Patient Characteristics of Possible Responders and Nonresponders to Total Ankle Arthroplasty

The impact of pre-operative mental health on outcomes of foot and ankle surgery: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that certain groups of orthopaedic patients have an increased prevalence of mental health disorders than the general population. This scoping review aims to evaluate the effect of pre-operative mental health on outcomes of foot and ankle surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in four databases. Studies investigating a relationship between preoperative mental health and postoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, readmissions or reoperations were included.

RESULTS

Of the 19 studies investigating the effect of preoperative mental health on PROMs, 16 (84.2%) reported a significant relationship between poorer preoperative mental health and inferior postoperative PROMs. Poorer mental health was associated with an increased rate of complications, readmissions and/or reoperations in four studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Poorer preoperative mental health is associated with significantly inferior outcomes following foot and ankle surgery. Clinicians should evaluate mental health to stratify likely outcomes and aid in the management of patient expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Scoping review of Level II-IV studies.

Clinical Outcomes and Registry Data in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an effective treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis consistently demonstrating good to excellent outcomes, even when considering factors such as deformity, patient age, bilaterality, and arthritis etiology. There is little consensus in the literature with regard to preferred patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) for assessing outcomes, although all metrics generally improve following TAA. Several countries have successful registries to track longevity of TAA in populations; however, PROMs are generally not successfully tracked in registries. A trend toward consensus on outcome metrics and collaborative registries is warranted to optimize patient selection and outcomes in TAA.

Obesity and Ankle Prosthesis Revision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The increasing number of total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) has led to growing evidence on the risk factors for complications after surgery. However, the role of obesity in this patient group has been the subject of much debate. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to investigate the evidence for untoward effects of obesity following TAA.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search on April 28, 2023, in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and CENTRAL. Eligible observational studies reported on the short- and long-term outcomes of primary TAA, comparing patients with and without obesity (defined as body mass index > 30). Using a random effects model, we calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from 2 by 2 tables (event and nonevent in the obese and nonobese primary TAA groups).

RESULTS

Nine studies with 10 388 patients were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. We found significantly higher odds of revision in the obese group compared to the nonobese group (OR = 1.68, CI: 1.44-1.95). However, the odds of overall perioperative complications (OR = 1.55, CI: 0.50-4.80) and wound complications (OR = 1.34, CI: 0.29-6.20) were nonsignificantly higher in the obese group.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, obesity may have affected long-term outcomes following TAA and may have negatively affected the prosthesis's survival.

Preoperative PROMIS Physical Function Scores Predict Postoperative Outcomes Following Total Ankle Replacement

BACKGROUND

Despite good evidence that supports significant improvements in pain and physical function following a total ankle replacement (TAR) for end-stage ankle arthritis, there is a subset of patients who do not significantly benefit from surgery. The purpose of this study was to perform a preliminary analysis to determine if preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores could be used to predict which patients were at risk of not meaningfully improving following a TAR.

METHODS

Prospectively collected preoperative and ≥2-year postoperative PROMIS physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression scores for 111 feet in 105 patients were included in the study. Significant postoperative improvement was defined using minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Logistic regression models and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to determine whether preoperative PROMIS scores were predictive of postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curves found statistically significant AUCs for the PROMIS physical function (AUC = 0.728, P = .004), pain intensity (AUC = 0.720, P = .018), and depression (AUC = 0.761, P < .001) domains. The preoperative PROMIS pain interference domain did not achieve a statistically significant AUC.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PROMIS physical function and pain intensity t scores may be used to predict postoperative improvement in patients following a fixed-bearing TAR; however, preoperative PROMIS pain interference scores were not good predictors. The results of this study may be used to guide research regarding patient-reported outcomes following TAR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.