Ponseti Casting and Achilles Release Versus Classic Casting and Soft Tissue Releases for the Initial Treatment of Arthrogrypotic Clubfeet

Outcomes of Ponseti Method for the Treatment of Clubfeet in Children With Arthrogryposis

INTRODUCTION

The Ponseti serial casting method is the method of choice in treating children with congenital clubfeet. The arthrogrypotic clubfoot has traditionally been considered challenging to treat, with higher rates of recurrence and the need for more corrective surgeries. However, initial reports have found promising results in using the Ponseti method to treat arthrogrypotic feet. This study aims to compare the outcomes of idiopathic versus arthrogrypotic clubfeet following initial treatment with the Ponseti serial casting method.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records from a single institution was conducted. Data was collected from children ages 0 to 18 with idiopathic or arthrogrypotic clubfoot treated from 2002 to 2022 with Ponseti-style serial casting with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Recurrence was defined as the need for additional casting or subsequent surgeries following initial correction. Data was collected on relevant patient demographics, previous treatment, casting records, Achilles tenotomies, and surgical treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 352 patients (546 feet) met inclusion criteria. In all, 334 idiopathic and 18 arthrogrypotic patients were analyzed with an average follow-up duration of 3.4 and 4.2 years, respectively. Twelve patients had distal arthrogryposis, and 6 had amyoplasia. In all, 93.4% of idiopathic and 72.2% of arthrogrypotic patients successfully achieved correction with Ponseti casting and Achilles tenotomy. Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the arthrogrypotic group at 83.3% compared with 44.6% in the idiopathic group (P=0.001). A posterior or posterior medial release was performed in 35.0% of idiopathic and 66.7% arthrogrypotic feet.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the largest series of arthrogrypotic clubfeet treated by Ponseti casting to the best of our knowledge. In contrast to earlier reports, our investigation underscores that while the Ponseti method may be able to secure initial correction in arthrogrypotic clubfeet, on average, at a 3-year follow-up, the prognosis is less favorable. These patients exhibit higher recurrence and often require operative treatment. Notably, a posterior medial release may eventually be needed in up to 6 of 10 patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic studies-investigating the results of treatment.

Multiple Serial Casting for Recurrent Clubfoot in Arthrogryposis Corrects Deformity With Diminishing Returns

PURPOSE

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) consists of more than 400 conditions involving severe joint contractures of at least two or more body regions. Management of clubfoot in patients with AMC is notoriously challenging, with a higher likelihood of recurrence than idiopathic clubfoot, which can be treated using the Ponseti technique to avoid or delay more invasive procedures. The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of multiple serial casting as a treatment of clubfoot in AMC using Pirani scores as an objective measure of deformity.

METHODS

Pirani scores were retrospectively collected from 17 AMC patients with a total of 30 clubfeet and two years follow-up from initiation of treatment. Patients with a minimum of three casting series were included. Pre-treatment and post-treatment deformity scores were examined across casting series using analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The first series pre-treatment Pirani score improved from 4.80±1.54 to 1.68±1.48 (p<0.001). The second series improved from 4.23±1.03 to 2.72±0.916 (p<0.001). The third series had the smallest improvement from 3.87±1.07 to 2.82±1.02 (p<0.001). Change in Pirani scores showed a significant decrease from the first series to the second (p=0.001) and third (p<0.001). In addition, the number of casting days was found to significantly affect the change in scores during the third series (p=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ponseti technique can improve clubfoot in AMC as measured by the Pirani score. Data shows that early intervention yields better results, with a diminished yet effective ability to elicit change over time.

Clubfoot

Clubfoot or talipes equinovarus deformity is one of the most common anomalies affecting the lower extremities. This review provides an update on the outcomes of various treatment options used to correct clubfoot. The ultimate goal in the treatment of clubfoot is to obtain a fully functional and pain-free foot and maintain a long-term correction. The Ponseti method is now considered the gold standard of treatment for primary clubfoot. Relapse is common after primary treatment with the Ponseti method, and other interventions are discussed that are used to provide for long-term successful outcomes.

Comparative evaluation and analysis of outcomes in non-idiopathic and idiopathic clubfeet with Ponseti method at a tertiary care centre of a developing country

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic clubfoot (congenital talipes equinovarus, CTEV) is being managed worldwide by Ponseti method with high success rates, while for non-idiopathic clubfoot surgical interventions is being widely used with variable results. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Ponseti method in non-idiopathic clubfoot and compared the results with idiopathic clubfoot.

METHODS

The paper evaluated the epidemiological incidence and demographic profile of non-idiopathic clubfoot in a tertiary centre of developing country. A total of 108 subjects with 85 having idiopathic (group I;125 feet) and 23 having non-idiopathic variety (group II;34 feet) were managed with Ponseti method and were followed for a mean duration of 38.33 (12-62) and 36.27 months (12-58) in group I and II respectively. The most common associations were meningomyelocele (MMC/spina bifida,5), arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC,4), developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH,3) and Down's syndrome and amniotic band syndrome (2 each).

RESULTS

Primary correction was achieved in both the groups in 98% and 87% in group I and II respectively, while recurrences of at least one deformity was observed in 11 (9%) and 12 (40%) feet in group I and II respectively. Favourable outcomes were noticed in 22 (65%) feet in non-idiopathic group and 12 feet (35%) underwent extensive soft tissue release as compared to 3 feet (2.4%) in idiopathic variety.

CONCLUSION

Deformities improved significantly in non-idiopathic clubfeet with Ponseti methods although complete correction was not possible. Extensive surgical interventions were reduced in up to 35% feet in non-idiopathic variety and hence, it is recommended as primary treatment for all variety of clubfeet, irrespective of their etiology.

Ponseti Idiopathic and Nonidiopathic Clubfoot Correction With Secondary Surgeries

The Ponseti method has revolutionized clubfoot treatment for not only idiopathic clubfoot but also non-idiopathic clubfoot. This study aimed to validate the existing literature with respect to the Ponseti method serving as first line treatment for clubfoot. The purpose of this study was to compare clubfoot type and recurrence with secondary surgical procedures following Ponseti method. Kaiser Permanente Northern California database was queried to identify clubfoot children under 3 years old with a consecutive 3-year membership. Associated comorbidities and operative procedure codes were identified. Chart review was performed on all surgical clubfoot patients who completed Ponseti method. Patients' average age at time of surgery, frequency of surgeries, and types of procedures performed were recorded. A logistic regression analysis assessed the adjusted association between surgery status and clubfoot type. Clubfoot incidence was about 1 in 1000 live births. Of the 375 clubfoot children, 334 (89%) were idiopathic and 41 (11%) were non-idiopathic. In the total study population, 82% (n = 309) patients maintained Ponseti correction without a secondary surgery; 66 patients (18%) underwent subsequent secondary surgeries. The non-idiopathic clubfoot underwent surgery more frequently compared to idiopathic clubfoot patients (41.5% vs 14.7%, respectively, p = .0001). Non-idiopathic clubfoot children underwent surgery at a younger age. This study validates the Ponseti method is the first line treatment for clubfoot correction despite etiology. However, patients with recurrent clubfoot may require secondary surgery following Ponseti method. Clubfoot recurrence surveillance is key for identifying early symptomatic recurrence in order to minimize foot rigidity and the need for osseous procedures.

Management issues of congenital talipes equinovarus in the neonatal intensive care unit: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Ponseti method is the standard of care for managing idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot) in the outpatient setting, but there are no clinical guidelines for inpatient treatment. Children in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with clubfoot often delay treatment initiation due to medical reasons.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed literature related to the treatment of clubfoot in the NICU, non-idiopathic clubfoot, and older infants, as well as barriers to care.

RESULTS

In a mixed NICU population of syndromic and idiopathic clubfoot, the Ponseti method has good functional outcomes with minimal interference with medical management. The Ponseti method has good functional outcomes with reduced need for extensive surgical procedures in non-idiopathic clubfoot and idiopathic clubfoot with delayed presentation (under one year of age).

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to begin Ponseti treatment in the NICU without compromising medical management. It is not clear if this confers an advantage over waiting for outpatient casting.

Ponseti Casting vs. Soft Tissue Release for the Initial Treatment of Non-idiopathic Clubfoot

Purpose: Ponseti casting has universally been accepted as the gold standard for treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. Conversely, primary treatment for non-idiopathic clubfoot has not been established. The purpose of this study is to compare treatment outcomes following primary soft tissue release (STR) and Ponseti casting of non-idiopathic clubfoot.

Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective study of patients treated for non-idiopathic clubfoot between 2005 and 2020 was conducted. Patients were included if they began treatment before the age of 2 and had at least 1 year of follow up. Patients were placed into either the STR group or Ponseti group and variables of interest were documented including reoccurrence of deformity, number of surgeries performed, type of surgeries performed, anesthesia time, and surgery time. Data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables.

Results: A total of 33 children with 57 neuromuscular/syndromic clubfoot were identified of which 9 (15 feet) were treated with STR and 24 (42 feet) were treated with Ponseti casting. Average anesthesia and surgery time were found to be 291 and 179 min, respectively, for the STR group, and 113 and 67 min for the Ponseti group. The difference in operating time was determined to be significant (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). Patients treated with STR were found to have significantly more surgeries performed over the course of treatment than those treated with Ponseti casting (p = 0.001) with an average of 4.2 surgeries in the STR group and 1.5 surgeries in the Ponseti group. Extracapsular procedures were performed in 100% of the STR group and 97.6% of the Ponseti group (p = 0.55). Intracapsular procedures were performed in 100% of the STR group and 50% of the Ponseti group (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: The Ponseti method should serve as the primary approach in the initial treatment of non-idiopathic clubfoot as it can reduce the risk of future invasive intracapsular surgery and shorten anesthesia and surgery times when surgical treatment is necessary.

Level of Evidence: Level III retrospective case control study.

The 5-Year Outcome of the Ponseti Method in Children With Idiopathic Clubfoot and Arthrogryposis

BACKGROUND

The Ponseti method effectively treats idiopathic clubfoot, but its effectiveness in treating the stiffer clubfoot associated with arthrogryposis is less clear. The purpose of this study was to assess the comparative effectiveness of the Ponseti method in 5-year-old children with either idiopathic clubfoot or clubfoot due to arthrogryposis.

METHODS

The outcomes of the Ponseti method were retrospectively evaluated in children with idiopathic clubfoot and clubfoot associated with arthrogryposis. The children with clubfoot were seen at our hospital between 2012 and 2019 and were 4.0 to 6.9 years old at the time of their evaluation. Outcomes of the 2 groups of children with clubfoot were assessed using passive range of motion, foot pressure analysis, the Gross Motor Function Measure Dimension-D, and parent report using the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument. These results were also compared with the same measures from a group of typically developing children. Surgical and bracing history was also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 117 children were included (89 idiopathic clubfoot and 28 associated with arthrogryposis) with an average age of 4.8±0.8 years. The historical gait analyses of 72 typically developing children were used as a control, with an average age of 5.2±0.8 years. Significant residual equinovarus was seen in both children with idiopathic clubfoot and associated with arthrogryposis according to passive range of motion and foot pressure analysis when compared with normative data. Children with arthrogryposis demonstrated limited transfer and basic mobility, sports functioning, and global functioning while children with idiopathic clubfoot were significantly different from their typically developing peers in only transfer and basic mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

Although children with idiopathic clubfoot continue with some level of residual deformity, the Ponseti method is effective in creating a pain-free, highly functional foot. In children with clubfoot associated with arthrogryposis, the Ponseti method is successful in creating a braceable foot that can delay the need for invasive surgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic Studies-Investigating the Results of Treatment.

A polyaxial fixation brace for the treatment of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus in newborns

BACKGROUND

Treatment of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is challenging for pediatric orthopedic surgeons. The Ponseti method is an effective protocol for treatment due to its technique of manipulation, casting, and limited surgery. Plaster casting is an essential component of the Ponseti method. In this report, we describe a new brace that was developed for use in the treatment of clubfoot in newborns instead of a plaster cast.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in two orthopedic medical centers. Between January 2011 and October 2013, 89 newborns with CTEV (131 ft) underwent corrective treatment using fixation braces in the experiment group (E-group) in our hospital, and 107 newborns with CTEV (141 ft) underwent plaster casting in the control group (C-group) in another medical center. All patients were treated according to the Ponseti method after the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Plaster casts were applied to patients in the C-group. The patients in the E-group received the custom-made polyaxial fixation braces instead of plaster casts. Prospective follow-up was performed for a mean duration of 36 months. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed using Pirani's scoring system. Chi-squared and independent t tests were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

In the E-group, 85 patients (125 ft) achieved good appearance within 3 months of treatment initiation (average, 1.7 months). Four patients (6 ft) required percutaneous Achilles tenotomy. Seven patients developed sores during treatment because of improper brace application, but all sores healed without scarring with timely treatment. In the C-group, 96 patients (123 ft) achieved good appearance within 3 months of treatment initiation (average, 1.6 months). Eleven patients (18 ft) required percutaneous Achilles tenotomy. Twenty-one feet developed sores during treatment because of plaster cast pressure on the dorsum of the feet. Sixteen sores healed without scarring with timely treatment, and 5 ft had obvious scars. The overall mean Pirani scores 1 year after treatment were 0.26 ± 0.06 in the E-group and 0.25 ± 0.03 in the C-group, and the Pirani scores 3 years after treatment were 0.23 ± 0.05 in the E-group and 0.22 ± 0.03 in the C-group. There were significant differences in the percutaneous Achilles tenotomy and skin sores but no significant difference in the Pirani scores between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that the new polyaxial fixation brace used in this study was an effective tool for the corrective treatment of CTEV in newborns. We propose the use of this brace as an alternative treatment for newborns.

Challenging clubfeet: the arthrogrypotic clubfoot and the complex clubfoot

Within the realm of clubfoot deformities, teratologic and complex (or atypical) clubfeet stand out as the most difficult. Exemplarities of the teratologic types of clubfoot are those associated with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Treatment of arthrogrypotic clubfoot deformities has been controversial; many different procedures have been advocated, with variable success rates. These clubfeet have a high recurrence rate, regardless of treatment type. Often, the high recurrence rate has led to a high repeat surgery rate, and poor outcomes. Treatment strategies should highlight care that avoids the development of a stiffened foot and allows for a variety of options to regain correction when a relapse occurs. Modifications of the Ponseti method for idiopathic clubfeet have been successful in managing the deformity. The equinocavus variant of the arthrogrypotic clubfoot should be distinguished from the classic clubfoot, as it requires a different treatment method. The equinocavus clubfoot is very similar to the complex or atypical clubfoot. The complex, or atypical, clubfoot also requires a different treatment strategy compared with the typical idiopathic congenital clubfoot. The complex clubfoot appears to be idiopathic in some cases and iatrogenic (due to slipping stretching casts) in others. Dr. Ponseti's modification of his protocol has been effective in treating the deformity. The high recurrence rate suggests the difficulty in maintaining the deformity after correction. The author's preferred treatment for each deformity is included, with an emphasis on minimally invasive methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, expert opinion.

Treatment of non-idiopathic clubfeet with the Ponseti method: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Although non-idiopathic clubfeet were long thought to be resistant to non-surgical treatment methods, more studies documenting results on treatment of these feet with the Ponseti method are being published. The goal of this systematic review is to summarize current evidence on treatment of non-idiopathic clubfeet using the Ponseti method.

METHODS

PubMed and Limo were searched, reference lists of eligible studies were screened and studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. Data on average number of casts, Achilles tendon tenotomy (ATT), initial correction, recurrence, successful treatment at final follow-up and complications were pooled. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies.

RESULTS

In all, 11 studies were included, yielding a total of 374 non-idiopathic and 801 idiopathic clubfeet. Non-idiopathic clubfeet required more casts (7.2 versus 5.4) and had a higher rate of ATT (89.4% versus 75.7%). Furthermore, these feet had a higher recurrence rate (43.3% versus 11.5%) and a lower rate of successful treatment at final follow-up (69.3% versus 95.0%). Complications were found in 20.3% of the non--idiopathic cohort. When comparing results between clubfeet associated with myelomeningocele and arthrogryposis, the first group presented with a lower number of casts (5.4 -versus 7.2) and a higher rate of successful treatment at final follow-up (81.8% versus 58.2%).

CONCLUSION

The Ponseti method is a valuable and non-invasive option in the primary treatment of non-idiopathic clubfeet in young children. Studies with longer follow-up are necessary to evaluate its long-term effect.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III - systematic review of Level-III studies.This work meets the requirements of the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and -Meta-Analyses).