Tracking Progression of Heart Disease with Cardiac Computed Tomography

Statin therapy in patients with atypical chest pain and mild-to-moderate coronary stenosis on 64-slice multidetector coronary computed tomography; a retrospective propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of computed tomography (CT)-guided statin therapy on patients with atypical chest pain and mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease has not been elucidated yet.

METHODS

A total of 1,952 patients who had 1-69 % stenosis on CT were reviewed retrospectively. After propensity score matching, 643 patients who were prescribed statins after CT (statin users) and 643 patients without statin therapy (statin non-users) were compared. Major cardiovascular events included all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome and stroke.

RESULTS

During a median of 42 months' follow-up, all-cause death was reported in 17 patients (1.3 %), of whom 6 (0.9 %) were statin users and 11 (1.7 %) statin nonusers. Major cardiovascular events developed in 6.1 % in the statin user group and 5.6 % in the statin non-users (P = 0.812). When evaluated according to plaque subtypes, statins showed significant benefit in patients who had non-calcified or mixed plaque (HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.22-1.01, P = 0.047). However, in patients with calcified plaques, statins had no benefit in reducing adverse events (P = 0.620).

CONCLUSION

In most patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery stenosis on CT, statin therapy has no beneficial effect on reducing adverse events. However, in patients with non-calcified or mixed plaques, statin therapy showed a significant benefit.

KEY POINTS

• Multidetector CT now identifies numerous subjects with mild-to-moderate coronary stenosis. • Statin therapy has little beneficial effect on patients with calcified plaques. • However, statins reduce adverse events in those with non-calcified or mixed plaques.

Secondary prevention strategies for coronary heart disease

Patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD) have a high risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and death from cardiovascular disease. Adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies for CHD has improved in recent years but still remains suboptimal. Mortality from CHD in the United States (US) has decreased substantially in recent decades. The decline in US deaths from CHD from 1980 through 2000 has been attributed to reductions in major risk factors and utilization of evidence-based medical therapies. It has been estimated that optimization of secondary prevention strategies could save as many as 80,000 more lives per year in the US. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) updated its guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease in 2006. The guidelines emphasize evidence-based developments in the field of CHD secondary prevention and also reinforce the need to implement these recommendations in actual clinical practice through programs such as the ACC's Guidelines Applied to Practice and the AHA's Get With The Guidelines. This review will discuss the epidemiology and risk assessment of CHD, current pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies available for the secondary prevention of CHD, and summarize the guidelines and evidence that support these treatment options. There will be an emphasis on antiplatelet therapy given the important role of thrombosis in clinical cardiovascular events.

Long-term changes in serum cholesterol level does not influence the progression of coronary calcification

BACKGROUND

A number of reports controversially describe the influence of cholesterol level and lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) on the progression of coronary calcium (CC). We tested the hypothesis that long-term changes in serum cholesterol (CL) would affect the progression of CC.

METHODS

The study population comprised 510 patients with stable angina pectoris, mean age of 63 ± 9 years. At baseline 372 patients received statin and/or fibrate (LLT group) while 138 patients did not (No-LLT at baseline group). Spiral CT every 24 months was used to track the progression of CC over a median 5.6 year follow-up.

RESULTS

CL decreased during follow-up in both groups, but more pronouncedly in patients with LLT. The changes in total calcium score (TCS) were similar in both groups (p=0.3). Changes in CL during follow-up were not associated with CC: TCS increased by 501 ± 63 from baseline in the 1st (upper) quartile, and by 350 ± 44, 403 ± 41 and 480 ± 56 in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles of CL longitudinal changes (p = 0.2), respectively. Baseline TCS and its changes were not correlated with baseline CL and its changes. New calcified lesions were diagnosed in 132 (28.2%) out of the 467 patients available for this analysis, without significant difference between groups (p=0.4). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only baseline TCS (p < 0.001), body mass index (p = 0.007) and age (p = 0.006) were independent predictors for the TCS changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal CL changes do not seem to have a measurable effect on the rate of progression of CC.