Management Options after Prophylactic Surgeries in Women with BRCA Mutations: A Review

Yield of surveillance magnetic resonance imaging after bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

There are no evidence-based guidelines for surveillance of women after bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction. Several societies recommend against routine breast imaging in this setting. Despite these recommendations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used to follow these women. We sought to examine the findings on MRI studies done in this setting.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive MRI exams done after bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction between January 2010 and April 2018. Data collected included demographic information, family history, BRCA status, indication for bilateral mastectomy, type of reconstruction, findings on MRI, and work-up of MRI findings. Cancer detection rate and interval cancer rates were calculated.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine women had 415 surveillance MRI exams. Most (372, 90%) studies were done in women with implant-based reconstruction. Four hundred and five (98%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 96-99%) of the studies were negative. One breast recurrence was found on MRI (cancer detection rate 2.4 per 1000 MRI exams, 95% CI 0.4-13); however, this woman was simultaneously diagnosed with metastatic disease. The false-positive rate was 90% (95% CI 54-99%). During follow-up three women were diagnosed with local recurrence (interval cancer rate 5 per 1000, 95% CI 1.3-17) and 4 women were diagnosed with metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

The yield of surveillance MRI in women with bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction is very low. As most of the cohort had retro-pectoral implant-based reconstruction, it appears safe to recommend against surveillance MRI in this setting regardless of the indication for mastectomy.

The risk of primary and contralateral breast cancer after ovarian cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: Implications for counseling

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of primary breast cancer (PBC) and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in patients who had BRCA1/BRCA2-associated epithelial ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS

From the database of the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic, patients who had BRCA-associated OC without a history of unilateral breast cancer (BC) (at risk of PBC; n = 79) or with a history of unilateral BC (at risk of CBC; n = 37) were selected. The control groups consisted of unaffected BRCA mutation carriers (n = 351) or mutation carriers who had a previous unilateral BC (n = 294), respectively. The risks of PBC and CBC were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival method with death considered as a competing risk event.

RESULTS

Women with BRCA-associated OC had lower 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year risks of PBC (3%, 6%, and 11%, respectively) compared with unaffected mutation carriers (6%, 16%, and 28%, respectively; P = .03), although they had a considerably higher mortality rate at similar time points (13%, 33%, and 61%, respectively, vs 1%, 2%, and 2%, respectively; P < .001). In BRCA mutation carriers with a previous unilateral BC, the 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year risks of CBC were nonsignificantly lower in patients with OC than in those without OC (0%, 7%, and 7%, respectively, vs 6%, 16%, and 34%, respectively; P = .06), whereas the mortality rate was higher in patients with OC (19%, 34%, and 55%, respectively, vs 4%, 11%, and 21%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BRCA-associated OC had a lower risk of developing a subsequent PBC or CBC than mutation carriers without OC, whereas the risk of dying from OC was greater than the risk of developing BC. These data may facilitate more tailored counseling for this patient subgroup, although confirmative studies are warranted.

Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance

The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of response to trastuzumab. Recently, the roles of ER as a negative and HER2 as a positive indicator for chemotherapy have been established. Ki67 has traditionally been recognized as a poor prognostic factor, but recent studies suggest that measurement of Ki67-positive cells during treatment will more effectively predict treatment efficacy for both anti-hormonal and chemotherapy. p53 mutations are found in 20–35% of human breast cancers and are associated with aggressive disease with poor clinical outcome when the DNA-binding domain is mutated. The utility of cyclin D1 as a predictor of breast cancer prognosis is controversial, but cyclin D1b overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. Likewise, overexpression of the low molecular weight form of cyclin E1 protein predicts poor prognosis. Breast cancers from BRCA1/2 carriers often show high nuclear grades, negativity to ER/PR/HER2, and p53 mutations, and thus, are associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic values of other molecular markers, such as p14^ARF, TBX2/3, VEGF in breast cancer are also discussed. Careful evaluation of these biomarkers with current treatment modality is required to determine whether their measurement or monitoring offer significant clinical benefits.