Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Hindfoot and Ankle Fusions Treated With rhPDGF-BB in Combination With a β-TCP-Collagen Matrix

Fostering tissue engineering and regenerative medicine to treat musculoskeletal disorders in bone and muscle

The musculoskeletal system, which is vital for movement, support, and protection, can be impaired by disorders such as osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and muscular dystrophy. This review focuses on the advances in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, specifically aimed at alleviating these disorders. It explores the roles of cell therapy, particularly Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCs), biomaterials, and biomolecules/external stimulations in fostering bone and muscle regeneration. The current research underscores the potential of MSCs and ADSCs despite the persistent challenges of cell scarcity, inconsistent outcomes, and safety concerns. Moreover, integrating exogenous materials such as scaffolds and external stimuli like electrical stimulation and growth factors shows promise in enhancing musculoskeletal regeneration. This review emphasizes the need for comprehensive studies and adopting innovative techniques together to refine and advance these multi-therapeutic strategies, ultimately benefiting patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

A rhPDGF-BB/bovine type I collagen/β-TCP mixture for the treatment of critically sized non-union tibial defects: An in vivo study in rabbits

Non-union during healing of bone fractures affects up to ~5% of patients worldwide. Given the success of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-B chain homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) in promoting angiogenesis and bone fusion in the hindfoot and ankle, rhPDGF-BB combined with bovine type I collagen/β-TCP matrix (AIBG) could serve as a viable alternative to autografts in the treatment of non-unions. Defects (~2 mm gaps) were surgically induced in tibiae of skeletally mature New Zealand white rabbits. Animals were allocated to one of four groups-(1) negative control (empty defect, healing for 8 weeks), (2 and 3) acute treatment with AIBG (healing for 4 or 8 weeks), and (4) chronic treatment with AIBG (injection 4 weeks post defect creation and then healing for 8 weeks). Bone formation was analyzed qualitatively and semi-quantitatively through histology. Samples were imaged using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography for defect visualization and volumetric reconstruction, respectively. Delayed healing or non-healing was observed in the negative control group, whereas defects treated with AIBG in an acute setting yielded bone formation as early as 4 weeks with bone growth appearing discontinuous. At 8 weeks (acute setting), substantial remodeling was observed with higher degrees of bone organization characterized by appositional bone growth. The chronic healing, experimental, group yielded bone formation and remodeling, with no indication of non-union after treatment with AIBG. Furthermore, bone growth in the chronic healing group was accompanied by an increased presence of osteons, osteonal canals, and interstitial lamellae. Qualitatively and semiquantitatively, chronic application of AI facilitated complete bridging of the induced non-union defects, while untreated defects or defects treated acutely with AIBG demonstrated a lack of complete bridging at 8 weeks.

Comparative Studies of Bone Graft and Orthobiologics for Foot Ankle Arthrodesis: A Critical Review

Graft materials available to supplement hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis procedures include autologous (autograft) or allogeneic bone graft (allograft) but also bone graft substitutes such as demineralized bone matrix, calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, and tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite. In addition, biologic agents, such as recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 or recombinant human platelet derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB), and preparations, including platelet-rich plasma or concentrated bone marrow aspirate, have been used to facilitate bone healing in ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis. The purpose of this review was to summarize the available clinical evidence surrounding the utilization and efficacy of the above materials and biological agents in ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis procedures, with emphasis on the quality of the existing evidence to facilitate clinical decision making.

Comparative results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis vs. open arthrodesis in patients with diabetes-associated Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy

BACKGROUND

Several studies demonstrated a considerable complication rate for open ankle or TTC arthrodesis in patients with diabetes, revision surgery and ulceration. Extensive approaches in combination with multimorbide patients have been suggested as the rationale behind the increased complication rate.

METHODS

Single-centre, prospective case-control study compared arthroscopic vs. open ankle arthrodesis in patients with Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy of the foot. 18 patients with septic Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy Sanders III-IV received an arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis with TSF (Taylor Spatial Frame®) fixation combined with different additional procedures required for infect treatment and hindfoot realignment. The ankle arthrodesis was required for the realignment of the hindfoot in Sanders IV patients, arthritis or in case of infection. 12 patients were treated with open ankle arthrodesis and TSF fixation combined with various additional procedures.

RESULTS

A significant improvement has been shown in radiological data in both groups. A significant lower complication rate has been registered in arthroscopic group. A significant correlation was seen between major complications and therapeutic anticoagulation as well as smoking.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk patients with diabetes and plantar ulceration excellent results could be demonstrated in arthroscopically performed ankle arthrodesis with midfoot osteotomy using TSF as fixation devise.

The Efficiency of Highly Porous β-Tricalcium Phosphate With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Midfoot Joint Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Nonunion is one of the most common and devastating complications following midfoot joint arthrodesis. Many different types of bone grafts and bone substitutes have been used to promote osseous fusion. However, there is no consensus on the gold standard bone grafting material and whether biologic materials should be used alone or in combination. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficiency of highly porous β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in midfoot joint arthrodesis.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study included patients who underwent midfoot joint arthrodesis using compression screws. Patients were classified into 2 groups: arthrodesis with highly porous β-TCP and BMAC (group A) and arthrodesis without them (group B). The osseous union rate was compared between the 2 groups. A total of 44 patients (46 feet) including 89 joints were included in this study.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the union rate between the 2 groups: 91.5% (43/47 joints) in arthrodesis with highly porous β-TCP and BMAC (group A) and 76.2% (32/42 joints) in arthrodesis without highly porous β-TCP and BMAC (group B; P = .048).

CONCLUSION

This study investigated the efficiency of highly porous β-TCP and BMAC to promote bony healing in midfoot joint arthrodesis. A significantly higher union rate was shown when arthrodesis was performed with highly porous β-TCP and BMAC, compared with arthrodesis performed without them. We suggest that highly porous β-TCP and BMAC can be a viable and effective adjunct to the fixation in midfoot joint arthrodesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective comparative analysis.

Delivery of Growth Factors to Enhance Bone Repair

The management of critical-sized bone defects caused by nonunion, trauma, infection, malignancy, pseudoarthrosis, and osteolysis poses complex reconstruction challenges for orthopedic surgeons. Current treatment modalities, including autograft, allograft, and distraction osteogenesis, are insufficient for the diverse range of pathology encountered in clinical practice, with significant complications associated with each. Therefore, there is significant interest in the development of delivery vehicles for growth factors to aid in bone repair in these settings. This article reviews innovative strategies for the management of critical-sized bone loss, including novel scaffolds designed for controlled release of rhBMP, bioengineered extracellular vesicles for delivery of intracellular signaling molecules, and advances in regional gene therapy for sustained signaling strategies. Improvement in the delivery of growth factors to areas of significant bone loss has the potential to revolutionize current treatment for this complex clinical challenge.

A retrospective review of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor with beta-tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitute use in hindfoot and/or ankle arthrodesis

Background

Nonunion following foot and ankle arthrodesis can cause chronic pain and disability, poor patient satisfaction, and increased healthcare costs. Nonunion rates are reported in 10%-12% of primary foot and/or ankle arthrodesis procedures, with significantly greater rates among patients with high-risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, obesity, or Charcot neuroarthropathy. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB-homodimer with beta-tricalcium phosphate (rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP) is a bone graft substitute that has demonstrated efficacy in foot and ankle fusion rates that are comparable to autograft.

Methods

Charts and radiographs were retrospectively reviewed on consecutive adult patients undergoing talonavicular, calcaneal-cuboid, subtalar, and/or ankle arthrodesis utilizing rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP bone graft substitute. The primary outcome measures were rate of and mean time to fusion, mean time to return to function, and incidence of adverse events.

Results

This study reviewed133 patients who underwent 209 hindfoot and/or ankle joint arthrodesis procedures with a mean follow-up 20.34 ± 11.05 months. The overall fusion rate was 92.82% (194/209 joints) with a mean time to fusion of 13.14 ± 2.52 weeks and return to function of 16.56 ± 3.26 weeks. Overall, there were 7 (5.26%) patients who experienced an adverse event (AE) with 15 (7.18%) joints experiencing a nonunion.

Conclusion

Fusion rates with rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP bone grafting material compared favorably to autograft controls when used in hindfoot and/or ankle arthrodesis. No AEwas related to rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP. This study suggests that using rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP is effective in hindfoot and/or ankle arthrodesis, even among patients with comorbidities who are at a higher risk of developing a nonunion.

Level of clinical evidence

3.

The Fate of Delayed Unions After Isolated Ankle Fusion

BACKGROUND

Nonunion remains the most common major complication of ankle arthrodesis. Although previous studies have reported delayed union or nonunion rates, few have elaborated on the clinical course of patients experiencing delayed union. In this retrospective cohort study, we sought to understand the trajectory of patients with delayed union by determining the rate of clinical success and failure and whether the extent of fusion on computed tomography scan (CT) was associated with outcomes.

METHODS

Delayed union was defined as incomplete (<75%) fusion on CT between 2 and 6 months postoperatively. Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criterion: isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis with delayed union. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained including patient satisfaction with their fusion. Success was defined as patients who were not revised and reported satisfaction. Failure was defined as patients who required revision or reported being not satisfied. Fusion was assessed by measuring the percentage of osseous bridging across the joint on CT. The extent of fusion was categorized as absent (0%-24%), minimal (25%-49%), or moderate (50%-74%).

RESULTS

We determined the clinical outcome of 28 (78%) patients with mean follow-up of 5.6 years (range, 1.3-10.2). The majority (71%) of patients failed. On average, CT scans were obtained 4 months after attempted ankle fusion. Patients with minimal or moderate fusion were more likely to succeed clinically than those with "absent" fusion (P = .040). Of those with absent fusion, 11 of 12 (92%) failed. In patients with minimal or moderate fusion, 9 of 16 (56%) failed.

CONCLUSION

We found that 71% of patients with a delayed union at roughly 4 months after ankle fusion required revision or were not satisfied. Patients with less than 25% fusion on CT had an even lower rate of clinical success. These findings may help surgeons in counseling and managing patients experiencing a delayed union after ankle fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

General Considerations About Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis. Any Way to Improve Our Results?

Nonunion and adjacent joint osteoarthritis (OA) are known complications after a fusion procedure, and foot and ankle surgeons are commonly exposed to such disabling complications. Determining who is at risk of developing nonunion is essential to reducing nonunion rates and improving patient outcomes. Several evidenced-based modifiable risk factors related to adverse outcomes after foot and ankle arthrodesis have been identified. Patient-related risk factors that can be improved before surgery include smoking cessation, good diabetic control (HbAc1 <7%) and vitamin D supplementation. Intraoperatively, using less invasive techniques, avoiding joint preparation with power tools, using bone grafts or orthobiologics in more complex cases, high-risk patients, nonunion revision surgeries, and filling in bone voids at the arthrodesis site should be considered. Postoperatively, pain management with NSAIDs should be limited to a short period (<2 weeks) and avoided in high-risk patients. Furthermore, early postoperative weight-bearing has shown to be beneficial, and it does not seem to increase postoperative complications. The incidence of surrounding joint OA after foot and ankle fusion seems to increase progressively with time. Owing to its progression and high probability of being symptomatic, patients must be informed consequently, as they may require additional joint fusions, resulting in further loss of ankle/foot motion. In patients with symptomatic adjacent joint OA and unsatisfactory results after an ankle arthrodesis, conversion to total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has become a potential option in managing these complex and challenging situations.

How to assess consolidation after foot and ankle arthrodesis with computed tomography. A systematic review

PURPOSES

Many studies have been performed that investigate consolidation after arthrodesis of foot and ankle joints. Consolidation in foot and ankle joints is best assessed by computed tomography (CT). However, no golden-standard methodology exists for radiological consolidation assessment from CT after ankle and foot arthrodesis. The aim of this review is to present an overview of the radiological methodologies for consolidation assessment, outcomes on reliability and validity and to advise which methodology should be used.

METHOD

Scientific databases were systematically searched. Eligible studies were studies that 1) performed foot or ankle arthrodesis, 2) mentioned radiological or CT follow-up in abstract, 3) performed postoperative CT in > 50% of patients. Two authors selected eligible studies and performed a risk of bias assessment with the COSMIN tool.

RESULTS

Risk of bias assessment showed that most studies (80%) were at high risk of bias due to poor methodology. The most popular method for consolidation assessment is by subjectively categorizing consolidation into consolidation groups, with a substantial reliability score. Another popular method is to calculate the fusion ratio and then apply a fusion threshold, to distinguish between fused and non-fused joints. This method had an excellent reliability score. In most studies a fusion threshold of 50% is used. However, four studies in this review showed that a 30% fusion threshold may by more valid.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this review we would advise to calculate fusion threshold and apply a 30% fusion threshold to distinguish fused from non-fused foot and ankle joints.

Nonoperative and Operative Soft-Tissue and Cartilage Regeneration and Orthopaedic Biologics of the Foot and Ankle: An Orthoregeneration Network Foundation Review

Orthoregeneration is defined as a solution for orthopaedic conditions that harnesses the benefits of biology to improve healing, reduce pain, improve function, and optimally, provide an environment for tissue regeneration. Options include drugs, surgical intervention, scaffolds, biologics as a product of cells, and physical and electromagnetic stimuli. The goal of regenerative medicine is to enhance the healing of tissue after musculoskeletal injuries as both isolated treatment and adjunct to surgical management, using novel therapies to improve recovery and outcomes. Various orthopaedic biologics (orthobiologics) have been investigated for the treatment of pathology involving the foot and ankle (including acute traumatic injuries and fractures, tumor, infection, osteochondral lesions, arthritis, and tendinopathy) and procedures, including osteotomy or fusion. Promising and established treatment modalities include 1) bone-based therapies (such as cancellous or cortical autograft from the iliac crest, proximal tibia, and/or calcaneus, fresh-frozen or freeze-dried cortical or cancellous allograft, including demineralized bone matrix putty or powder combined with growth factors, and synthetic bone graft substitutes, such as calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, bioactive glasses (often in combination with bone marrow aspirate), and polymers; proteins such as bone morphogenic proteins; and platelet-derived growth factors; 2) cartilage-based therapies such as debridement, bone marrow stimulation (such as microfracture or drilling), scaffold-based techniques (such as autologous chondrocyte implantation [ACI] and matrix-induced ACI, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis, matrix-associated stem cell transplantation, particulated juvenile cartilage allograft transplantation, and minced local cartilage cells mixed with fibrin and platelet rich plasma [PRP]); and 3) blood, cell-based, and injectable therapies such as PRP, platelet-poor plasma biomatrix loaded with mesenchymal stromal cells, concentrated bone marrow aspirate, hyaluronic acid, and stem or stromal cell therapy, including mesenchymal stem cell allografts, and adipose tissue-derived stem cells, and micronized adipose tissue injections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Staged Percutaneous Treatment of a Complete Lisfranc Dislocation Secondary to Charcot Arthropathy: A Case Report

CASE

A 36-year-old woman with diabetic neuropathy presented with complete dorsal dislocation of the midfoot secondary to Charcot arthropathy. She was treated in a staged fashion with a Taylor spatial butt frame to distract and reduce the midfoot followed by percutaneous preparation of the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joints and fixator-assisted fusion. The arthrodesis healed successfully with maintenance of function at the 30-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Staged treatment with a Taylor spatial frame can be used successfully to treat complete TMT dislocations in the setting of Charcot arthropathy. Complications are not uncommon and must be addressed appropriately.

Limited Evidence for Biological Adjuvants in Hindfoot Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of biological adjuvants in patients managed with hindfoot arthrodesis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with use of specific search terms and eligibility criteria. Assessment of evidence was threefold: level of evidence by criteria as described in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, quality of evidence according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and conflicts of interest. Meta-analysis was performed with fixed-effects models for studies of low heterogeneity (I2 < 25%) and with random-effects models for studies of moderate to high heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 25%).

RESULTS

A total of 1,579 hindfeet were recruited across all studies, and 1,527 hindfeet were recorded as having completed treatment and follow-up visits. The duration of follow-up ranged from 2.8 to 43 months. Twelve of the 17 included studies comprised patients with comorbidities associated with reduced healing capacity. Based on the random-effects model for nonunion rates for autograft versus allograft, the risk ratio was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.13 to 5.21; I2 = 56%; p = 0.83) in favor of lower nonunion rates for autograft. Based on the random-effects model for rhPDGF/β-TCP versus autograft, the risk ratio was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; I2 = 59%; p = 0.30) in favor of lower nonunion rates for rhPDGF/β-TCP.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of data to support the meaningful use of biological adjuvants as compared with autograft/allograft for hindfoot arthrodesis. The meta-analysis favored the use of autograft when compared with allograft but favored rhPDGF/β-TCP when compared with autograft in the short term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evaluation of lumbar spinal fusion utilizing recombinant human platelet derived growth factor-B chain homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) combined with a bovine collagen/β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) matrix in an ovine model

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

While the clinical effectiveness of recombinant human Platelet Derived Growth Factor-B chain homodimer combined with collagen and β-tricalcium phosphate (rhPDGF-BB + collagen/β-TCP) treatment for indications involving hindfoot and ankle is well-established, it is not approved for use in spinal interbody fusion, and the use of autograft remains the gold standard.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of rhPDGF-BB + collagen/β-TCP treatment on lumbar spine interbody fusion in an ovine model to those of autograft bone and collagen/β-TCP treatments using biomechanical, radiographic, and histological assessment techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-two skeletally mature Columbian Rambouillet sheep were used to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rhPDGF-BB + collagen/β-TCP matrix in a lumbar spinal fusion model. Interbody polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages contained either autograft, rhPDGF-BB + collagen/β-TCP, collagen/β-TCP matrix, or left empty.

METHODS

Animals were sacrificed 8- or 16-weeks post-surgery. Spinal fusion was evaluated via post-sacrifice biomechanical, micro-computed tomography (μCT), and histological analysis. Outcomes were statistically compared using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with an alpha value of 0.05 and a Tukey post-hoc test.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between groups within treatment timepoints for flexion-extension, lateral bending, or axial rotation range of motion, neutral zone, neutral zone stiffness, or elastic zone stiffness. μCT bone volume fraction was significantly greater between treatment groups independent of timepoint where Autograft and rhPDGF-BB + collagen/β-TCP treatments demonstrated significantly greater bone volume fraction as compared to collagen/β-TCP (P = .026 and P = .038, respectively) and Empty cage treatments (P = .002 and P = .003, respectively). μCT mean bone density fraction was most improved in rhPDGF-BB + collagen/β-TCP specimens at the 8 week and 16-week timepoints as compared to all other treatment groups. There were no statistically significant differences in histomorphometric measurements of bone, soft tissue, or empty space between rhPDGF-BB + collagen/β-TCP and autograft treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the use of rhPDGF-BB combined with collagen/β-TCP promotes spinal fusion comparable to that of autograft bone.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The data indicate that rhPDGF-BB combined with collagen/β-TCP promotes spinal fusion comparably to autograft bone treatment and may offer a viable alternative in large animal spinal fusion. Future prospective clinical studies are necessary to fully understand the role of rhPDGF-BB combined with collagen/β-TCP in human spinal fusion healing.

A Multicenter, Retrospective, Case Series of Patients With Charcot Neuroarthropathy Deformities Undergoing Arthrodesis Utilizing Recombinant Human Platelet-derived Growth Factor With Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate

Charcot neuroarthropathy has traditionally been treated using both nonsurgical and surgical strategies. Recently, orthobiologics have been used to promote arthrodesis in Charcot reconstructions, obviating the need for bone graft in some cases. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) in combination with beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold (β-TCP) is a bone graft substitute shown to have comparable efficacy to autograft in incidence of foot and ankle fusion. This multicenter, consecutive case series analyzed patients undergoing Charcot reconstructions utilizing rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP for joint fusion. In this cohort, 98 patients (62.24% male) with a mean age of 62.82 ± 10.28 years (range 40-87) had a fusion incidence of 217 of 223 joints (97.31%) with a mean time to fusion of 13.09 ± 4.87 weeks (range 6-30). There were 6 nonunions in the patient population. Fusion was defined as ≥50% osseous bridging based on computed tomography and/or radiographic consolidation, in addition to clinical findings. With an overall complication rate of 26.53% (26/98), adverse events occurring in more than 1 patient limb included hardware failures (n = 7, 7.14%), infection (n = 4, 4.08%), wound dehiscence (n = 4, 4.08%), amputation (n = 3, 3.06%), and death (n = 2, 2.04%). There were no adverse events related to the grafting material. From this review, we found rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP to be a safe and effective graft material that can be considered a viable alternative to autograft, even in high-risk patients such as those with Charcot neuroarthropathy.

Biomechanical Performance of Charcot-Specific Implants

Over the past 2 decades, an increased number of diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy reconstructions have been performed. Despite advances in implant technology, arthrodesis complication rates remain high. This study examined the biomechanical properties (4-point bending, cantilever bending, and thread pullout resistance) of intramedullary implants designed for midfoot reconstruction. Large implants included A1 (7.4 mm cannulated stainless steel beam), B1 (6.5 mm solid titanium bolt), and C1 (7.0 mm cannulated titanium beam). Smaller implants included A2 (5.4 mm cannulated stainless steel beam) and C2 (5.0 mm solid titanium bolt). Four-point bending testing compared flexural properties of the body of the implants. Cantilever-bending testing was performed with the maximum bending moment being applied off the main thread of the implant to assess the thread portion. Thread pullout strength was tested by fixing the implants to a Sawbone block on a platform, and the distal portion of the implant in a clamp connected to loading actuator. Implant A1 demonstrated higher stiffness, force to failure, and fatigue compared to implants B1 and C1 (p < .05). Pullout strength of implant A1 was higher than implant B1 (p < .05). Thread fatigue strength of implant A1 was higher than implant C1 (p < .05). Implant A2 demonstrated higher stiffness, force to failure, tip fatigue strength, and thread pullout strength compared to implant C2 (p < .05), while implant C2 demonstrated higher body fatigue failure than implant A2 (p < .05). Alteration of beam/bolt parameters influences the biomechanical performance of implants used in Charcot reconstruction. Greater stiffness resists deformation, providing improved stability. Greater static failure load and fatigue limit improves the implant's ability to withstand higher and repetitive loads before failing This study should stimulate further clinical research to determine if these biomechanical properties translate into reduced implant failure rates and improved clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy.

Commercial Bone Grafts Claimed as an Alternative to Autografts: Current Trends for Clinical Applications in Orthopaedics

In the last twenty years, due to an increasing medical and market demand for orthopaedic implants, several grafting options have been developed. However, when alternative bone augmentation materials mimicking autografts are searched on the market, commercially available products may be grouped into three main categories: cellular bone matrices, growth factor enhanced bone grafts, and peptide enhanced xeno-hybrid bone grafts. Firstly, to obtain data for this review, the search engines Google and Bing were employed to acquire information from reports or website portfolios of important competitors in the global bone graft market. Secondly, bibliographic databases such as Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were also employed to analyse data from preclinical/clinical studies performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of each product released on the market. Here, we discuss several products in terms of osteogenic/osteoinductive/osteoconductive properties, safety, efficacy, and side effects, as well as regulatory issues and costs. Although both positive and negative results were reported in clinical applications for each class of products, to date, peptide enhanced xeno-hybrid bone grafts may represent the best choice in terms of risk/benefit ratio. Nevertheless, more prospective and controlled studies are needed before approval for routine clinical use.

Biologic therapies for foot and ankle injuries

Introduction: The use of orthobiologics as supplemental treatment for foot and ankle pathologies have increased in the past decades. They have been used to improve the healing of bone and soft tissue injuries. There have been several studies that examined the use of biologics for knee and hip pathologies but the foot and ankle construct has unique features that must be considered.Areas covered: The biologics for foot and ankle injuries that are covered in this review are platelet-rich plasma (PRP), stem cells, growth factors, hyaluronic acid, bone grafts, bone substitutes, and scaffolds. These modalities are used in the treatment of pathologies related to tendon and soft tissue as well as cartilage.Expert opinion: The utilization of biological adjuncts for improved repair and regeneration of ankle injuries represents a promising future in our efforts to address difficult clinical problems. The application of concentrated bone marrow and PRP each represents the most widely studied and commonly used injection therapies with early clinical studies demonstrating promising results, research is also being done using other potential therapies such as stem cells and growth factors; further investigation and outcome data are still needed.

Growth Factors, Carrier Materials, and Bone Repair

This chapter provides an overview of the growth factors active in bone regeneration and healing. Both normal and impaired bone healing are discussed, with a focus on the spatiotemporal activity of the various growth factors known to be involved in the healing response. The review highlights the activities of most important growth factors impacting bone regeneration, with a particular emphasis on those being pursued for clinical translation or which have already been marketed as components of bone regenerative materials. Current approaches the use of bone grafts in clinical settings of bone repair (including bone grafts) are summarized, and carrier systems (scaffolds) for bone tissue engineering via localized growth factor delivery are reviewed. The chapter concludes with a consideration of how bone repair might be improved in the future.

Progress and Prospects of Polymer-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Bone Tissue Regeneration

Despite the high regenerative capacity of bone tissue, there are some cases where bone repair is insufficient for a complete functional and structural recovery after damage. Current surgical techniques utilize natural and synthetic bone grafts for bone healing, as well as collagen sponges loaded with drugs. However, there are certain disadvantages associated with these techniques in clinical usage. To improve the therapeutic efficacy of bone tissue regeneration, a number of drug delivery systems based on biodegradable natural and synthetic polymers were developed and examined in in vitro and in vivo studies. Recent studies have demonstrated that biodegradable polymers play a key role in the development of innovative drug delivery systems and tissue engineered constructs, which improve the treatment and regeneration of damaged bone tissue. In this review, we discuss the most recent advances in the field of polymer-based drug delivery systems for the promotion of bone tissue regeneration and the physical-chemical modifications of polymers for controlled and sustained release of one or more drugs. In addition, special attention is given to recent developments on polymer nano- and microparticle-based drug delivery systems for bone regeneration.

Comparison of arthroscopic to open tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Open tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is associated to high complication rates, which led to the development of arthroscopic techniques. Aim was to compare complication rates of open to arthroscopic TTCA in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective case-control study. Patients were selected from the authors' TTCA database. Eligible were high-risk patients receiving arthroscopic-, or open TTCA retrospectively suitable for arthroscopic TTCA. Primary outcome were major complications.

RESULTS

Eight open and 15 arthroscopic TTCAs were included. Three open and 4 arthroscopic TTCAs presented preoperative plantar ulceration. Fusion rates were similar (75% vs. 67%; p=0.679). Major complications occurred in 63% of open (80% surgical-site-infections (SSI)) and 33% of arthroscopic (100% non-unions) TTCA. Preoperative plantar ulceration did not affect major SSI in open TTCA (67% vs. 60%) but resulted in a significant increase of non-union rates for arthroscopic TTCA (75% vs. 18%; p=0.039). In patients without plantar ulceration the union-rate was 80% for both, open and arthroscopic TTCA.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic TTCA drastically reduced major SSI. Patients without preexisting ulceration had excellent union-rates for open and arthroscopic TTCA.

Current and Future Concepts for the Treatment of Impaired Fracture Healing

Bone regeneration represents a complex process, of which basic biologic principles have been evolutionarily conserved over a broad range of different species. Bone represents one of few tissues that can heal without forming a fibrous scar and, as such, resembles a unique form of tissue regeneration. Despite a tremendous improvement in surgical techniques in the past decades, impaired bone regeneration including non-unions still affect a significant number of patients with fractures. As impaired bone regeneration is associated with high socio-economic implications, it is an essential clinical need to gain a full understanding of the pathophysiology and identify novel treatment approaches. This review focuses on the clinical implications of impaired bone regeneration, including currently available treatment options. Moreover, recent advances in the understanding of fracture healing are discussed, which have resulted in the identification and development of novel therapeutic approaches for affected patients.

Orthobiologics

Use of orthobiologics in sports medicine and musculoskeletal surgery has gained significant interest. However, many of the commercially available and advertised products are lacking in clinical evidence. Widespread use of products before fully understanding their true indications may result in unknown adverse outcomes and may also lead to increased health care costs. As more products become available, it is important to remain judicial in use and to practice evidence-based medicine. Likewise, it is important to continue advances in research in hopes to improve surgical outcomes. This article reviews clinical evidence behind common orthobiologics in the treatment of foot and ankle pathology.

Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor BB in Combination With a Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate (rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP)-Collagen Matrix as an Alternative to Autograft

BACKGROUND

Joint arthrodesis often employs autograft to promote union; graft harvesting can lead to perioperative morbidity. A Canadian randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) combined with beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)-collagen was a safe, effective alternative to autograft. This multicenter North American RCT compared the safety and efficacy of rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen with autograft for ankle and hindfoot fusion. Subclassification using propensity scores (PS) incorporated patients from previous trials for enhanced statistical power for noninferiority testing and broader review of treatments.

METHODS

Patients requiring ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis and supplemental bone graft were treated with rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen (n = 69) or autograft (n = 35). Outcomes included joint fusion on computed tomography (24 weeks), clinical healing status, visual analog scale (VAS) pain, Short-Form 12 (SF-12), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, and Foot Function Index (FFI) scores over 52 weeks. PS methodology addressed potential selection bias arising from pooling data among these patients and 2 previous RCTs with similar inclusion criteria, surgical techniques, graft harvest techniques, and outcomes. All 132 rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen-treated patients and 167 of 189 candidate autograft-treated controls were selected for comparison by an independent statistician blinded to outcomes.

RESULTS

In the PS subclassification, 68.1% treatment patients and 68.4% controls achieved >50% osseous bridging at fusion sites. Clinical healing status was achieved in 84.8% of treated patients and 90.7% of controls at 52 weeks. Clinical, functional, and quality of life results demonstrated noninferiority of rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen to autograft. Safety-related outcomes were equivalent.

CONCLUSION

PS subclassification analysis of 3 RCTs demonstrated that rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen was as effective as autograft for ankle and hindfoot fusions, with less pain and morbidity than treatment with autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective randomized study.

Optimizing Results in Diabetic Charcot Reconstruction

Reconstruction of the diabetic Charcot foot can be a challenge even for the most experienced foot and ankle surgeon. The first portion of this article discusses the preoperative evaluation with an emphasis on factors that can be modified before surgical reconstruction to help optimize surgical results. The second portion of the article focuses on intraoperative methods and techniques to help improve postoperative outcomes. Surgeons should strive to provide high-quality, cost-effective care by optimizing patient selection and perioperative care. Objective measures of patient outcomes will become increasingly important with the transition from volume-based to value-based care.

The Use of Bone Grafts, Bone Graft Substitutes, and Orthobiologics for Osseous Healing in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Achieving fusion in osseous procedures about the foot and ankle presents unique challenges to the surgeon. Many patients have comorbidities that reduce osseous healing rates, and the limited space and high weightbearing demand placed on fusion sites makes the choice of bone graft, bone graft substitute, or orthobiologic agent of utmost importance. In this review, we discuss the essential characteristics of grafts, including their osteoconductive, osteoinductive, osteogenic, and angiogenic properties. Autologous bone graft remains the gold standard and contains all these properties. However, the convenience and lack of donor site morbidity of synthetic bone grafts, allografts, and orthobiologics, including growth factors and allogenic stem cells, has led to these being used commonly as augments.

What Is the Treatment "Algorithm" for Infection After Ankle or Hindfoot Arthrodesis?

RECOMMENDATION

There is no universal algorithm for addressing the infected ankle or subtalar arthrodesis. A potential algorithm created by consensus is.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Consensus.

DELEGATE VOTE

Agree: 100%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 0% (Unanimous, Strongest Consensus).

Advances in surgical applications of growth factors for wound healing

Growth factors have recently gained clinical importance for wound management. Application of recombinant growth factors has been shown to mimic cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation in vivo, allowing for external modulation of the healing process. Perioperative drug delivery systems can enhance the biological activity of these growth factors, which have a very short in vivo half-life after topical administration. Although the basic mechanisms of these growth factors are well understood, most have yet to demonstrate a significant impact in animal studies or small-sized clinical trials. In this review, we emphasized currently approved growth factor therapies, including a sustained release system for growth factors, emerging therapies, and future research possibilities combined with surgical procedures. Approaches seeking to understand wound healing at a systemic level are currently ongoing. However, further research and consideration in surgery will be needed to provide definitive confirmation of the efficacy of growth factor therapies for intractable wounds.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Utilizing a Titanium Intramedullary Nail With an Internal Pseudoelastic Nitinol Compression Element: A Retrospective Case Series of 33 Patients

Nitinol has been shown to generate durable compression under loading via pseudoelastic shape memory. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a hindfoot arthrodesis nail with an internal pseudoelastic nitinol compression element. Patients who had undergone tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis from 2013 to 2016 were identified at 2 tertiary referral centers (12-week follow-up minimum). Patients managed with a tibiotalocalcaneal nail with an internal nitinol compression element were identified for review. Sagittal computed tomographic scan reformats were reviewed to calculate a percentage of joint surface bony union. Intraoperative and postoperative radiographs were compared to calculate postoperative screw position change generated by the nitinol element, a surrogate for postoperative unloading of compressive forces. Thirty-three patients were included in analysis and 81% of patients had successful union of both tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Overall, 90% of all arthrodesis surfaces united. The union rate of arthrodesis surfaces among patients without Charcot osteoarthropathy was 94%. A history of Charcot was identified as a risk factor for subtalar nonunion (p = .04) and was associated with less complete computed tomography-based tibiotalar union: 94% versus 71% (p < .01). The posterior-to-anterior screw translated an average of 3.9 mm proximally relative to the rigid portion of the nail from intraoperative to initial postoperative radiographs (p < .0001). High rates of computed tomography-confirmed union were demonstrated in the face of challenging clinical scenarios. Shortening of the pseudoelastic nitinol element occurs early in the postoperative period, indicating continued unloading of the nitinol compression element through the arthrodesis sites after initial implantation.

Comparison and Use of Allograft Bone Morphogenetic Protein Versus Other Materials in Ankle and Hindfoot Fusions

Bone grafting is a common procedure in foot and ankle surgery. Because autogenous graft use results in comorbidity to the patient, the search has been ongoing for the ideal substitute. A novel processing technique for allograft using bone marrow, which retains many of the growth factors, has shown promise in the spinal data and early reports of foot and ankle surgery. We performed a retrospective, comparative study of patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis, with a total of 68 patients included. Of the 68 patients, 29 (42.65%) received a bone morphogenetic protein allograft and 39 (57.35%) did not. The patient demographics and social and medical history were similar between the 2 groups and both groups had a similar time to union (p = .581). Of the 29 patients in the bone morphogenetic protein allograft group, 3 (10.3%) experienced nonunion and 4 (13.8%) developed a complication. Of the 39 patients undergoing other treatment, 7 (17.9%) experienced nonunion and 14 (35.9%) developed a complication. The difference for nonunion was not statistically significant (p = .5). However, the difference in the overall complication rate was statistically significant (p = .04). We found that this novel bone graft substitute is safe and can be used for foot and ankle arthrodesis.

The role of biologic in foot and ankle trauma-a review of the literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of biologics in orthopedics is becoming increasingly popular as an adjuvant in healing musculoskeletal injuries. Though many biologics involved in the management of foot and ankle injuries are used based on physician preference, reports of improved outcomes when combined with standard operative treatment has led to further clinical interest especially in foot and ankle trauma.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most recent studies have shown benefits for biologic use in patients predisposed to poor bone and soft tissue healing. Biologics have shown benefit in treating soft tissue injuries such as Achilles ruptures as well as the complications of trauma such as non-unions and osteoarthritis. Biologics have shown some benefit in improving functional and pain scores, as well as reducing time to heal in foot and ankle traumatic injuries, with particular success shown with patients that have risk factors for poor healing. As the use of biologics continues to increase, there is a need for high-level studies to confirm early findings of lower level reports.

Anabolic Strategies to Augment Bone Fracture Healing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of therapeutics that target anabolic pathways involved in skeletogenesis is of great importance with regard to disease resulting in bone loss, or in cases of impaired bone repair. This review aims to summarize recent developments in this area.

RECENT FINDINGS

A greater understanding of how drugs that modulate signaling pathways involved in skeletogenesis exert their efficacy, and the molecular mechanisms resulting in bone formation has led to novel pharmacological bone repair strategies. Furthermore, crosstalk between pathways and molecules has suggested signaling synergies that may be exploited for enhanced tissue formation. The sequential pharmacological stimulation of the molecular cascades resulting in tissue repair is a promising strategy for the treatment of bone fractures. It is proposed that a therapeutic strategy which mimics the natural cascade of events observed during fracture repair may be achieved through temporal targeting of tissue repair pathways.

The Use of Decellularized Human Placenta in Full-Thickness Wound Repair and Periarticular Soft Tissue Reconstruction: An Update on Regenerative Healing

Prolonged or incomplete healing of the foot and ankle can pose significant challenges. Therefore, investigators have begun searching for alternative treatment strategies. With advances in tissue engineering, decellularized human placental connective tissue matrix has been suggested as a means to achieve more rapid and complete healing for various soft tissue and bone procedures. Basic science and clinical studies have shown that decellularized human placental connective tissue matrix can support regenerative healing through cellular migration, accelerated tissue remodeling, and the establishment of functional tissue. Additional research is needed to fully explore and evaluate clinical applications within the foot and ankle.

Osseous Healing in Foot and Ankle Surgery with Autograft, Allograft, and Other Orthobiologics

In the surgical treatment of foot and ankle abnormality, many problems require bone grafting for successful osseous union. Nonunion, reconstruction, and arthrodesis procedures pose specific challenges due to bony defects secondary to trauma, malunions, or previous surgery. Nonunion in foot and ankle arthrodesis is a significant risk and is well documented in recent literature. This article is a review of the recent literature regarding the use of bone graft and orthobiologics in foot and ankle surgery.

Platelet-derived growth factor BB enhances osteoclast formation and osteoclast precursor cell chemotaxis

Enhanced osteoclast formation increases bone resorption, which triggers bone remodeling. Platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB) enhances precursor cell homing, angiogenesis, and bone healing, and thereby could also treat osteoporosis. However, the effect of PDGF-BB on osteoclast formation is not fully understood. We investigated whether exogenous recombinant PDGF-BB directly affects osteoclast formation and osteoclast precursor cell chemotaxis. The murine monocyte-macrophage cell line RAW264.7 and bone-marrow-derived macrophages were cultured with recombinant mouse PDGF-BB with or without a platelet-derived growth factor receptor β inhibitor (AG-1295) or a Janus kinase 2 inhibitor (AG-490) to analyze the effect on osteoclastogenesis in vitro. PDGF-BB with or without AG-490 or AG-1295 was locally administrated in the mandibular fracture of 16-week-old Sprague Dawley rats (n = 18) for 1-2 weeks to analyze the effect on osteoclastogenesis in vivo. The effect of the treatments on osteoclast formation, osteoclast precursor cell migration, and expression of osteoclastogenic signaling molecules was analyzed. PDGF-BB enhanced osteoclast formation both in vitro and in vivo, but AG-490 and AG-1295 inhibited this effect. PDGF-BB enhanced phosphorylation of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), Akt, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in RAW264.7 cells. AG-490 inhibited PDGF-BB-induced STAT3 phosphorylation. PDGF-BB enhanced RAW264.7 cell migration and gene expression of osteoclastogenic signaling molecules (i.e., nuclear factor of activated T cells 1, dendrocyte-expressed seven transmembrane protein, and B-cell lymphoma 2), and treatment with AG-1295, AG-490, or S3I-201 (a STAT3 inhibitor) reduced this effect. PDGF-BB enhanced osteoclast formation, osteoclast precursor cell chemotaxis, and phosphorylation of STAT3, Akt, and ERK1/2. but AG-1295 and AG-490 reduced this effect. These findings reflect the complexity of PDGF-BB in bone biology.

Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB versus autologous bone graft in foot and ankle fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Today, autogenous bone graft (ABG) is still considered as the gold standard for joint fusion. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) which is of chemotactic and mitogenic to mesenchymal stem cells and possesses outstanding osteogenetic potentials has been used for ankle and foot fusion in recent years. The goal of this article is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rhPDGF-BB versus ABG in foot and ankle fusion. The PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematic searched. Finally, three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 634 patients were enrolled in this study. Results of radiologic effectiveness which included CT and radiographic union rates revealed that there was no significant difference between rhPDGF-BB approach and ABG approach. Analysis of clinical results held the same outcomes expect that ABG group was superior in long-term Short Form-12 physical component scores. The pooled results also demonstrated that rhPDGF-BB was as safe as ABG in foot and ankle surgery. However, autograft harvesting procedure has some drawbacks such as donor-site pain and morbidity, additional operation time, blood loss, and scarring, which can be overcome by rhPDGF-BB. Thus, rhPDGF-BB is a viable alternative to autograft in foot and ankle fusion surgery. Yet, more high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are still required to make the final conclusion.

Injectable Recombinant Human Platelet-derived Growth Factor in Collagen Carrier for Hindfoot Fusion

Arthrodesis of the hindfoot is a common procedure for degenerative joint disease and/or severe deformity. Nonunion is a common complication from this procedure, causing an increased burden to the patient and health care system, often resulting in the need for revision surgery. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF) has been shown to be a safe and effective tool to enhance arthrodesis rates in hindfoot surgery while avoiding the potential morbidity of bone grafting. This article provides a review of the role of rhPDGF in hindfoot fusions, and the surgical technique for performing an rhPDGF enhanced double-arthrodesis through a medial approach.

Vancouver Experience of Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor

Joint arthrodesis utilizing autogenous bone graft remains the gold standard of treatment in fusion procedures of the foot and ankle. Graft harvest, however, has been associated with increased morbidity to patients as well as increased costs. With this in mind, multiple clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rh-PDGF-BB) with beta-tricalcium phosphate (B-TCP) to augment in foot and ankle arthrodesis with favorable results. These factors have led to the increased use of rh-PDGF-BB with B-TCP in Vancouver with good clinical results.

The Importance of Sufficient Graft Material in Achieving Foot or Ankle Fusion

BACKGROUND

Nonunion, an important complication following foot and ankle arthrodesis, causes substantial morbidity and disability. In patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis, autogenous bone graft (autograft) or a suitable alternative is often used to promote osseous fusion across the joint. This study assessed the importance of adequate graft material in the fusion space to achieve joint fusion during ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis.

METHODS

This study used data from a previously published clinical trial of grafting material (recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB with beta-tricalcium phosphate [rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP] or autograft) for healing in hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis to correlate the amount of graft fill at 9 weeks with ultimate healing. Patients who received supplemental graft material for ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis for end-stage ankle or hindfoot arthritis were stratified according to nonunion risk factors and surgical fusion site. Patients underwent arthrodesis using standard rigid internal fixation. Graft fill was defined as "adequate" if the material occupied ≥50% of the cross-sectional area of the fusion space on a computed tomography (CT) scan made at 9 weeks. Fusion was defined as osseous bridging of ≥50% of each articulation on a CT scan made at 24 weeks. Three hundred and seventy-nine patients with 573 joints (383 managed with rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP and 190 managed with autograft) that underwent arthrodesis had complete follow-up with 9-week and 24-week CT scans available.

RESULTS

Overall, 472 (82%) of 573 joints had adequate graft fill; of those, 383 (81%) were successfully fused at 24 weeks compared with 21 (21%) of 101 joints without adequate graft fill (p < 0.0001). Absolute fusion rate differences (joints with adequate fill minus those without adequate fill) were consistent across joints (61% to 63%) and for graft materials. The overall odds ratio (OR) of successful fusion in joints with adequate graft fill compared with those without adequate graft fill was 16.4 (95% confidence interval, 9.6 to 27.9).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates an association between the amount of graft material and successful hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis. Graft material filling of ≥50% of the fusion space at 9 weeks, regardless of type or origin, was associated with significantly higher fusion rates at 24 weeks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of recombinant PDGF-BB on bone formation in the presence of β-tricalcium phosphate and bovine bone mineral matrix: a pilot study in rat calvarial defects

Background

Supplementation of bone substitutes with recombinant platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) can enhance bone regeneration. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of PDGF-BB on bone formation in the presence of β-tricalcium phosphate and bovine bone mineral matrix in a rat calvaria defect model.

Methods

The authors examined 5 mm rat calvarial defects treated with β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) or demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with and without 0.3 mg/ml recombinant PDGF-BB. Calvaria defects were randomly divided into the following treatment groups (n = 5); TCP; TCP plus PDGF-BB; DBBM; DBBM plus PDGF-BB; and untreated empty control. After 45 days, bone formation was evaluated by histomorphometry and fluorescence microscopy.

Results

The authors report that the area of newly formed bone was similar between the empty controls and the two bone substitutes, TCP and DBBM. Supplementation of TCP and DBBM with PDGF-BB had no significant impact on bone formation. Fluorochrome staining revealed no visible changes in the pattern of bone formation in defects filled with TCP and DBBM, irrespective of PDGF-BB. Furthermore, supplementation with PDGF-BB did not influence biomaterial degradation.

Conclusions

The authors concluded that PDGF-BB had no impact on bone formation and degradation of bone substitutes in the respective rodent models. Thus, possible beneficial effects of PDGF-BB may require other model situations.