Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Clinicopathologic Features

Diagnostic value of dual-source, dual-energy computed tomography combined with the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for discriminating gastric signet ring cell from mixed signet ring cell and non-signet ring cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

To explore the diagnostic value of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for differentiating gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) from mixed SRC (mSRC) and non-SRC (nSRC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent DSCT between August 2019 and June 2021 at our Hospital. The iodine concentration in the venous phase (ICvp), standardized iodine concentration (NICVP), and the slope of the energy spectrum curve (kVP) were extracted from DSCT data. NLR was determined from laboratory results. DSCT (including ICVP, NICVP, and kVP) and combination (including DSCT model and NLR) models were established based on the multinomial logistic regression analysis. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic value.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients (SRC [n = 45, aged 61.22 ± 11.4 years], mSRC [n = 60, aged 61.09 ± 12.7 years], and nSRC [n = 50, aged 67.66 ± 8.76 years]) were included. There were significant differences in NLR, ICVP, NICVP, and kVP among the SRC, mSRC, and nSRC groups (all P < 0.001). The AUC of the combination model for SRC vs. mSRC + nSRC was 0.964 (95% CI: 0.923-1.000), with a sensitivity of 98.3% and a specificity of 86.7%, higher than with DSCT (AUC: 0.959, 95% CI: 0.919-0.998, sensitivity: 90.0%, specificity: 89.9%) or NLR (AUC: 0.670, 95% CI: 0.577-0.768, sensitivity: 62.2%, specificity: 61.8%).

CONCLUSION

DSCT combined with NLR showed high diagnostic efficacy in differentiating SRC from mSRC and nSRC.

A novel web-based dynamic prognostic nomogram for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: a multicenter population-based study

Background

Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) is a rare and highly malignant disease with a poor prognosis. To assess the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with GSRCC, prognostic nomograms were developed and validated using common clinical factors.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with GSRCC between 2011 and 2018 from the National Cancer Center (n = 1453) and SEER databases (n = 2745). Prognostic nomograms were established by identifying independent prognostic factors using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The calibration curve and C-index were used to assess the predictions. The clinical usefulness of the survival prediction model was further evaluated using the DCA and ROC curves. The models were internally validated in the training cohort and externally validated in the validation cohort. Two web servers were created to make the nomogram easier to use.

Results

Patients with GSRCC were divided into training (n = 2938) and validation (n = 1260) cohorts. The nomograms incorporated six predictors: age, race, tumor site, tumor size, N stage, T stage, and AJCC stage. Excellent agreement was observed between the internal and exterior calibration plots for the GSRCC survival estimates. The C-index and area under the ROC curve were roughly greater than 0.7. Both nomograms had adequate clinical efficacy, as demonstrated by the DCA plots. Furthermore, we developed a dynamic web application utilizing the constructed nomograms available at https://jiangyujuan.shinyapps.io/OS-nomogram/ and https://jiangyujuan.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp-DFS/.

Conclusion

We developed web-based dynamic nomograms utilizing six independent prognostic variables that assist physicians in estimating the OS and CSS of patients with GSRCC.

Clinical Features of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Cancer: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Conflicting results about the prognostic relevance of signet ring cell histology in gastric cancer have been reported. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis focusing on the clinicopathological features and prognosis of this subgroup of cancer compared with other histologies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in the PubMed database was conducted, including all publications up to 1 October 2021. A meta-analysis comparing the results of the studies was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 2062 studies referring to gastric cancer with signet ring cell histology were identified, of which 262 studies reported on its relationship with clinical information. Of these, 74 were suitable to be included in the meta-analysis. A slightly lower risk of developing nodal metastases in signet ring cell tumours compared to other histotypes was found (especially to undifferentiated/poorly differentiated/mucinous and mixed histotypes); the lower risk was more evident in early and slightly increased in advanced gastric cancer. Survival tended to be better in early stage signet ring cell cancer compared to other histotypes; no differences were shown in advanced stages, and survival was poorer in metastatic patients. In the subgroup analysis, survival in signet ring cell cancer was slightly worse compared to non-signet ring cell cancer and differentiated/well-to-moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the conflicting results in signet ring cell gastric cancer literature could be derived from the lack of standardisation in their classification and the comparison with the different subtypes of gastric cancer. There is a critical need to strive for a standardised classification system for gastric cancer, fostering clarity and coherence in the forthcoming research and clinical applications.

Impact of Signet-Ring Cell Histology in the Management of Patients with Non-Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Analysis Comparing FLOT Perioperative Chemotherapy vs. Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

FLOT perioperative chemotherapy represents the standard of care in non-metastatic gastric cancer patients. Signet-ring cell positivity is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy. Comparison between FLOT perioperative chemotherapy vs. surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy based on signet-ring cell positivity is lacking. The aim of the analysis was to compare perioperative FLOT with adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients stratified by signet-ring cell positivity.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis based on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric cancer who received perioperative chemotherapy with a FLOT regimen and compared their survival with a historical cohort of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, matched by cT and cN stage and by tumor histological features.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were enrolled and 24 (32%) were signet-ring cell positive. At a median follow-up time of 39 months, the median DFS was 26.3 months and the median OS was 37.3 months. Signet-ring cell positivity was associated with a shorter OS (median OS: 20.4 vs. 46.9 months, HR: 3.30, 95%CI: 1.56-6.99, p = 0.0018) and DFS (mDFS: 15.2 vs. 38.6 months, HR: 3.18, 95%CI: 1.55-6.54, p = 0.0016). This was confirmed by multivariate analysis for DFS (Exp(B): 2.55) and OS (Exp(B): 2.68). After propensity score matching, statistically significant shorter DFS (HR: 3.30, 95%CI: 1.50-7.35, p = 0.003) and OS (HR: 5.25, 95%CI: 2.18-12-68, p = 0.0002) were observed for patients with signet-ring cell positivity who received perioperative treatment vs. those who received surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Signet-ring positivity was associated with shorter DFS and OS in patients who received perioperative treatment with FLOT compared with surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. These data suggest that for patients with signet-ring cell histology, FLOT perioperative treatment might not always be the best choice of treatment, and further research should be focused on this group of patients.

A Rare Case of Metastatic Gastric Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinoma in a 23-Year-Old Female Presenting as Malignant Pleural Effusion

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a poorly differentiated mucin-producing adenocarcinoma with greater than 50% signet ring cells. It commonly arises from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and rarely from extraintestinal organs. This is a rare case of a young African American female who presented with metastatic spread of signet ring cell gastric cancer (pleural and lymph nodal involvement) as the initial presentation of SRCC. Knowledge of the various clinical manifestations of SRCC can help with its early diagnosis, and there is a high need for detailed physical examination, early referral, and prompt treatment in patients with SRCC.

Pathological Nodal Staging Score for Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Clinical Tool of Adequate Nodal Staging

Background: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) is a subset of gastric cancer with distinct histological and inconsistent prognosis outcome. Currently, the association between the adequate regional lymph node and proper nodal staging in GSRCC is rarely noticed. Materials and methods: Clinical data of GSRCC were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Beta-binomial distribution model was employed for the estimation of the probability of missing nodal disease, followed by the development of a nodal staging score (NSS). Results: A total of 561 GSRCC patients were included in this study, with 193 in lymph node-negative and 368 in lymph node-positive diagnoses. As the number of examined lymph nodes increased, the probability of missing nodal disease decreased rapidly, with T stage-specific curves. The probability of missing nodal disease in T4 was lower than that in T1. NSS calculation indicated that T1 stage patients commonly had NSS > 0.8. However, with the NSS of T2−T4 to reach 0.8, the number of examined lymph node was required to be larger than 12 in T2, 17 in T3 and 27 in T4. NSS ≥ 0.75 (quantile 75%) subgroup in T2−T4 subgroups tended to have better outcome; however, without significant prognostic value. Conclusions: NSS is served as a reliable and feasible tool in adequate nodal staging of GSRCC with statistical basis and provides further evidence for clinical decision making.

Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) has shown a growth growing trend worldwide, but its clinicopathological features and prognostic-related risk factors have not been systematically studied. This systematic review was devoted to this.

Method

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were retrieved, and retrospective cohort studies comparing clinicopathological features and related risk factors in SRCC patients were included.

Results

In SRCC patient population, males were more than females (male, OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.20-1.60); N3 patients were more than N0-2 patients (N0-2, OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.98-5.15); M1 patients were more than M0 patients (M0, OR = 3.30, 95% CI: 1.88-5.80); patients with tumor > 5 cm were more than those with tumor (≤5 cm, OR = 7.36, 95% CI: 1.33-40.60). Patients with age < 60 years (age ≥ 60 years, OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), lymphatic vessel invasion (no, OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.03-2.45), T2 (T1, OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.28) and T4 (T1, OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 2.30-2.81) stages, and N1 (N0, OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.08-2.38), N2 (N0, OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.12-3.36), and N3 (N0, OR = 3.45, 95% CI: 1.58-5.32) stages had higher hazard ratio (HR).

Conclusion

SRCC may occur frequently in male. Age, lymphatic vessel invasion, TN, and M stage may be risk factors for poor prognoses of SRCC patients.

Signet ring cell carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract: National trends on treatment effects and prognostic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a distinct malignancy occurring across the tubular gastrointestinal tract (tGIT). We comprehensively examined the outcomes of patients diagnosed with SRCC across tGIT.

METHODS

SRCC and not-otherwise-specified adenocarcinoma (NOS) patients reported to the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 were included. Baseline characteristics, outcomes and site-specific adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) derived from Cox models of SRCC patients were compared to those of NOS patients. Overall survival (OS) was primary endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 41,686 SRCC (4.6%) and 871,373 NOS patients (95.4%) were included. SRCC patients were younger (63.1 ± 14.7 vs. 67.0 ± 13.4 y, p < 0.001) and more likely to present with Stage IV disease than NOS patients (42.5% vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001). Stomach (n = 24,433) and colon (n = 9,914) contributed highest frequency of SRCC. SRCC histology was associated with shorter OS (aHR = 1.377, p < 0.001) in multivariate model. There was an interaction between SRCC and chemotherapy effects on risk of death (interaction aHR = 1.072, p_interaction< 0.001) and between SRCC histology and disease site, suggesting that the effect of SRCC on OS is site-dependent, with a higher increased risk of death in patients with rectal SRCC (aHR = 2.378, p_interaction< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Significant negative prognostic effect associated with SRCC is site-dependent across the GIT. Surgical and or systemic therapy was associated with improved OS among SRCC patients, but remained lower than NOS patients. Further understanding of gastrointestinal SRCC molecular profile is needed to better inform future treatment strategies.