1
|
Johns WL, Johnson EE, Brutico J, Sherman MB, Freedman KB, Emper W, Salvo JP, Hammoud S. Postoperative Opioid Usage and Disposal Strategies After Arthroscopic Procedures in a Young Cohort: A Prospective Observational Study. Orthop J Sports Med 2024; 12:23259671241249688. [PMID: 38757068 PMCID: PMC11097716 DOI: 10.1177/23259671241249688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Although several studies have noted that patients are routinely overprescribed opioids, few have reported usage after arthroscopic surgery. Purpose To determine opioid consumption and allocation for unused opioids after common arthroscopic surgeries. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods Patients between the ages of 15 and 40 years who were scheduled to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), labral repair of the hip or shoulder, meniscectomy, or meniscal repair were prospectively enrolled. Patients were prescribed either 5 mg hydrocodone-325 mg acetaminophen or 5 mg oxycodone-325 mg acetaminophen based on surgeon preference. Patients completed a daily opioid usage survey during the 2-week postoperative period. In addition, patients completed a survey on postoperative day 21 inquiring about continued opioid use and medication disposal, if applicable. Opioid medication consumption was converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Results Of the 200 patients who were enrolled in the study, 176 patients had sufficient follow-up after undergoing 85 (48%) ACLR, 26 (14.8%) hip labral repair, 34 (19.3%) shoulder labral repair, 18 (10.2%) meniscectomy, and 13 (7.4%) meniscal repair procedures. Mean age was 26.1 years (SD, 7.38); surgeons prescribed a mean of 26.6 pills whereas patients reported consuming a mean of 15.5 pills. The mean MME consumption in the 14 days after each procedure was calculated: ACLR (95.7; 44% of prescription), hip labral repair (84.8; 37%), shoulder labral repair (57.2; 35%), meniscectomy (18.4; 27%), and meniscal repair (32.1; 42%). This corresponded to approximately 39% of the total opioid prescription being utilized across all procedures. Mean MME consumption was greatest on postoperative day 1 in hip, shoulder, and meniscal procedures and on postoperative day 2 in ACLR. Only 7.04% of patients reported continued opioid use in the third postoperative week. Patients had a mean of 11 unused pills or 77.7 MMEs remaining. Of the patients with remaining medication, 24.7% intended to keep their medication for future use. Conclusion The results of our study indicate that patients who undergo the aforementioned arthroscopic procedures consume <75 MMEs in the 2-week postoperative period, translating into a mean of 10 to 15 pills consumed. Approximately 60% of total opioids prescribed went unused, and one-fourth of patients intended to keep their remaining medication for future usage. We have provided general prescribing guidelines and recommend that surgeons carefully consider customizing their opioid prescriptions on the basis of procedure site to balance optimal postoperative analgesia with avoidance of dissemination of excess opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William L. Johns
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emma E. Johnson
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph Brutico
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew B. Sherman
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kevin B. Freedman
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William Emper
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John P. Salvo
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sommer Hammoud
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Selznick A, Kruse C, Al-Mohrej OA, Valente G, Khan M, Al-Asiri J, Petrisor B. The Role of Preoperative Opioid Use in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Foot Ankle Surg 2024; 63:305-311. [PMID: 37923116 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Prescription opioids, particularly for treating musculoskeletal pain, are a significant contributor to the opioid epidemic in North America. There is also evidence to suggest that chronic use of opioids is associated with poor outcomes after orthopedic surgery. However, whether this association is relevant in foot and ankle surgery is still unclear. Accordingly, a systematic review of the literature was undertaken to assess the impact of preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery concerning postoperative pain, complications, and postoperative opioid dependence. Four databases, including EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and CINAHL, were searched to March 2022 for studies reporting preoperative opioid use and its effect on postoperative outcomes or opioid use after foot and ankle surgery. A total of 22,092 patients were included in the final synthesis of 8 studies. Most of which were level 3 evidence (5 studies). Around 18% of the patients used opioids preoperatively. Preoperative opioid use was associated with more quantities and prolonged use of opioids postoperatively. Two studies showed an increased risk of complications postoperatively in patients who used opioids preoperatively compared to the nonopioid group. Preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgeries is associated with increased and prolonged use of opioids postoperatively and may therefore predict the potential for misuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asher Selznick
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
| | - Colin Kruse
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
| | - Omar A Al-Mohrej
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada; Section of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nourah Bint Abdul Rahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Giuseppe Valente
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
| | - Moin Khan
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
| | - Jamal Al-Asiri
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
| | - Bradley Petrisor
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wally MK, Thompson ME, Odum S, Kazemi DM, Hsu JR, Beuhler M, Bosse M, Castro M, Gibbs M, Griggs C, Jarrett S, Leas D, Rachal J, Roomian T, Runyon M, Saha A, Watling B, Yu Z, Seymour RB. Adherence to legislation limiting opioid prescription duration following musculoskeletal injury. J Opioid Manag 2023; 19:103-115. [PMID: 37879665 DOI: 10.5055/jom.2023.0804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES North Carolina had implemented legislation (Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention (STOP) Act) limiting opioid prescriptions to 5 days for acute pain and 7 days for post-operative pain. This study aimed to identify patient, prescriber, and facility characteristics associated with STOP Act adherence for patients with acute or post-surgical musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. DESIGN A three-level hierarchical logistic regression model was used to predict odds of adherence with STOP Act duration limits, accounting for fixed and random effects at the patient, prescriber, and facility levels. SETTING A large healthcare system in North Carolina. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS Patients (N = 6,849) presenting from 2018 to 2020 with a diagnosis of an acute MSK injury. INTERVENTIONS The STOP Act limited the duration of opioid prescriptions in North Carolina. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Prescriptions adhering to the STOP Act duration limits of 5 days (nonoperative) or 7 days (operative) were the primary outcome. RESULTS Opioids were compliant with STOP Act duration limits in 69.3 percent of encounters, with 33 percent of variation accounted for by clinician and 29 percent by facility. Patients prescribed >1 opioid (odds ratio (OR) 0.46, 95 percent confidence interval (CI): 0.36, 0.58) had reduced odds of a compliant prescription; surgical patients had increased odds of a compliant prescription (outpatient surgery: OR 5.89, 95 percent CI: 2.43-14.29; inpatient surgery: OR 7.71, 95 percent CI: 3.04-19.56). Primary care sports medicine clinicians adhered to legislation less frequently than orthopedic surgeons (OR 0.38, 95 percent CI: 0.15, 0.97). CONCLUSIONS Most prescriptions adhered to STOP Act legislation. Tailored interventions to improve adherence among targeted groups of prescribers, eg, those treating nonoperative injuries and sport medicine clinicians, could be useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan K Wally
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4540-532X
| | - Michael E Thompson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Susan Odum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute; Department of Public Health Sci-ences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; OrthoCarolina Research Institute Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Donna M Kazemi
- College of Health and Human Services, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Joseph R Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Michael Beuhler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Michael Bosse
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Manuel Castro
- Department of Psychiatry, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Michael Gibbs
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Christopher Griggs
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Steven Jarrett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Daniel Leas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute; Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - James Rachal
- Department of Psychiatry, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Tamar Roomian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Michael Runyon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Animita Saha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | - Ziqing Yu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Rachel B Seymour
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eisenschink J, Leveille D, Leveille R, Mollica A, Rhodenizer J. Postoperative Opioid Consumption Following Hallux Valgus and Rigidus Surgery: A Guide to Postoperative Prescription Writing. J Foot Ankle Surg 2023; 62:873-876. [PMID: 37315776 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Prescribing postoperative pain medications is essential to foot and ankle surgery; however, prescribing an amount that results in an excess of pills has shown to lead to opioid abuse. The opioid epidemic has forced surgeons to analyze how we manage postoperative pain with a goal to prescribe the optimal number of pills that will reduce a patient's pain while limiting the amount that is left over. The purpose of this study was to develop a guideline for prescribing postoperative pain medication for hallux valgus and rigidus procedures. One hundred eighty-five opioid naive patients were followed after undergoing surgery for hallux valgus or hallux rigidus. The number of opioids consumed was obtained and compared to a number of variables. There were 28 different prescriptions given during the study. As the number of pills given decreased, so did the number of pills consumed (p = .08). Of the 185 patients, 14 (7.56%) received a refill. Ninety-five patients were available for opioid consumption data analysis. Those patients consumed a median of 36.7% and 39.1% of their prescription for hallux valgus and hallux rigidus procedures respectively. Smokers consumed 2.4 times the number of narcotics compared to nonsmokers (p = .002). The median number of 5-325 mg hydrocodone-acetaminophen pills consumed was 8.5 for distal metatarsal osteotomies and 10 for first metatarsophalangeal joint procedures. Body mass index, gender, number of procedures performed did not have a statistical difference in the number of opioids taken. Foot and ankle surgeons can reduce the amount of excess opioids by decreasing the initial prescription and educating the patient on proper pain management modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Anthony Mollica
- Foot & Ankle Surgeon, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wally MK, Thompson ME, Odum S, Kazemi DM, Hsu JR, Seymour RB. Changes in opioid prescription duration for musculoskeletal injury associated with the North Carolina Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention (STOP) Act. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2023; 24:926-932. [PMID: 36943361 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess whether implementation of the Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention (STOP) Act was associated with an increase in the percentage of opioid prescriptions written for 7 days or fewer among patients with acute or postsurgical musculoskeletal conditions. DESIGN An interrupted time-series study was conducted to determine the change in duration of opioid prescriptions associated with the STOP Act. SETTING Data were extracted from the electronic health record of a large health care system in North Carolina. SUBJECTS Patients presenting from 2016 to 2020 with an acute musculoskeletal injury and the clinicians treating them were included in an interrupted time-series study (n = 12 839). METHODS Trends were assessed over time, including the change in trend associated with implementation of the STOP Act, for the percentage of prescriptions written for ≤7 days. RESULTS Among patients with acute musculoskeletal injury, less than 30% of prescriptions were written for ≤7 days in January of 2016; by December of 2020, almost 90% of prescriptions were written for ≤7 days. Prescriptions written for ≤7 days increased 17.7% after the STOP Act was implemented (P < .001), after adjustment for the existing trend. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate significant potential for legislation to influence opioid prescribing behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan K Wally
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC 28207, United States
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States
| | - Michael E Thompson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States
| | - Susan Odum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC 28207, United States
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States
| | - Donna M Kazemi
- College of Health and Human Services, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States
| | - Joseph R Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC 28207, United States
| | - Rachel B Seymour
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC 28207, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rooney EM, Odum SM, Hamid N, Irwin TA. Opioid-Free Forefoot Surgery vs Traditional Perioperative Opiate Regimen: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Foot Ankle Int 2023; 44:21-31. [PMID: 36537761 DOI: 10.1177/10711007221140834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to the opioid epidemic, the use of multimodal pain management in orthopaedic surgery is increasing. Efforts to decrease opioid prescribing and opioid consumption among foot and ankle surgical patients are needed. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and adverse events between 2 multimodal pain management pathways for forefoot surgical patients: standard opioid-containing (OC) and opioid-free (OF). METHODS This is a single-center noninferior randomized controlled trial of 51 patients undergoing forefoot surgery allocated to one of 2 perioperative pain management treatments: opioid-free, multimodal (OF, n=27 patients), or traditional opioid-containing (OC, n=24 patients). Patient characteristics, creatine markers, pain (numeric rating scale [NRS]), general health (Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey [VR-12]), and depression were measured preoperatively. Postoperatively, pain was measured at 24-hour, 2-week, and 6-week time points. Satisfaction with pain control, complications, and general health were measured at 2 and 6 weeks. RESULTS The OF group is statistically noninferior to the OC group and reported lower median pain scores at 24 hours (2 [IQR 0, 3] vs 6 [IQR 3.5, 7]; p<.0001) and 2 weeks (2 [IQR 1, 4] vs 4 [IQR 0, 3]; p=.018]. By 6 weeks, pain levels were similar between groups. More than 85% of all patients reported satisfaction with pain level at 2 weeks, which increased to >90% at 6 weeks. The VR-12 scores were similar between groups across all time points. At 2 weeks, 8 patients in each group reported constipation. By 6 weeks, all but 2 OC patients reported resolution. No other adverse events of postoperative wound complications, readmissions, medication reactions, thrombosis, or persistent pain were documented. CONCLUSION In forefoot surgery, the opioid-free pain management protocol was statistically noninferior to the opioid-containing protocol in reducing postoperative pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan M Odum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Nady Hamid
- OrthoCarolina Foot and Ankle Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Todd A Irwin
- OrthoCarolina Foot and Ankle Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cunningham D, Anastasio AT, Cochrane NH, Ryan SP, Bolognesi M, Seyler TM. Opioid Legislation Decreases Opioid Prescribing in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2022; 46:142-150. [PMID: 36508483 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20221207-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of opioid-limiting legislation on perioperative opioid prescriptions in total knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that opioid legislation has reduced opioid prescription filling above levels anticipated by national trends. This study retrospectively evaluated opioid prescription filling for all patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in a commercially available insurance database between 2010 and 2018 (n=1,068,764). Initial discharge and 90-day cumulative oxycodone 5-mg equivalents filled were tabulated. Opioid prescription filling was evaluated over time and between states with and without opioid-limiting legislation using analysis of variance and multivariable linear and logistic regression. States with and without opioid legislation had significant reductions in initial and cumulative opioid prescription filling volume (all P<.001). However, the magnitude of this reduction was larger in states with opioid legislation. Legislation targeting duration and volume had the largest impact on initial post-act opioid prescription filling volume compared with states without legislation in an estimated "pre-act" time frame. Legislation targeting duration and volume and no specific target had the largest impact on cumulative post-act opioid prescription filling volume. States without legislation still had large, significant reductions in filling volume, but the magnitude was not as great as in states with opioid legislation. States with and without opioid legislation had significant decreases in initial and cumulative opioid prescription filling volume. However, the magnitude of reduction was larger in states that enacted legislation. Younger age, pre-operative opioid use, and higher comorbidity burden were associated with greater opioid use postoperatively. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].
Collapse
|
8
|
Postoperative Pain Medication Utilization in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Sports Orthopaedic Surgery: Characterizing Patient Usage Patterns and Opioid Retention. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2022; 6:01979360-202210000-00010. [PMID: 36734649 PMCID: PMC9592445 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-22-00206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid overprescribing is a problem in orthopaedic surgery, with many patients having leftover opioid medications after surgery. The purpose of our study was to capture utilization patterns of opioids in pediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic sports medicine surgery, in addition to evaluating patient practices surrounding unutilized opioid medication. Our hypothesis was that there would be low utilization of opioids in this patient population and would in turn contribute to notable overprescribing of opioids and opioid retention in this population. METHODS Pediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery for knee and hip pathology were prospectively enrolled. A survey was administered 14 days postoperatively, with questions centered on the patient-reported number of opioids prescribed, number of opioids used, number of days opioids were used, and incidences of leftover opioid medication and disposal of leftover medication. The magnitude of opioid overprescribing was calculated using the reported prescribed and reported used number of opioid pills. Linear regression was used to examine associations between opioids and NSAIDs prescribed. RESULTS One hundred fourteen patients reported a mean prescription of 12.0 ± 5.0 pills, with utilization of 4.4 ± 6.1 pills over 2.7 ± 5.1 days. Patients were prescribed 2.73 times the number of opioid pills required on average. One hundred patients (87.7%) reported having unused opioid medication after their surgery, with 71 (71.0%) reporting opioid retention. Regression results showed an association with opioids used and prescribed opioid amount (β = 0.582, R = 0.471, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION Overall, our study results help characterize the utilization patterns of opioid medications in the postsurgical pediatric sports orthopaedic population and suggest that orthopaedic surgeons may be able to provide smaller quantities of opioid pills for analgesia than is typically prescribed, which in turn may help reduce the amount of prescription opioid medications present in the community. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
|
9
|
Vesely BD, Bonvillian JP, King MA, Kim ST, Gangopadhyay P, Blazek CD. Opioid Prescribing Patterns of Foot and Ankle Surgeons: Single State Review. J Foot Ankle Surg 2022; 61:1071-1075. [PMID: 35346575 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The United States is currently in an opioid crisis. In order improve the amount of misuse and overdoses from opioids, some institutions have begun to create protocols based off of state and federal opioid prescription regulations. Our purpose is to analyze the current opioid prescribing patterns in foot and ankle surgery and create an institutional protocol. A survey on current opioid prescribing patterns based on the podiatric surgery was sent out from November 20, 2020 to January 11, 2021 to all members of the North Carolina Foot and Ankle Society. One-hundred surgeons participated in the survey. The most commonly prescribed postoperative pain medication was Hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5 mg/325 mg and the most common quantity was between 21 and 30 tablets. The most common medication for local blocks reported was bupivacaine and lidocaine mixed performed as a block closest to the surgical site. We recommend creating an institutional based opioid protocol for foot and ankle surgeries based off of the procedure performed by the surgeon. We recommend limiting prescriptions to under 30 tablets and utilizing a local or regional pain block for podiatric surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryanna D Vesely
- Resident Physician, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC.
| | - John P Bonvillian
- Attending Physician, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Matthew A King
- Resident Physician, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Seiha T Kim
- Attending Physician, Department of Anesthesia, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Paula Gangopadhyay
- Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Cody D Blazek
- Attending Physician, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pain Plan Implementation Effect: Analysis of Postoperative Opioid Use, Hospital Length of Stay, and Clinic Resource Utilization for Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e1122-e1136. [PMID: 35468099 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-01237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Pain Plan was developed collaboratively and implemented a unique systematic approach to reduce opioid usage in elective spine surgery. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients who underwent elective spine surgery before and after Pain Plan implementation. The Pain Plan was implemented on May 1, 2019. The experimental group comprised patients over the subsequent 1-year period with a Pain Plan (n = 319), and the control group comprised patients from the previous year without a Pain Plan (n = 385). Outcome variables include hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient opioid use, outpatient opioid prescription quantities, number of clinic communication encounters, and communication encounter complexity. Patients were prospectively divided into three surgical invasiveness index subgroups representing small-magnitude, medium-magnitude, and large-magnitude spine surgeries. RESULTS There was a statistically significant decrease in hospital LOS ( P = 0.028), inpatient opioid use ( P = 0.001), and the average number of steps per communication encounter ( P = 0.010) for Pain Plan patients and a trend toward decreased outpatient opioid prescription quantities ( P = 0.052). No difference was observed in patient-reported pain scores. Statistically significant decreases in inpatient opioid use were seen in large-magnitude (50% reduction, P < 0.001) and medium-magnitude surgeries (49% reduction, P < 0.001). For small-magnitude surgeries, there was no difference (1.7% reduction, P = 0.99). The median LOS for large-magnitude surgeries decreased by 38% (20.5-hour decrease, P < 0.001) and decreased by 34% for medium-magnitude surgeries (17-hour difference, P = 0.055). For small-magnitude surgeries, there was no significant difference ( P = 0.734). Outpatient opioid prescription quantities were markedly decreased in small-magnitude surgeries only. The total number of communication encounters was not statistically significant in any group. However, the number of steps within a communication encounter was significantly decreased ( P = 0.010), and staff survey respondents reported more efficient and effective postoperative pain management for Pain Plan patients. DISCUSSION Pain Plan implementation markedly decreased hospital LOS, inpatient opioid use and outpatient opioid prescription quantities, and clinic resource utilization in elective spine surgery patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Jolissaint JE, Scarola GT, Odum SM, Leas D, Hamid N. Opioid-free shoulder arthroplasty is safe, effective, and predictable compared with a traditional perioperative opiate regimen: a randomized controlled trial of a new clinical care pathway. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:1499-1509. [PMID: 35065291 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opiate-based regimens have been used as a foundation of postoperative analgesia in orthopedic surgery for decades, and the vast majority of orthopedic patients in the United States receive postoperative opioid prescriptions. Both the safety and efficacy of opioid use in orthopedic patients have been questioned because of mounting evidence that postoperative opioid use can be detrimental to outcomes and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to compare a new, opioid-free pain management pathway with a traditional opioid-containing, multimodal pathway in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS This is a single-center randomized clinical trial in which 67 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty were allocated into 2 treatment arms: either a completely opioid-free, multimodal perioperative pain management pathway (OF), or a traditional opioid-containing perioperative pain management pathway (OC). Pain was measured on a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 at 6-, 12-, 24-hour, 2-week, and 6-week time points. Deviations from the OF pathway, morphine milligram equivalents, readmissions, and opioid-related side effects were analyzed. RESULTS Pain levels were significantly lower in the OF group at 12 hours, 24 hours, and 2 weeks. At 12 hours, the median pain rating was 0 compared with a median pain rating of 3 in the OC group (P = .003). At 24 hours, the OF group reported a median pain rating of 1 and the OC group reported a median pain rating of 4 (P < .001). The median pain rating at the 2-week time point in the OF group was 2 compared with 4 in the OC group (P = .006). Median pain ratings were similar between the OF group and the OC group at the 6-week time point. The median pain rating in the OF group at 6 weeks was 1, compared with 1.5 in the OC group. Of the 35 patients in the OF pathway, 1 required a rescue opioid medication for left cervical radiculopathy that ultimately necessitated cervical spine fusion after recovery from right shoulder arthroplasty, and 1 was noted to have taken an opioid medication, diverted from a prior prescription, at the 2-week visit. The morphine milliequivalents received in the OF group was 20 compared with 4936.25 in the OC group. There were no readmissions in the OF pathway, and no differences between the groups with regard to constipation, falls, or delirium. CONCLUSION A multimodal, opioid-free perioperative pain management pathway is safe and effective in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty and offers superior pain relief to that of a traditional opioid-containing pain management pathway at 12 hours, 24 hours, and 2 weeks postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susan M Odum
- OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA; Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Leas
- Department of Orthopaedics, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Nady Hamid
- OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA; OrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
| | -
- OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA; Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA; OrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center, Charlotte, NC, USA; OrthoCarolina Hand Center, Charlotte, NC, USA; OrthoCarolina Foot and Ankle Center, Charlotte, NC, USA; OrthoCarolina Spine Center, Charlotte, NC, USA; OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jen TTH, Ke JXC, Wing KJ, Denomme J, McIsaac DI, Huang SC, Ree RM, Prabhakar C, Schwarz SKW, Yarnold CH. Development and internal validation of a multivariable risk prediction model for severe rebound pain after foot and ankle surgery involving single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block. Br J Anaesth 2022; 129:127-135. [PMID: 35568510 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rebound pain occurs after up to 50% of ambulatory surgeries involving regional anaesthesia. To assist with risk stratification, we developed a model to predict severe rebound pain after foot and ankle surgery involving single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block. METHODS After ethics approval, we performed a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing lower limb surgery with popliteal sciatic nerve block from January 2016 to November 2019 were included. Exclusion criteria were uncontrolled pain in the PACU, use of a perineural catheter, or loss to follow-up. We developed and internally validated a multivariable logistic regression model for severe rebound pain, defined as transition from well-controlled pain in the PACU (numerical rating scale [NRS] 3 or less) to severe pain (NRS ≥7) within 48 h. A priori predictors were age, sex, surgery type, planned admission, local anaesthetic type, dexamethasone use, and intraoperative anaesthesia type. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Nagelkerke's R2, scaled Brier score, and calibration slope. RESULTS The cohort included 1365 patients (mean [standard deviation] age: 50 [16] yr). The primary outcome was abstracted in 1311 (96%) patients, with severe rebound pain in 652 (50%). Internal validation revealed poor model performance, with AUROC 0.632 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.602-0.661; bootstrap optimisation 0.021), Nagelkerke's R2 0.063, and scaled Brier score 0.047. Calibration slope was 0.832 (95% CI: 0.623-1.041). CONCLUSIONS We show that a multivariable risk prediction model developed using routinely collected clinical data had poor predictive performance for severe rebound pain after foot and ankle surgery. Prospective studies involving other patient-related predictors are needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05018104.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim T H Jen
- Department of Anesthesia, St Paul's Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Janny X C Ke
- Department of Anesthesia, St Paul's Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management & Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Kevin J Wing
- Department of Orthopedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Justine Denomme
- Department of Anesthesia, St Paul's Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Shih-Chieh Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ronald M Ree
- Department of Anesthesia, St Paul's Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christopher Prabhakar
- Department of Anesthesia, St Paul's Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stephan K W Schwarz
- Department of Anesthesia, St Paul's Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cynthia H Yarnold
- Department of Anesthesia, St Paul's Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ang PPJ, Hugo B, Silvester R. Acute postoperative pain management protocols in podiatric surgery within Australia: a Delphi study. J Foot Ankle Res 2022; 15:27. [PMID: 35410248 PMCID: PMC9004200 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-022-00535-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is limited evidence in the literature to describe an analgesic protocol that takes into consideration the extent of foot and ankle surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a guide for acute postoperative pain management for podiatric surgery in Australia, and to identify opportunities to improve the current list of scheduled medicines available to podiatric surgeons.
Methods
A Delphi method involving 3 survey rounds was employed for this study. Twelve expert panellists in the field of podiatric surgery and anaesthesiology were invited to participate, and 10 panellists remained by the end of the study. Round 1 involved 15 open-ended questions. These answers formed the basis of the 55 statements that were developed for the following 2 survey rounds, where panellists rated the appropriateness of each statement on a 9-point Likert scale. The third survey round was an opportunity for panellists to revise their answers to each statement in light of the majority response.
Results
For mild acute postoperative pain, non-opioid oral analgesics were recommended as an appropriate management option. For moderate and severe acute postoperative pain, both non-opioid and opioid products were found to be appropriate by the majority. It was agreed that oral opioids be reserved for breakthrough pain at all severity levels. All other statements in the Delphi study pertaining to drug hypersensitivities or allergies, stratification of pain management, opioid prescription concerns, and access to pain medications were accepted as appropriate by the majority of panellists.
Conclusion
The agreed approach to acute postoperative pain management for podiatric surgeons in Australia was with a stepwise approach, utilising multimodal therapy, and reserving oral opioids for breakthrough pain. Additionally, there was consensus for podiatric surgeons in Australia to have wider access to alternative analgesics and anti-emetics that have similar or improved efficacies with better safety profiles.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lans J, Westenberg RF, Gottlieb RE, Valerio IL, Chen NC, Eberlin KR. Long-Term Opioid Use Following Surgery for Symptomatic Neuroma. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38:137-143. [PMID: 35100646 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying patients at risk for prolonged opioid use following surgery for symptomatic neuroma would be beneficial for perioperative management. The aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with postoperative opioid use of >4 weeks in patients undergoing neuroma surgery. METHODS After retrospective identification, 77 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic neuroma of the upper or lower extremity were enrolled. Patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, and a custom medication questionnaire at a median of 9.7 years (range: 2.5-16.8 years) following surgery. Neuroma excision followed by nerve implantation (n = 39, 51%), nerve reconstruction/repair (n = 18, 23%), and excision alone (n = 16, 21%) were the most common surgical treatments. RESULTS Overall, 27% (n = 21) of patients reported opioid use of more than 4 weeks postoperatively. Twenty-three patients (30%) reported preoperative opioid use of which 11 (48%) did not report opioid use for >4 weeks, postoperatively. In multivariable logistic regression, preoperative opioid use was independently associated with opioid use of >4 weeks, postoperatively (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-14.3, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION Neuroma surgery reduces opioid use in many patients but patients who are taking opioids preoperatively are at risk for longer opioid use. Almost one-third of patients reported opioid use longer than 4 weeks, postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Lans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Ritsaart F Westenberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Rachel E Gottlieb
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Ian L Valerio
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery, and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Neal C Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Kyle R Eberlin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery, and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Biz C, de Iudicibus G, Belluzzi E, Dalmau-Pastor M, Bragazzi NL, Funes M, Parise GM, Ruggieri P. Prevalence of chronic pain syndrome in patients who have undergone hallux valgus percutaneous surgery: a comparison of sciatic-femoral and ankle regional ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:1043. [PMID: 34911525 PMCID: PMC8675526 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04911-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain syndrome (CPS) is a common complication after operative procedures, and only a few studies have focused on the evaluation of CPS in foot-forefoot surgery and specifically on HV percutaneous correction. The objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain levels and incidence of CPS in two groups of patients having undergone femoral-sciatic nerve block or ankle block regional anaesthesia before hallux valgus (HV) percutaneous surgery and the association between postoperative pain levels and risk factors between these patient groups. Methods A consecutive patient series was enrolled and evaluated prospectively at 7 days, 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The participants were divided into two groups according to the regional anaesthesia received, femoral-sciatic nerve block or ankle block, and their outcomes were compared. The parameters assessed were postoperative pain at rest and during movement by the numerical rating scale (NRS), patient satisfaction using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), quality of life and return to daily activities. Statistical analysis was performed. Results One hundred fifty-five patients were assessed, 127 females and 28 males. Pain at rest (p < 0.0001) and during movement (p < 0.0001) significantly decreased during the follow-ups; at 6 months, 13 patients suffered from CPS. Over time, satisfaction remained stable (p > 0.05), quality of life significantly increased and patients returned to daily activities and work (p < 0.0001). No significant impact of type of anaesthesia could be detected. ASA 3 (p = 0.043) was associated to higher pain during movement; BMI (p = 0.005) and lumbago (p = 0.004) to lower satisfaction. No operative-anaesthetic complications were recorded. Postoperative pain at rest and during movement improved over time independently of the regional block used, with low incidence of CPS at last follow-up. Among risk factors, only a higher ASA was associated to higher pain during movement, while higher BMI and lumbago to lower satisfaction. Conclusions Both ultrasound-guided sciatic-femoral and ankle blocks were safe and effective in reducing postoperative pain with low incidence of CPS at last follow-up. Trial registration Clinical Trial NCT02886221. Registered 1 September 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Biz
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 3, 35128, Padova, Italy. .,Minimally Invasive Foot and Ankle Society (MIFAS By Grecmip), 2 Rue Georges Negrevergne, 33700, Merignac, France.
| | - Gianfranco de Iudicibus
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 3, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Elisa Belluzzi
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 3, 35128, Padova, Italy. .,Musculoskeletal Pathology and Oncology Laboratory, Orthopaedics and Orthopedics Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 3, 3518, Padova, Italy.
| | - Miki Dalmau-Pastor
- Minimally Invasive Foot and Ankle Society (MIFAS By Grecmip), 2 Rue Georges Negrevergne, 33700, Merignac, France.,Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
- Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Manuela Funes
- Institute of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gian-Mario Parise
- Institute of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Pietro Ruggieri
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 3, 35128, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guo EW, Yedulla NR, Cross AG, Hessburg LT, Elhage KG, Koolmees DS, Makhni EC. Older, Male Orthopaedic Surgeons From Southern Geographies Prescribe Higher Doses of Post-Operative Narcotics Than do their Counterparts: A Medicare Population Study. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e1577-e1583. [PMID: 34977609 PMCID: PMC8689220 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods Results Conclusion Level of Evidence
Collapse
|
17
|
Shing EZ, Leas D, Michalek C, Wally MK, Hamid N. Study protocol: randomized controlled trial of opioid-free vs. traditional perioperative analgesia in elective orthopedic surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:104. [PMID: 33485328 PMCID: PMC7824925 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-03972-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The medical community is beginning to recognize the contribution of prescription opioids in the growing national opioid crisis. Many studies have compared the safety and efficacy of alternative analgesics to opioids, but none utilizing a completely opioid-free perioperative protocol in orthopedics. METHODS We developed and tested an opioid-free perioperative analgesic pathway (from preoperative to postoperative period) among patients undergoing common elective orthopedic procedures. Patients will be randomized to receive either traditional opioid-including or completely opioid-free perioperative medications. This study is being conducted across multiple orthopedic subspecialties in patients undergoing the following common elective orthopedic procedures: single-level or two-level ACDF/ACDA, 1st CMC arthroplasty, Hallux Valgus/Rigidus corrections, diagnostic knee arthroscopies, total hip arthroplasty (THA), and total shoulder arthroplasty/reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA/RTSA). The primary outcome measure is pain score at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures include pain scores at additional time points, medication side effects, and several patient-reported variables such as patient satisfaction, quality of life, and functional status. DISCUSSION We describe the methods for a feasibility randomized controlled trial comparing opioid-free perioperative analgesics to traditional opioid-including protocols. We present this study so that it may be replicated and incorporated into future studies at other institutions, as well as disseminated to additional orthopedic and/or non-orthopedic surgical procedures. The ultimate goal of presenting this protocol is to aid recent efforts in reducing the impact of prescription opioids on the national opioid crisis. TRIAL REGISTRATION The protocol was approved by the local institutional review board and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04176783 ) on November 25, 2019, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Z Shing
- Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, P.O. Box 32861, Charlotte, NC, 28232, USA.
| | - Daniel Leas
- Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | - Meghan K Wally
- Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, P.O. Box 32861, Charlotte, NC, 28232, USA
| | - Nady Hamid
- OrthoCarolina Shoulder and Elbow Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|