Spinal Radiosurgery for Metastatic Disease of the Spine

Progress of Phototherapy Applications in the Treatment of Bone Cancer

Bone cancer including primary bone cancer and metastatic bone cancer, remains a challenge claiming millions of lives and affecting the life quality of survivors. Conventional treatments of bone cancer include wide surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, some bone cancer cells may remain or recur in the local area after resection, some are highly resistant to chemotherapy, and some are insensitive to radiotherapy. Phototherapy (PT) including photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT), is a clinically approved, minimally invasive, and highly selective treatment, and has been widely reported for cancer therapy. Under the irradiation of light of a specific wavelength, the photosensitizer (PS) in PDT can cause the increase of intracellular ROS and the photothermal agent (PTA) in PTT can induce photothermal conversion, leading to the tumoricidal effects. In this review, the progress of PT applications in the treatment of bone cancer has been outlined and summarized, and some envisioned challenges and future perspectives have been mentioned. This review provides the current state of the art regarding PDT and PTT in bone cancer and inspiration for future studies on PT.

Pain Relief by Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Spinal Metastasis

Aims and background

To report pain relief effect in patients with spinal metastases treated with Cyberknife® and to analyze the factors associated with pain relapse after initial pain relief.

Methods and study design.

We retrospectively analyzed patients with spinal metastasis treated with stereotactic body radiosurgery between April 2007 and June 2009. A total of 57 patients with 73 lesions were available for analysis with a median follow-up of 6.8 months (range, 1–30). Pain was assessed by a verbal/visual analogue scale at each visit: from 0 to 10. Pain relief was defined as a decrease of at least three levels of the pain score without an increase in analgesic use. Complete relief was defined as no analgesics or a score 0 or 1.

Results

Pain relief was achieved in 88% of the lesions, with complete relief in 51% within 7 days from the start of radiosurgery. The median duration of pain relief was 3.2 months (range, 1–30). Pain reappeared in 16 patients (27%). Spinal cord compression (P = 0.001) and performance status (P = 0.01) were predictive of pain relapse by multivariate Cox analysis. All 6 patients treated with solitary spinal metastasis experienced pain relief; 5 of them were alive without evidence of disease at a median of 16 months (range, 7–30).

Conclusions

As previous studies have shown, our study confirms that pain relief with spinal radiosurgery is around 90%. In particular, long-term pain relief and disease control was observed in patients with solitary spinal metastasis.

Matrix metalloproteinase-based photodynamic molecular beacons for targeted destruction of bone metastases in vivo

The metastatic spread of cancer from the primary site or organ is one of its most devastating aspects, being responsible for up to 90% of cancer-associated mortality. Bone is one of the common sites of metastatic spread, including the vertebrae. Regardless of the treatment strategy, the clinical goals for patients with vertebral metastases are to improve the quality of life by preventing neurologic decline, to achieve durable pain relief and enhance local tumor control. However, in part due to the close proximity of the spinal cord, current treatment options are limited. We propose a novel therapeutic strategy with the use of photodynamic molecular beacons (PMBs) for targeted destruction of spinal metastases, particularly to de-bulk lesions as an adjuvant to vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty in order to mechanically stabilize weak or fractured vertebrae. The PDT efficacy of a matrix metalloproteinase-specific PMB is reported in a metstatic model that recapitulates the clinical features of tumor growth within the bone. We demonstrate that not only does tumor cell destruction occur but also the killing of bone stromal cells. The potential of PMB-PDT to destroy metastatic tumors, disrupt the osteolytic cycle and better preserve critical organs with an increased therapeutic window compared with conventional photosensitizers is demonstrated.

Spine radiosurgery for the local treatment of spine metastases: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image guidance, clinical aspects and future directions

Many cancer patients will develop spinal metastases. Local control is important for preventing neurologic compromise and to relieve pain. Stereotactic body radiotherapy or spinal radiosurgery is a new radiation therapy technique for spinal metastasis that can deliver a high dose of radiation to a tumor while minimizing the radiation delivered to healthy, neighboring tissues. This treatment is based on intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image guidance and rigid immobilization. Spinal radiosurgery is an increasingly utilized treatment method that improves local control and pain relief after delivering ablative doses of radiation. Here, we present a review highlighting the use of spinal radiosurgery for the treatment of metastatic tumors of the spine. The data used in the review were collected from both published studies and ongoing trials. We found that spinal radiosurgery is safe and provides excellent tumor control (up to 94% local control) and pain relief (up to 96%), independent of histology. Extensive data regarding clinical outcomes are available; however, this information has primarily been generated from retrospective and nonrandomized prospective series. Currently, two randomized trials are enrolling patients to study clinical applications of fractionation schedules spinal Radiosurgery. Additionally, a phase I clinical trial is being conducted to assess the safety of concurrent stereotactic body radiotherapy and ipilimumab for spinal metastases. Clinical trials to refine clinical indications and dose fractionation are ongoing. The concomitant use of targeted agents may produce better outcomes in the future.

Clinical efficacy of computed tomography-guided iodine-125 seed implantation therapy in patients with advanced spinal metastatic tumors

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and clinical efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided radioactive iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed implantation treatment in patients with spinal metastatic tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 20 cases of spinal metastatic tumors, including nine men and eleven women aged 50–79 years (mean age: 61.1 years). We used treatment planning system (TPS) to construct three-dimensional images of the spinal metastatic tumors and to determine what number and dose rate distribution to use for the ¹²⁵I seeds. The matched peripheral dose of the ¹²⁵I seed implantation was 90–130 Gy. Twenty-four spinal metastatic tumors were treated by CT-guided radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation. A median of 19 (range: 4–43) ¹²⁵I seeds were implanted.

Results

Twenty cases were followed for a median of 15.3 months (range: 7–32 months). The rate of pain relief was 95%. The median control time for all of the patients was 12.5 months. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month cumulative local control rates were 100%, 95%, and 60%, respectively. The median survival time for all of the patients was 16 months. The cumulative 6- and 12-month survival rates were 100% and 78.81%, respectively. No major complications were observed. No ¹²⁵I seeds were lost or migrated to other tissues or organs.

Conclusion

CT-guided radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive method for the treatment of patients with spinal metastatic tumors. It is a possible alternative therapy for the treatment of spinal metastases.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases: a literature review

OBJECTIVE

The spine is the most common location for bone metastases. Since cure is not possible, local control and relief of symptoms is the basis for treatment, which is grounded on the use of conventional radiotherapy. Recently, spinal radiosurgery has been proposed for the local control of spinal metastases, whether as primary or salvage treatment. Consequently, we carried out a literature review in order to analyze the indications, efficacy, and safety of radiosurgery in the treatment of spinal metastases.

METHODS

We have reviewed the literature using the PubMed gateway with data from the MEDLINE library on studies related to the use of radiosurgery in treatment of bone metastases in spine. The studies were reviewed by all the authors and classified as to level of evidence, using the criterion defined by Wright.

RESULTS

The indications found for radiosurgery were primary control of epidural metastases (evidence level II), myeloma (level III), and metastases known to be poor responders to conventional radiotherapy--melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (level III). Spinal radiosurgery was also proposed for salvage treatment after conventional radiotherapy (level II). There is also some evidence as to the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery in cases of extramedullar and intramedullar intradural metastatic tumors (level III) and after spinal decompression and stabilization surgery.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery can be used in primary or salvage treatment of spinal metastases, improving local disease control and patient symptoms. It should also be considered as initial treatment for radioresistant tumors, such as melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Residual Setup Errors and Intra-Fraction Motion Using the Stereotactic X-Ray Image Guidance Verification System

Purpose

To determine the precision of our institution’s current immobilization devices for spine SBRT, ultimately leading to recommendations for appropriate planning margins.

Methods

We identified 12 patients (25 treatments) with spinal metastasis treated with spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). The Body-FIX system was used as immobilization device for thoracic (T) and lumbar (L) spine lesions. The head and shoulder mask system was used as immobilization device for cervical (C) spine lesions. Initial patient setup used the infrared positioning system with body markers. Stereotactic X-ray imaging was then performed and correction was made if the initial setup error exceeded predetermined institutional tolerances, 1.5 mm for translation and 2° for rotation. Three additional sets of verification X-rays were obtained pre-, mid-, and post-treatment for all treatments.

Results

Intrafraction motion regardless of immobilization technique was found to be 1.28 ± 0.57 mm. The mean and standard deviation of the variances along each direction were as follows: Superior-inferior, 0.56 ± 0.39 mm and 0.77 ± 0.52 mm, (p = 0.25); Anterior-posterior, 0.57 ± 0.43 mm and 1.14 ± 0.61 mm, (p = 0.01); Left-right, 0.48 ± 0.34 mm and 0.74 ± 0.40 mm, (p = 0.09) respectively. There was a significantly greater difference in the average 3D variance of the BodyFIX as compared to the head and shoulder mask immobilization system, 1.04 ± 0.46 mm and 1.71 ± 0.52 mm; (p = 0.003) respectively.

Conclusions

Overall, our institution’s image guidance system using stereotactic X-ray imaging verification provides acceptable localization accuracy as previously defined in the literature. We observed a greater intrafraction motion for the head and shoulder mask as compared with the BodyFIX immobilization system, which may be a result of greater C-spine mobility and/or the suboptimal mask immobilization. Thus, better immobilization techniques for C-spine SBRT are needed to reduce setup error and intrafraction motion. We are currently exploring alternative C-spine immobilization techniques to improve set up accuracy and decrease intrafraction motion during treatment.

The benefits of photodynamic therapy on vertebral bone are maintained and enhanced by combination treatment with bisphosphonates and radiation therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to ablate tumors within vertebral bone and yield short-term improvements in vertebral architecture and biomechanical strength, in particular when combined with bisphosphonate (BP) treatment. Longer-term outcomes of PDT combined with current treatments for skeletal metastases are essential to understand its therapeutic potential. The objective of this study is to evaluate the response of vertebrae to PDT after a longer (6-week) time period, alone and combined with previous BP or radiation treatment (RT). Sixty-three female rnu/rnu rats were randomized to six treatment groups: untreated control, BP-only, RT-only, PDT-only, combined BP + PDT and combined RT + PDT. L2 vertebrae were structurally analyzed through µCT-based analysis, axial compressive load-to-failure testing and histological analysis of morphology, osteoid formation and osteoclast activity. Combined BP + PDT treatment yielded the largest improvements in bone architecture with combined RT + PDT treatment yielding similar findings, but of a lesser magnitude. Mechanically, ultimate force and stress were correlated to stereological parameters that demonstrated a positive structural effect from combinatory treatment. Increased osteoid formation was observed in both combination therapies without any significant differences in osteoclast activity. Overall, multimodality treatment demonstrated a sustained positive effect on vertebral structural integrity, motivating PDT as a minimally-invasive adjuvant treatment for spinal metastases.

Beyond radiation therapy: photodynamic therapy maintains structural integrity of irradiated healthy and metastatically involved vertebrae in a pre-clinical in vivo model

Spinal metastasis commonly occurs in advanced breast cancer. Treatment is often multimodal including radiation therapy (RT), bisphosphonates (BPs), and surgery, yet alternative minimally invasive local treatments are needed. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to ablate tumor cells and enhance bone formation secondary to metastatic breast cancer, demonstrating potential as a treatment for spinal metastasis. Combined with previous BP treatment, bone formation was further enhanced by PDT. This study aimed to determine the effects of PDT in combination with previous RT on healthy and metastatically involved vertebrae. Forty-six athymic rats underwent RT (4 Gy on day-7), twenty-three of them were inoculated with MT-1 human breast cancer cells on day 0. Thirteen healthy and ten metastatically involved rats underwent PDT treatment on day 14. All rats were sacrificed on day 21. L2 vertebrae were analyzed using μCT imaging, mechanical testing, and histological methods. In healthy vertebrae, while modest increases in trabecular structure were found in RT + PDT compared to RT only, mechanical stability was negatively affected. The 4 Gy RT dose was found to ablate all tumor cells and prevent further vertebral metastasis. As such, in metastatically involved rats, no differences in stereological or mechanical properties were detected. RT + PDT and RT-only treatment resulted in greatly improved vertebral structural and mechanical properties versus untreated or PDT-only treatment in metastatically involved rats, due to early tumor destruction in RT-treated groups. Increased amounts of woven bone and osteoid volume were found in PDT-treated vertebrae. Further investigation is needed to understand if structural improvements seen in RT + PDT treatment can translate into longer-term improvements in strength to support the potential of PDT as a viable adjuvant treatment for spinal metastasis postradiation.

Spinal metastasis in head and neck cancer

Background

The incidence of head and neck cancer is relatively low in developed countries and highest in South East Asia. Notwithstanding advances in surgery and radiotherapy over the past several decades, the 5-year survival rate for head and neck cancer has stagnated and remains at 50–55%. This is due, in large part, to both regional and distant disease spread, including spinal metastasis. Spinal metastasis from head and neck cancer is rare, has a poor prognosis and can significantly impede end-stage quality of life; normally only palliative care is given.

This study aims to conduct a systematic review of the evidence available on management of spinal metastasis from head and neck cancer and to use such evidence to draw up guiding principles in the management of the distant spread.

Methods

Systematic review of the electronic literature was conducted regarding the management of spinal metastasis of head and neck malignancies.

Results

Due to the exceptional rarity of head and neck cancers metastasizing to the spine, there is a paucity of good randomized controlled trials into the management of spinal metastasis. This review produced only 12 case studies/reports and 2 small retrospective cohort studies that lacked appropriate controls.

Conclusion

Management should aim to improve end-stage quality of life and maintain neurological function. This review has found that radiotherapy +/− medical adjuvant is considered the principle treatment of spinal metastasis of head and neck cancers.

There is an absence of a definitive treatment protocol for head and neck cancer spinal metastasis. Our failure to find and cite high-quality scientific evidence only serves to stress the need for good quality research in this area.

Metastatic spine disease in the elderly: diagnostic and management considerations

Metastatic spine disease is becoming a more frequent problem in cancer patients as advancements in treatment for primary tumors prolong patient survival. Elderly patients over 60 years of age make up the majority of these cases, with the incidence of metastatic disease several folds higher in the elderly than in any other age group. These patients are also the most challenging group to treat, given higher rates of comorbidities and decreased tolerance to medical, surgical and radiation therapies. Advancements in therapeutic strategies, including minimally invasive surgeries and stereotactic radiosurgery, have provided increasingly attractive treatment options for elderly patients owing to their decreased procedure-associated morbidity. This article will discuss efficacy and limitations of conventional, as well as more recent, treatment modalities with an emphasis on their role in the management of elderly patients.

Imaging of specific activation of photodynamic molecular beacons in breast cancer vertebral metastases

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Approximately 85% of patients with advanced cases will develop spinal metastases. The vertebral column is the most common site of breast cancer metastases, where overexpression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) promotes the spread of cancer. Current therapies have significant limitations due to the high associated risk of damaging the spinal cord. An attractive alternative is photodynamic therapy providing noninvasive and site-selective treatment. However, current photosensitizers are limited by their nonspecific accumulation. Photodynamic molecular beacons (PP(MMP)B), activated by MMPs, offer another level of PDT selectivity and image-guidance preserving criticial tissues, specifically the spinal cord. Metastatic human breast carcinoma cells, MT-1, were used to model the metastatic behavior of spinal lesions. In vitro and in vivo evidence demonstrates MMP specific activation of PP(MMP)B in MT-1 cells. Using a clinically relevant metastatic model, fluorescent imaging establishes the specific activation of PP(MMP)B by vertebral metastases versus normal tissue (i.e., spinal cord) demonstrating the specificity of these beacons. Here, we validate that the metastasis-selective mechanism of PP(MMP)Bs can specifically image breast cancer vertebral metastases, thereby differentiating tumor and healthy tissue.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis of external beam and stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of spine metastases: a matched-pair analysis

OBJECT

The objective of this study was to compare the palliative efficacy and cost effectiveness of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as primary treatment for bone metastatic disease of the spinal column.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were matched based on age, primary tumor site, year of treatment, and location of metastasis. Outcomes of interest were pain relief, cost-effectiveness, toxicities, and need for further intervention. Pain relief was rated as excellent, good, fair, or poor, using a radiosurgical pain scale to combine visual analog scale and verbal descriptor ordinal scale scores. Medicare fee schedules were used to compute the charges for both the technical and professional components of care. Patients in the EBRT group were treated using a linear accelerator while patients in the SBRT group were treated with the CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system. Patients received regular follow-up evaluations by a radiation oncologist and neurosurgeon.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (22 pairs) were analyzed. At a follow-up of 1 month, there was no statistically significant difference in pain between the 2 groups (p = 0.11). Patients who underwent SBRT had the highest total gross charge; depending on technique, EBRT treatments ranged from 29% to 71% of the SBRT charge. Patients treated using EBRT had more acute toxicities, and more of these patients underwent further intervention at the treated spinal level. There were no late complications attributed to either treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

External beam radiation therapy remains an efficacious and cost-effective method of palliation of spine metastases. In this study, patients treated with EBRT had more acute toxicities and were more likely to require additional interventions at the treated sites. Stereotactic body radiation therapy, although more costly, resulted in comparable rates of pain relief and late treatment-related toxicity, and continues to show promise as an emerging modality for selected patients with spine metastases.

Reliability analysis of the epidural spinal cord compression scale

OBJECTIVE

The evolution of imaging techniques, along with highly effective radiation options has changed the way metastatic epidural tumors are treated. While high-grade epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) frequently serves as an indication for surgical decompression, no consensus exists in the literature about the precise definition of this term. The advancement of the treatment paradigms in patients with metastatic tumors for the spine requires a clear grading scheme of ESCC. The degree of ESCC often serves as a major determinant in the decision to operate or irradiate. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of a 6-point, MR imaging-based grading system for ESCC.

METHODS

To determine the reliability of the grading scale, a survey was distributed to 7 spine surgeons who participate in the Spine Oncology Study Group. The MR images of 25 cervical or thoracic spinal tumors were distributed consisting of 1 sagittal image and 3 axial images at the identical level including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and Gd-enhanced T1-weighted images. The survey was administered 3 times at 2-week intervals. The inter- and intrarater reliability was assessed.

RESULTS

The inter- and intrarater reliability ranged from good to excellent when surgeons were asked to rate the degree of spinal cord compression using T2-weighted axial images. The T2-weighted images were superior indicators of ESCC compared with T1-weighted images with and without Gd.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESCC scale provides a valid and reliable instrument that may be used to describe the degree of ESCC based on T2-weighted MR images. This scale accounts for recent advances in the treatment of spinal metastases and may be used to provide an ESCC classification scheme for multicenter clinical trial and outcome studies.

Hemangiopericytomas of the spine: case report and review of the literature

We describe a rare case of a primary intracranial meningeal hemangiopericytoma (HPC) with late metastasis to the cervical spine. A 36-year-old woman had a left occipital lesion that was histopathologically identified as HPC. Fourteen years after resection, the tumor recurred and was treated with radiotherapy. Three years later, CT imaging showed a large mass in the liver consistent with metastatic HPC, and MRI of the cervical spine showed an extensive lesion of the C3 vertebral body. The patient underwent C3 corpectomy with en-bloc tumor removal and follow-up radiation with no local recurrence or other spinal metastasis for the following 4 years. Regardless of the subtype of spinal HPC, complete surgical removal and radiotherapy appear to be treatment of choice.

Stereotactic spine radiosurgery for intradural and intramedullary metastasis

Object

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an important treatment alternative to surgery for a variety of spinal lesions. However, the use of SRS in the management of intradural intramedullary (IDIM) metastasis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of SRS for treatment of IDIM metastasis.

Methods

Nine patients with 11 IDIM metastases treated with SRS at Henry Ford Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age at presentation was 50 years, with a range of 14–71 years. There were 4 intradural extramedullary and 7 intramedullary lesions. The radiosurgery procedure used techniques of image-guided and intensitymodulated radiation. The mean treatment dose was 13.8 Gy, with a range of 10–16 Gy. All patients had clinical follow-up (except in 1 lesion), with an emphasis on initial symptoms and ambulatory status, and 8 patients (9 lesions) had imaging studies. The median follow-up duration was 10 months.

Results

The presenting symptoms were improved in 8 (80%) of 10 evaluable lesions, unchanged in 1 case, and worsened in 1 case. Radiographic responses were seen as follows: complete response in 2 (22%) of 9; partial response in 3 (33%) of 9; stable disease in 3 (33%) of 9; and progressive disease in 1 (11%) of 9. After radiosurgery, 7 patients (78%) remained ambulatory until the last follow-up visit. The overall median survival time after SRS was 8 months, with a range of 2–19 months. No radiation toxicity was detected clinically during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Despite the fact that this was a small series of patients with IDIM metastasis who had limited treatment options, SRS appears to be an effective and safe method of treating patients with these lesions.

Outcome following decompressive surgery for different histological types of metastatic tumors causing epidural spinal cord compression. Clinical article

OBJECT

Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is a relatively common and debilitating complication of metastatic disease that often results in neurological deficits. Recent studies have supported decompressive surgery over radiation therapy for patients who present with MESCC. These studies, however, have grouped all patients with different histological types of metastatic disease into the same study population. The differential outcomes for patients with different histological types of metastatic disease therefore remain unknown.

METHODS

An institutional database of patients undergoing decompressive surgery for MESCC at an academic tertiary-care institution between 1996 and 2006 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with primary lung, breast, prostate, kidney, or gastrointestinal (GI) cancer or melanoma were identified. Fisher exact and log-rank analyses were used to compare pre-, peri-, and postoperative variables and survival for patients with these different types of primary cancers.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with primary lung cancer, 26 with breast cancer, 20 with prostate cancer, 21 with kidney cancer, 13 with GI cancer, and 7 with melanoma were identified and categorized. All of these patients were followed up for a mean +/- SD of 10.8 +/- 3.8 months following surgery. Patients with primary lung and prostate cancers were typically older than patients with other types of primary cancers. Patients with prostate cancer had the shortest duration of symptoms and more commonly presented with motor deficits, while patients with breast cancer more commonly had cervical spine involvement and compression fractures. For all histological types, > 90% of patients retained the ability to ambulate following surgery. However, the group with the highest percentage of patients who regained ambulatory function after decompressive surgery was the lung cancer group. Patients with breast or kidney cancer and those with melanoma had the highest median duration of survival following decompressive surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study identifies differences in presenting symptoms, operative course, perioperative complications, long-term ambulatory outcomes, and duration of survival for patients with lung, breast, prostate, kidney, and GI cancers and melanoma. This understanding may allow better risk stratification for patients with MESCC.