Resection Arthroplasty for Resistant Ulcers Underlying the Hallux in Insensate Diabetics

Effectiveness of offloading interventions for people with diabetes-related foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Offloading treatment is crucial to heal diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU). This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of offloading interventions for people with DFU.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and trials registries for all studies relating to offloading interventions in people with DFU to address 14 clinical question comparisons. Outcomes included ulcers healed, plantar pressure, weight-bearing activity, adherence, new lesions, falls, infections, amputations, quality of life, costs, cost-effectiveness, balance, and sustained healing. Included controlled studies were independently assessed for risk of bias and had key data extracted. Meta-analyses were performed when outcome data from studies could be pooled. Evidence statements were developed using the GRADE approach when outcome data existed.

RESULTS

From 19,923 studies screened, 194 eligible studies were identified (47 controlled, 147 non-controlled), 35 meta-analyses performed, and 128 evidence statements developed. We found non-removable offloading devices likely increase ulcers healed compared to removable offloading devices (risk ratio [RR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.09-1.41; N = 14, n = 1083), and may increase adherence, cost-effectiveness and decrease infections, but may increase new lesions. Removable knee-high offloading devices may make little difference to ulcers healed compared to removable ankle-high offloading devices (RR 1.00, 0.86-1.16; N = 6, n = 439), but may decrease plantar pressure and adherence. Any offloading device may increase ulcers healed (RR 1.39, 0.89-2.18; N = 5, n = 235) and cost-effectiveness compared to therapeutic footwear and may decrease plantar pressure and infections. Digital flexor tenotomies with offloading devices likely increase ulcers healed (RR 2.43, 1.05-5.59; N = 1, n = 16) and sustained healing compared to devices alone, and may decrease plantar pressure and infections, but may increase new transfer lesions. Achilles tendon lengthening with offloading devices likely increase ulcers healed (RR 1.10, 0.97-1.27; N = 1, n = 64) and sustained healing compared to devices alone, but likely increase new heel ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-removable offloading devices are likely superior to all other offloading interventions to heal most plantar DFU. Digital flexor tenotomies and Achilles tendon lengthening in combination with offloading devices are likely superior for some specific plantar DFU locations. Otherwise, any offloading device is probably superior to therapeutic footwear and other non-surgical offloading interventions to heal most plantar DFU. However, all these interventions have low-to-moderate certainty of evidence supporting their outcomes and more high-quality trials are needed to improve our certainty for the effectiveness of most offloading interventions.

Outcomes of Keller Gap Arthroplasty for Plantar Hallux Interphalangeal Joint Ulcers in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

Hallux ulcers are known for their recurrence and associated risk for future amputations. Traditional nonsurgical external offloading methods have poor compliance rates, and the data is sparse on surgical offloading of hallux ulcers. We performed this study to analyze the outcomes of Keller excision gap arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in patients with a neuropathic plantar hallux interphalangeal joint (IPJ) ulcer in patients with diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 105 diabetic patients with a plantar hallux IPJ ulcer who underwent a Keller excision gap arthroplasty between December 2014 and June 2020 was done. A total of 122 great toes had been operated upon for hallux IPJ ulcers. We studied the long-term wound healing rates from patient records and then did a prospective survey of the postreview period.

RESULTS

All the hallux IPJ ulcers healed well in the immediate postoperative period. Six patients reported a recurrence of the ulcer at the original site during a mean follow-up period of 30 months. For these 6 patients, the mean time to recurrence of ulcer after operation was 2.5 years.

CONCLUSION

At an average of 30 months, we found the Keller gap arthroplasty for treatment of noninfected and nonischemic diabetic foot hallux IPJ ulcers was associated with an ulcer recurrence rate of 5%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, cohort study.

A Novel Classification for Diabetic Foot Ulcers of the First Ray

OBJECTIVE

Diabetic foot ulcers of the first ray result from several distinct biomechanical mechanisms related to anatomical deformities, which must be addressed if surgical offloading is contemplated. The objective of this study was to create a classification of the anatomical deformities of first-ray ulcers that could lead to better standardization of treatment and reporting.

METHODS

The authors performed a file review of patients with diabetic neuropathy diagnosed with first-ray ulcers over a period of 3 years in an outpatient setting. Anatomical deformities were diagnosed clinically and reported with ulcer location. The primary classification was the metatarsophalangeal joint, the interphalangeal joint, and the distal phalanx.

RESULTS

Records for 59 patients (mean age, 62 years) with University of Texas A1 and A2 ulcers were reviewed. Mean ulcer duration was 2 months. The more common deformities were hallux valgus (41%), hallux valgus interphalangeus (14%), and hallux malleus (20%), and these were primarily associated with metatarsophalangeal, interphalangeal joint, and tip-of-toe ulcers, respectively (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

By classifying ulcer locations, the relevant corrective surgery may be chosen. Although some prophylactic procedures may be safe and effective, prophylactic hallux valgus correction in the diabetic foot requires further study.

Diabetic foot ulcer: Challenges and future

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) have become one of the important causes of mortality and morbidity in patients with diabetes, and they are also a common cause of hospitalization, which places a heavy burden on patients and society. The prevention and treatment of DFUs requires multidisciplinary management. By controlling various risk factors, such as blood glucose levels, blood pressure, lipid levels and smoking cessation, local management of DFUs should be strengthened, such as debridement, dressing, revascularization, stem cell decompression and oxygen therapy. If necessary, systemic anti-infection treatment should be administered. We reviewed the progress in the clinical practice of treating DFUs in recent years, such as revascularization, wound repair, offloading, stem cell transplantation, and anti-infection treatment. We also summarized and prospectively analyzed some new technologies and measurements used in the treatment of DFUs and noted the future challenges and directions for the development of DFU treatments.

Effect of tibial cortex transverse transport in patients with recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective multicenter cohort study

Background

Management of recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) remains difficult. Distraction osteogenesis mediates new bone formation and angiogenesis in the bone itself and the surrounding tissues. Recently it was reported that tibial cortex transverse transport (TTT) was associated with neovascularization and increased perfusion at the foot in patients with recalcitrant DFUs and facilitated healing and limb salvage. However, the findings were from several single-center studies with relatively small populations, which need to be confirmed in multicenter cohort studies with relatively large populations. Furthermore, the effect of this technique on patient's health-related quality of life is still unclear.

Methods

We treated patients with recalcitrant (University of Texas wound grading system 2-C to 3-D and not responding to prior routine conservative and surgical treatments for at least 8 weeks) DFUs from seven centers using TTT (a 5 ​cm ​× ​1.5 ​cm corticotomy followed by 4 weeks of medial and lateral distraction) between July 2016 and June 2019. We analyzed ulcer healing, major amputation, recurrence, health-related quality of life (physical and mental component summary scores), and complications in the 2-year follow-up. Foot arterial and perfusion changes were evaluated using computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging 12 weeks postoperatively.

Results

A total of 1175 patients were enrolled. Patients who died (85, 7.2%) or lost to follow-up (18, 1.7%) were excluded, leaving 1072 patients for evaluation. Most of the patients were male (752, 70.1%) and with a mean age of 60.4 ​± ​9.1 years. The mean ulcer size was 41.0 ​± ​8.5 ​cm² and 187 (16.6%) ulcers extended above the ankle. During the follow-up, 1019 (94.9%) patients healed in a mean time of 12.4 ​± ​5.6 weeks, 53 (4.9%) had major amputations, and 33 (3.1%) experienced recurrences. Compared to preoperatively, the patients had higher physical (26.2 ​± ​8.3 versus 41.3 ​± ​10.6, p ​= ​0.008) and mental (33.6 ​± ​10.7 versus 45.4 ​± ​11.3, p ​= ​0.031) component summary scores at the 2-year follow-up. Closed tibial fracture at the corticotomy site was found in 8 (0.7%) patients and was treated using external fixation and healed uneventfully. There were 23 (2.1%) patients who had pin site infections and were treated successfully with dressing changes. Compared to preoperatively, the patients had more small arteries and higher foot blood flow (8.1 ​± ​2.2 versus 28.3 ​± ​3.9 ml/100 ​g/min, p ​= ​0.003) and volume (1.5 ​± ​0.3 versus 2.7 ​± ​0.4 ml/100 ​g, p ​= ​0.037) 12 weeks postoperatively.

Conclusion

TTT promotes healing, limb salvage, and health-related quality of life in patients with recalcitrant DFUs as demonstrated in this multicenter cohort study. The surgical procedure was simple and straightforward and the complications were few and minor. The effect of this technique was associated with neovascularization and improved perfusion at the foot mediated by the cortex distraction. The findings are required to confirm in randomized controlled trials.The Translational Potential of this Article: TTT can be used as an effective treatment in patients with recalcitrant DFUs. The mechanism is associated with neovascularization and consequently increased perfusion in the foot after operation.

Distal Metatarsal Osteotomies for Chronic Plantar Diabetic Foot Ulcers

In more than 30 years of scientific literature (1986-2021), the few published studies on the management of CPDFUs by DMOs showed satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. Although these reports were all case series, their data suggest that DMOs, performed at a different level of the distal metatarsal bones, are an effective surgical treatment option for achieving rapid healing of CPDFUs and preventing their recurrence after balancing the pressures in diabetic forefeet. Hence, DMOs can be a valid alternative treatment method also for CPDFUs with chronic infection, ulcers penetrating deep structures, and even ulcers with osteomyelitis at the metatarsophalangeal level.

Analysis of repeated lesions after diabetic forefoot amputation

AIM

This study was performed to analyze the clinical characteristics, related factors, and prognosis of repeated lesions after diabetic forefoot amputation.

METHODS

The medical records of 998 patients who underwent forefoot amputation because of their diabetic feet from March 2002 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 508 selected patients with a follow-up period of at least 6 months, 288 had repeated lesions in the forefoot, and 220 did not have repeated lesions. The related factors of repeated lesions were compared and analyzed. Of the patients with repeated lesions, 142 and 104 on the ipsilateral and contralateral sides, respectively were also compared and examined.

RESULTS

Repeated lesions were statistically significant in diabetic polyneuropathy, vascular calcification, and dialysis. However, the anatomical positions of diabetic foot lesions, causes of lesions, anatomical amputation levels, number of surgeries, and management duration had no significant differences. Contralateral lesions occurred 8 months later than ipsilateral lesions, but reamputation above the Lisfranc joint was more frequent and prognosis was poorer.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated lesions were affected by general conditions, and the contralateral side must be carefully examined after diabetic forefoot amputation.

A Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Resection Arthroplasty for Resistant Hallucal Diabetic Ulcers

The standard medical care (SC) of non-infected diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) has been reported to yield varying rates of wound healing with high recurrence rate in non-infected wounds. Conservative surgery has been advanced as an alternative to SC in treating resistant non-complicated and complicated DFUs. Studies reporting resection arthroplasty (RA) of the first metatarsal head stated high healing rates with less recurrence. The aim of this meta-analysis is to quantitatively assess the efficacy of the RA procedure. Based on 9 included studies (3 case-control and 6 case-series) with 225 patients (244 feet, 244 hallucal plantar ulcers) and a mean follow-up period was of 22.8 ±13.3 months, the weighted estimates of comparative studies (RA vs. SC) were as follows: healing rate (100% vs. 79.9%, p = .0001), time to heal (3.3 ±0.28 vs. 8.4 ±1.5 weeks, p = .002), recurrence rate (5.7% vs. 25.4%, p = .001) and transfer rate (4.5% vs. 1.4%, p = .1). Similar values were found when analyzing case-series of non-infected and infected wounds treated with RA. Based on the available evidence, resection arthroplasty of the first ray is to be considered an effective conservative surgery in treating resistant or complicated hallucal neuropathic ulcers. Further prospective controlled trials are warranted to validate the review findings.

Effect of Mini-invasive Floating Metatarsal Osteotomy on Plantar Pressure in Patients With Diabetic Plantar Metatarsal Head Ulcers

BACKGROUND

Distal metatarsal osteotomy has been used to alleviate plantar pressure caused by anatomic deformities. This study's purpose was to examine the effect of minimally invasive floating metatarsal osteotomy on plantar pressure in patients with diabetic metatarsal head ulcers.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series of prospectively collected data on 32 patients with diabetes complicated by plantar metatarsal head ulcers without ischemia. Peak plantar pressure and pressure time integrals were examined using the Tekscan MatScan prior to surgery and 6 months following minimally invasive floating metatarsal osteotomy. Patients were followed for complications for at least 1 year.

RESULTS

Peak plantar pressure at the level of the osteotomized metatarsal head decreased from 338.1 to 225.4 kPa (P < .0001). The pressure time integral decreased from 82.4 to 65.0 kPa·s (P < .0001). All ulcers healed within a mean of 3.7 ± 4.2 weeks. There was 1 recurrence (under a hypertrophic callus of the osteotomy) during a median follow-up of 18.3 months (range, 12.2-27). Following surgery, adjacent sites showed increased plantar pressure and 4 patients developed transfer lesions (under an adjacent metatarsal head); all were managed successfully. There was 1 serious adverse event related to surgery (operative site infection) that resolved with antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the minimally invasive floating metatarsal osteotomy successfully reduced local plantar pressure and that the method was safe and effective, both in treatment and prevention of recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case series of prospectively collected data.

Proximal Derotation Phalangeal Osteotomy for Medial First Toe Diabetic Ulcer

BACKGROUND

Foot ulcers are a common complication in diabetic patients. Mild callus formation due to a plantar pressure can lead to an ulcer formation with potentially hazardous sequelae. Eliminating the pressure from the ulcer is essential for a proper healing process. Proximal derotation phalangeal osteotomy is a relatively simple procedure that can redistribute the planter pressure points over the hallux.

METHODS

Thirteen patients underwent proximal derotation phalangeal osteotomy to relieve the bony pressure causing an ulcer in the first toe, which was refractory to non-operative treatment. Twelve patients had diabetes type 2 and one had Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

RESULTS

Ulcers were completely resolved in all 13 patients in an average time of 4.3 (range 2-8) weeks. Four patients (31%) had mild complications that resolved well. No further surgery was required at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Proximal derotation phalangeal osteotomy enabled ulcer healing in refractory cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective study.

Conversion of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis to Interpositional Arthroplasty With Acellular Dermal Matrix for First Ray Ulceration: A Case Report

The purpose of this study is to report the outcome of the conversion of a first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis to an interpositional arthroplasty with an acellular dermal matrix for a chronic nonhealing first ray wound. To our knowledge, this is the first case report converting a first ray arthrodesis to an interpositional arthroplasty to heal a chronic ulceration. A 78-year-old female developed a chronic neuropathic ulceration under the first metatarsal head and hallux after a first MTP joint arthrodesis. The patient failed local wound care and underwent gastrocnemius recession, hallux interphalangeal joint fusion, and an interpositional arthroplasty with the use of an acellular dermal matrix. Bone tunnels were placed proximal to the metatarsal neck, where absorbable sutures affixed to the dermal matrix were passed from plantar to dorsal, and the graft was secured to the reamed metatarsal head and associated capsule. Postoperative radiographs revealed improved alignment of the first MTP joint. Complete reepithelialization of the plantar ulceration occurred within 2 weeks postoperatively. At the 16-month follow-up, the patient was ambulating without restriction and continued to be free of first ray ulceration and infection. This case study details the use of an acellular dermal matrix in an interpositional arthroplasty to offload a chronic nonhealing ulceration secondary to elevated first ray pressure associated with first MTP joint arthrodesis. The goal of this treatment is to reduce pain, heal the ulceration, and prevent its recurrence.

Guidelines on multidisciplinary approaches for the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (2020 edition)

In recent years, as living standards have continued to improve, the number of diabetes patients in China, along with the incidence of complications associated with the disease, has been increasing. Among these complications, diabetic foot disease is one of the main causes of disability and death in diabetic patients. Due to the differences in economy, culture, religion and level of medical care available across different regions, preventive and treatment methods and curative results for diabetic foot vary greatly. In multidisciplinary models built around diabetic foot, the timely assessment and diagnosis of wounds and appropriate methods of prevention and treatment with internal and external surgery are key to clinical practice for this pathology. In 2019, under the leadership of the Jiangsu Medical Association and Chinese Diabetes Society, the writing group for the Guidelines on multidisciplinary approaches for the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (2020 edition) was established with the participation of scholars from the specialist areas of endocrinology, burn injury, vascular surgery, orthopedics, foot and ankle surgery and cardiology. Drawing lessons from diabetic foot guidelines from other countries, this guide analyses clinical practices for diabetic foot, queries the theoretical basis and grades and gives recommendations based on the characteristics of the pathology in China. This paper begins with assessments and diagnoses of diabetic foot, then describes treatments for diabetic foot in detail, and ends with protections for high-risk feet and the prevention of ulcers. This manuscript covers the disciplines of internal medicine, surgical, nursing and rehabilitation and describes a total of 50 recommendations that we hope will provide procedures and protocols for clinicians dealing with diabetic foot.

Registry number: IPGRP-2020cn124

Proximal Tibial Cortex Transverse Distraction Facilitating Healing and Limb Salvage in Severe and Recalcitrant Diabetic Foot Ulcers

BACKGROUND

The management of severe and recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers is challenging. Distraction osteogenesis is accompanied by vascularization and regeneration of the surrounding tissues. Longitudinal distraction of the proximal tibia stimulates increased and prolonged blood flow to the distal tibia. However, the effects of transverse distraction of the proximal tibia cortex on severe and recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers are largely unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does tibial cortex transverse distraction increase healing and decrease major amputation and recurrence of severe and recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers compared with routine management (which generally included débridement, revascularization, negative pressure wound therapy, local or free flaps, or skin grafts as indicated)? (2) Does neovascularization and perfusion increase at the foot after the procedure? (3) What are the complications of tibial cortex transverse distraction in patients with severe and recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers?

METHODS

Between July 2014 and March 2017, we treated 136 patients with diabetes mellitus and University of Texas Grade 2B to 3D ulcers (wound penetrating to the tendon, capsule, bone, or joint with infection and/or ischemia). The patients had failed to respond to treatment for at least 6 months, and their ulcers had a mean ± SD area of 44 cm ± 10 cm. All 136 patients underwent tibial cortex transverse distraction (partial corticotomy of the upper tibia, which was in normal condition, followed by 4 weeks of transverse distraction medially then laterally). We compared these patients with the last 137 consecutive patients we treated with standard surgical treatment, consisting of débridement, revascularization, local or free flap or skin equivalent, or graft reconstruction along with negative-pressure wound therapy between May 2011 and June 2013; there was a 1-year period during which both treatments were in use, and we did not include patients whose procedures were performed during this time in either group. Patients in both groups received standard off-loading and wound care. The patients lost to follow-up by 2 years (0.7% of the treatment group [one of 137] and 1.4% of the control group [two of 139]; p = 0.57) were excluded. The patients in the treatment and control groups had a mean age of 61 years and 60 years, respectively, and they were predominantly men in both groups (70% [95 of 136] versus 64% [88 of 137]; p = 0.32). There were no differences with respect to parameters associated with the likelihood of ulcer healing, such as diabetes and ulcer duration, ulcer grades and area, smoking, and arterial status. We compared the groups with respect to ulcer healing (complete epithelialization without discharge, maintained for at least 2 weeks, which was determined by an assessor not involved with clinical care) in a 2-year follow-up, the proportion of ulcers that healed by 6 months, major amputation, recurrence, and complications in the 2-year follow-up. Foot arterial status and perfusion were assessed in the tibial cortex transverse distraction group using CT angiography and perfusion imaging.

RESULTS

The tibial cortex transverse distraction group had a higher proportion of ulcers that healed in the 2-year follow-up than the control group (96% [131 of 136] versus 68% [98 of 137]; odds ratio 10.40 [95% confidence interval 3.96 to 27.43]; p < 0.001). By 6 months, a higher proportion of ulcers healed in the tibia cortex transverse distraction group than the control group (93% [126 of 136] versus 41% [56 of 137]; OR 18.2 [95% CI 8.80 to 37.76]; p < 0.001). Lower proportions of patients in the tibia cortex transverse distraction group underwent major amputation (2.9% [four of 136] versus 23% [31 of 137], OR 0.10 [95% CI 0.04 to 0.30]; p < 0.001) or had recurrences 2.9% (4 of 136) versus 17% (23 of 137), OR 0.20 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.45]; p < 0.001) than the control group in 2-year follow-up. In the feet of the patients in the tibial cortex transverse distraction group, there was a higher density of small vessels (19 ± 2.1/mm versus 9 ± 1.9/mm; mean difference 10/mm; p = 0.010), higher blood flow (24 ± 5 mL/100 g/min versus 8 ± 2.4 mL/100 g/min, mean difference 16 mL/100 g/min; p = 0.004) and blood volume (2.5 ± 0.29 mL/100 g versus 1.3 ± 0.33 mL/100 g, mean difference 1.2 mL/100 g; p = 0.03) 12 weeks postoperatively than preoperatively. Complications included closed fractures at the corticotomy site (in 1.5% of patients; two of 136), which were treated with closed reduction and healed, as well as pin-site infections (in 2.2% of patients; three of 136), which were treated with dressing changes and they resolved without osteomyelitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal tibial cortex transverse distraction substantially facilitated healing and limb salvage and decreased the recurrence of severe and recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers. The surgical techniques were relatively straightforward although the treatment was unorthodox, and the complications were few and minor. These findings suggest that tibial cortex transverse distraction is an effective procedure to treat severe and recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers compared with standard surgical therapy. Randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Effectiveness of offloading interventions to heal foot ulcers in persons with diabetes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Offloading interventions are commonly used in clinical practice to heal foot ulcers. The aim of this updated systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of offloading interventions to heal diabetic foot ulcers.

METHODS

We updated our previous systematic review search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to also include original studies published between July 29, 2014 and August 13, 2018 relating to four offloading intervention categories in populations with diabetic foot ulcers: (a) offloading devices, (b) footwear, (c) other offloading techniques, and (d) surgical offloading techniques. Outcomes included ulcer healing, plantar pressure, ambulatory activity, adherence, adverse events, patient-reported measures, and cost-effectiveness. Included controlled studies were assessed for methodological quality and had key data extracted into evidence and risk of bias tables. Included non-controlled studies were summarised on a narrative basis.

RESULTS

We identified 41 studies from our updated search for a total of 165 included studies. Six included studies were meta-analyses, 26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 13 other controlled studies, and 120 non-controlled studies. Five meta-analyses and 12 RCTs provided high-quality evidence for non-removable knee-high offloading devices being more effective than removable offloading devices and therapeutic footwear for healing plantar forefoot and midfoot ulcers. Total contact casts (TCCs) and non-removable knee-high walkers were shown to be equally effective. Moderate-quality evidence exists for removable knee-high and ankle-high offloading devices being equally effective in healing, but knee-high devices have a larger effect on reducing plantar pressure and ambulatory activity. Low-quality evidence exists for the use of felted foam and surgical offloading to promote healing of plantar forefoot and midfoot ulcers. Very limited evidence exists for the efficacy of any offloading intervention for healing plantar heel ulcers, non-plantar ulcers, and neuropathic ulcers with infection or ischemia.

CONCLUSION

Strong evidence supports the use of non-removable knee-high offloading devices (either TCC or non-removable walker) as the first-choice offloading intervention for healing plantar neuropathic forefoot and midfoot ulcers. Removable offloading devices, either knee-high or ankle-high, are preferred as second choice over other offloading interventions. The evidence bases to support any other offloading intervention is still weak and more high-quality controlled studies are needed in these areas.

Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)

The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This guideline is on the use of offloading interventions to promote the healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes and updates the previous IWGDF guideline. We followed the GRADE methodology to devise clinical questions and critically important outcomes in the PICO format, to conduct a systematic review of the medical-scientific literature, and to write recommendations and their rationale. The recommendations are based on the quality of evidence found in the systematic review, expert opinion where evidence was not available, and a weighing of the benefits and harms, patient preferences, feasibility and applicability, and costs related to the intervention. For healing a neuropathic plantar forefoot or midfoot ulcer in a person with diabetes, we recommend that a nonremovable knee-high offloading device is the first choice of offloading treatment. A removable knee-high and removable ankle-high offloading device are to be considered as the second- and third-choice offloading treatment, respectively, if contraindications or patient intolerance to nonremovable offloading exist. Appropriately, fitting footwear combined with felted foam can be considered as the fourth-choice offloading treatment. If non-surgical offloading fails, we recommend to consider surgical offloading interventions for healing metatarsal head and digital ulcers. We have added new recommendations for the use of offloading treatment for healing ulcers that are complicated with infection or ischaemia and for healing plantar heel ulcers. Offloading is arguably the most important of multiple interventions needed to heal a neuropathic plantar foot ulcer in a person with diabetes. Following these recommendations will help health care professionals and teams provide better care for diabetic patients who have a foot ulcer and are at risk for infection, hospitalization, and amputation.

Bone Reconstruction in the Diabetic Foot

Surgical bone reconstructive procedures of the foot and ankle in diabetic patients must be considered when performing evaluation of a diabetic foot for patients with preulcerative lesions and preexisting wounds. Preventive deformity correction can reduce the potential risk of ulceration, infection, and possible amputation in a patient with an at-risk foot type. It can also expedite wound healing and prevent further breakdown in a patient with lower extremity ulcerations. This article discusses different types of surgical bone reconstructive procedures as preventive and prophylactic deformity corrections to reduce osseous deformity, minimize preulcerative lesions, and increase limb-salvage rates in the compromised patient.

New trends in the orthopaedic management of diabetic foot

Although there are various types of therapeutic footwear currently used to treat diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), recent literature has enforced the concept that total-contact casts are the benchmark.Besides conventional clinical tests and imaging modalities, advanced MRI techniques and high-sensitivity nuclear medicine modalities present several advantages for the investigation of diabetic foot problems.The currently accepted principles of DFU care are rigorous debridement followed by modern wound dressings to provide a moist wound environment. Recently, hyperbaric oxygen and negative pressure wound therapy have aroused increasing attention as an adjunctive treatment for patients with DFUs.For DFU, various surgical treatments are currently available, including resection arthroplasty, metatarsal osteotomies and metatarsal head resections.In the modern management of the Charcot foot, surgery in the acute phase remains controversial and under investigation. While conventional fixation techniques are frequently insufficient to keep alignment postoperatively, superconstruct techniques could provide a successful fixation.Retrograde intramedullary nailing has been a generally accepted method of achieving stability. The midfoot fusion bolt is a current treatment device that maintains the longitudinal columns of the foot. Also, Achilles tendon lengthening remains a popular method in the management of Charcot foot. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170073.

Surgical offloading procedures for diabetic foot ulcers compared to best non-surgical treatment: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Diabetic foot ulcers are frequently related to elevated pressure under a bony prominence. Conservative treatment includes offloading with orthopaedic shoes and custom made orthotics or plaster casts. While casting in plaster is usually effective in achieving primary closure of foot ulcers, recurrence rates are high. Minimally invasive surgical offloading that includes correction of foot deformities has good short and long term results. The surgery alleviates the pressure under the bony prominence, thus enabling prompt ulcer healing, negating the patient's dependence on expensive shoes and orthotics, with a lower chance of recurrence. The purpose of this protocol is to compare offloading surgery (percutaneous flexor tenotomy, mini-invasive floating metatarsal osteotomy or Keller arthroplasty) to non-surgical treatment for patients with diabetic foot ulcers in a semi-crossover designed RCT.

Methods

One hundred patients with diabetic neuropathy related foot ulcers (tip of toe ulcers, ulcers under metatarsal heads and ulcers under the hallux interphalangeal joint) will be randomized (2:3) to a surgical offloading procedure or best available non-surgical treatment. Group 1 (surgery) will have surgery within 1 week. Group 2 (controls) will be prescribed an offloading cast applied for up to 12 weeks (based on clinical considerations). Following successful offloading treatment (ulcer closure with complete epithelization) patients will be prescribed orthopaedic shoes and custom made orthotics. If offloading by cast for at least 6 weeks fails, or the ulcer recurs, patients will be offered surgical offloading. Follow-up will take place till 2 years following randomization. Outcome criteria will be time to healing of the primary ulcer (complete epithelization), time to healing of surgical wound, recurrence of ulcer, time to recurrence and complications.

Discussion

The high recurrence rate of foot ulcers and their dire consequences justify attempts to find better solutions than the non-surgical options available at present. To promote surgery, RCT level evidence of efficacy is necessary.

Trial registration

Israel MOH_2017-08-10_000719. NIH: NCT03414216.

Toe-Sparing Surgery for Neuropathic Toe Ulcers With Exposed Bone or Joint in an Outpatient Setting

The purpose of this study was to review the results of aggressive surgical debridement of neuropathic toe ulcers with exposed bone or joint. We identified patients with a single toe ulcer with exposed bone or joint that had been operated on in an outpatient setting. The surgery had included aggressive debridement and was performed using a small curette and rongeur, followed by oral antibiotic treatment at home. Success was defined as complete healing with no recurrence 6 months after full wound closure and epitheliazation was achieved. Twenty-five patients with neuropathic toe ulcers (72% male) had a total of 26 primary operations. Their mean age was 60 ± 12 years. In 22 patients, the neuropathy resulted from diabetes mellitus of 17 ± 9 years’ duration. The mean ulcer duration was 6 weeks (range 1-24). The mean number of visits per patient was 6.5 (range 3-20). The ulcers closed in a median of 5 weeks (8 ± 6 weeks, range 3-24 weeks, Q1-Q3 4-10 weeks). At 6 months, 3 (11.5%) patients had needed a toe amputation for infection or necrosis that could not be controlled. None needed a major amputation or hospitalization related to the ulcer. Toe-sparing surgery is feasible and in a select population can have a high success rate (88%), even though it does dictate more dedicated patient care.