Operative Results of Plantar Plating for Fifth Metatarsal Stress Fracture

Intramedullary Screw versus Locking Plate Fixation for Traumatic Displaced Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Intramedullary screw fixation (IMS) and locking plate fixation (LPF) are currently recommended treatments for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures (PFMF). However, treating comminuted or small displaced avulsion PFMF with IMS poses challenges due to complications. A novel alternative fixation method, the locking compression plate for distal ulna hook plate fixation (LPF), has been introduced recently for distal ulna fractures and has shown improved clinical results. This scoping review aims to assess whether LPF yields superior outcomes, such as postoperative AOFAS scores and rate of postoperative complications, compared to IMS in PFMF treatment. Methods: This review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, or case series involving patients with PFMF who underwent plate fixation or screw fixation. The primary outcome was the postoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Studies were sourced from databases including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, with the search conducted up to February 2024. The Systematic Review protocol was registered in the CRD PROSPERO database (CRD42024532593). Results: Ten studies were included, comprising 3 cohort studies, 1 case-control study, and 6 case series, with a total of 309 patients (158 with LPF and 142 with IMS). The postoperative AOFAS scores showed no significant difference between LPF and IMS in treating PFMF. However, LPF demonstrated efficient surgical procedures and enhanced functional outcomes. Complications were minimal in both groups, with no significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in AOFAS scores between LPF and IMS, LPF demonstrated efficient surgical procedures and enhanced functional outcomes, making it a reasonable alternative method for PFMF. Effective shared decision-making (SDM) with patients becomes paramount in choosing the optimal surgical approach. In the surgical landscape, thoughtful deliberation, patient engagement, and adherence to biomechanical principles are crucial for achieving successful outcomes in the treatment of PFMF.

Jones Fracture in the National Football League

Background: Jones fracture, or proximal fifth metatarsal fracture, is a common injury in National Football League (NFL)-caliber athletes. Combine draft performance can greatly impact the long-term success of these athletes, and substantial emphasis has been placed on early return to play (RTP) and the minimization of post-operative complications after Jones fracture in these athletes. To date, no study has specifically described the treatment and outcomes of this injury specifically in NFL-caliber players, considering factors relevant to this unique population. Thus, the purpose of this review is to delve into Jones fracture in NFL-caliber athletes, evaluating the diagnostic, treatment, and RTP considerations. Methods: We searched Medline (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus (Elsevier), and SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost) for the concept of Jones fractures in the NFL. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a team of three reviewers conducted abstract screenings, full-text screenings, and the extraction of studies describing Jones fractures specifically in the NFL. Results: Of the 1911 studies identified, 6 primary retrospective studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The heterogeneity of the outcome reporting precluded a meta-analysis; thus, a qualitative review of manuscripts describing Jones fracture was carried out. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment considerations, RTP statistics and outcomes, and complications were discussed. Amongst the primary studies, there were 285 Jones fractures, all athletes were able to RTP, and the average time to RTP ranged from 6 weeks to 27 weeks. For complications, with operative treatment, the refracture rate ranged from 4 to 12%, and incomplete healing ranged from 7 to 50%. RTP was 15 weeks for refractures. There were no patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: The vast majority of Zone 2/3 Jones fractures are treated with IM screw fixation with or without adjunctive orthobiologics, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate, in NFL-caliber athletes. The six major series investigating outcomes after the operative treatment of Jones fractures in NFL players reveal very positive findings overall with regard to RTP, reoperation, and career continuation.

Return to sport following low-risk and high-risk bone stress injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Bone stress injuries (BSIs) are classified in clinical practice as being at low- or high-risk for complication based on the injury location. However, this dichotomous approach has not been sufficiently validated. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the prognostic role of injury location on return-to-sport (RTS) and treatment complications after BSI of the lower extremity and pelvis.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases were searched from database inception to December 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Peer-reviewed studies that reported site-specific RTS of BSIs in athletes.

RESULTS

Seventy-six studies reporting on 2974 BSIs were included. Sixteen studies compared multiple injury sites, and most of these studies (n=11) described the anatomical site of injury as being prognostic for RTS or the rate of treatment complication. Pooled data revealed the longest time to RTS for BSIs of the tarsal navicular (127 days; 95% CI 102 to 151 days) and femoral neck (107 days; 95% CI 79 to 135 days) and shortest duration of time for BSIs of the posteromedial tibial shaft (44 days, 95% CI 27 to 61 days) and fibula (56 days; 95% CI 13 to 100 days). Overall, more than 90% of athletes successfully returned to sport. Treatment complication rate was highest in BSIs of the femoral neck, tarsal navicular, anterior tibial shaft and fifth metatarsal; and lowest in the fibula, pubic bone and posteromedial tibial shaft.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review supports that the anatomical site of BSIs influences RTS timelines and the risk of complication. BSIs of the femoral neck, anterior tibial shaft and tarsal navicular are associated with increased rates of complications and more challenging RTS.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021232351.

Surgical Management of Jones Fractures in Athletes: Orthobiologic Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 718 Fractures

BACKGROUND

The use of orthobiologics is expanding. However, the use of orthobiologic augmentation in primary fracture fixation surgery remains limited. Primary fracture fixation of the fifth metatarsal (Jones) in athletes is one of the rare situations where primary orthobiologic augmentation has been advocated.

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of orthobiologic augmentation on the outcome of surgically managed Jones fractures in athletes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 2 independent team members searched several databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through March 2021 to identify studies reporting on surgically managed Jones fractures of the fifth metatarsal exclusively in athletes. The primary outcomes were the return to play (RTP) rate and time to RTP, whereas the secondary outcomes were time to union, union rate, and refractures. Data were presented by type of treatment (biologically augmented fixation or fixation alone).

RESULTS

In the biologically augmented fixation group, successful RTP was reported in 195 (98.98%) of 197 fractures (odds ratio [OR], 97.5%; 95% CI, 95.8%-100%; I² = 0), with a mean time to RTP of 10.3 weeks (95% CI, 9.5-11.1 weeks; I² = 99%). In the group that received fixation without biological augmentation, successful RTP was reported in 516 (99.04%) of 521 fractures (OR, 98.7%; 95% CI, 97.8%-99.7%; I² = 0], with a mean time to RTP of 9.7 weeks (95% CI, 7.84-11.53 weeks; I² = 98.64%]. In the biologically augmented fixation group, fracture union was achieved in 194 (98.48%) of 197 fractures (OR, 97.6%; 95% CI, 95.5%-99.7%; I² = 0%), with a mean time to fracture union of 9.28 weeks (95% CI, 7.23-11.34 weeks; I² = 98.18%). In the group that received fixation without biological augmentation, fracture union was achieved in 407 (93.78%) of 434 fractures (OR, 97.4%; 95% CI, 96%-98.9%; I² = 0%), with a mean time to fracture union of 8.57 weeks (95% CI, 6.82-10.32 weeks; I² = 98.81%).

CONCLUSION

Orthobiologically augmented surgical fixation of Jones fractures in athletes is becoming increasingly common, despite the lack of comparative studies to support this practice. Biologically augmented fixation of Jones fractures results in higher fracture union rates than fixation alone but similar rates of RTP and time to RTP. Although the current evidence recommends primary surgical fixation for the management of Jones fractures in athletes, further high quality comparative studies are required to establish the indication for orthobiologic augmentation.

Fifth Metatarsal Jones Fractures: Diagnosis and Treatment

A Jones fracture, located at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the fifth metatarsal, is at an increased risk for nonunion and continued pain. Even with excellent surgical technique and postoperative management, a delayed union and refracture can occur. These complications in athletes can have deleterious effects on performance and delay return to sport. This article reviews the classification, diagnosis, and treatment considerations for Jones fractures. Treatment options including nonsurgical management, intramedullary screw, and plate fixation will be covered. The authors preferred technique using intramedullary screw fixation will be discussed in depth. Emerging considerations including biologic augmentation, primary bone grafting, and refracture will be examined as well. Ideal rehabilitation protocols, orthoses, and shoe wear suggestions will be given to optimize patient outcomes.

The Effectiveness of Intramedullary Screw Fixation Using the Herbert Screw for Fifth Metatarsal Stress Fractures in High-Level Athletes

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary screw fixation is the most common operative procedure used for treatment of fifth metatarsal stress fractures in athletes. However, the optimal implant in intramedullary screw fixation is still being investigated.

PURPOSE

To review experiences with intramedullary screw fixation using the Herbert screw for fifth metatarsal stress fractures in high-level athletes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed 37 high-level athletes (Tegner activity score ≥7) who underwent intramedullary screw fixation using the Herbert screw for fifth metatarsal stress fractures between August 2005 and August 2017. The minimum follow-up period of the patients was 2 years. In assessing the surgical results, time to obtain bone union, time to return to original level of sport participation, and treatment failures/complications were reviewed. Additionally, the effect of intraoperative plantar gap widening caused by the screw insertion was analyzed. The surgical results of the 2 groups, the no-gap group (intraoperative plantar gap widening, <1 mm) and the gap group (intraoperative plantar gap widening, ≥1 mm), were compared, while correlations between intraoperative plantar gap widening and the surgical results were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Bone union and return to the original sport were attained in all patients without treatment failures/complications such as delayed union, nonunion, or refracture. The mean time to obtain bone union was 10.1 weeks, and the mean time to return to sport was 10.9 weeks. In comparing the no-gap group (n = 16) and the gap group (n = 21), no significant differences in the time to obtain bone union (P = .392) or to return to sport (P = .399) were noted. Additionally, there was no correlation between intraoperative plantar gap widening and the time to obtain bone union (r = 0.131; P = .428) or to return to sport (r = 0.160; P = .331).

CONCLUSION

The use of the Herbert screw for intramedullary screw fixation to treat fifth metatarsal stress fractures in high-level athletes provided satisfactory results enabling all the athletes to return to the original sport without treatment failures/complications. Additionally, intraoperative plantar gap widening does not affect the surgical results using this technique.

Fractures of the Base of the Fifth Metatarsal Bone: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal (PFMT) are one of the most common foot injuries, accounting for 61% to 78% of all foot fractures, but full consensus on their classification, diagnosis, and treatment has not yet been reached.

»

The most commonly accepted classification is that of Lawrence and Botte, who divided the location of PFMT fractures into 3 zones with respect to their healing potential.

»

Avulsion fractures of the tuberosity of the base (zone 1) generally heal well, and nonoperative treatment is commonly recommended.

»

Internal fixation may be considered for displaced fractures that extend into the fourth-fifth intermetatarsal joint (zone 2) as well as for nondisplaced fractures in athletes or high-demand patients, with the aims of reducing the healing time and expediting return to sport or work.

»

Stress fractures of the proximal diaphysis (zone 3) are preferably treated operatively, particularly in the presence of signs of delayed union. With nonoperative treatment, supportive measures such as ultrasonography or external/extracorporeal shockwave therapy have been demonstrated to have limited potential for the enhancement of fracture-healing.

Surgical Management of Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Elite Athletes: A Systematic Review

Background

As a result of the high physical demand in sport, elite athletes are particularly prone to fifth metatarsal fractures. These injuries are typically managed surgically to avoid high rates of delayed union and allow for quicker return to play (RTP).

Purpose

To review studies showing clinical and radiographic outcomes, RTP rates, and complication rates after different surgical treatment modalities for fifth metatarsal fractures exclusively in elite-level athletes.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted within the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from January 2000 to January 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of clinical outcome studies after operative management of fifth metatarsal fractures in elite athletes. Exclusion criteria consisted of nonoperative management, high school or recreational-level athletic participation, nonclinical studies, expert opinions, and case series with <5 patients.

Results

A total of 12 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria, comprising 280 fifth metatarsal fractures treated surgically. Intramedullary screw fixation was the most common fixation construct (47.9%), and some form of intraoperative adjunctive treatment (calcaneal autograft, iliac crest bone graft, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, demineralized bone matrix) was used in 67% of cases. Radiographic union was achieved in 96.7% of fractures regardless of surgical construct used. The overall mean time to union was 9.19 weeks, with RTP at a mean of 11.15 weeks. The overall reported complication rate was 22.5%, with varying severity of complications. Refracture rates were comparable between the different surgical constructs used, and the overall refracture rate was 8.6%.

Conclusion

Elite athletes appeared to have a high rate of union and reliably returned to the same level of competition after surgical management of fifth metatarsal fractures, irrespective of surgical construct used. Despite this, the overall complication rate was >20%. Specific recommendations for optimal surgical management could not be made based on the heterogeneity of the included studies.

Jones type fifth metatarsal fracture fixation in athletes: A review and current concept

Jones type fifth metatarsal fracture is a common occurrence among athletes at all levels. These fractures may occur due to several mechanisms, but inversions and twisting injuries are considered some of the leading causes in sports. However, while Jones fracture incidences are frequent in the sporting world, there is still a lack of consensus on how such fractures should be effectively managed. There are numerous treatment options for patients with fifth metatarsal Jones fractures. The role of nonoperative treatment remains controversial, with concerns about delayed union and nonunion. Surgical stabilization of metatarsal Jones fractures is therefore often recommended for athletes, as it is often associated with a low number of complications and a higher rate of union than nonoperative management. This review will focus on literature regarding the prevalence of Jones type fifth metatarsal fracture, alongside the efficacy of both conservative and surgical treatment within this population.

Percutaneous Fixation of a Fifth Metatarsal Base Fracture

Owing to a vascular watershed, zone II and III fifth metatarsal base fractures commonly progress to nonunion without operative intervention. This article and the accompanying video demonstrate the use of intramedullary screw fixation for a fifth metatarsal base fracture and review treatment decisions involved with management of these injuries.

Jones Fracture Management in Athletes

Jones fractures in both elite and recreational athletes are best treated with surgical fixation, given superior results as compared to nonoperative management. While screw specifics remain controversial, intramedullary screw fixation is established as the standard surgical technique. Plate fixation also has shown excellent outcomes. Complications of refracture, nonunion, and delayed union require careful evaluation for contributions of early return to play, implant characteristics, and anatomic/metabolic abnormality. Revision fixation with autograft and biologic augmentation is supported in the literature, with ongoing inquiry to optimizing specific implants and adjuvants.