Role of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Predicting Outcome of Bunion Surgery

Carpal tunnel syndrome and sleep, a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The most common symptom and reason patients seek treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome is lack of sleep. Our purpose was to determine how much sleep-related symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome improve after carpal tunnel release using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective sleep data as primary measures of interest.

METHODS

A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Only interventional clinical trials that examined primary outcome measures of interest were included. Patient-reported outcome measures underwent meta-analysis to determine how much scores improved following carpal tunnel release.

RESULTS

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index improved significantly after carpal tunnel release, by 4.43 points and 6.02 points at 1-3 and 6-12 months postoperatively, respectively, and continued to improve up to 2 years. Improvement on the Insomnia Severity Index after carpal tunnel release was also significant, with improvement up to 1 year postoperatively, by 8.54 points and 9.05 points at 1-3 and 6-12 months, respectively. Insomnia Severity Index scores improved significantly after splinting as well.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis determined to what extent patients can expect their sleep to improve after operative and non-operative intervention, as measured by various patient-reported outcome measures that assess sleep. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Insomnia Severity Index correlated very well between studies and across hundreds of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Data are lacking to define the minimal clinically important difference and assess whether patients achieve a minimal clinically important difference for sleep questionnaires; more information on this topic is needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Correlation Between Traditional Anteroposterior Radiographic Measurements With Lateral Radiographic Measurements Following Triplanar Correction of Hallux Valgus and With Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Prospective Multicenter Trial

Hallux valgus (HV) is a common condition in which the first ray is deformed, leading to pain and altered joint mechanics. A variety of radiographic measurements are used to evaluate HV. Little is known about measurements used in the assessment of HV on lateral radiographs compared to anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. The primary aim of this study was to correlate lateral measurements with AP measurements pre and postoperatively. The secondary aim was to correlate lateral measurements with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) pre and postoperatively. One hundred eighty-three patients were initially enrolled in the study. Two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists independently performed all measurements. On AP radiographs, hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were measured. On lateral radiographs, sagittal IMA, Meary's angle, and sagittal first ray length were measured. Measurements were recorded at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for inter-reader analysis. ICCs were moderate to very strong among readers. There were significant but weak correlations between lateral measurements and AP measurements. For at least 1 timepoint, IMA correlated with sagittal IMA, sagittal first ray length, and Meary's angle. HVA only correlated with sagittal first ray length. These correlations were all weak in magnitude. There were a few significant but weak correlations between the measurements in the study and PROMs. This study showed that sagittal IMA, sagittal first ray length, and Meary's angle are not predictive of AP measurements or patient outcomes and are not useful in preoperative assessment of HV.

Country-specific reference values for PROMIS® pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values

INTRODUCTION

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS^®) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB), Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APSRA), and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SSRA), as compared to US reference values.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A panel completed full PROMIS-PF (n=1310), PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB (n=1052), and PROMIS-APSRA and PROMIS-SSRA (n=1002) item banks and reported their level of health per domain (no, mild, moderate, severe limitations). T-scores were calculated by sample and subgroups (age, gender, self-reported level of domain). Distribution-based and anchor-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were determined.

RESULTS

Mean T-scores were close to the US mean of 50 for PROMIS-PF (49.8) and PROMIS-APSRA (50.6), lower for PROMIS-SSRA (47.5) and higher for PROMIS-PI (54.9) and PROMIS-PB (52.0). Distribution-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were comparable to US recommended cut-off values (except for PROMIS-PI) but participants reported limitations 'earlier' than suggested thresholds.

CONCLUSION

Dutch reference values were close to US reference values for some PROMIS domains but not all. We recommend country-specific reference values to facilitate worldwide PROMIS use.KEY MESSAGESPROMIS offers universally applicable IRT-based efficient and patient-friendly measures to assess commonly relevant patient-reported outcomes across medical conditions.To support the use of PROMIS in daily clinical practice and research across the world, country-specific general population reference values should be obtained.More research is necessary to obtain reliable and valid cut-off values for what constitutes mild, moderate and severe scores from the patients' perspective.

Contemporary Review: An Overview of the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has favorable psychometric and administrative properties in orthopaedic clinical research. It facilitates clinically meaningful data collection while minimizing administration time and survey fatigue and improving compliance. PROMIS is a critical component of patient-centered care and shared decision making, as it provides enhanced communication and engagement between patients and providers. As a validated instrument, it may also aid in measuring value-based health care quality. The goal of the current work is to provide an overview of PROMIS metrics used in orthopaedic foot and ankle, including advantages and disadvantages compared to legacy scales and PROMIS's applicability in specific foot and ankle conditions based on psychometric properties. We provide a review of the literature regarding the utilization of PROMIS as an outcome measure for specific foot and ankle procedures and conditions.

One- and Two-Year Analysis of a Five-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Assessing Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Triplanar First Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis With Early Weightbearing for Symptomatic Hallux Valgus

We report one- and 2-year results of a prospective, 5-year, multicenter study of radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes following triplanar first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis with early weightbearing. One-hundred and seventeen patients were included with a mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) follow-up time of 16.6 (15.5, 17.7) months. Mean (95% CI) time to weightbearing in a boot walker was 7.8 (6.6, 9.1) days, mean time to return to athletic shoes was 45.0 (43.5, 46.6) days, and mean time to return to unrestricted activity was 121.0 (114.5, 127.5) days. There was a significant improvement in radiographic measures with a mean corrective change of -18.0° (-19.6, -16.4) for hallux valgus angle, -8.3° (-8.9, -7.8) for intermetatarsal angle and -2.9 (-3.2, -2.7) for tibial sesamoid position at 12 months (n = 108). Additionally, there was a significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes (Visual Analog Scale, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) and changes were maintained at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. There was 1/117 (0.9%) reported recurrence of hallux valgus at 12 months. There were 16/117 (13.7%) subjects who experienced clinical complications of which 10/117 (8.5%) were related to hardware. Of the 7/117 (6.0%) who underwent reoperation, only 1/117 (0.9%) underwent surgery for a nonunion. The results of the interim report of this prospective, multicenter study demonstrate favorable clinical and radiographic improvement of the HV deformity, early return to weightbearing, low recurrence, and low rate of complications.

The influence of concomitant hammertoe correction on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hallux valgus correction

BACKGROUND

Patients with hallux valgus often develop secondary hammertoe deformities of the lesser toes. Operative management of bunions with hammertoe can be more extensive; however, it is unclear whether this affects patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative patient-reported outcome measures and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent isolated bunion correction and patients who underwent simultaneous bunion and hammertoe correction.

METHODS

Preoperative, postoperative, and change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were compared between patients who underwent isolated hallux valgus correction and those who underwent concomitant hammertoe correction. Radiographic measures including hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal-articular angle (DMAA), and Meary's angle were also compared. Targeted minimum-loss estimation (TMLE) was used for statistical analysis to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 221 feet (134 isolated bunion correction, 87 concomitant hammertoe correction) with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included in this study. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in the physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and global physical health PROMIS domains (all p < 0.001). However, patients in the concomitant hammertoe cohort had significantly less improvements in pain interference and pain intensity (p < 0.01, p < 0.05 respectively). The concomitant hammertoe cohort also had significantly higher postoperative pain interference scores than the isolated bunion cohort (p < 0.01). Radiographic outcomes did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

While both isolated bunion correction and concomitant hammertoe correction yielded clinically significant improvements in patient reported outcomes and normalized radiographic parameters, patients undergoing simultaneous bunion and hammertoe correction experienced substantially less improvement in postoperative pain-related outcomes than those who underwent isolated bunion correction.

Do Patient Personality Traits and Self-Reported Physical and Psychosocial Symptoms Help to Predict Hallux Valgus Surgery Outcomes?

As many as 10% of patients remain unsatisfied after hallux valgus surgery. We explored the effects of patient personality traits and other preoperative patient characteristics on patient-reported outcomes following surgery. Eighty consecutive adult patients (mean age 45 ± 14 years, 91% female [73/80]) undergoing scarf bunionectomy at our practice were prospectively enrolled from January 2016 to January 2017 and followed for 12 months. Predictor variables included preoperative physical and psychosocial complaints (determined via Brief Battery for Health Improvement-2 questionnaire), patient aggression level, and personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness). Primary outcome measures included the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) with its 5 subscales, and patient satisfaction. Multiple multivariable regression models were used to determine preoperative patient characteristics associated with FAOS outcome and satisfaction at 12 months. Seventy subjects (70/80, 87.5%) completed the study. All patients experienced technically successful surgery. In the multivariable regression analyses, none of the combinations of potentially important predictor variables explained more than 19.8% of the variance in any of the 5 FAOS subscales at 12 months (range: 6.1%-19.8%). Furthermore, no predictor was associated with patient satisfaction in either the univariate or multivariable analyses. We conclude that patient personality traits, aggression level, and self-reported physical and psychological symptoms do very little to predict outcomes in hallux valgus surgery. As healthcare delivery in the United States has increasingly prioritized patient satisfaction, we will need to broaden the quest for predictors associated with our best (and worst) patient-reported outcomes after hallux valgus surgery.

Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores and Postoperative Outcomes in Hallux Rigidus Patients Undergoing Cheilectomy

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that preoperative patient-reported outcome measures are associated with postoperative outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, and also in specific procedures such as bunionectomy, flatfoot reconstruction, and total ankle replacement. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression scores were associated with the ability of patients undergoing cheilectomy for hallux rigidus to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of improvement.

METHODS

This retrospective study included preoperative and ≥2-year postoperative PROMIS physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression scores for 125 feet in 118 patients undergoing cheilectomy collected from an institutional review board (IRB)-approved foot and ankle registry database. MCIDs were established using distribution-based methods to determine clinical significance of improvements in PROMIS scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve analyses were used to determine which preoperative PROMIS scores were associated with patients meeting the MCID.

RESULTS

ROC analysis found statistically significant areas under the curve (AUCs) for the physical function domain (AUC 0.71), pain intensity (AUC 0.70), and depression (AUC 0.79) PROMIS domains. Subsequent analyses were unable to identify clinically useful 95% sensitivity and specificity preoperative thresholds, with the exception of the 95% sensitivity PROMIS physical function threshold. A preoperative physical function score of greater than 53.2 resulted in a 63% probability of achieving the MCID. The pain interference PROMIS domain did not demonstrate a statistically significant AUC.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PROMIS physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression scores are minimally associated with preoperative to 2-year postoperative improvement in patients undergoing cheilectomy. It may be difficult to determine which patients improve from a cheilectomy based on the severity of symptoms they exhibit preoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Correction of hallux abducto valgus by scarf osteotomy. A ten-year retrospective multicentre review of patient reported outcomes shows high satisfaction rates with podiatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Corrective surgery for hallux abducto valgus is one of the most performed elective procedures in foot and ankle practice. Numerous methods of surgical correction have been reported within the literature, with varying clinical and patient reported outcomes. This study reviews the patient experience and outcomes in five podiatric surgery centres using the scarf diaphyseal osteotomy.

METHOD

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were captured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire 10 (PSQ-10), part of the PASCOM-10 podiatric surgery audit tool. PROMs were collated across five hospital sites over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

Of 1351 patients reported during the period, 1189 had complete retrospective data. The most common patient aim of surgery was 'no/less pain' reported in 70% of patients. 96.8% of patients reported their original foot complaint as 'better' or 'much better' after surgery. 92.8% of patients reported their expectations had been met with 96.6% reporting they would have surgery again under the same conditions. 98.5% of patients noted that the risks, complications, and expectations had been discussed prior to surgery. The most common complication was metatarsal fracture (4.6%).

CONCLUSION

The scarf osteotomy (with or without an Akin phalangeal osteotomy) consistently showed high patient satisfaction with low complication rates using PSQ-10 and this information can be used as part of the pre-operative consenting process. Patient expectations for surgery were often achieved, which may be attributed to the pre-operative work up of the patient. Further investigation into this correlation is suggested.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective review).

Preoperative Expectations Versus Reality: A Patient Experience Study Following Scarf Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Correction

The relationship between managing patient expectations and postoperative functional outcomes has been studied widely in other areas of orthopedics, but there is a paucity of information in the foot and ankle literature. The primary objective of the study was to identify the most common patient "expectations" from hallux valgus surgery and establish over what time period postsurgery they would meet those goals. A prospective study of 45 consecutive patients was performed at a single center. This included adult patients (>18 years old) that underwent a scarf osteotomy for primary hallux valgus correction. Patients were followed up for 6 months and completed pre- and postoperative Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scale scores. A separate "expectations" questionnaire was designed and completed assessing the patient's preoperative rehabilitation expectations compared to the actual time taken to achieve those goals. These included 5 domains: pain improvement, return to walking unaided, return to normal foot sensation, return to normal footwear, and return to driving. The postoperative functional scores demonstrated statistically significant improvement postsurgery (p < .001). It also highlighted the overall time frame over which the above expectations were met. On average, patients achieved satisfactory pain improvements 1.4 weeks earlier than expected (p < .001) along with trends toward an earlier return to driving function of patient expectation (p < .05). Patients can thus be reliably informed that their pain symptoms are likely to settle within one month of surgery. This should allow patients to prepare for their rehabilitation more informed, thus facilitating earlier weightbearing and return to function.

The Impact of Hospitalization for Diabetic Foot Infection on Health-Related Quality of Life: Utilizing PROMIS

Diabetic foot infections (DFI) are an increasingly common cause of hospitalizations. Once hospitalized with DFI, many patients require some level of amputation, often undergoing multiple operations. With increasing importance on patient-centered metrics, self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) tools have been developed. This prospective cohort study aimed assessed the impact of DFI on HRQOL. Two hundred twenty-four patients completed the 29-item Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) survey. Secondary outcomes using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measures survey were obtained and included in the analysis. The study group was comprised of hospitalized patients with DFIs (n = 120), and the control group was comprised of patients with diabetes who were evaluated for routine outpatient foot care (n = 104); diabetic foot screening, wound care, onychomycosis, and/or callosities. Using this cohort, a propensity score-matched sample of hospitalized patients with DFI (n = 35) and control group patients (n = 35) was created for comparative analysis. The 2-independent sample t test was used to test for group differences on each of the PROMIS subscale outcomes. Using PROMIS, we found that hospitalized patients with DFI reported significantly worse HRQOL in 6 of 7 subscales (physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, social role, pain intensity; p value range: .0001-.02) compared to outpatients with diabetes evaluated for routine foot care. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups on sleep disturbance (p = .22). Patients hospitalized for DFI report lower HRQOL compared to patients with diabetes receiving routine outpatient foot care.

Association of First Metatarsal Pronation Correction With Patient-Reported Outcomes and Recurrence Rates in Hallux Valgus

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine if a postoperative decrease in first metatarsal pronation on 3-dimensional imaging was associated with changes in patient-reported outcomes as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function, pain interference, and pain intensity domains or recurrence rates in patients with hallux valgus (HV) who undergo a first tarsometatarsal fusion (modified Lapidus procedure).

METHODS

Thirty-nine consecutive HV patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent a modified Lapidus procedure had preoperative and ≥2-year postoperative PROMIS scores and had first metatarsal pronation measured on preoperative and at least 5-month postoperative weightbearing CT scans were included. Multivariable regression analyses were used to investigate differences in the change in PROMIS domains preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively between patients with "no change/increased first metatarsal pronation" and "decreased first metatarsal pronation." A log-binomial regression analysis was performed to identify if a decrease in first metatarsal pronation was associated with recurrence of the HV deformity.

RESULTS

The decreased first metatarsal pronation group had a significantly greater improvement in the PROMIS physical function scale by 7.2 points (P = .007) compared with the no change/increased first metatarsal pronation group. Recurrence rates were significantly lower in the decreased first metatarsal pronation group when compared to the no change/increased first metatarsal pronation group (risk ratio 0.25, P = .025).

CONCLUSION

Detailed review of this limited cohort of patients who underwent a modified Lapidus procedure suggests that the rotational component of the HV deformity may play an important role in outcomes and recurrence rates following the modified Lapidus procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Modified Lapidus vs Scarf Osteotomy Outcomes for Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity

BACKGROUND

The Lapidus procedure and scarf osteotomy are indicated for the operative treatment of hallux valgus; however, no prior studies have compared outcomes between the procedures. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients with symptomatic hallux valgus treated with the modified Lapidus procedure versus scarf osteotomy.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients treated by 1 of 7 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons. Inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years, primary modified Lapidus procedure or scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus, minimum 1-year postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, and minimum 3-month postoperative radiographs. Revision cases were excluded. Clinical outcomes were assessed using 6 PROMIS domains. Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters were measured on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral weightbearing radiographs. Statistical analysis utilized targeted minimum-loss estimation (TMLE) to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients (73 Lapidus, 63 scarf) with an average of 17.8 months of follow-up were included in this study. There was significant improvement in PROMIS physical function scores in the modified Lapidus (mean change, 5.25; P < .01) and scarf osteotomy (mean change, 5.50; P < .01) cohorts, with no significant differences between the 2 groups (P = .85). After controlling for bunion severity, the probability of having a normal postoperative intermetatarsal angle (IMA; <9 degrees) was 25% lower (P = .04) with the scarf osteotomy compared with the Lapidus procedure.

CONCLUSION

Although the modified Lapidus procedure led to a higher probability of achieving a normal IMA, both procedures yielded similar improvements in 1-year patient-reported outcome measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort.

Forecasting Posttreatment Outcome of Hallux Valgus Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in operative techniques and the extraordinary number of procedures described for correcting hallux valgus (HV), there is still uncertainty as to why some patients thrive postoperatively whereas others do not. This study aimed to investigate whether the postoperative outcome of HV surgery could be predicted from patient demographics or functional impairment at the time of referral.

METHODS

The prospectively collected data, from 92 patients, were analyzed to determine whether patient demographics significantly influenced outcome 52 weeks after surgery. Potential relationships between socioeconomic deprivation and the outcome, as well as between preoperative functional impairment and postoperative improvement, were examined. The Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) were used in this evaluation.

RESULTS

None of the demographics studied were found to be statistically significant determinants of outcome. Preoperative MOXFQ scores for patients from the most deprived areas were significantly worse at the time of referral. Patients living in the least deprived postcodes experienced the lowest improvement in MOXFQ scores. Patients from the most deprived SIMD quintile achieved significantly higher improvement in MOXFQ-walking and standing compared to those from the least deprived quintile. A strong positive correlation was found between the preoperative MOXFQ scores and the improvement in the scores postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

In this patient cohort, demographics could not be used to predict the postoperative outcome at week 52. Socioeconomic disparities seem to influence the timing of patients seeking surgery. Lower preoperative MOXFQ scores strongly correlate with a lesser degree of postoperative improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective study with prospective arm.

Preoperative PROMIS Physical Function Scores Predict Postoperative Outcomes Following Total Ankle Replacement

BACKGROUND

Despite good evidence that supports significant improvements in pain and physical function following a total ankle replacement (TAR) for end-stage ankle arthritis, there is a subset of patients who do not significantly benefit from surgery. The purpose of this study was to perform a preliminary analysis to determine if preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores could be used to predict which patients were at risk of not meaningfully improving following a TAR.

METHODS

Prospectively collected preoperative and ≥2-year postoperative PROMIS physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression scores for 111 feet in 105 patients were included in the study. Significant postoperative improvement was defined using minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Logistic regression models and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to determine whether preoperative PROMIS scores were predictive of postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curves found statistically significant AUCs for the PROMIS physical function (AUC = 0.728, P = .004), pain intensity (AUC = 0.720, P = .018), and depression (AUC = 0.761, P < .001) domains. The preoperative PROMIS pain interference domain did not achieve a statistically significant AUC.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PROMIS physical function and pain intensity t scores may be used to predict postoperative improvement in patients following a fixed-bearing TAR; however, preoperative PROMIS pain interference scores were not good predictors. The results of this study may be used to guide research regarding patient-reported outcomes following TAR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

First Metatarsal Rotation in Hallux Valgus Deformity

Rotation of the first metatarsal (M1) as a potential etiological factor of hallux valgus (HV) deformity was described relatively early in the description of HV pathoanatomy. However, because biplanar radiographs have been the standard method for imaging HV, clinicians primarily developed measurement methods and corrective operations confined to 2 dimensions, medial-lateral and inferior-superior. Recently, as our understanding of HV pathoanatomy has further developed, aided in part by advanced imaging technology, M1 rotation about its axis ("axial rotation") and its implications for HV deformity and treatment has reemerged. The goal of this review is to summarize M1 rotation in HV from a historical perspective, to present the current understanding of its potential role in the etiology/pathogenesis of HV, and to summarize relevant imaging and operative considerations with respect to M1 rotation.Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review.

Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Relationship With Postoperative Outcomes in Flexible Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that procedure-specific thresholds using preoperative patient-reported outcome scores may be used to predict postoperative outcomes. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) thresholds could be used to predict which patients would clinically improve at 2 years postoperatively following reconstruction of their flexible adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD).

METHODS

PROMIS physical function, pain interference, and depression scores were prospectively collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively for 75 feet with flexible AAFD. Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were calculated to establish significant postoperative improvement. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve analyses were employed to determine whether preoperative PROMIS scores could be used to predict postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The PROMIS physical function receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve = 0.913, P < .001) found that a preoperative PROMIS physical function score greater than 45.7 resulted in a 14.3% probability of achieving the MCID, whereas a preoperative score of less than 40.8 had a 97.7% probability of achieving the MCID. A preoperative PROMIS pain interference score (area under the curve = 0.799, P < .001) less than 54.1 had only a 23.1% probability of achieving the MCID at 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative PROMIS physical function and pain interference scores could be used to predict postoperative improvement in patients with flexible AAFD. These results may help surgeons counsel patients regarding the anticipated benefit of surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Distal Metatarsal Segmental Shortening for the Treatment of Chronic Metatarsophalangeal Dislocation of Lesser Toes

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to describe the techniques and results of distal metatarsal segmental shortening (DMSS) for the treatment of chronic irreducible metatarsophalangeal (MTP) dislocation of lesser toes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent DMSS for chronic dislocation of MTP joints of lesser toes between January 2010 and December 2017 with follow-up of at least 24 months. Demographic data, radiographic measurements, functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Furthermore, the results of patients with short segment of shortening (group I, <10 mm) were compared to those with long segment of shortening (group II, ≥10 mm). A total of 43 MTP joints of 30 patients with an average age of 70.4 years were included.

RESULTS

Union was observed in 42 metatarsals (97.7%). Mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scale scores improved significantly from 42.2 (range, 15-65) preoperatively to 79.1 (range, 52-90) (P < .001). Mean visual analog scale pain score improved significantly from 5.0 (range, 1-9) preoperatively to 1.8 (range, 0-6) (P < .001). Complications included 1 nonunion, 1 osteonecrosis, 3 metatarsal angulation, 4 recurrent instability, 4 symptomatic osteoarthritis, 3 transfer metatarsalgia, and 1 floating toe. Group I included 23 MTP joints and group II included 20 MTP joints. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes and complications between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

DMSS was a reliable procedure for the treatment of chronic irreducible dislocated MTP joint of lesser toes. It provided satisfactory surgical outcomes and a low rate of postoperative complications, regardless of length of metatarsal shortening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Meaningful Clinical Applications of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedics

»

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) comprise valuable data, when combined with traditional clinical information, for patient-centered health outcome assessment.

»

While PROMs form the foundation of orthopaedic clinical research, they are invaluable tools for clinical care.

»

PROMs play a critical role in shared decision-making with patients, as they are quantitative measures of patient health (function, pain, and satisfaction).

»

PROMs should be incorporated into routine postoperative care for effective clinical monitoring and understanding of the response to surgery.

»

PROMs can be additionally utilized for meaningful clinical research, predictive analytics, and value-based care delivery pathways.

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Hallux Valgus and Metatarsus Adductus Treated With a Modified Lapidus Procedure

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found an increased rate of deformity recurrence in hallux valgus (HV) patients with concomitant metatarsus adductus (MA) undergoing metatarsal osteotomies. The purpose of this paper was to determine if there were radiographic or clinical outcome differences between HV patients with and without MA undergoing a modified Lapidus procedure.

METHODS

One hundred forty-seven feet that underwent a modified Lapidus procedure for HV were divided into 2 groups based on their preoperative modified Sgarlato's angle: (1) the MA group had an angle ≥20 degrees and (2) the HV-only group had an angle <20 degrees. HV angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were measured on preoperative and ≥5-month postoperative weightbearing radiographs. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) scores were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients in the MA group had a significantly higher mean postoperative HVA (10.8 vs 7.5 degrees; P = .038). There was a trend toward higher PROMIS PI scores in the MA group at 1 year postoperatively (51.9 vs 47.6; P = .088). Patients in the MA group were more likely to have a revision surgery (7.3% vs 0%; P = .021), and there was a trend toward those patients having a higher recurrence rate (17.1% vs 6.6%; P = .064).

CONCLUSION

Despite potentially worse postoperative outcomes in patients with HV and MA who undergo a modified Lapidus procedure, the recurrence rates reported here are lower than those reported in the literature for patients with MA undergoing metatarsal osteotomies, indicating that a modified Lapidus procedure may be an acceptable choice in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.