Long-term Follow-up of 254 Ceramic Coated Implant (CCI) Evolution Total Ankle Replacements

The significance of heterotopic ossification following total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total ankle replacement (TAR).

METHODS

During August 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies reporting HO following TAR. Data regarding surgical characteristics, pathological characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, ankle range of motion, radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies with 2639 patients (2695 ankles) at a weighed mean follow-up time of 52.8 ± 26.9 months were included. The pooled prevalence rate was 44.6% (0.25; 0.66). The implant with the highest rate of HO was the INBONE I (100%) and BOX (100%) implants. The most common modified Brooker staging was grade 1 (132 patients, 27.0%). Random effects models of standardized mean differences found no difference in American orthopedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale scores (VAS) and ankle range of motion (ROM) between patients with HO and patients without HO. Random effects models of correlation coefficients found no correlation between AOFAS, VAS and ROM and the presence of HO. The surgical intervention rate for symptomatic HO was 4.2%.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that HO is a common finding following TAR that is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes. Surgical intervention was required only for moderate-to-severe, symptomatic HO following TAR. This study is limited by the marked heterogeneity and low level and quality of evidence of the included studies. Further higher quality studies are warranted to determine the precise prevalence and impact of HO on outcomes following TAR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

Outcomes of Total Ankle Replacement with Preoperative Varus Deformity

Historically, coronal plane deformities of greater than 10° to 15° have been deemed contraindications for total ankle replacement (TAR). However, recent studies show satisfactory results in TAR with severe preoperative varus deformity. When correctly applying ancillary procedures, preoperative varus deformity can be structurally corrected, resulting in similar clinical scores to those obtained with "regular TAR." However, complications and revisions appear to increase with increasing deformity. Unfortunately, results of TAR in varus ankles consist of heterogeneous data (eg, with regards to prosthetic brands, bearing-types, duration of follow-up, and ancillary procedures) precluding strict conclusions. This could be solved by an international consensus group.

The ceramic coated implant (CCI). Evolution total ankle replacements: a retrospective analysis of 40 ankles with 8 years follow-up

Diminutive data is available on the outcome of several previously used total ankle replacement implants. The purpose of this study was to investigate the medium-term functional and radiological outcome and implant survival of the CCI Evolution implant. Consecutive series of 40 ankles operated in our hospital with primary TAR using the CCI Evolution implant in 2010-2013 were available for follow-up. The prospective clinical and radiographic data including the Kofoed score, subjective satisfaction and standard radiographs were collected preoperatively and at fixed time-points postoperatively. A CT was obtained in cases where osteolysis or loosening were suspected. The improvement of the Kofoed score and subjective satisfaction were statistically significant (p<0.0001). The implant survival was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 81%-100 %) at 5 years, and 81 % (95% confidence interval (CI) 60 %-92%) at 8 years. There were altogether 25 (64%) complications. Overall revision rate was 28% and failure rate 13%. The CCI implant outcome was not acceptable. The malposition of prosthetic components, subsidence, and peri-implant osteolysis were recorded often. Although the patient reported outcome measures improved, mostly due to positive changes in pain severity, overall revision and failure rates were high and comparable with previous findings of the CCI implant.