Biomechanical Comparison of Syndesmotic Repair Techniques During External Rotation Stress

A Cadaveric Study: Does Ankle Positioning Affect the Quality of Anatomic Syndesmosis Reduction?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the quality of syndesmotic reduction with the ankle in maximal dorsiflexion versus neutral plantarflexion (normal resting position).

METHODS

Baseline computed tomography (CT) imaging of 10 cadaveric ankle specimens from 5 donors was obtained with the ankles placed in normal resting position. Two fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons disrupted the syndesmosis of each ankle specimen. All ankles were then placed in neutral plantarflexion and were subsequently reduced with thumb pressure under direct visualization through an anterolateral approach and stabilized with one 0.062-inch K-wire placed from lateral to medial in a quadricortical fashion across the syndesmosis. Postreduction CT scans were then obtained with the ankle in normal resting position. This process was repeated with the ankles placed in maximal dorsiflexion during reduction and stabilization. Postreduction CT scans were then obtained with the ankles placed in normal resting position. All postreduction CT scans were compared with baseline CT imaging using mixed-effects linear regression with significance set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Syndesmotic reduction and stabilization in maximal dorsiflexion led to increased external rotation of the fibula compared with baseline scans [13.0 ± 5.4 degrees (mean ± SD) vs. 7.5 ± 2.4 degrees, P = 0.002]. There was a tendency toward lateral translation of the fibula with the ankle reduced in maximal dorsiflexion (3.3 ± 1.0 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mm, P = 0.096). No other statistically significant differences between measurements of reduction with the ankle placed in neutral plantarflexion or maximal dorsiflexion compared with baseline were present (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing the syndesmosis with the ankle in maximal dorsiflexion may lead to malreduction with external rotation of the fibula. There was no statistically significant difference in reduction quality with the ankle placed in neutral plantarflexion compared with baseline. Future studies should assess the clinical implications of ankle positioning during syndesmotic fixation.

Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament Suture Tape Augmentation for Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries

BACKGROUND

The best operative construct and technique for treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries is highly debated. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) suture repair or suture tape (ST) augmentation provides any biomechanical advantage to the operative repair of an isolated syndesmotic injury.

METHODS

Twelve lower leg specimens underwent biomechanical testing in 6 states: (1) intact, (2) AITFL suture repair, (3) AITFL suture repair + transsyndesmotic suture button (SB), (4) AITFL suture repair + ST augmentation + SB, (5) AITFL suture repair + ST augmentation, and (6) complete syndesmotic injury. The ankle joint was subjected to 6 cycles of 5 Nm internal and external rotation torque under a constant axial load. The spatial relationship between the tibia, fibula, and talus was continuously recorded with a 5-camera motion capture system.

RESULTS

AITFL suture repair and AITFL suture repair + ST augmentation showed no statistically significant change in fibula kinematics compared to the intact state. Compared to native, AITFL suture repair + SB showed increased fibular external rotation (+2.32 degrees, P < .001), and decreased tibiofibular gap (overtightening) (-0.72 mm, P = .007). AITFL suture repair + ST augmentation + SB also showed increased fibular external rotation (+1.46 degrees, P = .013). Sagittal plane motion of the fibula was not significantly different between any states. None of the repairs restored intact state talus rotation; however, the repairs that used ST augmentation reduced the talus external rotation laxity compared to the complete syndesmotic injury.

CONCLUSION

AITFL suture repair and AITFL ST augmentation best restored the rotational kinematics and stability of the fibula and ankle joint in an isolated syndesmotic injury model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

AITFL suture repair with or without ST augmentation may be a good operative addition or alternative to SB fixation for isolated syndesmotic disruptions.

Comparison of Several Combinations of Suture Tape Reinforcement and Suture Button Constructs for Fixation of Unstable Syndesmosis

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to arthroscopically evaluate syndesmotic stability after fixation with several combinations of suture buttons (SBs) and suture tape reinforcement in a completely unstable cadaver model.

METHODS

Fifteen cadaver above-knee specimens underwent sequential ligament transection and fixation to create six experimental models: (1) intact model, (2) after complete disruption of the syndesmotic ligaments, and after repair with either suture tape reinforcement (3), suture tape reinforcement with a single SB (4), suture tape reinforcement with two diverging SBs (5), or two diverging SBs alone (6). Instability measurements included anterior and posterior tibiofibular spaces measured arthroscopically under 100 N coronal stress, tibiofibular anteroposterior and posteroanterior translation in sagittal plane measured arthroscopically under sagittal stress of 100 N, and anterior tibiofibular space measured directly with a caliper under external rotation torque of 7.5 N·m. Instability measurements taken after each fixation method were compared with the uninjured model and with the complete unstable model using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Fixation using a combination of one SB and singular suture tape reinforcement augmentation provided stability similar to the intact stage (coronal anterior space 1.24 versus 1.15, P = 0.887; coronal posterior space 1.63 versus 1.64, P = 0.8421; anteroposterior translation 0.91 versus 0.46, P = 0.003; posteroanterior translation 0.51 versus 0.57, P = 0.051; external rotation anterior tibiofibular space 1.08 versus 0.55, P = 0.069). Moreover, adding a second SB led to further gains in fixation stability.

DISCUSSION

This study suggests that although a destabilizing syndesmotic injury that includes the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, interosseous ligament, and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament is not adequately stabilized by either one or two SBs, the addition of a suture tape reinforcement to even one SB restores syndesmotic stability to the preinjury level.

In Vivo Syndesmotic Motion After Rigid and Flexible Fixation Using 4-Dimensional Computerized Tomography

INTRODUCTION

Maintaining reduction after syndesmotic injury is crucial to patient function; however, malreduction remains common. Flexible suture button fixation may allow more physiologic motion of the syndesmosis compared with rigid screw fixation. Conventional syndesmotic imaging fails to account for physiologic syndesmotic motion with ankle range of motion (ROM), providing misleading results. Four-dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) can image joints through a dynamic ROM. Our purpose was to compare syndesmotic motion after rigid and flexible fixation using 4DCT.

METHODS

We analyzed 13 patients with syndesmotic injury who were randomized to receive rigid (n = 7) or flexible (n = 6) fixation. Patients underwent bilateral ankle 4DCT while moving between ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. Measures of syndesmotic position and rotation were extracted from 4DCT to determine syndesmotic motion as a function of ankle ROM.

RESULTS

Uninjured ankles demonstrated significant decreases in syndesmotic width of 1.0 mm with ankle plantar flexion (SD = 0.6 mm, P < 0.01). Initial rigid fixation demonstrated reduced motion compared with uninjured ankles in 4 of 5 measures (P < 0.01) despite all patients in the rigid fixation group having removed, loose, or broken screws by the time of imaging. Rigid fixation led to less motion than flexible fixation in 3 measures (P = 0.02-0.04). There were no observed differences in syndesmotic position or motion between flexible fixation and uninjured ankles.

CONCLUSION

Despite the loss of fixation in all subjects in the rigid fixation group, initial rigid fixation led to significantly reduced syndesmotic motion. Flexible fixation recreated more physiologic motion compared with rigid fixation and may be used to reduce rates of syndesmotic malreduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of deltoid ligament injuries in acute ankle fracture: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Deltoid ligament repair (DLR) was historically a common adjunct to ankle fracture fixation; however, prevailing clinical practice is to explore the medial side of the ankle only if reduction is blocked. We performed a systematic review to determine the breadth and quality of the literature evaluating DLR in the context of ankle fractures.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases in May 2020 for English-language articles evaluating DLR versus no repair or syndesmotic fixation in patients with acute ankle fractures. We used descriptive statistics to compare studies and draw conclusions.

RESULTS

Of 362 articles identified, 8 (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 5 retrospective cohort studies) were included in our final analysis. Five studies compared DLR to conservative management, and 3 compared DLR to transsyndesmotic fixation. Functional outcomes were equivalent between groups. Five of the 6 studies that included radiographic outcomes showed a statistically significant decrease in the medial clear space and decreased malreduction rates postoperatively in the DLR groups.

CONCLUSION

High-quality evidence guiding treatment of deltoid ligament injury in acute ankle fractures is lacking; currently available evidence appears to support DLR. Given recent increased interest in DLR and syndesmotic fixation, a comprehensive multicentre RCT is warranted. Although radiographic evidence indicates the potential benefit of DLR, further research is required to establish the superiority of DLR versus clinical equipoise.

Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries

Background: Surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries is not trivial, and there are no generally accepted treatment guidelines. The most common controversies regarding surgical treatment are related to screw fixation versus dynamic fixation, the use of reduction clamps, open versus closed reduction, and the role of the posterior malleolus and of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL). Our aim was to draw important conclusions from the pertinent literature concerning surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries, to transform these conclusions into surgical principles supported by the literature, and finally to fuse these principles into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists of systematic reviews of relevant studies dealing with the surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries were searched independently by two reviewers using specific terms and limits. Surgical principles supported by the literature were fused into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Results: A total of 171 articles were included for further considerations. Among them, 47 articles concerned syndesmotic screw fixation and 41 flexible dynamic fixations of the syndesmosis. Twenty-five studies compared screw fixation with dynamic fixations, and seven out of these comparisons were randomized controlled trials. Nineteen articles addressed the posterior malleolus, 14 the role of the AITFL, and eight the use of reduction clamps. Anatomic reduction is crucial to prevent posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Therefore, flexible dynamic stabilization techniques should be preferred whenever possible. An unstable AITFL should be repaired and augmented, as it represents an important stabilizer of external rotation of the distal fibula. Conclusions: The current literature provides sufficient arguments for the development of an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm for unstable syndesmotic injuries.

APKASS Consensus Statement on Chronic Syndesmosis Injury, Part 2: Indications for Surgical Treatment, Arthroscopic or Open Debridement, and Reconstruction Techniques of Suture Button and Screw Fixation

Background:

The indications for surgical treatment of chronic syndesmosis injury are challenging for many orthopaedic clinicians, as there is no international consensus on the optimal management of these injuries.

Purpose:

An international group of experts representing the field of sports injuries in the foot and ankle area was invited to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence regarding chronic syndesmosis injury. All were members of the Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society (APKASS).

Study Design:

Consensus statement.

Methods:

From November to December 2020, a total of 111 international experts on sports medicine or ankle surgery participated in a 2-stage Delphi process that included an anonymous online survey and an online meeting. A total of 13 items with 38 statements were drafted by 13 core authors. Of these, 9 items with 17 clinical questions and statements were related to indications for surgical treatment, arthroscopic versus open debridement, and suture button versus screw fixation reconstruction techniques and are presented here. Each statement was individually presented and discussed, followed by a general vote. The strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; and unanimous, 100%.

Results:

Of the 17 questions and statements, 4 achieved unanimous support, 11 reached strong consensus, and 2 reached consensus.

Conclusion:

This APKASS consensus statement, developed by international experts in the field, will assist surgeons and physical therapists with surgical indications and techniques for chronic syndesmosis injury.

Acute foot and ankle injuries and time return to sport

Foot and ankle sports injuries encompass a wide spectrum of conditions from simple contusions or sprains that resolve within days to more severe injuries that change the trajectory of an athlete’s sporting career. If missed, severe injuries could lead to prolonged absence from the sport and therefore a catastrophic impact on future performance. In this article, we discuss the presentation of the commonest foot and ankle sports injuries and share recent evidence to support an accurate diagnosis and best management practice.

Effect of Lateral Column Lengthening on Subtalar Motion in a Cadaveric Model

BACKGROUND

Although lengthening of the lateral column through a calcaneal neck osteotomy is an integral component of flatfoot reconstruction in younger patients with flexible planovalgus deformities, concern exists as to the effect of this intra-articular osteotomy on subtalar motion. The purpose of this study was to quantify the alterations in subtalar motion following lateral column lengthening (LCL).

METHODS

The subtalar motion of 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric feet was assessed using a 3-dimensional motion capture system and materials testing system (MTS). Following potting of the tibia and calcaneus, optic markers were placed into the tibia, calcaneus, and talus. The MTS was used to apply a rotational force across the subtalar joint to a torque of 5 Nm. Abduction/adduction, supination/pronation, and plantarflexion/dorsiflexion about the talus were recorded. Specimens then underwent LCL via a calcaneal neck osteotomy, which was maintained with a 12-mm porous titanium wedge. Repeat subtalar motion analysis was performed and compared to pre-LCL motion using a paired t test.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in subtalar abduction/adduction (10.9 vs 11.8 degrees, P = .48), supination/pronation (3.5 vs 2.7 degrees, P = .31), or plantarflexion/dorsiflexion (1.6 vs 1.0 degrees, P = .10) were identified following LCL.

CONCLUSION

No significant changes in subtalar motion were observed following lateral column lengthening in this biomechanical cadaveric study.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although these findings do not obviate concerns of clinical subtalar stiffness following lateral column lengthening for planovalgus deformity correction, they suggest that diminished postoperative subtalar motion, when it occurs, may be due to soft tissue scarring rather than alterations of joint anatomy.

Indications and Surgical Treatment of Acute and Chronic Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injuries with and Without Associated Fractures

Syndesmosis injury may occur in a wide variety of clinical scenarios. Accurate diagnosis and anatomic reconstruction are necessary for optimizing clinical outcomes. The management considerations of syndesmotic injuries with associated proximal fibula fractures are reviewed. Methods to improve the accuracy of syndesmotic reduction are outlined. The management of fractures of the posterior malleolus, Chaput tubercle, and Wagstaffe tubercle is discussed with an emphasis on their contributions to syndesmotic stability. The evolving role of flexible fixation for syndesmosis injuries is discussed. Causes and strategies for dealing with loss of reduction and malreduced syndesmotic injuries are presented.

Biomechanics of Ankle Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study to Compare Stability of Reconstruction Techniques Using 1 or 2 Fibular Tunnels

Background

Anatomic lateral ankle ligament reconstruction has been proposed for patients with chronic ankle instability. A reliable approach is a reconstruction technique using an allograft and 2 fibular tunnels. A recently introduced approach that entails 1-fibular tunnel reconstruction might reduce the risk of intraoperative complications and ultimately improve patient outcome.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that both reconstruction techniques show similar ankle stability (joint laxity and stiffness) and are similar to the intact joint condition.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 10 Thiel-conserved cadaveric ankles were divided into 2 groups and tested in 3 stages-intact, transected, and reconstructed lateral ankle ligaments-using either the 1- or the 2-fibular tunnel technique. To quantify stability in each stage, anterior drawer and talar tilt tests were performed in 0°, 10°, and 20° of plantarflexion (anterior drawer test) or dorsiflexion (talar tilt test). Bone displacements were measured using motion capture, from which laxity and stiffness were calculated together with applied forces. Finally, reconstructed ligaments were tested to failure in neutral position with a maximal applicable torque in inversion. A mixed linear model was used to describe and compare the outcomes.

Results

When ankle stability of intact and reconstructed ligaments was compared, no significant difference was found between reconstruction techniques for any flexion angle. Also, no significant difference was found when the maximal applicable torque of the 1-tunnel technique (9.1 ± 4.4 N·m) was compared with the 2-tunnel technique (8.9 ± 4.8 N·m).

Conclusion

Lateral ankle ligament reconstruction with an allograft using 1 fibular tunnel demonstrated similar biomechanical stability to the 2-tunnel approach.

Clinical Relevance

Demonstrating similar stability in a cadaveric study and given the potential to reduce intraoperative complications, the 1-fibular tunnel approach should be considered a viable option for the surgical therapy of chronic ankle instability. Clinical randomized prospective trials are needed to determine the clinical outcome of the 1-tunnel approach.

Biomechanical Evaluation of a New Suture Button Technique for Reduction and Stabilization of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis

Background:

Stabilization methods for distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries present risk of malreduction. We compared reduction accuracy and biomechanical properties of a new syndesmotic reduction and stabilization technique using 2 suture buttons placed through a sagittal tunnel in the fibula and across the tibia just proximal to the incisura with those of the conventional method.

Methods:

Syndesmotic injury was created in 18 fresh-frozen cadaveric lower leg specimens. Nine ankles were repaired with the conventional method and 9 with the new technique. Reduction for the conventional method was performed using thumb pressure under direct visualization and for the new method by tightening both suture buttons passed through the fibular and tibial tunnels. Computed tomography was used to assess reduction accuracy. Torsional resistance, fibular rotation, and fibular translation were evaluated during biomechanical testing.

Results:

The new technique showed less lateral translation of the fibula on CT measurements after reduction (0.06 ± 0.06 mm) than the conventional method (0.26 ± 0.31 mm), P = .02. The new technique produced less fibular rotation during internal rotation after 0 cycles (new –2.4 ± 1.4 degrees; conventional –5.0 ± 1.2 degrees, P = .001), 100 cycles (new –2.1 ± 1.9 degrees; conventional –4.6 ± 1.4 degrees, P = .01), and 500 cycles (new –2.2 ± 1.6 degrees; conventional –5.3 ± 2.5 degrees, P = .01) and during external rotation after 100 cycles (new 3.9 ± 3.3 degrees; conventional 5.9 ± 3.5 degrees, P = .02) and 500 cycles (new 3.3 ± 3.2 degrees; conventional 6.3 ± 2.6 degrees, P = .03). Fixation failed in 3 specimens.

Conclusion:

The new syndesmotic reduction and fixation technique resulted in more accurate reduction of the fibula in the tibial incisura in the coronal plane and better rotational stability compared with the conventional method.

Clinical Relevance:

This new technique of syndesmosis reduction and stabilization may be a reliable alternative to current methods.

Acute and Chronic Syndesmotic Instability: Role of Surgical Stabilization

Acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries significantly impact athletic function and activities of daily living. Patient history, examination, and judicious use of imaging modalities aid diagnosis. Surgical management should be used when frank diastasis, instability, and/or chronic pain and disability ensue. Screw and suture-button fixation remain the mainstay of treatment of acute injuries, but novel syndesmotic reconstruction techniques hold promise for treatment of acute and chronic injuries, especially for athletes. This article focuses on anatomy, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis, and surgical reduction and stabilization of acute and chronic syndesmotic instability. Fixation methods with a focus on considerations for athletes are discussed.

Syndesmosis Injury From Diagnosis to Repair: Physical Examination, Diagnosis, and Arthroscopic-assisted Reduction

Injuries to the tibio-fibular syndesmotic ligaments are different than ankle collateral ligament injuries and occur in isolation or combination with malleolar fractures. Syndesmotic ligament injury can lead to prolonged functional limitations and ultimately long-term ankle dysfunction if not identified and treated appropriately. The syndesmosis complex is a relatively simple construct of well-documented ligaments, but the dynamic kinematics and the effects of disruption have been a point of contention in diagnosis and treatment. Syndesmotic ligament injuries are sometimes referred to as "high ankle sprains" because the syndesmotic ligaments are more proximal than the collateral ligaments of the ankle joint. Rotational injuries to the ankle often result in malleolar fractures, which can be combined with ankle joint or syndesmotic ligament injuries. Most of the orthopaedic literature to this point has addressed syndesmosis ligament injuries in combination with fractures and not isolated syndesmotic ligament injuries. Thus, we propose a simplified general video guide to do the diagnostic examinations and arthroscopic-assisted reduction based on current evidence-based medicine.

Sagittal instability with inversion is important to evaluate after syndesmosis injury and repair: a cadaveric robotic study

PURPOSE

Disruption of the syndesmosis, the anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), the posterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and the interosseous membrane (IOM), leads to residual symptoms after an ankle injury. The objective of this study was to quantify tibiofibular joint motion with isolated AITFL- and complete syndesmotic injury and with syndesmotic screw vs. suture button repair compared to the intact ankle.

METHODS

Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 60 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a six degree-of-freedom robotic testing system and three-dimensional tibiofibular motion was quantified using an optical tracking system. A 5 Nm inversion moment was applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion, and 10° dorsiflexion. Outcome measures included fibular medial-lateral translation, anterior-posterior translation, and external rotation in each ankle state: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected (isolated AITFL injury), 3) AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected (complete injury), 4) tricortical screw fixation, and 5) suture button repair.

RESULTS

Both isolated AITFL and complete injury caused significant increases in fibular posterior translation at 15° and 30° plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle (p < 0.05). Tricortical screw fixation restored the intact ankle tibiofibular kinematics in all planes. Suture button repair resulted in 3.7 mm, 3.8 mm, and 2.9 mm more posterior translation of the fibula compared to the intact ankle at 30° and 15° plantarflexion and 0° flexion, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ankle instability is similar after both isolated AITFL and complete syndesmosis injury and persists after suture button fixation in the sagittal plane in response an inversion stress. Sagittal instability with ankle inversion should be considered when treating patients with isolated AITFL syndesmosis injuries and after suture button fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Controlled laboratory study, Level V.

Latarjet with cortical button fixation is associated with an increase of the risk of recurrent dislocation compared to screw fixation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of the Latarjet procedure using two cortical buttons vs two screws. It was hypothesized that cortical button would result in similar rates of recurrent dislocations, but a lower rate of reoperation compared to screw fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative case-cohort analysis was performed for all patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. Patient demographics, number of dislocations prior surgery, arm dominance, shoulder hyperlaxity, level of sport, type of sport and ISIS score were collected. Shoulders were separated into two groups based on surgical fixation (screws vs cortical button). Postoperatively, shoulders were evaluated for recurrent dislocation, revision surgery, post-operative Walch-Duplay score, and the Simple shoulder test (SST). Two hundred and thirty-six patients were included in the screw fixation group (group A) and 72 in button fixation group (group B) and were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 0.8 years. Demographics of the two groups were similar with the exception of operative side hand dominance, which was more common in group B [50 (69.4%) vs 128 (54.2%), p = 0.02].

RESULTS

Recurrent dislocation was significantly lower in Group A: 6 (2.5%) vs 6(8.3%) (p = 0.02). Reoperation was more common in group A [14 (5.9%) vs 0 (0%)]. At follow-up, Walch-Duplay scores and simple shoulder tests were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Button fixation for Latarjet showed higher rates of recurrent dislocation compared to screw fixation. However, the increased stability afforded by screw fixation needs to be weighed against the increased risk of reoperation for hardware prominence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Anatomic Ligament Repairs of Syndesmotic Injuries

Poor clinical results are seen with syndesmotic injuries in the setting of ankle sprains and ankle fractures. The goal of syndesmosis repair is to restore the normal anatomic relationship of the distal tibiofibular joint and prevent ankle arthritis. Indications for surgical intervention for isolated syndesmotic injuries include frank syndesmosis diastasis, medial clear space widening on plain radiographs, significant radiographic syndesmosis diastasis during stress examination, or subtle syndesmotic diastasis detected by arthroscopic evaluation. Complications after syndesmosis repair include symptomatic hardware, malreduction, and arthritis. Anatomic reduction of the syndesmosis leads to better outcomes following surgery.