Endoscopic Resection of Different Types of Talocalcaneal Coalition

Outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of tarsal coalition, assess the role of the surgical technique, as well as of coalition size and type on outcomes.

METHODS

The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and was performed in four databases: MEDLINE, Central, Scopus and Web of Science. The protocol has been registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), complications, revisions and radiographic recurrence were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using MINORS criteria. A random-effects model for meta-analysis was applied for analysis of data heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies including 760 tarsal coalitions were included and had a weighted average follow-up of 44 months. Studies scored fair to poor on the risk of bias assessment with a mean MINORS score of 67% (44-81%). In 77.8% (37.5-100%) of surgically treated tarsal coalitions, good/excellent/non-limiting or improved PROMs were reported. Calculated data heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 57%). Open bar resection with material interposition had a clinical success rate of 78.8% (50-100%). Complications occurred in 4.96% of cases. Coalition size did not prove to be a determining factor in postoperative outcome. The influence of the coalition type was not investigated by any of the studies.

CONCLUSION

Data on outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions is limited to retrospective case series with high risk of bias and moderate data heterogeneity. In about ¾ of cases, open resection and interposition of material results in improved PROMs. The arbitrary margin of ≥ 50% of TC coalition size in relation to the posterior facet has little importance in surgical decision-making. None of the studies reported on the influence of the coalition type on postoperative clinical success.

Lateral endoscopy of the sinus tarsi: Anatomy, technique and current indications

Numerous pathologies are reported in the lateral mid- and hind-foot. Access to the sinus tarsi is difficult, making lateral endoscopy the preferred approach. The present technical note describes the anatomy, technique and current indications for lateral endoscopy of the sinus tarsi.

8 out of 10 patients do well after surgery for tarsal coalitions: A systematic review on 1284 coalitions

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to determine the clinical success rate after treatment for talocalcaneal (TCC) and calcaneonavicular coalitions (CNC). The secondary aim was to evaluate the complication, recurrence and revision rate.

METHODS

A search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) criteria. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate and was pooled per type of coalition and treatment modality. 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) of the success rates were calculated. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, coalition recurrence rates, revision rates and pain improvement using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A sub-analysis on interposition material was performed.

RESULTS

43 articles comprising of 1284 coalitions were included, with a pooled mean follow-up of 51 months. Methodological quality was fair. The overall pooled success rate for TCCs was 79% (95% CI, 75%-83%). Conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection of TCCs resulted in success rates of 58% (95% CI, 42%-73%), 80% (95% CI, 76%-84%) and 86% (95% CI, 71%-94%), respectively. CNCs have an overall success rate of 81% (95% CI, 75%-85%), with 100% (95% CI, 34%-100%), 80% (95% CI, 74%-85%) and 100% (95% CI, 65%-100%) for conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection, respectively. Pooled complication rates of 4% (95% CI, 3%-7%) for TCCs and 6% (95% CI, 4%-11%) for CNCs were found. The success rates of resection with and without interposition material for TCCs were 83% (95% CI, 78%-87%) and 79% (95% CI, 65%-88%), and for CNCs 81% (95% CI, 76%-86%) and 69% (95% CI, 44%-85%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of tarsal coalitions can be considered good to excellent as well as safe, with an overall clinical success rate of 79% for TCCs and 81% for CNCs. Arthroscopic resection of the coalition appears to be non-inferior to open resection of TCCs and CNCs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Systematic Review.

Midterm Outcomes of Talocalcaneal Coalition Arthroscopic Resection in Adults

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic resection of the talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) has been reported to be associated with good short-term outcomes. However, the midterm outcomes of this approach remain uncertain.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent arthroscopic resection for symptomatic TCC. The patients were divided into 2 groups (group P, patients with isolated posterior facet coalition; and group MP, patients with both middle and posterior facet coalition). The preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale scores were calculated. The postoperative AOFAS and VAS scores between the 2 groups were analyzed. Patient satisfaction was also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included in this study. The mean age at the time of surgery was 26.0±8.5 years, and the mean follow-up period was 56.9±18.0 months. Thirteen (41%) patients were in group P, whereas 19 (59%) patients were in group MP. Postoperative VAS and AOFAS scores improved more significantly than preoperative scores. At the final follow-up, excellent and good subjective outcomes were attained in 26 patients (81%), fair and poor outcomes in 6 patients (19%). There were no statistical differences in the postoperative AOFAS (91.0±7.0 vs 85.8±10.8, P = .532) and VAS score (2.1±1.7 vs 4.0±2.6, P = .537) between patients with the ratio of coalition/posterior facet more than or less than 50%. There were no statistical differences in postoperative VAS score (1.8±1.3 vs 2.6±2.2, P = .236) and AOFAS score (92.5±5.6 vs 89.2±8.7, P = .297) between group P (n=13) and group MP (n=19), either. Three patients (9.4%) had complications, including these notable findings: 1 patient complained of restricted dorsal flexion, 1 with computed tomography-proven coalition recurrence, and 1 with partial tibial nerve injury.

CONCLUSION

We found that TCC arthroscopic resection was generally associated with reasonable outcomes at midterm follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Lateral Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis for Talocalcaneal Coalition: Surgical Technique

Resection of symptomatic talocalcaneal coalitions (TCCs) has been performed for patients with normal tarsal joints and <50% involvement of the subtalar joint. For those with TCCs >50% of subtalar articulation or/and subtalar arthritis, a subtalar arthrodesis is done. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe the arthroscopic resection of TCC and talocalcaneal arthrodesis during the same procedure by using a 2 lateral portal technique. With the patient in lateral decubitus under general or locoregional anaesthesia, the foot and ankle are extended beyond the edge of the surgical table. A lateral portal is created 1 cm anterior to the tip of the lateral malleolus in which the arthroscope is introduced. The anterolateral portal is created 1 cm inferior and 2 cm anterior to the tip of the lateral malleolus. The posterior subtalar surface is prepared progressively. The TCC resection is completed. The fixation is obtained with 2 cannulated screws. The arthroscopic resection of TCC and subtalar arthrodesis during the same procedure by using 2 lateral portals can be done for correctly selected patients.

Tarsal coalition: Systematic review of arthroscopic management

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care in the treatment of symptomatic tarsal coalitions is open surgery. However, certain limitations exist with open surgery, which include limited visualization leading to an incomplete resection and possible recurrence of the tarsal coalition. Arthroscopic tarsal coalition resection (TCR) is an alternative that is gaining traction, primarily as the safety profile of posterior ankle and subtalar arthroscopy is more well understood. This study provides a systematic review of the outcomes of arthroscopic TCR.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched independently by 2 reviewers for relevant articles based on predetermined criteria. The subject heading "tarsal coalition" and its related key terms were used.

RESULTS

A total of 416 studies were revealed by the initial search, out of which only 6 met our predetermined inclusion criteria. A total of 42 patients (average age: 17.6 years) were treated with arthroscopic TCR. Thirty-three (78.6%) and 9 (21.4%) patients had talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions, respectively. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 60 months (mean: 26 months), and no recurrence of the tarsal coalition was detected (0.0%). Complications occurred in two (4.8%) patients only, with one developing complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and another patient developing hyperesthesia on the medial aspect of the calcaneus.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic TCR is a feasible and effective surgery for both CNC and TCC with minimal complications and no disease recurrence at an average of 26 months follow-up. Future high-level of evidence studies are needed to compare the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic TCR.

Outcomes of Posterior Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis for Medial Facet Talocalcaneal Coalition

BACKGROUND

Medial facet talocalcaneal coalition can be a painful condition. This study aimed to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes of posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis (PASTA) for adult patients presenting with symptomatic medial facet talocalcaneal coalition and normal hindfoot alignment, with a minimal follow-up of 18 months.

METHODS

Between June 2017 and July 2019, this procedure was performed on 8 feet (8 patients; mean age, 55 [42-70] years; mean BMI, 29.8 [24.4-45.0] kg/m²). Clinical assessment was performed using Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-P), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Patient satisfaction was assessed at the last available follow-up as "very satisfied", "satisfied" or "unsatisfied". Radiographic analysis was performed using plain radiography, computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary outcome was to determine both clinical and radiographic outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 25.1 (18.2-34.2) months. The authors found statistically significant improvement on all clinical scores (VASP-P, FAOS and SF-36). They registered 6 "very satisfied" patients, 2 "satisfied" patients and no "unsatisfied" patient. Fusion of the subtalar joint was observed in all patients by 12 weeks and in 5 of them as soon as 8 weeks postoperatively (mean, 9.5 [8-12] weeks). There were no cases of delayed fusion or nonunion of the subtalar joint, superficial or deep infection, neurovascular damage, thromboembolic event, screw breakage, need for hardware removal or revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study found that PASTA is a safe and reliable technique for adult patients presenting with symptomatic medial facet talocalcaneal coalition and normal hindfoot alignment, demonstrating and maintaining clinical improvement at an average follow-up of 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

A new classification of talocalcaneal coalitions based on computed tomography for operative planning

BACKGROUND

Current classifications emphasize the morphology of the coalition, however, subtalar joint facets involved should also be emphasized.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a new classification system based on the articular facets involved to cover all coalitions and guide operative planning.

METHODS

Patients were diagnosed with talocalcaneal coalition using a CT scan, between January 2009 and February 2021. The coalition was classified into four main types according to the shape and nature of the coalition: I, inferiorly overgrown talus or superiorly overgrown calcaneus; II, both talus and calcaneus overgrew; III, coalition with an accessory ossicle; IV, complete osseous coalition (I-III types are non-osseous coalition). Then each type was further divided into three subtypes according to the articular facets involved. A, the coalition involving the anterior facets; M, the coalition involving the middle facets, and P, the coalition involving the posterior facets. Interobserver reliability was measured at the main type (based on nature and shape) and subtype (articular facet involved) using weighted Kappa. Results There were 106 patients (108 ft) included in this study. Overall, 8 ft (7.5%) were classified as type I, 75 ft (69.4%) as type II, 7 ft (6.5%) as type III, and 18 ft (16.7%) as type IV. Twenty-nine coalitions (26.9%) involved the posterior facets only (subtype-P), 74 coalitions (68.5%) involved both the middle and posterior facets (subtype-MP), and five coalitions (4.6%) simultaneously involved the anterior, middle, and posterior facets (subtype-AMP). Type II-MP coalition was the most common. The value of weighted Kappa for the main type was 0.93 (95%CI 0.86-0.99) (p<0.001), and the value for the subtype was 0.78 (95%CI 0.66-0.91) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A new classification system of the talocalcaneal coalition to facilitate operative planning was developed.

Post-operative outcomes of arthroscopic tarsal coalition resection: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic resection of tarsal coalitions is a relatively new technique. This systematic review aimed to investigate the post-operative complications and functional outcomes in arthroscopic resection of tarsal coalitions.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane library were searched for studies that reported outcomes in arthroscopic resection of tarsal coalitions.

RESULTS

8 studies met the inclusion criteria. Post-operative outcomes were reported in 103 cases. The overall complication rate was 13.6%. Tibial nerve injury was reported in 1 patient. All included studies demonstrated post-operative improvement in functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic resection is a feasible and effective treatment method for symptomatic tarsal coalitions.

Endoscopic Resection of Tarsal Coalitions

Endoscopic resection of tarsal coalitions is technically feasible for both talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions. Careful consideration of each individual patient is necessary before proceeding with endoscopic resection. Endoscopic resection of these coalitions may offer benefits in terms of faster recovery and less wound problems, but this has not been proven. Several case reports and case series appear in the literature and are reviewed here along with the different techniques reported. Better-quality evidence is required to assess the clinically relevant benefits and the recurrence rate for endoscopic resection in comparison with open resection.

[Evans lateral lengthening calcaneal osteotomy in treatment of talocalcaneal coalition with hindfoot valgus deformity]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of the Evans lateral lengthening calcaneal osteotomy (E-LLCOT) in treatment of talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) with hindfoot valgus deformity.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and October 2017, 10 patients (13 feet) of TCC with hindfoot valgus deformities underwent E-LLCOTs. There were 6 males (8 feet) and 4 females (5 feet) with an age of 13-18 years (mean, 15.8 years). The disease duration was 10-14 months (mean, 11.5 months). The foot deformity was characterized by hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and collapse of the medial arch. Pain site was the tarsal sinus in 4 feet, TCC in 5 feet, and ankle joint in 4 feet. There were tightness of the gastrocnemius in 3 cases (4 feet) and Achilles tendon in 7 cases (9 feet) on Silverskiold test. The preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score was 46.54±9.08 and visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.54±0.88 after walking 1 kilometer. The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score were adopted to evaluate the postoperative function of the foot. The talar-first metatarsal angle (T1MT), talonavicular coverage angle (TCA), talar-horizontal angle (TH), calcaneal pitch angle (CP), and heel valgus angle (HV) were measured after operation.

RESULTS

All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 18 months). At last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score were 90.70±6.75 and 1.85±0.90, respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative scores ( t=-23.380, P=0.000; t=35.218, P=0.000). X-ray films showed that the osteotomy healed at 2-4 months (mean, 3 months) after operation. At last follow-up, the T1MT, TCA, TH, and HV were significantly lower than preoperative ones ( P<0.05), and the CP was significantly higher than preoperative one ( P<0.05). During the follow-up, the pain did not relieve obviously in 1 patient (1 foot), and the cutaneous branch of the sural nerve injured in 1 patient (1 foot).

CONCLUSION

For TCC with severe hindfoot valgus deformity, E-LLCOT can effectively correct deformity and relieve pain.

Tarsal coalition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tarsal coalitions may cause painful pes planovalgus and recurrent sprains, and can lead to arthrosis if improperly managed. In this review, we discuss the current topics related to talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tarsal coalitions are initially managed with conservative therapy, and when this approach fails, surgery is performed. Treatment of calcaneonavicular coalitions involves resection of the coalition and interposition of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle or fat, and in cases of marked valgus deformity, correction of the deformity. In talocalcaneal coalitions, recommendations include coalition resection for those affecting less than 50% of the area of the posterior facet and with a less than 16° valgus, coalition resection and valgus correction for those affecting less than 50% of the area and valgus greater than 16°, and isolated valgus correction for those affecting more than 50% of the area and with a more than or less than 16° valgus. Arthrodesis is reserved as a salvage procedure.

SUMMARY

Talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions can cause painful pes planovalgus. Their diagnoses are confirmed by plain radiograph, computed tomography, and, in cases of fibrous or cartilaginous coalitions, MRI. Initial treatment is conservative, and when symptoms persist, resection of the coalition is recommended along with tissue graft interposition with or without associated valgus correction. Arthrodesis is indicated as a salvage procedure whenever treatment fails or with advanced arthrosis.

[Effectiveness of a modified posterior approach for arthroscopic resection on painful talocalcaneal coalition in adults]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic talocalcaneal coalition resection in painful adults via a modified posterior approach.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2017, 9 patients with painful talocalcaneal coalition accepted arthroscopic resection via the posterior malleolus high lateral observation approach combined with the lower medial operation approach. Of them, 6 were male and 3 were female, aged from 19 to 30 years (mean, 24 years). Among them, 2 cases had no definite local trauma and 7 cases had a history of sprain of foot and ankle. The disease duration ranged from 6 to 30 months, with a median of 12 months. Rozansky classification of talocalcaneal coalition for the 9 patients: 5 cases (5 feet) were type Ⅰ, 2 cases (2 feet) type Ⅱ, and 2 cases (2 feet) type Ⅲ. The patients had no sequelae of limb dysfunction and no limb joint surgery in the past. All the patients received anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT scans of the ankle joint during follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind foot score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.

RESULTS

The operation time was 60-90 minutes (mean, 76 minutes). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months). All the incisions healed by first intention, without infection, skin necrosis, lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, vascular nerve and tendon injury, bone bridge recurrence, and other complications. The ankle function recovered well and the pain was relieved obviously after operation, and the patients returned to work at 3-5 months after operation, with an average of 3.9 months. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 0.7±0.5, which was significantly improved ( t=20.239, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score (4.2±0.5); the AOFAS ankle-hind foot score was 94±4, which was significantly improved ( t=-27.424, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score (62±2). According to AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system, the results were excellent in 7 cases and good in 2 cases at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

It is more intuitive, more space, and more flexibility for operation via the modified posterior malleolus high lateral observation approach combined with the lower medial operation approach in talocalcaneal coalition. It is feasible to remove talocalcaneal coalition programmatically according to the specific anatomic signs during the operation.

Operative Approaches to Ankle and Hindfoot Arthroscopy

The role of arthroscopy in the management of ankle and hindfoot pathology management has increased greatly in recent years with the potential for lower complication rates, faster recovery, improved access, and improved outcomes when compared to open techniques. Procedural variations exist as techniques aim to optimize lesion access, decrease operative time, and improve patient safety. Our goal is to summarize the described approaches and patient positionings common in minimally invasive arthroscopic surgery for anterior, lateral, and posterior ankle pathologies. A survey of pathology organized by arthroscopic approach and a review of recent advances in concomitant lesion management may be useful when planning arthroscopic foot and ankle surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, expert opinion.