Staged treatment of high energy midfoot fracture dislocations

Effective Rehabilitation of a Lisfranc Fracture in a 25-Year-Old Male Patient: A Case Report

A dislocation or break of the tarsometatarsal joint in the foot is referred to as a Lisfranc fracture, sometimes called a Lisfranc injury. It can be caused by less stressful mechanisms like a twisting fall as well as high-energy events like car crashes or falls from heights. Swelling, bruises, and midfoot pain that gets worse when standing or walking are some of the symptoms. The damage may only affect the ligaments or the foot's bony structures. Nonoperative or surgical treatment may be part of the management, depending on how severe the injury is. In order to realign and stabilize the bones, open reduction internal fixation with Kirschner wires (K-wires) is a common surgical procedure. In this case, a 25-year-old male patient complained of left foot pain and wound. He gave a history of a left leg stuck in the harvester. Immediately, he was taken to a local hospital, where a dressing of his left foot was done. He was referred to a super specialty hospital where an investigation, like an X-ray, was done, which revealed a Lisfranc fracture. K-wire was applied to fix the Lisfranc fracture. Further on, rehabilitation was started to restore mobility, regain full range of motion, and develop muscle strength. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were used as outcome measures.

Comparison of temporary external and percutaneous k-wire fixations for treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations

PURPOSE

Ankle fracture-dislocations are among the most severe injuries, and the use of an external fixator as a recommended fixation method has some disadvantages. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and complication rates of external and K-wire fixations in the treatment of ankle fracture dislocations.

METHODS

A total of 67 patients with ankle fracture-dislocations requiring temporary external or percutaneous K-wire fixation were included. The exclusion criteria were pilon fractures, open fractures, and those who required acute open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) score (range 0-10), and complications before and after the definitive surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

A significant difference between the two groups was not observed for age, sex, affected side, fracture type, smoking status, or diabetes. The average AOFAS scores were 83.2 and 83.3, the median VAS scores were 3 and 3, and the complication rates were 32.4% and 6.7% in the external and K-wire fixation groups, respectively (p = 0.010). However, skin necrosis, re-dislocation of the ankle, surgical wound infection, and posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis frequency were not significantly different between the groups, except for pin-sites infection (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Ankle fracture-dislocations using percutaneous k-wire fixation showed a low rate of complications and favorable clinical outcomes. This method could be a good alternative treatment option for ankle fracture-dislocations.

A modified three-incision approach to treating three-column Lisfranc injuries

PURPOSE

The most popular surgical approach to manage Lisfranc fracture-dislocations is the double-incision approach, which frequently causes a variety of complications, such as skin necrosis, rotational malreduction of the first tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) and lateral column dorsoplantar malreduction of the TMTJ. We introduce a three-incision approach to treat Lisfranc fracture-dislocations with only minor postoperative complications and good foot function.

METHODS

We prospectively selected 30 previously healthy patients, ranging from 18 to 60 years of age, but only 23 patients completed the follow-up and thus were finally included, with an average age of 38.1 ± 12.9 years. All patients have sustained Lisfranc fracture-dislocations involving all three-column; 13.0% (3/23) were Myerson classification type A (medial), 47.8% (11/23) were type A (lateral), and 39.1% (9/23) were type C2. All patients were treated via a three-incision approach: a long incision made along the lateral border of the second ray was used as a working incision to visualize and reduce the first three TMTJs, as well as to apply internal fixation instrumentation; a 2 cm medial incision was made at the medial side of the first TMTJ as an inspecting incision, ensuring good reduction of the first TMTJ in medial and plantar view; another 1 cm inspecting incision was made at the dorsal side of the fourth/fifth TMTJ to prevent sagittal subluxation of the lateral column. Mean ± SD was used for quantitative data such as operation time, follow-up time and foot function scores. Postoperative complications were documented, and foot function was evaluated using the American orthopaedic foot & ankle society score, foot function index and Maryland foot score at follow-up. The foot function of the injured foot and contralateral foot of the same patient was at the end of follow-up, and independent sample t-test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The median operation time was 117.9 ± 14.6 min (range 93 - 142 min). All complications occurred within three months after the operation, and included delayed wound healing (17.4%), superficial infection (8.7%), complex regional pain syndrome (4.3%) and neuroma (4.3%). There was no case of postoperative skin necrosis or malreduction. At the end of follow-up of 14.1 ± 1.2 months (range 12-16 months), the median American orthopaedic foot & ankle society score of the operated foot was 89.7 ± 5.7, the median foot function index was 21.7 ± 9.9, and the median Maryland foot score was 88.7 ± 4.8. There were no significant differences between the operated and contralateral sides, in terms of foot function, at the end of followup (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The three-incision approach can provide adequate visualization of all TMTJs to ensure anatomical reduction and offer sufficient working space to apply internal fixation instrumentation, which is effective in treating three-column Lisfranc fracture-dislocations with minor soft tissue complications and satisfactory functional recovery.

Staged surgery for closed Lisfranc injury with dislocation

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of staged surgery for patients with closed Lisfranc injury and dislocation.

Methods

This study included 48 patients with acute closed Lisfranc injury and dislocation admitted between July 2016 and July 2021. The patients were divided into two groups. 23 patients in group A underwent staged surgeries included emergency reduction within 4–8 h after injury, and open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc injury and first tarsometatarsal joint fusion after the swelling had subsided. 25 patients in group B underwent open reduction and internal fixation as an elective procedure after the swelling had subsided. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used for assessment at the final follow-up.

Results

A total of 48 patients with closed Lisfranc injury and dislocation were included. The lengths of hospitalization were 11.52 ± 1.61 day and 19.80 ± 2.37 day in groups A and B, respectively. The total lengths of surgery were 67.34 ± 1.71 min and 104.36 ± 8.31 min in groups A and B, respectively. 48 patients completed the final follow-up (follow-up period range: 12–24 months, mean: 18 months). All fractures had healed at 12–18 weeks after surgery (mean: 14.6 weeks). At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, the AOFAS and VAS score was 86.87 ± 4.24 and 1.91 ± 0.78, respectively, during weight-bearing walking in group A patients and 71.72 ± 5.46 and 3.20 ± 1.17 in group B. By the end of the follow-up period, only 2 patients in group B had developed traumatic arthritis and no patients had joint re-dislocation or required secondary surgery.

Conclusion

Staged surgery for closed Lisfranc injury with dislocation reduced the incidence of perioperative complications and achieved good surgical outcomes while shortening the lengths of surgery and hospitalization.

Temporizing Care of Acute Traumatic Foot and Ankle Injuries

Temporizing care has become a critical part of the treatment armamentarium for select foot and ankle injuries. Indications for performing temporizing care are based on the specific injury pattern, the host, associated injuries, as well as surgeon resources. Foot and ankle injuries are often associated with severe adjacent injury to the soft tissue sleeve. An acute procedure performed through a traumatized soft tissue envelope will often lead to the failure of wound healing and/or infectious complications. Thus, delayed reconstruction of acute foot and ankle injuries is often advisable in these cases.

The Lisfranc Injury: A Literature Review of Anatomy, Etiology, Evaluation, and Management

Despite being first described in the 1800s, the Lisfranc injury remains one of the most controversial topics in foot and ankle surgery. From the basic anatomy of the ligament complex to the optimal diagnostic and management methods, new research both sharpens and yet confounds our understanding of this unique injury. This article reviews the literature from established and classic papers to recent studies evaluating newer techniques. We discuss the unique bony and ligamentous anatomy, which confer strength to the Lisfranc complex, the typical mechanisms of injury, the most common classification systems, the clinical presentation, current imaging modalities, and conservative and surgical treatment options. We review studies comparing open reduction and internal fixation with primary arthrodesis of acute injuries, in addition to studies evaluating the various methods for obtaining fixation, including intra-articular screws, dorsal plates, and flexible fixation. It is clear from this review that despite the vast number of studies in the literature, much is still to be learned about the diagnosis and management of this challenging injury.Levels of Evidence: Level V: Expert opinion.

Fracture blisters: pathophysiology and management

Open fractures are considered an orthopaedic emergency due to the severe soft tissue disruption that might potentially lead to devastating complications. On the other hand, closed fractures, and especially those resulting from high-energy mechanisms, are also often accompanied by severe soft tissue trauma. Soft tissue envelope compromise can have a detrimental effect on the final outcome of the patients. Fracture blisters in particular, develop as a sign of significant local tissue trauma and appear in a time period between 6 to 72 hours post-injury. They can delay the definitive fracture treatment for a considerable amount of time and at the same time they also increase the risk for post-operative wound complications. Awareness of fracture blisters pathophysiology and their management options are crucial for orthopaedic surgeons, in order to achieve a favorable clinical outcome. In the herein study we present a concise synopsis of the pathophysiology pathways and management options of fracture blisters.

Staged surgical treatment of open Lisfranc fracture dislocations using an adjustable bilateral external fixator: A retrospective review of 21 patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the early operative results of a staged progressive reduction technique using a bilateral external fixator in the treatment of patients with open Lisfranc fracture dislocations.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 21 patients (5 women and 16 men; mean age=44.4 years; age range=24 to 69 years) with open Lisfranc fracture dislocations were included. All the patients were treated in a staged manner from 2012 to 2015. The mean follow-up was 15.4 months (range=12 to 24 months). A two-stage surgical protocol was performed for each patient. At the first stage, a bilateral spanning external fixator was applied across the injured Lisfranc joint, and the length of the disrupted columns was restored by distraction process. Vacuum-assisted closure was used if required. At the second stage, the external fixator was removed, and open reduction and internal fixation were carried out. The time interval between the first and second stages and postoperative complications were documented. To assess the functional status of the patients, the visual analog scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot - Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scale were measured at the final follow-up. Radiographic parameters indicating the alignment of the midfoot after the second operation were examined.

RESULTS

Deep infection in one patient and superficial infection in 2 patients were observed. Venous thrombosis was detected in 3 patients. The mean interval between the first and second stages was 18.6 days (range=8 to 48 days). The first metatarso-cuneiform step-off (p=0.002) and the second metatarso-cuneiform step-off (p=0.000) significantly improved at the final follow-up. The mean VAS score was 2.4 (range=0-5), and the mean AOFAS score was 76.3 (range=63 to 97). Primary arthrodesis was performed in seven patients, and six of the remaining 14 patients developed post-traumatic arthritis.

CONCLUSION

With a low risk of complications, the staged progressive reduction protocol using an adjustable bilateral external fixator can be an effective treatment to achieve and maintain anatomic reduction for patients with open Lisfranc fracture dislocations in a short-time follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Therapeutic study.

Temporizing External Fixation vs Splinting Following Ankle Fracture Dislocation

BACKGROUND

Closed reduction and splinting followed by outpatient management is standard of care for temporizing most ankle fractures. However, ankle fracture-dislocation potentially warrants a different approach based on the propensity for loss of reduction. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of complications associated with closed reduction and splinting of unstable ankle fracture-dislocations. Further, we sought to determine the efficacy of immediate external fixation as an alternative to splinting in cases too swollen for acute operation.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review analyzed all ankle-fracture dislocations that came through a large health care system from 2008 to 2018. Patients managed with acute open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and open fractures were excluded. In patients managed late, the cohorts were divided into those temporized with closed reduction/splinting vs external fixation. Reduction quality and splint technique were additionally assessed in splinted patients. A total of 354 closed ankle fracture-dislocations were identified: 298 patients (84%) underwent ORIF within 48 hours and were excluded; 28 (15 female/13 male, average age 46.8 years) were placed in an external fixator and 28 (22 female/6 male, average age 57.2 years) were reduced, splinted, and discharged.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 14 of the patients (50%) in the splint group developed loss of reduction and 5 of these patients (17.6%) developed anteromedial skin necrosis from skin tenting. None of the patients in the ex-fix group developed loss of reduction or skin necrosis. The rate of redislocation and the rate of development of skin necrosis was statistically higher in cases temporized with a splint versus an external fixator (P < .01 and P = .05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We found that in ankle fracture-dislocations not treated with acute ORIF, splint immobilization was associated with an increased risk of complications, including redislocation and skin necrosis, when compared to a temporizing external fixator.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Antibiotic Hydroxyapatite Impregnated Bulk Autograft for Traumatic Large Bone Void. Technique & Case Report

Background: Mid-foot open fractures are rare, and usually presents with high energy trauma. Staged approach for the management of open midfoot fractures was described by few authors. Case presentation: Up to authors best knowledge, this is the first article describing the management of mid-foot open fracture that presented 6 weeks spost injury and had absent medial cuneiform at presentation, with multi-fragmentary fracture of middle and lateral cuneiform associated with fracture of proximal second, third and fourth metatarsals. Management and Outcomes: Management involved conjoint ortho-plastics care, External fixation, with iliac crest graft covered with Gentamicin Eluting Injectable Bone Graft Substitute (Cerament-G) to replace missing medial cuneiform, free Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator (SCIP) Flap. This surgical approach resulted in successful union of iliac crest graft restoring the medial cuneiform alignment, with no evidence of infection.

Acute management of high-energy lisfranc injuries: A simple approach

INTRODUCTION

The aims of this study were to (1) describe the use of the K-wire for the initial management of high-energy Lisfranc dislocations or fracture dislocations, (2) to evaluate whether this standalone technique allowed for adequate reduction of these injuries, (3) to evaluate whether reductions were maintained until definitive fixation was performed, (4) and to determine if it contributed to any increase in complications prior to or after definitive fixation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients who presented with tarsometatarsal injuries from January 2005 through June 2015. Dislocations of the tarso-metatarsal joints were classified as either Type A (total incongruity, homolateral complex), Type B (partial incongruity, homolateral incomplete) or Type C (divergent, total or partial displacement) patterns, with or without associated fractures. For the purposes of this paper, high-energy injuries were defined as patients presenting with either a Type A or Type C (total displacement) dislocations or fracture-dislocation patterns. A total of 176 patients presented with a tarsometatarsal injury. Eighteen patients with divergent or homolateral patterns underwent a staged approach. Fifteen patients were managed exclusively with K-wire fixation. Wound complications, infections or the unexpected need to return to surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

All patients demonstrated an improved alignment using K-wires. There were no compartment syndromes, vascular insufficiency, complications to the skin associated with traction or manipulation, or pin site infections. At definitive fixation, no patient demonstrated a loss in the alignment that had been obtained at the index procedure or had an unexpected return to surgery.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that high-energy Lisfranc injuries are uncommon and that K-wires are a simple and adequate technique that can be used for initial staged approach of these injuries. The use of 2.0mm K-wires were sufficient to obtain and maintain the reduction until definitive fixation has been obtained, without producing any increase risk for complications.

Management of Tarsometatarsal Joint Injuries

Joint disruptions to the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint complex, also known as the Lisfranc joint, represent a broad spectrum of pathology from subtle athletic sprains to severe crush injuries. Although injuries to the TMT joint complex are uncommon, when missed, they may lead to pain and dysfunction secondary to posttraumatic arthritis and arch collapse. An understanding of the appropriate anatomy, mechanism, physical examination, and imaging techniques is necessary to diagnose and treat injuries of the TMT joints. Nonsurgical management is indicated in select patients who maintain reduction of the TMT joints under physiologic stress. Successful surgical management of these injuries is predicated on anatomic reduction and stable fixation. Open reduction and internal fixation remains the standard treatment, although primary arthrodesis has emerged as a viable option for certain types of TMT joint injuries.

Staged management of open Lisfranc injury: Experience from 14 patients

There are still controversies on the management and outcome of open Lisfranc injury in available studies. This study evaluates the staged management of Lisfranc injury and its complications.Patients who received a staged strategy for open Lisfranc injury were reviewed.One patient with degloving injury suffered from partial skin and hallux necrosis which was treated by debridement, hallux amputation, definitive internal fixation, and local flap transfer on the 12th day after first stage management. A definitive internal fixation and simultaneous skin graft or flap coverage were performed in another 3 patients with soft tissue defects. Other patients without soft tissue problems underwent a second stage of definitive internal fixation. Bone union was observed on the 12.5th week after definitive surgery. The median AOFAS midfoot score at the last follow-up was 74.4 ± 8.7, while the average VAS score was 2.2 ± 1.8. The average return-to-work time was 8th months postoperatively in 9 patients. Flap necrosis, infection, implant failure, nonunion, and osteomyelitis were not observed during the follow-up. Two patients received Lisfranc arthrodesis for persistent pain due to posttraumatic arthritis.In the management of open Lisfranc injury, surgeons must consider soft tissue condition. Staged strategy is a rational protocol for this severe injury. Temporary K-wire fixation after early radical debridement and realignment will facilitate the definitive internal fixation until soft tissue condition improves, which also can decrease the soft tissue complication.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Primary Arthrodesis for Lisfranc Injuries

Management of injuries to the tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) joint complex continues to generate heated debate. Arthrodesis of the Lisfranc joint complex has historically been reserved as a salvage procedure for failed treatment. Recently, primary arthrodesis has emerged as a viable treatment alternative to open reduction and internal fixation for these injuries. The objective of this article was to examine the current literature regarding open reduction and internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc injuries.

Lisfranc injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss key anatomic and pathoanatomic factors, treatment principles, and patient outcomes of Lisfranc injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) remains the current gold standard of treatment, ORIF with primary arthrodesis has become increasingly popular in recent years, both for pure ligamentous and for bony-ligamentous injuries. Return to activity and competitive sports as well as overall patient outcomes have been further defined, suggesting that most patients are able to return to near pre-injury level if properly diagnosed and appropriately treated. Considerable controversy remains as to the optimal method of treatment of Lisfranc injuries and may ultimately be defined by activity-specific or sport-specific criteria.

Randomized, Prospective Comparison of Bioabsorbable and Steel Screw Fixation of Lisfranc Injuries

OBJECTIVE

This study's objective is to compare outcomes of bioabsorbable versus steel screws for treating Lisfranc injuries.

DESIGN

This research was conducted in a prospective and randomized manner between September 2008 and December 2013.

SETTING

This study was performed in the outpatient setting at a tertiary-level care center in a single surgeon's practice.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Forty patients with acute Lisfranc injuries, amenable to open reduction and screw fixation, enrolled and presented for final follow-up.

INTERVENTION

Through randomization, 20 and 20 patients received bioabsorbable versus steel screws, respectively.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Function and pain were graded using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM) and a visual analog scale of pain. Radiographs were assessed for joint stability and degeneration.

RESULTS

For those with steel screws, the mean FAAM score increased from 24.9 to 89.6 of 100 and pain score decreased from 6.5 to 1.9 of 10 by latest follow-up. For those with absorbable screws, the mean FAAM score increased from 32.5 to 91.2 and pain score decreased from 4.7 to 1.3 by latest follow-up. These differences in final mean function (P = 0.4) and pain (P = 0.25) between the study groups were not statistically significant. Final radiographs showed no Lisfranc instability in any study patients, but rather midfoot arthritis in 4 and 2 patients with steel versus bioabsorbable screws, respectively. None of the patients who received steel screws had hardware-related problems, but 1 patient who received absorbable fixation developed an inflammatory reaction at a nonresorbed screw head at 2 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioabsorbable screws provide short-term results that are comparable and not significantly different from steel screws for treating unstable Lisfranc injuries. Both methods are predictable in improving function and pain, but using absorbable screws eliminates the need for hardware removal after such trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Severe open Lisfranc injuries: one-stage operation through internal fixation associated with vacuum sealing drainage

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of treating severe open Lisfranc injuries by means of one-stage internal fixation with k-wires associated with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD).

METHODS

The clinical outcomes of 20 cases of severe open Lisfranc joint fracture-dislocation treated by using one-stage internal fixation with k-wires associated with VSD, after debridement and suturing during emergency treatment, were reviewed.

RESULTS

At 6 and 12 months after surgery, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot scores were 69.2 and 78.2, the positive rates were 75 and 85 %, and the average visual analogue scale scores were 4.3 and 1.3, respectively. The average time of internal fixation surgery was 47 min (30-70 min). There were three cases of wound-edge necrosis; however, there were no cases of skin necrosis around the incision, or deep infection. The mean time of first hospital stay was 16.1 days (10-23 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of severe open Lisfranc fracture and dislocation through one-stage internal fixation with k-wires in association with VSD led to fast anatomical reduction, stabilized bony structure, fast soft tissue recovery, and good short-term follow-up results.

Temporising external fixation of calcaneus fractures prior to definitive plate fixation: a case series

INTRODUCTION

Surgical management of calcaneus fractures is technically demanding and has a high risk of wound complications. These fractures are traditionally managed with splinting until swelling has subsided, which can take weeks and leaves the fracture fragments displaced. We describe a novel protocol for the management of displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures that utilises a temporising external fixator and staged conversion to plate fixation through a sinus tarsi approach. The goal of this technique was to enable earlier treatment with open reduction and internal fixation, minimise the amount of manipulation required at the time of definitive fixation and reduce the wound complication rate seen with the traditional extensile approach.

METHODS

The records of patients with displaced calcaneus fractures from 2010-2014 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of nine patients with 10 calcaneus fractures were treated using this protocol. All patients underwent ankle-spanning medial external fixation within 48 hours after injury. Patients underwent conversion to open plate fixation through a sinus tarsi approach when skin turgor had returned to normal. Time to surgery, infection rate, wound complications, radiographic alignment, and time to radiographic union were recorded.

RESULTS

The average Bohler's angle improved from 13.2 (range -2 to 34) degrees preoperatively to 34.3 (range 26 to 42) degrees postoperatively. The average time from external fixation to conversion to internal fixation was 4.8 (range 3 to 7) days. There were no immediate post-surgical complications. The average time to weight-bearing was 8.5 weeks. The average time to radiographic union was 9.5 (range 8 to 12) weeks. There were no infections or wound complications at the time of last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Early temporising external fixation for the acute management of displaced calcaneus fractures is a safe and effective method to reduce and stabilise the foot and may decrease the time to definitive fixation. There were no complications related to the use of the external fixator in this series.

Reconstruction of Traumatic Composite Tissue Defect of Medial Longitudinal Arch With Free Osteocutaneous Fibular Graft

A 34-year-old male sustained a crush injury resulting in bone and soft tissue loss along the medial longitudinal arch of his left foot. Specifically, the injury resulted in loss of first metatarsal without injury to the medial cuneiform or proximal phalanx, fracture of the third metatarsal, and a 5-cm × 9-cm soft tissue defect overlying the dorsomedial aspect of the right foot. After debridement and daily wound care, the defect was subsequently reconstructed using a free osteocutaneous fibular graft. Approximately 6 months after reconstructive surgery, the patient returned to his job without pain, and his pedogram showed almost equal weightbearing distribution on both feet.