Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using an Intramedullary-Referencing Implant

A systematic review of outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty with INBONE II

BACKGROUND

This study systematically reviews the literature and reports on outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with the INBONE II fixed-bearing implant.

METHODS

PubMed, SCOPUS and CINAHL were searched for clinical studies reporting INBONE II specific outcomes from database inception through July 13th, 2024, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Seven primary TAA studies and 4 revision TAA studies were included with 406 and 114 patients respectively. Survivorship was 96.5 % (mean follow-up 44.8 months) and 93.9 % (mean follow-up=37.3 months) for primary and revision TAA, respectively. The mean reoperation rate was 11.4 % with a 3.2 % rate of major complications for primary TAA. Meanwhile, the reoperation rate was 9.1 % with a major complication rate of 12.2 % for revision TAA.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary and revision TAA with this implant results in over 93 % survival at mid-term follow-up with an acceptable complication rate, supporting its continued use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Systematic Review of Level I-IV Studies.

Racial Disparities in Outcomes After Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis delved into the impact of race and ethnicity on outcomes following foot and ankle surgery, an area garnering increasing attention within the medical community. Despite significant literature on postsurgical clinical and functional outcomes, limited research has explored the influence of racial and ethnic factors on postoperative outcomes. In this study, data from 33 relevant studies, involving a total of 557,734 patients, were analyzed to assess outcomes across different racial and ethnic groups. Notably, only 6 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the final meta-analysis due to variations in outcome reporting. Findings revealed disparities in functional scores, pain levels, and resource utilization among different racial and ethnic cohorts. Specifically, non-White and minority patients exhibited higher rates of foot and ankle fractures and lower extremity surgeries, worse functional outcomes, increased pain, longer hospital stays, and a greater incidence of complications compared to their White counterparts. However, some studies presented contradictory results, emphasizing the necessity for further investigation to elucidate these discrepancies fully. This research underscores the importance of considering racial and ethnic factors in foot and ankle surgery outcomes and highlights the need for targeted interventions to address existing disparities.

Five-Year Results of the Salto XT Revision Ankle Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The treatment of failed ankle replacements is debated, and little is published about the medium- and long-term results of revision implants. We wanted to examine prosthesis survival and physical function at least 5 years after insertion of the Salto XT revision prosthesis.

METHODS

All consecutive patients operated with a Salto XT revision prosthesis underwent clinical and radiologic examinations preoperatively and after 3, 12, 24, and 60 months. Complications and reoperations are described, and changes in patient-reported outcome measures and clinical scores are reported.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were operated with a Salto XT revision prosthesis between March 2014 and March 2017. Three of these were revised (1 to a fusion and 2 to a new prosthesis), and 3 patients were reoperated with screw removal. A concurrent subtalar fusion was performed on 13 patients, and there was 1 case of likely nonunion after these procedures, but no reoperations. The mean AOFAS score increased from 39.2 (95% CI 30.8-47.5) preoperatively to 75.1 (95% CI 67.3-82.9) after 5 years, and the mean improvement was 34.2 points (95% CI 23.8-44.6). Mean EQ-5D increased from 0.36 (95% CI 0.30-0.42) preoperatively to 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.85) after 5 years, an improvement of 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.49). Radiolucent lines were present in all but 3 patients. Five-year prosthesis survival was 93% (83.6-100).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to present medium-term results of this implant. We found good improvement in outcome scores and good implant survival, but also a high prevalence of radiolucent lines.

Outcomes of Total Ankle Replacement

Total ankle replacement (TAR) is an effective operative treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) in the appropriate patient, conferring improved kinematic function, decreased stress across adjacent joints, and offering equivalent pain relief in comparison to ankle arthrodesis (AA). It is important to consider patient age, weight, coronal tibiotalar deformity, joint line height, and adjacent joint OA to maximize clinical and patient outcomes. Both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing implants have demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes, marked improvement in patient-reported outcomes, and good survivorship; however, implant survivorship decreases with longer term follow-up, necessitating constant improvement of primary and revision TAR options.

Lessons From Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Tibias Fail Earlier, and Taluses Fail Later (and Fail Again)

BACKGROUND

The literature on survivorship and outcomes after revision total ankle replacement (TAR) in the modern era is limited. This study aimed to describe the timing to revision and survivorship after revision TAR. We hypothesized that tibial-sided failures would occur earlier after the primary TAR, and secondary revisions after failure of revision TAR would occur more due to talar-sided failures than tibial-sided failures.

METHODS

This is a single-institution retrospective study of TAR patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Revision TARs (defined as exchange of tibial and/or talar components) for aseptic causes with any implant were included. Etiology of failure necessitating revision and ultimate outcomes after revision (survival of TAR revision, additional revision, conversion to fusion, and below-knee amputation [BKA]) were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 46 revision TARs, with mean age of 60.6 (range: 31-77) years and mean 3.5 years' follow-up postrevision. Revisions for tibial failure occurred significantly earlier (n = 22, 1.3 ± 0.5 years after index procedure) than those for talar failure (n = 19, 2.3 ± 1.7 years after index procedure) or combined tibial-talar failure (n = 5, 3.4 ± 3.4 years after index procedure) (P = .015). Revisions for tibial-only failure had better survival (95.5%) than revisions for talar or combined tibial-talar failures: 26% of talar failures and 20% of combined tibial-talar failures underwent ≥1 revisions. Of the 6 additional revisions after failure of the talar component, 1 ultimately underwent BKA, 2 were converted to total talus replacement, 2 were revised to modular augmented talar components, and 1 was treated with explant and cement spacer for PJI after the revision.

CONCLUSION

TAR tibial failures occurred earlier than talar failures or combined tibial-talar failures. Revisions for talar failures and combined tibial-talar failures were more likely to require additional revision or ultimately fail revision treatment. This is important given the consequences of talar implant subsidence, bone necrosis, loss of bone stock, and limited salvage options.

Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using a Novel Modular Fixed-Bearing Revision Ankle System

INTRODUCTION

Large bone defects such as those encountered after failed total ankle replacement have previously been a relative contraindication to revision ankle replacement due to inadequate bone stock. We describe our experience and patient reported outcomes with a modular ankle replacement system with tibial and talar augments.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series analysis of patients who underwent a total ankle replacement using the INVISION system across 2 centers between 2016 and 2022. Patients completed the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and EQ-5D pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years. Medical records were reviewed for complications and re-operations. X-rays were reviewed for lucencies and alignment.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients were included in the study; 14 men and 3 women with an average age at the time of surgery of 67.9 years (range 56-80 years). The average follow-up post-operatively was 40.5 months (range 7-78) at the time of this study. The indication for surgery was revision of failed total ankle replacement (TAR) in 16 and revision of failed ankle fusion in 1. An augmented tibia was used in 13, an augmented talus in 13, and both augmented tibia and talus in 9 cases. There were no early surgical complications. One patient required debridement and implant retention for late deep infection. No implants have been revised. The average MOXFQ score improved by 19.3 points at most recent follow-up. The average AOS score improved by 25.2 points.

CONCLUSION

The early results of a modular augmented ankle arthroplasty system have shown satisfactory patient outcomes with a low complication and re-operation rate and present another option for patients with larger bone defects. This is a small series, and a larger series with long-term follow-up would be beneficial.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Case series.

Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Young Patients

With continuing advancements in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), it is quickly becoming the procedure of choice for older patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. Multiple studies have been conducted on younger patients who have undergone TAA with promising results, but is it the procedure of choice? Considerations of TAA versus ankle arthrodesis, TAA implant longevity, outcomes of revision TAA, and whether patients should be offered an arthrodesis with plans for conversion to arthroplasty may help elucidate whether pursuing ankle arthroplasty in a younger, more active population is the correct approach for surgeons.

Clinical Outcomes and Registry Data in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an effective treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis consistently demonstrating good to excellent outcomes, even when considering factors such as deformity, patient age, bilaterality, and arthritis etiology. There is little consensus in the literature with regard to preferred patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) for assessing outcomes, although all metrics generally improve following TAA. Several countries have successful registries to track longevity of TAA in populations; however, PROMs are generally not successfully tracked in registries. A trend toward consensus on outcome metrics and collaborative registries is warranted to optimize patient selection and outcomes in TAA.

Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Replacement

The objective of this study is to provide an up-to-date review of the outcomes of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Relevant studies published over the last decade were reviewed. Twelve studies were included. At a median follow-up of 4 years, the median survival and reoperation rates were 86% and 16%, respectively. Significant postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcome measures were recorded in 6 studies. Significant improvement in alignment was documented in 1 study only. Revision TAA is a safe procedure that can produce good outcomes. Nevertheless, data relating to long-term outcome are still limited in quantity and duration.

Lack of Consensus on the Definition of Aseptic Loosening in Total Ankle Replacement: A Narrative Systematic Review

Background: Aseptic loosening is one of the most common modes of failure of total ankle replacement (TAR). However, a precise definition of aseptic loosening is still lacking. This systematic review aimed to identify the variations of applied definitions and offer insights into the lack of consensus. Methods: Human studies reporting aseptic loosening of TAR published in peer-reviewed journals within the last decade were considered. The search strategy involved specific terms in Embase, MEDLINE ALL, and the Cochrane Library. Variations in aseptic loosening definitions were analysed. Results: Of 767 studies, 88 were included in this study. Only nine studies precisely defined aseptic loosening with significant variations. Twenty-two studies referenced the term and fifty-seven reported it as a complication but neither defined nor referenced it. Conclusions: Significant uncertainty exists regarding the universal definition of aseptic loosening of TAR, and many variations occur in terms of the assessment approach and criteria.

Revision of total ankle arthroplasty: Survival and medium-term functional results

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to analyze the results and survivorship of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) revision surgery with standard (Salto Talaris®) or revision (Salto Talaris XT®) implants.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and December 2017, all patients undergoing TAA revision at our hospital were included. Indications for revision, type of surgery performed, improvement in function assessed with the AOFAS score, occurrence of complications and implant survival at last follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the end, 25 TAA patients who had undergone revision (11 unipolar, 14 bipolar) were included. The mean follow-up time was 5.1 ± 1.9 years. At the last follow-up, function was improved compared to the preoperative AOFAS score (51.3 ± 17.5 vs. 83.5 ± 10.1; p < .001), but not plantar flexion (17.5 ± 5.7 vs. 15.4 ± 7.1; p = 0.28) or dorsal flexion (7 ± 5.6 vs. 8.3 ± 4.9; p = 0.3). Complications occurred in six patients (24 %) that led to reoperation: three infections, one lateral impingement, one implant malposition, and one hindfoot alignment disorder. At the last follow-up, implant survival was 96 %, but the probability of survival without reoperation was 78.7 ± 8.5 % at 4 years.

CONCLUSION

TAA revision by arthroplasty is feasible, produces good functional results in the medium term, but has a high risk of complications. The challenge of revision TAA is managing the loss of bone stock and anchoring the new implants.

Survival and risk assessment in revision arthroplasty of the ankle

Aims

Implant failure has become more common as the number of primary total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) performed has increased. Although revision arthroplasty has gained attention for functional preservation, the long-term results remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of revision TAA using a mobile-bearing prosthesis in a considerably large cohort; the risk factors for failure were also determined.

Methods

This single-centre retrospective cohort study included 116 patients (117 ankles) who underwent revision TAA for failed primary TAA between July 2000 and March 2010. Survival analysis and risk factor assessment were performed, and clinical performance and patient satisfaction were evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up.

Results

The mean duration from initial revision TAA to last follow-up was 15.0 years (SD 3.0; 11.2 to 20.5). The cumulative survival rates of the revised ankles were 81% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74% to 88%), 74% (65% to 82%), and 70% (61% to 79%) at five, ten, and 15 years, respectively. Comorbidities prior to primary TAA, aseptic loosening, instability, or grafting of cysts were found to be the most common risk factors for secondary revision. The median value for preoperative pain, as assessed using the visual analogue scale, declined from 6 (interquartile range (IQR) 5 to 8) to 2 (IQR 0 to 5) (p < 0.001) and the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score improved from 43 (SD 17) preoperatively to 70 (SD 20) (p < 0.001) at last follow-up.

Conclusion

Revision TAA offers acceptable survival rates after 15 years; it therefore offers a valuable option for treatment of implant failure in carefully selected cases. Although patient-reported outcomes improve substantially, the degree of improvement reported following primary TAA is not achieved.

Comparison of Radiographic Talar Loosening Rates Between Salto-Talaris and INBONE II

BACKGROUND

Despite substantial increase in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) nationwide, there are few studies comparing flat-cut vs chamfer-cut talar systems in TAA with regard to radiographic aseptic loosening rates of the implant.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 189 Salto-Talaris TAA and 132 INBONE II primary TAA with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patient characteristics were obtained including gender, age at surgery, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, primary diagnosis, surgical time, and the presence of diabetes. Radiographic evidence for aseptic loosening was assessed. Statistical analysis was performed for comparison in outcomes between Salto-Talaris and INBONE II.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 63.5 ± 9.8 years at surgery. Mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 3.0 years. Radiographic aseptic loosening of the tibial implant showed no significant difference between the 2 groups: Salto-Talaris, 18%, and INBONE II, 18.9% (P = .829). Aseptic loosening of the talar implant also showed no significant difference between the 2 groups: Salto-Talaris, 1.6%, and INBONE II, 1.5% (P = .959). No variables, including the implant type, were found to contribute to the aseptic loosening rate of either the tibia or talus.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, we observed no difference in radiographic implant aseptic loosening between Salto-Talaris and INBONE II systems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series study.

Use of Femoral Head Allograft for Extended Bone Loss in Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Case Report

CASE

A 38-year-old male patient presented with severe ankle pain 13 years after a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Radiographic evaluation revealed loosening of the implant and extensive osteolytic lesions. The medial tibial plafond and malleolus were reconstructed using a fresh-frozen femoral head graft, and revision TAA was performed. The midterm results were satisfactory, with adequate integration of the allograft and stable implant components.

CONCLUSION

The use of the allograft technique in revision TAA is feasible in the presence of severe bone loss, including the malleoli, and allows firm component fixation of the reconstructed bone.

How Does a Novel In Situ Fixed-bearing Implant Design Perform in Revision Ankle Arthroplasty in the Short Term? A Survival, Clinical, and Radiologic Analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the growing number of primary total ankle replacements (TAR), an increase in the number of patients undergoing subsequent revisions might be expected. Achieving a stable and balanced ankle while preserving the remaining bone stock as much as possible is crucial for success in revision TAR. Most reported techniques rely on bulky implants with extended fixation features. Since 2018, we have used a novel, three-component ankle prosthesis for revision that is converted in situ to a fixed-bearing, two-component ankle prosthesis once the components have found their position according to an individual's anatomy. The results of this novel concept (fixation, revision, pain, or function) have not, to our knowledge, been reported.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

What are the short-term results with this new revision TAR design, in terms of (1) repeat revision surgery, (2) patient-reported outcomes on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, (3) pain according to the VAS, and (4) radiographic signs of fixation?

METHODS

Between February 2018 and February 2020, we performed 230 TAR surgeries (in 206 patients) for any indication in our clinic. The novel semiconstrained, uncemented Hintermann Series H2 © implant was used in 96% (220 of 230) of procedures (201 patients). Fifty-four percent (119 of 220) of these were converted from an existing TAR to H2, which was the focus of the present study. However, only 45% (54 of 119) of these conversions to H2 were eligible for analysis. These patients had a mean age of 63 ± 12 years, and 43% (23 of 54) were women. The median (range) follow-up time was 3.2 years (2.0 to 4.3). The H2 design allows in situ conversion to a fixed-bearing system, with minimal bone resection. It achieves translational and rotational stability while preserving function and supporting the periarticular soft tissues. We defined repeat revision as exchange of one or both metal components, ankle fusion, or amputation and assessed it using a cumulative incidence survivorship estimator. Factors potentially associated with revision were assessed using Cox regression analyses. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at the most recent follow-up interval. Clinical outcomes included pain on the VAS (average pain during normal daily activity during the past seven days) and AOFAS score. Radiologic outcomes were the tibial articular surface angle, tibiotalar surface angle, talar tilt angle in the coronal plane, and AP offset ratio in the sagittal plane, as well as radiolucent lines and radiographic signs of loosening, defined as change in position greater than 2° of the flat base of the tibia component in relation to the long axis of the tibia, subsidence of the talar component into the talus greater than 5 mm, or change in position greater than 5° relative to a line drawn from the top of the talonavicular joint to the tuberosity of the calcaneus, as seen on plain weightbearing radiographs.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of repeat revision after 1 and 2 years was 5.6% (95% CI 0% to 11%) and 7.4% (95% CI 0% to 14%), respectively. With the numbers available, no clinical factors we analyzed were associated with the risk of repeat revision. The median values of all assessed clinical outcomes improved; however, not all patients improved by clinically important margins. The median (range) AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score increased (from 50 [16 to 94] to 78 [19 to 100], difference of medians 28; p < 0.01), and the median pain on the VAS decreased (from 5 [0 to 9] to 2 [0 to 9], difference of medians 3; p < 0.01) from before surgery to follow-up at a minimum of 2 years. Radiographically, lucency was seen in 12% (6 of 49 patients) and loosening was seen in 8% (4 of 49). One of these patients showed symptomatic loosening and was among the four patients overall who underwent revision. We could not assess risk factors for repeat revision because of the low number of events (four).

CONCLUSION

The investigated new in situ fixed-bearing ankle design achieved overall better short-term results than those reported in previous research. Destabilization of the ankle joint complex, soft tissue insufficiency, and possible changes of the joint configuration need an optimal solution in revision arthroplasty. The studied implant might be the answer to this complex issue and help surgeons in the perioperative decision-making process. However, a relatively high percentage of patients did not achieve a clinically important difference. Observational studies are needed to understand long-term implant behavior and possibly to identify ankles benefiting the most from revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Management of Periprosthetic Bone Cysts After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Modern improvements in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) have increased the performance of this procedure for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. A common finding after TAA is the formation of periprosthetic bone cysts, which can be clinically silent or result in TAA failure. The exact cause of periprosthetic bones cysts has not been established, but major theories are related to osteolysis secondary to implant wear, micromotion, and stress shielding. Treatment can be nonoperative with clinical observation for small, asymptomatic cysts. Large, progressive, and symptomatic cysts often merit surgical treatment with debridement and grafting, revision TAA, or salvage arthrodesis.

Failure rates and patient-reported outcomes of revision of total ankle arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Despite the increasing number of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), the literature on indications, surgical options, and outcomes is limited. This study reports on failure rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROM) for a cohort of 122 patients who underwent revision of TAA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of revision TAA between 2006 and 2020 was performed at one institution. Patient's demographics and different surgical procedures were analyzed with particular attention to comparing polyethylene exchange with revision of both metallic components and to additional interventions for axis correction. Failure rates and the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score were collected. The average follow-up period was 70.37 ± 46.76 months.

RESULTS

122 patients were treated with an exchange procedure. The surgery included 69 polyethylene exchanges, 12 revisions of one metallic component, and 41 revisions of both metallic components. The overall failure rate was 14.75%. The EFAS score, completed by 94 of the 122 patients, was used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Median EFAS score was 12.51 ± 5.53, and median EFAS sports score was 2.97 ± 3.04. Revision rates after polyethylene exchange were significantly higher than after exchanging both metallic components (p value = 0.03), while the EFAS score showed slightly better results in patients treated with polyethylene exchange. Adding procedures to induce axis correction led to significantly lower revision rates (p value = 0.03), and the EFAS score was also improved but without statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The high failure rate of polyethylene exchange indicates that the intervention does not address the actual cause of failed TAA in many cases. Additional axis correction should be considered more frequently. If the underlying issues of prosthesis failure can be identified and sufficiently addressed, the results of revision surgery are likely to improve.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using the INBONE II Prosthesis

BACKGROUND

The literature on the outcome of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) remains limited. In this study, we aimed to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision TAA at a high-volume center in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of 28 patients who underwent 29 revision TAAs using the INBONE II Total Ankle System (Wright Medical Technology/Stryker). Demographic, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measure data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean duration from primary TAA to revision was 87.5 months (range, 16 to 223 months). The main indication for the revision was aseptic loosening after the primary TAA (83%). Additional procedures were required in 76% of ankles. At a mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 24 to 60 months), the infection rate was 7%, the reoperation rate was 7%, and the implant survival rate was 97%. A significant postoperative improvement in the radiographic component alignment measures was observed. The subsidence, loosening, and heterotopic ossification rates in this study were comparable with those in other reports and did not influence the clinical outcome. A significant improvement was observed in the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in all domains and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) in 3 domains at 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision TAA using the INBONE II prosthesis was associated with good short-term survival and improvement in postoperative scores at 2 years. Maintenance of the postoperatively improved alignment was documented at the follow-up. The results of this study support the notion that revision TAA is a satisfactory option for failed primary TAA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.