerve, respectively. In all patients, access, identification of the OCL, debridement, and microfracture were successfully performed. All patients demonstrated improvements in Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores and Short Form-12 scores and began gradual return to activity within 12 weeks following the operation. No significant complications occurred. MRI indicated signal consistent with reparative fibrocartilage in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Talonavicular arthroscopy allowed visualization, curettage, synovectomy, loose body removal, and microfracture of OCLs that would have otherwise required an open approach. At early follow-up, all patients had returned to their previous activity levels. Arthroscopy of the talonavicular joint was a viable approach for microfracture of OCLs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Talonavicular joint fixation: a biomechanical comparison of locking compression plates and lag screws

BACKGROUND

Fusion of the talonavicular (TN) joint is an effective treatment for hindfoot pain and deformity. Nonunion in hindfoot fusion procedures is most common in the TN joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the mechanical stability of 2 different forms of fixation for isolated fusion of the TN joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

13 fresh-frozen cadaver foot and ankles were procured and mounted vertically in a robotic biomechanical testing platform and tested before and after operative fixation; 7 specimens received 2 retrograde lag screws (2S), and 6 specimens received a locked compression plate with 1 retrograde lag screw (PS). A constant Achilles tendon load was initially applied followed by internal or external rotation (ER) of the foot and axial compression through the tibia. The relative motion of the talus and navicular bones was tracked using 3-dimensional optoelectric targets. Motion data were recorded in the traditional anatomical reference frame and then transformed into the TN joint frame.

RESULTS

In the TN joint frame, relative to the intact (preoperative) state, the plate fixation group PS showed a significant reduction in separation along the long axis of the talus in 3 out of the 4 loading scenarios (P values = .007, .02, and .05). The PS construct also significantly restricted the flexion-extension motion at the joint compared with the 2S construct, during the ER tests (P values = .002 and .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our simulated weight-bearing model, a dorsal locked compression plate with 1 retrograde screw was more effective at limiting the 3D motion across the TN joint compared with the traditional construct of 2 retrograde screws.

Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis for talonavicular arthritis: a follow-up study

We have reviewed a single surgeon's (M.S.) experience of talonavicular arthrodesis in 7 feet in 7 patients with isolated talonavicular arthritis. A standard dorsomedial approach was used to the talonavicular joint. Fixation was performed with 5.5-mm, partially threaded, cancellous screws. The visual analog scale for the foot and ankle (VASFA) was used to measure the preoperative and postoperative results in the categories of pain, function, other complaints, and total score. The follow-up period was 17 to 90 months (mean 48). The overall VASFA score ranged from +19.2 to +57.6 (mean +33.2, p < .01). The VASFA score for pain ranged from +19 to +74.8 (mean +51.3, p < .01). The VASFA score for function ranged from +12.5 to +68.2 (mean +28.3, p < .01). The VASFA score for other problems ranged from +12 to +45.8 (mean +25.5, p < .01). None of the 7 feet required revision, and all 7 patients were satisfied with the outcome and would have the operation again. We have concluded that, taking into account the small power of the present study, talonavicular arthrodesis is a successful treatment for isolated talonavicular arthritis.

Arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint using angle-stable mini-plates: a prospective study

PURPOSE

The talonavicular joint is a central connection of the human foot. Symptomatic talonavicular arthritis can be adequately addressed by isolated talonavicular fusion. However, non-union remains a relevant clinical challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. The aim of this study was to analyse the clinicoradiological outcome of talonavicular fusion using angle-stable mini-plates.

METHODS

We performed 30 talonavicular fusions in 30 patients (12 male, 18 female) with a mean age of 58.8 years (range, 22-74) between 2005 and 2007. Osseous joint fusion was achieved using mono- and multidirectional angle-stable mini-plates. The patients followed a standardised immobilisation and weight bearing protocol. The mean postoperative follow up was 15.8 months (6.1-23.8).

RESULTS

The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society AOFAS score increased significantly from 31.7 (19-42) to 82.3 points (55-97) (p < 0.001). Neither age at operation nor gender influenced the score results significantly, while the aetiology of talonavicular degeneration showed a significant effect. Mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity (0-10) reduced from 8.6 to 1.7 (p < 0.001). Good or excellent results were achieved in 26 patients, while two patients reported fair and another two poor results. Complete osseous fusion was observed at a mean of 10.9 weeks (8-13) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of talonavicular arthritis, the application of mono- and multidirectional angle-stable mini-plates provided a strong fixation that led to high union rates and good to excellent overall outcome.

Vascularized pedicle bone grafting for nonunions of the tarsal navicular

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis and nonunions of the tarsal navicular remain a challenging clinical problem. This article presents a series of patients treated with local vascularized pedicle bone grafting to the navicular. The purpose of this study was to determine the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of this technique.

METHODS

Patients who underwent local vascularized pedicle bone grafting for osteonecrosis of the navicular from 2002 to 2007 were included in this study. The Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), the Revised Foot Function Index (FFI-R), and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) outcomes questionnaires were administered at most recent followup. Postoperative imaging was reviewed for evidence of healing. Eight patients with a mean age of 47.5 (range, 18 to 68) years were included in this study. The mean followup time was 61 (range, 32 to 72) months.

RESULTS

Two patients underwent concomitant talonavicular arthrodesis. Two patients underwent additional procedures to address continued nonunion of the navicular. Neither patient elected to complete the outcomes questionnaires. The mean postoperative FFI score was 35.2 (range, 16.6 to 59). SF-36 subscales were as follows: bodily pain, 53; general health, 55; mental health, 75; physical function, 56; role emotional, 61; role physical, 37.5; social function, 71; and vitality, 56. The mean postoperative AOS pain score was 27.9 (range, 0 to 46.2) and the average disability score was 31.4 (range, 0 to 78.2). Postoperative imaging revealed consolidation and full healing in six of eight patients.

CONCLUSION

Vascularized pedicle bone grafting is a treatment option for patients with chronic nonunion or osteonecrosis of the navicular. Additionally, it may serve as an adjunct procedure to provide increased vascularity to talonavicular arthrodesis in cases of navicular osteonecrosis and talonavicular arthritis.

Management of the rigid arthritic flatfoot in adults: triple arthrodesis

The traditional surgical treatment for adults with a rigid, arthritic flatfoot is a dual-incision triple arthrodesis. Over time, this procedure has proved to be reliable and reproducible in obtaining successful deformity correction through fusion and good clinical results. However, the traditional dual-incision triple arthrodesis is not without shortcomings. Early complications include lateral wound problems, malunion, and nonunion. Long-term follow-up of patients after a triple arthrodesis has shown that many develop adjacent joint arthritis at the ankle or midfoot. This particular problem should be considered an expected consequence, rather than a failure of the procedure. Although the indications for and surgical techniques used in triple arthrodesis have evolved and improved with time (predictably improving results in the intermediate term), the triple arthrodesis should be regarded as a salvage procedure. Certain measures can be taken by the surgeon to avoid some problems. If patients are at risk for lateral wound complications, the arthrodesis could be performed through a single medial incision. However, this can make some aspects of the CC fusion more difficult. Implants would have to be inserted percutaneously, which prevents the surgeon from using either staples or plates. If a patient were to need a lateral column lengthening through a CC distraction fusion, this would not be possible medially. If either the ST or CC joints have minimal degenerative changes, they could be spared through a double or modified double arthrodesis, respectively. Although these procedures that deviate from the traditional triple arthrodesis offer promise, further study is required to better define their role in treatment of the rigid, arthritic AAFD. Triple arthrodesis is, by no means, a simple surgery. It requires preoperative planning, meticulous preparation of bony surfaces, cognizance of hindfoot positioning, and rigidity of fixation. The procedure also requires enough experience on the part of the operating surgeon to anticipate postoperative problems and provide modifications in traditional technique for certain patients.

Osteoarthritis of the talonavicular joint with pseudarthrosis of the navicular bone: a case report

Introduction

Osteoarthritis of the talonavicular joint caused by inflammatory, degenerative, and post-traumatic arthritis has been commonly described, and isolated arthrodesis for talonavicular joint has usually been performed for such conditions. However, arthritis accompanied by pseudarthrosis of the navicular bone is an extremely rare case, and to the best of our knowledge, isolated arthrodesis for this situation has not been previously described in any published reports.

Case presentation

The patient was a 39-year-old Japanese man. He had complained of pain in his left middle foot since a fall from his motorcycle six months previously. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans revealed pseudarthrosis of the navicular bone. MRI indicated mild arthritic change in the talonavicular joint and avascular necrosis of the navicular bone. We performed an isolated arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint with two 6.5 mm cancellous screws. One year after the operation, radiographical bone union had been obtained, and the patient reported no pain and complete satisfaction with the result.

Conclusions

Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis is one of the effective procedures for the treatment of traumatic talonavicular arthritis with pseudarthrosis of the navicular bone both in providing pain relief and functional improvement.

The isolated talonavicular arthrodesis

Based on a high percentage of good results, retrospective studies strongly suggest that isolated talonavicular arthrodesis provides efficient pain relief and functional improvement in case of talonavicular arthritis in rheumatoid arthritis, primary or posttraumatic arthritis, flexible acquired flatfoot deformity, residual dorsolateral subluxation of the talonavicular joint after surgical treatment of clubfoot, and some neurologic disorders. However, prospective trials with rigorous methodology are required to establish evidence of efficacy for this procedure. Well-designed biomechanical studies have demonstrated the key role of the talonavicular joint in the complex hindfoot motion and may serve as baseline for further prospective studies.

Arthroscopic debridement of the talonavicular joint using dorsomedial and dorsolateral portals: a cadaveric study of safety and access

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and access talonavicular arthroscopy provides for the purpose of arthrodesis through dorsomedial and dorsolateral portals in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

The talonavicular joints of 8 cadaveric specimens were arthroscopically debrided, by use of a dorsomedial instrumentation portal and a dorsolateral visualization portal. The specimens were dissected with the arthroscopic equipment left in place, the distances from the edge of the instrument to the neurovascular structures were measured, and the specimens were then examined for signs of damage. Finally, the naviculars and tali were removed, and the percentage of debrided subchondral bone was determined by use of ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).

RESULTS

Examination of the talonavicular joint showed mean subchondral debridement of 98.6% of the navicular and 83.2% of the talus. The dorsomedial portal had a median distance of 4.5 mm, 10.5 mm, and 7 mm to the superficial peroneal nerve, the medial terminal branch of the deep peroneal nerve, and the dorsalis pedis, respectively. The dorsolateral portal had a median distance of 1 mm to the lateral branch of the deep peroneal nerve, with the nerve found resting on the arthroscope in 2 specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic debridement of the talonavicular joint is possible. Because of the risk of damage to the lateral terminal branch of the deep peroneal nerve, an alternative to the dorsolateral portal should be considered.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides evidence that arthroscopic assisted talonavicular arthrodesis is possible but that further research is needed to ensure the safety of the technique.

Total ankle replacement in association with hindfoot fusion

We report the clinical and radiological outcome of total ankle replacement performed in conjunction with hindfoot fusion or in isolation. Between May 2003 and June 2008, 60 ankles were treated with total ankle replacement with either subtalar or triple fusion, and the results were compared with a control group of 288 ankles treated with total ankle replacement alone.

After the mean follow-up of 39.5 months (12 to 73), the ankles with hindfoot fusion showed significant improvement in the mean visual analogue score for pain (p < 0.001), the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (p < 0.001), and the mean of a modified version of this score (p < 0.001). The mean visual analogue pain score (p = 0.304) and mean modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (p = 0.119) were not significantly different between the hindfoot fusion and the control groups. However, the hindfoot fusion group had a significantly lower mean range of movement (p = 0.009) and a higher rate of posterior focal osteolysis (p = 0.04). Both groups showed various complications (p = 0.131) and failure occurring at a similar rate (p = 0.685).

Subtalar or triple fusion is feasible and has minimal adverse effects on ankles treated with total ankle replacement up to midterm follow-up. The clinical outcome of total ankle replacement when combined with hindfoot fusion is comparable to that of ankle replacement alone. Thus, hindfoot fusion should be performed in conjunction with total ankle replacement when indicated.

Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the foot and tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The foot is often affected in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Subtalar joints are involved more frequently than ankle joints. Deformities of subtalar joints often lead to painful flatfoot and valgus deformity of the heel. Major contributors to the early development of foot deformities include talonavicular joint destruction and tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction, mainly due to its rupture.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2005 we performed isolated talonavicular arthrodesis in 26 patients; twenty women and six men. Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction was diagnosed preoperatively by physical examination and by MRI. Talonavicular fusion was achieved via screws in eight patients, memory staples in twelve patients and a combination of screws and memory staples in six cases. The average duration of immobilization after the surgery was four weeks, followed by rehabilitation. Full weight bearing was allowed two to three months after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age of the group at the time of the surgery was 43.6 years. MRI examination revealed a torn tendon in nine cases with no significant destruction of the talonavicular joint seen on X-rays. Mean of postoperative followup was 4.5 years (3 to 7 years). The mean of AOFAS Hindfoot score improved from 48.2 preoperatively to 88.6 points at the last postoperative followup. Eighteen patients had excellent results (none, mild occasional pain), six patients had moderate pain of the foot and two patients had severe pain in evaluation with the score. Complications included superficial wound infections in two patients and a nonunion developed in one case.

CONCLUSIONS

Early isolated talonavicular arthrodesis provides excellent pain relief and prevents further progression of the foot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction.

The influence of talonavicular versus double arthrodesis on load dependent motion of the midtarsal joint

BACKGROUND

Today the most frequently used operative procedures in advanced arthritis of the hindfoot joints are isolated talonavicular arthrodesis and double arthrodesis (involving the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints, i.e. the Chopart joint). This in vitro study investigates whether the fusion of the talonavicular joint alone can provide the hindfoot, as well as a midfoot, with comparable biomechanical stability as the double arthrodesis does. Hence with the less-invasive intervention the same benefit in terms of pain reduction and better functionality could be achieved.

METHODS

In a series of ten fresh cadaver feet without any radiological pathologies, we measured the range of motion of different tarsal bones in three planes under axial stress. Every foot was loaded without arthrodesis, after talonavicular and after double arthrodesis, by charging tibia and fibula with a force of 350 N using a calibrated Instron® load frame. Each tarsal bone was marked with a K-wire and its motion was measured by registering the movement of the wire’s shade that was projected onto the surrounding walls of the trial box.

RESULTS

Both operative procedures led to a considerable reduction of the motion of every marked bone to a mean of 18% of the preoperative value. In direct comparison of the two simulated arthrodeses we found for every bone and in every plane only minimal differences of the mean excursions of 1.0 mm on average. Both fusions lead to equal residual tarsal bone motion postoperatively, and provide the midtarsal joint as well as the subtalar joint with comparable biomechanical stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis is a useful and effective alternative to double arthrodesis. It is the less complicated, less-invasive and functionally equivalent operative option for arthritic alterations of the hindfoot and transverse tarsal joint.

Talonavicular joint arthrodesis for the treatment of pes planus valgus in older children and adolescents with cerebral palsy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to review our experience with talonavicular joint arthrodesis for the treatment of severe valgus foot deformities in older children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).

METHODS

The clinical, radiographic, and gait parameters results after talonavicular joint arthrodesis were retrospectively reviewed in 32 patients (59 feet) with valgus deformities of the foot. The surgery was performed as part of multiple simultaneous surgeries for the treatment of gait disorders. The mean age of the patients was 13.9 years (range 9-20 years) and the mean follow-up was 40 months (range 18.3-66.7 months).

RESULTS

The clinical and radiographic measurements improved significantly (P = 0.000). There were no significant changes in gait parameters. Symptoms were relieved in most patients with symptomatic preoperative feet. The most frequent complication was pseudoarthrosis, which occurred in seven feet. We found a high rate of satisfaction of patients (or parents) and most of them recommended the procedure to other patients with the same condition.

CONCLUSION

Talonavicular joint arthrodesis is a reliable technique that provides both functionally and cosmetically good results with a low rate of complications in the treatment of severe pes planus valgus in older children and adolescents with CP. Careful examination should rule out concomitant ankle valgus deformities. A stable fixation of the arthrodesis is recommended.

Biomechanical comparison of screw versus plate/screw construct for talonavicular fusion

BACKGROUND

Talonavicular fusion is performed for a variety of indications. This study examined the effects of fixation techniques on plantar pressures, construct stiffness, and strength.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight matched pairs of cadaveric lower extremities were axially loaded intact and after talonavicular fixation with a 3.5 reconstruction plate, reconstruction plate plus cancellous screw (plate/screw), or three screws (screws). Recorded plantar pressures were divided into three forefoot, two midfoot, and two hindfoot regions. Cantilevered bending of excised constructs provided stiffness data for plantar and lateral directions, and failure characteristics in plantar bending.

RESULTS

Relative to the intact state, all fixations decreased peak pressure in the medial forefoot, while generally increasing it in the lateral forefoot and midfoot. Average pressure shifted laterally for all fixation methods in the forefoot, generally in the hindfoot and the lateral midfoot. Generally, contact areas decreased in the medial forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot while increasing laterally in the midfoot and hindfoot. The only difference among fixation methods was a decreased medial midfoot contact area for screws. No differences were found between screws and plate/screw in bending stiffness or failure (p < 0.5 and p < 0.2 respectively). Plantar and lateral bending stiffness for the plate/screw method averaged approximately 363 N/mm while stiffness of the screw only construct averaged approximately 380 N/mm. The load to failure averaged 946 N for the plate/screw construct and 1099 N for the screw construct.

CONCLUSION

This study showed lateralization of plantar pressures following talonavicular fixation. Minimal differences were found between plate/screw and screws. Fixation across the joint may be key to achieving stability sufficient to resist shear and rotational stresses.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Plate/screw or screws would likely be similarly effective in fusing the talonavicular joint. However, the fusion induced lateralization of plantar pressures may unintentionally result in adjacent joint arthritis and foot pain.