1
|
Corlee B, Bloomquist M, Brantley B, Hamilton C, Ringus V. Surgical Treatment of Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy Augmented With Human Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Retrospective Case Series. FOOT & ANKLE ORTHOPAEDICS 2024; 9:24730114241284019. [PMID: 39398266 PMCID: PMC11465337 DOI: 10.1177/24730114241284019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is often surgically treated with Achilles tendon partial or total detachment, debridement and repair of the Achilles tendon, excision of retrocalcaneal exostosis, and suture anchor reattachment. To date, there is no report that examines the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) augmentation in this procedure without the use of suture anchor reattachment. Methods Thirty-two female and 10 male patients (mean age 52 years) with IAT underwent surgical treatment including partial detachment of the Achilles tendon, excision of the retrocalcaneal exostosis, debridement and repair of the Achilles tendon, and augmentation with human acellular dermal matrix allograft. Outcomes measured were the visual analog scale (VAS) score, time to weightbearing, major and minor complications. Results Forty-two patients were followed for a mean of 20.8 months. The VAS score improved from a mean of 5.1 to 1.9 at final follow-up. The mean time to weightbearing was 4.4 weeks. Eleven patients (26.2%) experienced complications. One patient (2.4%) suffered a rupture of the Achilles in the early postoperative period. Three patients (7.1%) had delayed wound healing, with 1 (2.4%) requiring surgical debridement. Two (4.8%) experienced continued pain requiring further surgical treatment. Conclusion This protocol for surgical treatment of IAT with the use of human ADM allograft augmentation resulted in improved VAS scores and was associated with a low risk of postoperative infection without a prolonged nonweightbearing period. Level of Evidence Level IV, retrospective case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryce Corlee
- Foot & Ankle Center of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Branden Brantley
- PMSR/RRA Residency Program, Cleveland Clinic Foundation/Surgical Hospital of Oklahoma LLC, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Curtis Hamilton
- PMSR/RRA Residency Program, Cleveland Clinic Foundation/Surgical Hospital of Oklahoma LLC, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramelli L, Docter S, Kim C, Sheth U, Park SSH. Single-Row Repair Versus Double-Row Repair in the Surgical Management of Achilles Insertional Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2024; 12:23259671241262772. [PMID: 39143983 PMCID: PMC11322933 DOI: 10.1177/23259671241262772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 6% of people will report Achilles tendon pain during their lifetime, and one-third of these individuals will have Achilles insertional tendinopathy (AIT). For patients who have failed conservative treatment, surgical repair is performed. Achilles tendon repair can occur through various techniques, including a single-row or double-row repair. Purpose To determine if there are significant advantages to double-row repair over single-row repair with respect to biomechanical and clinical outcomes. Study design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. An electronic search of the EMBASE and PubMed databases was performed for all studies related to surgical treatment of AIT, which yielded 1431 unique results. These included both biomechanical and clinical studies. Clinical studies in which patients were not diagnosed with AIT, underwent surgery for repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture, or studies that included additional procedures such as a concomitant flexor hallucis longus transfer were excluded. Eligible studies were independently screened by 2 reviewers. A risk-of-bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions and risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials tools. Results A total of 23 studies were included, 4 of which were biomechanical studies and 19 were clinical studies. Biomechanical comparison found that there was a significant advantage to using double-row versus single-row fixation with respect to load at yield (354.7 N vs 198.7 N; P = .01) and mean peak load (433.9 N vs 212 N; P = .042). There was no significant difference between double-row and single-row repair with respect to load to failure. Significant heterogeneity of the studies did not allow for a statistical comparison of the clinical outcomes between double-row and single-row repairs. Conclusion Although biomechanical studies favor double-row repair for AIT, the current data available on the clinical outcomes are not sufficient to determine if there is a clinical advantage of double-row repair. Larger, prospective randomized controlled trials utilizing validated outcome measures are needed to further elucidate whether the biomechanical advantages associated with double-row repair also translate into improved patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Ramelli
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM) Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shgufta Docter
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM) Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Kim
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ujash Sheth
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sam Si-Hyeong Park
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM) Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vora A, Ingwer SJ, Withrow M, Denove N, Hauck O, Khoury A. Double-Row Achilles Insertional Repair With Rip-Stop Increases Construct Strength Compared to Traditional Techniques: A Biomechanical Study. Foot Ankle Int 2024; 45:535-541. [PMID: 38348561 DOI: 10.1177/10711007241227948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although double-row suture-anchored (DRSA) techniques for Achilles insertional tendinosis has proven successful, a reoccurring failure mode not yet addressed is suture tearing through the tendon. This study aims to address suture tearing by incorporating a rip-stop element. Authors hypothesized that the Rip-Stop group would demonstrate increased strength compared with more traditional techniques. METHODS 12 paired cadaveric feet were used in this study (n = 24). One sample from each pair was assigned to receive the standard double-row (SDR) Achilles repair with 4.75-mm knotless anchors (n = 12). The control's matched sides were divided between 2 DRSA bridge groups: modified double-row (MDR) bridge with 3.9-mm anchors or rip-stop double-row (RS-DR) bridge repair with soft proximal anchors and 3.9-mm anchored distal row. In neutral position, specimens underwent 1000 cycles (20-100 N) followed by load to failure. Displacements, stiffness, ultimate load, and failure mode were recorded. RESULTS RS-DR had the lowest initial displacement values followed by SDR and MDR (1.3 ± 0.4, 2.7 ± 1.4, and 3.2 ± 1.3 mm, respectively). Significance was detected when comparing initial displacement of RS-DR to MDR (P = .038). Cyclic displacement was lowest for RS-DR, followed by MDR and SDR (1.6 ± 0.9, 2.2 ± 1.1, and 4.5 ± 3.2 mm, respectively). Cyclic stiffness was similar for RS-DR and MDR (89.1 ± 24.6 and 81.9 ± 5.6 N/mm, respectively). RS-DR ultimate load (1116.8 ± 405.7 N) was statistically greater than SDR (465.6 ± 352.7, P = .003). CONCLUSION RS-DR-repaired specimens demonstrated a decrease in displacement values and increased ultimate load and stiffness when compared to other groups. Results of this cadaveric model suggest that the addition of a rip-stop to DRSA Achilles repair is more impactful than anchor size. Limitations include that this was a time-zero biomechanical study, which cannot simulate the performance of the repairs during postoperative healing and recovery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE A rip-stop technique for Achilles repair effectively improves dynamic mechanical characteristics and may mitigate suture tearing through tendon in a patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Vora
- Illinois Bone & Joint Institute, Libertyville, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hembree WC, Tarka MC, Pasternack JB, Mathew SE, Guyton GP. What's New in Foot and Ankle Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:737-743. [PMID: 36888693 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.01382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Walter C Hembree
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lewis TL, Srirangarajan T, Patel A, Yip GCK, Hussain L, Walker R, Singh S, Latif A, Abbasian A. Clinical outcomes following surgical management of insertional Achilles tendinopathy using a double-row suture bridge technique with mean two-year follow-up. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2022; 33:1179-1184. [PMID: 35507118 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03270-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical outcomes following surgical management of insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) vary depending on the surgical technique used to reattach the Achilles tendon following debridement. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with IAT who underwent surgical management with a double-row suture bridge technique used to reattach the Achilles tendon. METHODS A retrospective review of consecutive patients diagnosed with IAT, who underwent surgical management utilising a double-row suture bridge technique (Arthex Speedbridge), and a minimum of 3-month follow-up were included. The primary outcome was the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) Index score which is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM). Secondary outcomes included EuroQol EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life PROM and complication rates. RESULTS Between July 2013 and June 2020, 50 consecutive patients (23 male; 27 female) were included. The mean age (± standard deviation) was 52.3 ± 11.3 (range 29.0-84.3). Pre- and post-operative PROM data were available for all cases. The mean follow-up was 2.4 ± 1.9 years. The MOXFQ Index score improved from 48.5 to 12.4 (p < 0.01), EQ-5D-5L improved from 2.7 ± 0.46 to 1.2 ± 0.37 (p < 0.01), and EQ-VAS improved from 48.0 ± 18.4 to 84.1 ± 12.6 (p < 0.01). Four patients had complications which were of minimal clinical relevance and caused no deviation from routine recovery. There were no cases of tendon rupture. CONCLUSION This study has demonstrated that surgical management of IAT is safe and effective with clinical improvement in both clinical and general health-related quality of life outcome PROMs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T L Lewis
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - T Srirangarajan
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - A Patel
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - G C K Yip
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - L Hussain
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - R Walker
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - S Singh
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - A Latif
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - A Abbasian
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grävare Silbernagel K, Malliaras P, de Vos RJ, Hanlon S, Molenaar M, Alfredson H, van den Akker-Scheek I, Antflick J, van Ark M, Färnqvist K, Haleem Z, Kaux JF, Kirwan P, Kumar B, Lewis T, Mallows A, Masci L, Morrissey D, Murphy M, Newsham-West R, Norris R, O'Neill S, Peers K, Sancho I, Seymore K, Vallance P, van der Vlist A, Vicenzino B. ICON 2020-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Trials of Achilles Tendinopathy. Sports Med 2022; 52:613-641. [PMID: 34797533 PMCID: PMC8891092 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nine core domains for tendinopathy have been identified. For Achilles tendinopathy there is large variation in outcome measures used, and how these fit into the core domains has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE To identify all available outcome measures outcome measures used to assess the clinical phenotype of Achilles tendinopathy in prospective studies and to map the outcomes measures into predefined health-related core domains. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy, sample size ≥ ten participants, age ≥ 16 years, and the study design was a randomized or non-randomized clinical trial, observational cohort, single-arm intervention, or case series. RESULTS 9376 studies were initially screened and 307 studies were finally included, totaling 13,248 participants. There were 233 (177 core domain) different outcome measures identified across all domains. For each core domain outcome measures were identified, with a range between 8 and 35 unique outcome measures utilized for each domain. The proportion of studies that included outcomes for predefined core domains ranged from 4% for the psychological factors domain to 72% for the disability domain. CONCLUSION 233 unique outcome measures for Achilles tendinopathy were identified. Most frequently, outcome measures were used within the disability domain. Outcome measures assessing psychological factors were scarcely used. The next step in developing a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy is to engage patients, clinicians and researchers to reach consensus on key outcomes measures. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42020156763.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Grävare Silbernagel
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA.
| | - Peter Malliaras
- Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robert-Jan de Vos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Shawn Hanlon
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA
| | - Mitchel Molenaar
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Håkan Alfredson
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Inge van den Akker-Scheek
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jarrod Antflick
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Mathijs van Ark
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Care Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences and Peescentrum, Centre of Expertise Primary Care Groningen (ECEZG), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Zubair Haleem
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Arsenal Football Club, London, UK
| | - Jean-Francois Kaux
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and Sports Traumatology, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Paul Kirwan
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bhavesh Kumar
- Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, UK
| | - Trevor Lewis
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Adrian Mallows
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Lorenzo Masci
- Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, UK
| | - Dylan Morrissey
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Myles Murphy
- National School of Nursing, Midwifery, Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Richard Newsham-West
- School of Allied Health, Department of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Norris
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
- Liverpool University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Seth O'Neill
- School of Allied Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Koen Peers
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Igor Sancho
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Physiotherapy Department, University of Deusto, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Kayla Seymore
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA
| | - Patrick Vallance
- Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Arco van der Vlist
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bill Vicenzino
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|