Resection of Medial Talocalcaneal Coalition With Interposition of a Pediculated Flap of Tibialis Posterior Tendon Sheath

Comparison of different interposition techniques after surgical resection of tarsal coalitions in children: a systematic review

In the surgical treatment of tarsal coalitions, it is unclear whether interposition material should be used to prevent recurrence. The aim of this review was to systematically examine the results of different interposition tissues after surgical resection of tarsal coalitions in children. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two independent investigators systematically searched electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) and included original articles reporting outcomes of tarsal coalition resection. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Out of 294 articles, 21 studies examining 436 patients (581 feet), were included. The mean age was 12.2 years (range 7-18). There were 153 talocalcaneal, 425 calcaneonavicular, 2 naviculocuboidal, and 1 naviculocuneiform coalitions. The mean follow-up time was 58 months (range 12-276). In 96 feet, solely resection was performed. Resection and interposition were performed with muscle/tendon (n = 178), fat graft (n = 176), other material (n = 36), or a combination of interposition techniques (n = 95). Eighteen studies reported on recurrence, which was found in 45 of 485 feet (9%). The highest recurrence (17%) was described after muscle/tendon interposition for calcaneonavicular coalitions. However, a statistical comparison could not be performed. The included studies were diverse and the scientific quality was generally low (MINORS mean 7, range 3-20). Coalition resection with various interposition techniques results in low recurrence rates. It is unclear which interposition material shows the best results.

Outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of tarsal coalition, assess the role of the surgical technique, as well as of coalition size and type on outcomes.

METHODS

The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and was performed in four databases: MEDLINE, Central, Scopus and Web of Science. The protocol has been registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), complications, revisions and radiographic recurrence were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using MINORS criteria. A random-effects model for meta-analysis was applied for analysis of data heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies including 760 tarsal coalitions were included and had a weighted average follow-up of 44 months. Studies scored fair to poor on the risk of bias assessment with a mean MINORS score of 67% (44-81%). In 77.8% (37.5-100%) of surgically treated tarsal coalitions, good/excellent/non-limiting or improved PROMs were reported. Calculated data heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 57%). Open bar resection with material interposition had a clinical success rate of 78.8% (50-100%). Complications occurred in 4.96% of cases. Coalition size did not prove to be a determining factor in postoperative outcome. The influence of the coalition type was not investigated by any of the studies.

CONCLUSION

Data on outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions is limited to retrospective case series with high risk of bias and moderate data heterogeneity. In about ¾ of cases, open resection and interposition of material results in improved PROMs. The arbitrary margin of ≥ 50% of TC coalition size in relation to the posterior facet has little importance in surgical decision-making. None of the studies reported on the influence of the coalition type on postoperative clinical success.

8 out of 10 patients do well after surgery for tarsal coalitions: A systematic review on 1284 coalitions

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to determine the clinical success rate after treatment for talocalcaneal (TCC) and calcaneonavicular coalitions (CNC). The secondary aim was to evaluate the complication, recurrence and revision rate.

METHODS

A search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) criteria. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate and was pooled per type of coalition and treatment modality. 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) of the success rates were calculated. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, coalition recurrence rates, revision rates and pain improvement using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A sub-analysis on interposition material was performed.

RESULTS

43 articles comprising of 1284 coalitions were included, with a pooled mean follow-up of 51 months. Methodological quality was fair. The overall pooled success rate for TCCs was 79% (95% CI, 75%-83%). Conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection of TCCs resulted in success rates of 58% (95% CI, 42%-73%), 80% (95% CI, 76%-84%) and 86% (95% CI, 71%-94%), respectively. CNCs have an overall success rate of 81% (95% CI, 75%-85%), with 100% (95% CI, 34%-100%), 80% (95% CI, 74%-85%) and 100% (95% CI, 65%-100%) for conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection, respectively. Pooled complication rates of 4% (95% CI, 3%-7%) for TCCs and 6% (95% CI, 4%-11%) for CNCs were found. The success rates of resection with and without interposition material for TCCs were 83% (95% CI, 78%-87%) and 79% (95% CI, 65%-88%), and for CNCs 81% (95% CI, 76%-86%) and 69% (95% CI, 44%-85%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of tarsal coalitions can be considered good to excellent as well as safe, with an overall clinical success rate of 79% for TCCs and 81% for CNCs. Arthroscopic resection of the coalition appears to be non-inferior to open resection of TCCs and CNCs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Systematic Review.

Surgical Treatment of Calcaneonavicular and Talocalcaneal Coalitions

Tarsal coalition is determined by an absence of segmentation between one or more foot bones. The main symptom is activity-related foot pain, usually dorsolateral for calcaneonavicular coalitions and medial for talocalcaneal ones. At presentation, a symptomatic tarsal coalition must be treated conservatively for at least 6 months. If the conservative treatment fails and the foot is still painful, resection is the treatment of choice. Advantage of surgery is to restore mobility and reduce the risk of subsequent degenerative arthritis. Common pitfalls of surgery include failure to recognize associated coalitions, inadequate or extensive resection, and injury of adjoining bones.

Operative versus nonoperative treatment in children with painful rigid flatfoot and talocalcaneal coalition

Background

The management of painful rigid flatfoot (RFF) with talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) is controversial. We aimed to compare operative and nonoperative treatment in children with RFF and TCC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records and radiographs of children with RFF and TTC treated between 2005 and 2015. The nonoperative treatment consisted of manipulation under anesthesia, cast immobilization and shoe insert after cast removal. The operative treatment consisted of combined TCC resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis.

Results

Thirty-four children (47 ft) in the nonoperative group and twenty-one children (34 ft) in the operative group were included. No differences were found between groups, concerning baseline characteristics. The mean age at treatment was 11.8 years (9–17): 11.6 (9–17) for the nonoperative group, 12.2 (10–15) for the operative group. The mean follow-up averaged 6.6 (3–12) years and was significantly longer in the nonoperative group (7.8 versus 4.7 years; p < 0.0005), since the operative procedure was increasingly practiced in the latest years.

There were no complications in either groups, but 6 patients (7 ft) in the nonoperative group were unsatisfied and required surgery. At the latest follow-up, the AOFAS-AHS improved in both groups, although the operative group showed significantly better improvement. The operative group reported also significantly better FADI score, after adjustment for follow-up and baseline variables.

Conclusion

The operative treatment showed better results compared to the nonoperative treatment. Symptomatic RFF with TCC in children can be effectively treated in one step with resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings and to identify the best operative strategy in this condition.

Surgical treatment of tarsal coalitions in children and adolescents

A tarsal coalition is an abnormal connection between two or more tarsal bones caused by failure of mesenchymal segmentation.

The two most common tarsal coalitions are calcaneonavicular coalition (CNC) and talocalcaneal coalition (TCC). Both CNC and TCC can be associated with significant foot and ankle pain and impaired quality of life; there may also be concomitant foot and ankle deformity.

Initial, non-operative management for symptomatic tarsal coalition commonly fails, leaving surgical intervention as the only recourse.

The focus of this article is to critically describe the variety of methods used to surgically manage CNC and TCC. In review of the pertinent literature we highlight the ongoing treatment controversies in this field and discuss new innovations.

The evidence-based algorithmic approach used by the authors in the management of tarsal coalitions is illustrated alongside some clinical pearls that should help surgeons treating this common, and at times complex, condition.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:80-89. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180106

Tarsal coalition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tarsal coalitions may cause painful pes planovalgus and recurrent sprains, and can lead to arthrosis if improperly managed. In this review, we discuss the current topics related to talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tarsal coalitions are initially managed with conservative therapy, and when this approach fails, surgery is performed. Treatment of calcaneonavicular coalitions involves resection of the coalition and interposition of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle or fat, and in cases of marked valgus deformity, correction of the deformity. In talocalcaneal coalitions, recommendations include coalition resection for those affecting less than 50% of the area of the posterior facet and with a less than 16° valgus, coalition resection and valgus correction for those affecting less than 50% of the area and valgus greater than 16°, and isolated valgus correction for those affecting more than 50% of the area and with a more than or less than 16° valgus. Arthrodesis is reserved as a salvage procedure.

SUMMARY

Talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions can cause painful pes planovalgus. Their diagnoses are confirmed by plain radiograph, computed tomography, and, in cases of fibrous or cartilaginous coalitions, MRI. Initial treatment is conservative, and when symptoms persist, resection of the coalition is recommended along with tissue graft interposition with or without associated valgus correction. Arthrodesis is indicated as a salvage procedure whenever treatment fails or with advanced arthrosis.