Effects of direct renin inhibition on atherosclerotic biomarkers in patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Cardiovascular-renal complications and the possible role of plasminogen activator inhibitor: a review

Since angiotensin increases the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI), mechanisms associated with an actively functioning renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system can be expected to be associated with increased PAI-1 expression. These mechanisms are present not only in common conditions resulting in glomerulosclerosis associated with aging, diabetes or genetic mutations, but also in autoimmune disease (like scleroderma and lupus), radiation injury, cyclosporine toxicity, allograft nephropathy and ureteral obstruction. While the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and growth factors, such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), are almost always part of the process, there are rare experimental observations of PAI-1 expression without their interaction. Here we review the literature on PAI-1 and its role in vascular, fibrotic and oxidative injury as well as work suggesting potential areas of intervention in the pathogenesis of multiple disorders.

Effects of aliskiren in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: Insights from AQUARIUS

BACKGROUND

Aliskiren previously was found to have potentially harmful effects in diabetic individuals prescribed concomitant angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotenisn receptor antagonists (ARB). We explored potential effects of aliskiren on coronary atheroma progression and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death/non-fatal MI/non-fatal stroke/hospitalization for heart failure/hospitalization for ACS/arterial revascularization) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

AQUARIUS employed serial intravascular ultrasound measures of coronary atheroma volume in coronary artery disease patients randomized to receive daily aliskiren 300 mg or placebo for 104 weeks. This post hoc analysis compared changes in plaque volume [percent atheroma volume (PAV) and total atheroma volume (TAV)] and MACE in patients with (n = 115) and without (n = 343) DM stratified by treatment allocation.

RESULTS

In multivariable propensity-weighted analyses, which included controlling for baseline and concomitant ACEI/ARB therapy and duration of aliskiren therapy, aliskiren-treated non-DM patients demonstrated the greatest PAV and TAV regression, whereas aliskiren-treated DM patients demonstrated the greatest TAV progression and greater PAV. Aliskiren-treated non-DM patients appeared at significantly lower risk of MACE compared with their aliskiren-treated DM counterparts [HR 95% CI 0.28 (0.10, 0.80)]. Statistical interactions were noted between DM status and treatment allocation for both changes in PAV (p < 0.001), TAV (p = 0.010) and MACE (p = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

Aliskiren appears to be relatively anti-atherosclerotic in non-diabetic patients. Due to the limited number MACE and low numbers of diabetic patients in AQUARIUS, the pro-atherosclerotic effects of aliskiren in this population are inconclusive, and these results should be thus considered hypothesis generating. Further outcome studies are required in non-diabetic patients to confirm the possible favorable effects of aliskiren.

A study about the relevance of adding acetylsalicylic acid in primary prevention in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: effects on some new emerging biomarkers of cardiovascular risk

AIM

To evaluate the relevance of adding acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in primary prevention in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

213 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension were randomized to amlodipine 5 mg, or amlodipine 5 mg + ASA 100 mg for 3 months (Phase A); then, if adequate blood pressure control was reached patients terminated the study; otherwise, amlodipine was up-titrated to 10 mg/day for further 3 months and compared to amlodipine 10 mg + ASA 100 mg (Phase B). We assessed at baseline, at the end of Phase A, and at the end of Phase B the levels of some new emerging biomarkers of cardiovascular risk including: high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), adiponectin (ADN), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), myeloperoxidase (MPO), soluble CD40 ligand (sCDL40).

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, at the end of Phase A, patients treated with amlodipine 5 mg + ASA 100 mg showed a statistically significant reduction of Hs-CRP (-15.0%), TNF-α (-21.7%), MPO (-9.7%), and sCDL40 (-15.7%), and a statistically significant increase of ADN (+15.0%). These values were significantly better than the ones obtained with amlodipine alone. Similarly, at the end of Phase B, amlodipine 10 mg + ASA significantly lowered Hs-CRP (-18.8%), TNF-α (-15.0%), MPO (-9.2%), and sCDL40 (-20.0%) and increased ADN (+11.8%), with a better effect compared to amlodipine alone.

CONCLUSION

All biomarkers considered were significantly improved by ASA addition. These data suggest that the use of ASA in primary prevention could be useful in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02064218.