Clinicopathological Differences in T2 Gallbladder Cancer According to Tumor Location

Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors in GBC

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare entity with a poor prognosis, usually discovered late due to nonspecific symptoms; therefore, over the last years, attention has been focused on identifying the risk factors for developing this malignancy in order to provide an early diagnosis, as well as new prognostic factors in order to modulate the long-term evolution of such cases. The aim of this review is to discuss both major risk factors and prognostic factors in GBC for a better understanding and integration of relevant and currently available information. Methods: A literature search was performed using Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, Elsevier, and Web of Science; studies published after the year of 2000, in English, were reviewed. Results: Over time, risk factors associated with the development of GBC have been identified, which outline the profile of patients with this disease. The most important prognostic factors in GBC remain TNM staging, safety margin, and R0 status, along with perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Both the technique and experience of the surgeons and a pathological examination that ensures final staging are particularly important and increase the chances of survival of the patients. Conclusions: improvements in surgical techniques and pathological analyses might provide better and more consistent guidance for medical staff in the management of patients with GBC.

Clinical implication of the geometric location (fundal end versus cystic ductal end) of gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Management of early-stage gallbladder cancer is becoming more important as the rate of early detection is increasing. Although there have been many studies about the clinical implication of the invasion depth or peritoneal/hepatic location of gallbladder cancers, there is no study on the clinical implication of the geometric location of cancer along the longitudinal length of the gallbladder.

METHODS

The location of gallbladder cancer was defined as the geometric center of the primary site of a tumour, which lies on the longitudinal diameter of the surgical specimens. We compared the oncologic outcomes following surgery between gallbladder cancers located on the fundal end and those located on the cystic ductal end. We also analysed patients with stage 1 gallbladder cancer who recurred after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 575 patients with gallbladder cancer were included in this study. Patients with gallbladder cancer on the cystic ductal end had significantly lower rates of recurrence-free survival (P = 0.016) and overall survival (P = 0.023) compared to those with gallbladder cancer on the fundal end. Among 90 patients with stage 1 gallbladder cancer, three patients had a recurrence, all of whom had cystic ductal end gallbladder cancer and showed cystic duct invasion or concomitant xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis in permanent pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Gallbladder cancers on the cystic ductal end had worse postoperative oncologic outcomes compared with those on the fundal end.

Multi-clinical index classifier combined with AI algorithm model to predict the prognosis of gallbladder cancer

Objectives

It is significant to develop effective prognostic strategies and techniques for improving the survival rate of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). We aim to develop the prediction model from multi-clinical indicators combined artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for the prognosis of GBC.

Methods

A total of 122 patients with GBC from January 2015 to December 2019 were collected in this study. Based on the analysis of correlation, relative risk, receiver operator characteristic curve, and importance by AI algorithm analysis between clinical factors and recurrence and survival, the two multi-index classifiers (MIC1 and MIC2) were obtained. The two classifiers combined eight AI algorithms to model the recurrence and survival. The two models with the highest area under the curve (AUC) were selected to test the performance of prognosis prediction in the testing dataset.

Results

The MIC1 has ten indicators, and the MIC2 has nine indicators. The combination of the MIC1 classifier and the "avNNet" model can predict recurrence with an AUC of 0.944. The MIC2 classifier and "glmet" model combination can predict survival with an AUC of 0.882. The Kaplan-Meier analysis shows that MIC1 and MIC2 indicators can effectively predict the median survival of DFS and OS, and there is no statistically significant difference in the prediction results of the indicators (MIC1: χ² = 6.849, P = 0.653; MIC2: χ² = 9.14, P = 0.519).

Conclusions

The MIC1 and MIC2 combined with avNNet and mda models have high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the prognosis of GBC.

Subserosal vascular density predicts oncological features of T2 gallbladder cancer

PURPOSE

Tumor sidedness (hepatic side vs. peritoneal side) reportedly predicts microvascular invasion and survival outcomes of T2 gallbladder cancer, although the actual histopathological mechanism is not fully understood.

METHODS

The clinical relevance of tumor sidedness was revisited in 84 patients with gallbladder cancer using histopathological analysis of the vascular density of the gallbladder wall.

RESULTS

Hepatic-side tumor location was associated with overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 13.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.09-88.93) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR, 8.70; 95% CI, 1.36-55.69) in T2 tumors. The Adjusted Kaplan-Meier curve indicated a clear survival difference between T2a (peritoneal side) and T2b (hepatic side) tumors (P = 0.006). A review of 56 pathological specimens with gallbladder cancer and 20 control specimens demonstrated that subserosal vascular density was significantly higher on the hepatic side of the gallbladder, regardless of the presence of cancer (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis also confirmed that higher subserosal vascular density was significantly associated with poor OS (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.10-2.73 per 10 microscopic fields) and poor RFS (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.06-2.49) in T2  gallbladder cancer.

CONCLUSION

Higher subserosal vascular density may account for the higher incidence of cancer spread and the poor prognosis of T2b gallbladder cancer.

Imaging patterns of wall thickening type of gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) has a high incidence in certain geographical regions. Morphologically, GBC presents as a mass replacing the gallbladder, a polypoidal lesion, or wall thickening. The incidence of preoperative diagnosis of wall thickening type of GBC is less well studied. The patterns of mural involvement and extramural spread are not well described in the literature. Additionally, wall thickening in the gallbladder does not always indicate malignancy and can be secondary to inflammatory or benign gallbladder diseases and extracholecystic causes and systemic pathologies. Objective reporting of gallbladder wall thickening will help us appreciate GBC's early features. In this review, we illustrate the imaging patterns of wall thickening type of GBC.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival outcomes in T2a and T2b gallbladder cancers

BACKGROUND

The 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging of Gallbladder cancer subdivided T2 stage into T2a and T2b based on tumour location. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes in T2a and T2b gallbladder cancers.

METHODS

Literature search of Medline, Web of science, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed. Study characteristics, survival and recurrence data were extracted for meta-analysis of effect estimates and of individual patient data.

RESULTS

Fifteen retrospective studies (2531 patients, T2a = 1332, T2b = 199) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in patients with T2b compared to T2a tumours (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.67-2.86, p < 0.0001). Meta-analysis of individual patient data (n = 629) showed similar results (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.43-2.58, p < 0.00001). Patients with T2b tumours had higher risk of recurrence compared to T2a (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.40-7.28, p = 0.006) and were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.12-2.84, p = 0.014). Liver resection improved OS in T2b tumours (HR 2.99, CI 1.73-5.16, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

T2b gallbladder tumours have worse overall survival and increase risk of recurrence compared to T2a. Liver resection appears to improve OS in patients with T2b tumours. However, high quality multicenter data is required to confirm these results.

Survival Predictors of Resectable Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

Background

To analyze population-level data for resectable gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.

Methods

We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify all patients aged 18 years or older with T1-3 M0 GBC diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Multivariate cox hazard regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

Of the 1601 eligible patients, 1310 (81.8%) underwent cholecystectomy only and 291 (18.2%) underwent an en bloc resection. Overall, 219 (13.7%) patients were in stage I, 400 (25%) were in stage II, 260 (16.2%) were in stage IIIA, 653 (40.8%) were in stage IIIB, and 69 (4.3%) were in stage IVB. The 5-year survival rates for patients were 82.7% for stage I, 73.4% for stage II, 31.9% for stage IIIA, 24.1% for stage IIIB, and 10% for stage IVB. Multivariate cox analysis indicated that predictors of decreased CSS included age at diagnosis >65 years, tumor size >3.2 cm, adenocarcinoma, increasing tumor spread, and lymph node involvement. Besides, chemotherapy and radiation were predictors of increased CSS.

Conclusions

Older age, increasing tumor size, adenocarcinoma, and advanced tumor/node stage were associated with a poorer prognosis after resection for GBC. Furthermore, patients with resectable GBC can benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Tumor location and concurrent liver resection, impact survival in T2 gallbladder cancer: a meta-analysis of the literature

Aim of doing this review was to give a uniform consensus on prognostic impact of tumor location (hepatic vs peritoneal), liver resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in gall bladder cancer and, to compare them with previous well-studied factors of survival. We systematically review PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane for relevant articles with no date restrictions, language was restricted to English. Those articles were included that had provided Hazard ratio (HR) of survival for T2 gall bladder cancer. We identified nine retrospective studies published between 2014 and 2020 with 2345 patients. Meta-analysis showed that T2b (hepatic) cancers had higher odds of mortality (HR 3.16 [2.11, 4.74], I² = 0%). Liver resection was associated with significantly higher odds of 5-year overall survival only in T2b (2.20 [1.33, 3.63], I² = 67%), adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with any significant decrease in mortality risk (0.98 [0.83-1.16]. I² = 20%). Hepatic sided gall bladder tumors carry higher odds for mortality and recurrence. T2a tumors can be managed without hepatic resection. To risk stratify patients we also formulated a scoring system for mortality risk.

Applicability of sentinel lymph node oriented treatment strategy for gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Utility of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in some malignancies has been reported, however, research on that of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rare. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the concept of SLN is applicable to T2/3 GBC.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients who underwent resection for gallbladder cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients with GBC were stratified into two groups based on the location of tumor, peritoneal-side (T2p or 3p) and hepatic-side (T2h or 3h) groups. We evaluated the relationship between cystic duct node (CDN) and downstream lymph node (LN) status. CDN was defined as a SLN in this study.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were classified into T2, including T2p (n = 18) and T2h (n = 20), and 42 patients into T3, including T3p (n = 22) andT3h (n = 20). The incidence of LN metastasis was significantly higher in hepatic-side than peritoneal-side in both T2 and T3 (P = 0.036 and 0.009, respectively). In T2, 14 T2p had negative CDN and downstream LN, however, three T2h had negative CDN and positive downstream LNs (defined as a skipped LN metastasis) (P = 0.043). In T3, patients with skipped LN metastasis were significantly higher in T3h (n = 11) than those in T3p (n = 2) (P<0.001). There was no recurrence of the local lymph node. Disease-free survival in the T2p and T3p were significantly better than those in the T2h and T3h (P = 0.005 and 0.025, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The concept of SLN can be applicable to T2p GBC, where the downstream LNs dissection can be omitted.

Current and New Biomarkers for Early Detection, Prognostic Stratification, and Management of Gallbladder Cancer Patients

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive disease that shows evident geographic variation and is characterized by a poor prognosis, mainly due to the late diagnosis and ineffective treatment. Genetic variants associated with GBC susceptibility, including polymorphisms within the toll-like receptors TLR2 and TLR4, the cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1), and the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter ABCG8 genes, represent promising biomarkers for the stratification of patients at higher risk of GBC; thus, showing potential to prioritize cholecystectomy, particularly considering that early diagnosis is difficult due to the absence of specific signs and symptoms. Similarly, our better understanding of the gallbladder carcinogenic processes has led to identify several cellular and molecular events that may influence patient management, including HER2 aberrations, high tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, among others. Despite these reports on interesting and promising markers for risk assessment, diagnosis, and prognosis; there is an unmet need for reliable and validated biomarkers that can improve the management of GBC patients and support clinical decision-making. This review article examines the most potentially significant biomarkers of susceptibility, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection for GBC patients, highlighting the need to find and validate existing and new molecular biomarkers to improve patient outcomes.