Enhanced post-receptor insulin effects in women following dehydroepiandrosterone infusion

The Use of Dehydroepiandrosterone Therapy in Clinical Practice

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) therapy is controversial due to sensationalized reports of epidemiologic studies and the over-the-counter availability of DHEA. Human clinical trials have investigated the potential efficacy of DHEA therapy in multiple conditions with resultant inconsistencies in findings. DHEA is unique compared with other adrenal steroids because of the fluctuation in serum levels found from birth into advancing age. The lower endogenous levels of DHEA and DHEA sulfate found in advancing age have been correlated with a myriad of health conditions. Also, some studies suggest gender-specific actions of endogenous and exogenous DHEA. We reviewed only pharmacokinetic studies and human clinical trials investigating the efficacy of DHEA therapy that were placebo-controlled as these provided the most reliable scientific basis for the evaluation of DHEA therapy. Pharmacodynamic studies suggest that doses of 30-50mg of oral DHEA may produce physiologic androgen levels, especially in women. These studies report a dose-dependent effect and lack of accumulation of serum androgen levels. Pharmacologic studies also reveal a gender-specific response to DHEA therapy such that testosterone levels are increased in women but not in men. Clinical trials suggest that 50mg of oral DHEA, but not <30mg, can increase serum androgen levels to within the physiologic range for young adults with primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency, possibly improve sexual function, improve mood and self-esteem, and decrease fatigue/exhaustion. Whereas DHEA replacement therapy may be effective in treating patients with adrenal insufficiency, human clinical trials investigating its efficacy in conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, HIV, Alzheimer disease, advancing age, male sexual dysfunction, perimenopausal symptoms, depression, and cardiovascular disease have not provided consistent findings.

Dehydroepiandrosterone: is there a role for replacement?

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfated ester are found in high concentrations in the plasma; however, their role in normal human physiology, other than as precursors for sex hormones, remains incompletely defined. Studies of rodent models have shown that these hormones have beneficial effects on a wide variety of conditions, such as diabetes, obesity, immune function, atherosclerosis, and many of the disorders associated with normal aging. However, rodents are not the best models to study the actions of these hormones because they have very little endogenous DHEA; thus, the doses given to these animals are usually suprapharmacological. Human studies have been performed to determine the potential beneficial effects of DHEA replacement in persons with low DHEA levels. Results have been conflicting. Human studies suggest a potential role for DHEA replacement in persons who have undergone adrenalectomy and possibly in the aging population. However, long-term studies assessing the benefits vs adverse effects must be done before DHEA replacement can be recommended.

Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation improves endothelial function and insulin sensitivity in men

The dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) concentration decreases with age. There is evidence that DHEA has a protective effect against age-related disorders, including cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, we examined the effect of DHEA supplementation (25 mg/d) on endothelial function, insulin sensitivity, and fibrinolytic activity in 24 men with hypercholesterolemia (mean age, 54 +/- 1 yr). All subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind study. Flow-mediated dilation of brachial artery after transient occlusion, which was expressed as the percent change from the baseline value of the diameter, increased significantly with DHEA supplementation [DHEA: baseline, 3.9 +/- 0.5%; 4 wk, 6.9 +/- 0.7%; 8 wk, 7.9 +/- 0.6%; 12 wk, 8.4 +/- 0.7% (P < 0.01 vs. baseline for all, by ANOVA); placebo: 4.1 +/- 0.6%, 4.5 +/- 0.5%, 3.9 +/- 0.5%, and 4.4 +/- 0.6% (P < 0.01 for all, by ANOVA)]. There was a significant concurrent reduction in the plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 during DHEA supplementation [DHEA: 9.1 +/- 2.2, 6.4 +/- 2.3, 5.5 +/- 2.8, and 5.1 +/- 2.0 IU/ml (P < 0.01 vs. baseline, by ANOVA); placebo: 9.0 +/- 2.1, 10.4 +/- 2.2, 9.5 +/- 2.2, and 9.6 +/- 2.1 IU/ml (P < 0.01, by ANOVA)]. DHEA supplementation also decreased steady state plasma glucose [DHEA: baseline, 178.9 +/- 12.2; 12 wk, 132.0 +/- 12.8 mg/dl (P < 0.01, by ANOVA); placebo: 181.0 +/- 13.8 and 179.6 +/- 12.4 mg/dl (P < 0.01, by ANOVA)]. In contrast, steady state plasma insulin did not change during the study in either group. The low dose DHEA supplementation improves vascular endothelial function and insulin sensitivity and decreases the plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 concentration. These beneficial changes have the potential to attenuate the development of age-related disorders such as cardiovascular disease.

Is there a case for DHEA replacement?

There are many hormonal changes that occur with ageing in humans, of which the most dramatic and intriguing change occurs for the adrenal androgenic steroid dehydroepiandosterone (DHEA). There are tantalizing epidemiological data demonstrating a significant association between the changes in circulating DHEA level and changes in the incidence of malignancy, atherosclerosis, Alzheimer's disease and other age-related changes. The pharmacological effects in animals such as rodents and rabbits have demonstrated many beneficial effects, for example increased immune function, the prevention of atherosclerosis, cancer, diabetes and obesity, and the improvement of memory. Clinical studies carried out in small groups of subjects have clearly demonstrated that the administration of DHEA to the elderly increases many hormone levels, including that of insulin-like growth factor-1, (free and total) testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, oestrone and oestradiol. It remains to be clearly defined whether these changes are clinically beneficial, and there is only insufficient information on the side-effects on long-term use. Results from short-term intervention studies in small groups of subjects have not demonstrated any convincing beneficial effects so far. A judgement on whether DHEA replacement has a place in preventing age-related disabilities could be determined only on the basis of results from studies of long-term DHEA replacement in elderly people.

Dehydroepiandrosterone Supplements: Bringing Sense to Sensational Claims

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current information about dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), a steroid hormone produced in the adrenal cortex.

METHODS

The biochemical and physiologic features of DHEA and its purported effects on overall age-related decline and on various disorders are reviewed. In addition, the potential side effects from administration of DHEA are discussed.

RESULTS

During the normal life cycle, levels of DHEA fluctuate, beginning with production of large quantities in the fetus, stopping at birth, resuming during ages 5 to 7 years, and increasing throughout puberty to maximal production in the 20s. Thereafter, DHEA levels progressively decline. This age-related decline in physiologic levels of DHEA has prompted speculation about a relationship between relative "DHEA deficiency" in older age and diseases of aging as well as the possibility of deriving benefits from administration of DHEA. Certain studies in animals (primarily rodents) have suggested anticancer effects of DHEA in pharmacologic doses and improvement in metabolism. In various studies in animals and humans, discrepant results have been found in the assessment of the association between DHEA levels and coronary artery disease. Likewise, the clinical significance of changes in immune function with DHEA treatment is unknown. Because DHEA is classified as a "nutritional supplement," it is not subjected to government regulation, and a potential exists for inaccurate dosage and impurities.

CONCLUSION

Studies have shown that DHEA influences multiple systems and disease processes in animals and humans; some of these effects could be considered beneficial and others detrimental. To date, no long-term health benefits from DHEA in "replacement" doses have been demonstrated.