Mode of Death in Patients With Systolic Heart Failure

The rationale for repurposing funny current inhibition for management of ventricular arrhythmia

Management of ventricular arrhythmia in structural heart disease is complicated by the toxicity of the limited antiarrhythmic options available. In others, proarrhythmia and deleterious hemodynamic and noncardiac effects prevent practical use. This necessitates new thinking in therapeutic agents for ventricular arrhythmia in structural heart disease. Ivabradine, a funny current (I_f) inhibitor, has proven safety in heart failure, angina, and inappropriate sinus tachycardia. Although it is commonly known that funny channels are primarily expressed in the sinoatrial node, atrioventricular node, and conducting system of the ventricle, ivabradine is known to exert effects on metabolism, ion homeostasis, and membrane electrophysiology of remodeled ventricular myocardium. This review considers novel concepts and evidence from clinical and experimental studies regarding this paradigm, with a potential role of ivabradine in ventricular arrhythmia.

Diagnostic discrepancies in clinical practice: An autopsy study in patients with heart failure

Autopsies are the gold standard for diagnostic accuracy; however, no recent study has analyzed autopsies in heart failure (HF).We reviewed 1241 autopsies (January 2000-May 2005) and selected 232 patients with HF. Clinical and autopsy diagnoses were analyzed and discrepancies categorized according to their importance regarding therapy and prognosis.Mean age was 63.3 ± 15.9 years; 154 (66.4%) patients were male. The causes of death at autopsy were end-stage HF (40.9%), acute myocardial infarction (17.2%), infection (15.9), and pulmonary embolism 36 (15.5). Diagnostic discrepancies occurred in 191 (82.3%) cases; in 56 (24.1%), discrepancies were related to major diagnoses with potential influence on survival or treatment; pulmonary embolism was the cause of death for 24 (42.9%) of these patients. In 35 (15.1%), discrepancies were related to a major diagnosis with equivocal influence on survival or treatment; in 100 (43.1%), discrepancies did not influence survival or treatment. In multivariate analysis, age (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.008-1.052, P = 0.007) and presence of diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.359, 95% CI: 0.168-0.767, P = 0.008) influenced the occurrence discrepancies.Diagnostic discrepancies with a potential impact on prognosis are frequent in HF. These findings warrant reconsideration in diagnostic and therapeutic practices with HF patients.

Mortality rates and modes of death in heart failure patients with reduced versus preserved systolic function

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting reports regarding the characteristics and mortality rates of heart failure patients with preserved (HFPSF) vs. reduced systolic left ventricular function (SHF).

METHODS

We evaluated the clinical profiles, mortality rates and modes of death in 481 consecutive symptomatic heart failure patients. In 317(66%) patients LVEF was <40% (SHF), and in 164(34%) LVEF≥40% (HFPSF).

RESULTS

Compared to the HFPSF group, SHF patients were predominantly younger males with ischemic etiology and less cardiovascular comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation. Over a mean follow-up period of 2 years, 148(31%) patients died. Overall mortality was similar between the two groups: 53(32%) HFPSF patients and 95(30%) SHF patients died (p=0.6), even after adjusting for baseline variables, including age, gender and comorbidities (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.61; p=0.67). In contrast to the similar mortality rates, the modes of death were different. SHF patients had higher death rates due to pump failure compared to the HFPSF group {32/95(34%) vs. 9/53(17%) patients, p=0.03}. A trend towards higher rate of non-cardiac death was observed in HFPSF group {33/53(62%) patients vs. 45/95(47%) patients, respectively, p=0.08}. The prevalence of arrhythmic death was similar in both groups {17/95(18%) vs. 10/53(19%) patients, p=0.9}.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the characteristics of HFPSF and SHF patients are distinctively different, the mortality rates are similar. The mode of death is different among the two groups of patients, as pump failure death is significantly higher in SHF patients, while non-cardiac mortality is more prevalent in HFPSF patients.