Venous thromboembolism pharmacy intervention management program with an active, multifaceted approach reduces preventable venous thromboembolism and increases appropriate prophylaxis

Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients: An NATF Anticoagulation Action Initiative

Hospitalized patients with acute medical illnesses are at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) during and after a hospital stay. Risk factors include physical immobilization and underlying pathophysiologic processes that activate the coagulation pathway and are still present after discharge. Strategies for optimal pharmacologic VTE thromboprophylaxis are evolving, and recommendations for VTE prophylaxis can be further refined to protect high-risk patients after hospital discharge. An early study of extended VTE prophylaxis with a parenteral agent in medically ill patients yielded inconclusive results with regard to efficacy and bleeding. In the Acute Medically Ill VTE Prevention with Extended Duration Betrixaban (APEX) trial, extended use of betrixaban halved symptomatic VTE, decreased hospital readmission, and reduced stroke and major adverse cardiovascular events compared with standard enoxaparin prophylaxis. Based on findings from APEX, the Food and Drug Administration approved betrixaban in 2017 for extended VTE prophylaxis in acute medically ill patients. In the Reducing Post-Discharge Venous Thrombo-Embolism Risk (MARINER) study, extended use of rivaroxaban halved symptomatic VTE in high-risk medical patients compared with placebo. In 2019, rivaroxaban was approved for extended thromboprophylaxis in high-risk medical patients, thus making available a new strategy for in-hospital and post-discharge VTE prevention. To address the critical unmet need for VTE prophylaxis in medically ill patients at the time of hospital discharge, the North American Thrombosis Forum (NATF) is launching the Anticoagulation Action Initiative, a comprehensive consensus document that provides practical guidance and straightforward, patient-centered recommendations for VTE prevention during hospitalization and after discharge.

Reducing inappropriately suspended VTE prophylaxis through a multidisciplinary shared learning programme and electronic prompting

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of preventable hospital death, accounting for up to 10% of inpatient mortality. National guidelines recommend that all patients should be regularly assessed for VTE risk, and prescribed mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis accordingly. While previous studies have focused on improving prescription uptake on admission, there has been relatively little emphasis on the inappropriate suspension of prophylaxis during inpatient stay.

Objective

The purpose of this project was to identify the reasons and scale of inappropriate suspension of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis for medical inpatients. We subsequently planned to introduce a number of interventions in order to reduce inappropriate suspension.

Methods

An initial audit of all medical inpatients was carried out to establish the number with inappropriately suspended pharmacological prophylaxis. We then designed a series of educational meetings and electronic prompting interventions to alert prescribers to these errors, followed by re-audit to assess their efficacy.

Results

The number of patients with inappropriately suspended VTE prophylaxis was significantly reduced following introduction of our intervention strategy.

Conclusions

Combined education and electronic email prompts are an effective way of alerting practitioners to reduce inappropriate suspension of VTE prophylaxis. With ongoing teaching and integration of prescribing software alerts, this reduction in VTE prescribing errors could be sustained.

Deep-vein thrombosis: A United States cost model for a preventable and costly adverse event

Preventable venous thromboembolism (VTE) and “appropriate” type, dose, and duration of prophylaxis are emerging concepts. Contemporary definitions by key quality organisations, including the World Health Organization, have shifted towards “preventable” VTE being considered an adverse event or adverse drug event. A decision tree and cost model were developed to estimate the United States health care costs for total deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), total hospital-acquired DVT, and total “preventable” DVT. Annual cost ranges were obtained in 2010 US dollars for total ($7.5 to $39.5 billion), hospital-acquired ($5 to $26.5billion), and preventable ($2.5 to $19.5 billion) DVT costs. When the sensitivity analysis was applied – taking into consideration higher incidence rates and costs – annual US total, hospital-acquired, and “preventable” DVT costs ranged from $9.8 to $52 billion, $6.8 to $36 billion, and $3.4 to $27 billion, respectively.

Hidden costs associated with venous thromboembolism: impact of lost productivity on employers and employees

OBJECTIVE

To determine productivity loss and indirect costs with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

Medical and pharmacy claims with short-term disability (STD) and long-term disability (LTD) claims from 2007 to 2010 were analyzed from the Integrated Benefits Institute's Health and Productivity Benchmarking (IBI-HPB) database (STD and LTD claims) and IMS LifeLink™ data (medical and pharmacy claims), which were indirectly linked using a weighting approach matching from IBI-HPB patients' demographic distribution.

RESULTS

A total of 5442 DVT and 6199 PE claims were identified. Employees with DVT lost 57 STD and 440 LTD days per disability incident. The average per claim productivity loss from STD and LTD was $7414 and $58181, respectively. Employees with PE lost 56 STD and 364 LTD days per disability incident. The average per claim productivity loss from STD and LTD was $7605 and $48,751, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep vein thrombosis and PE impose substantial economic burdens.

Venous thromboembolism and preoperative steroid use: analysis of the NSQIP database to evaluate risk in surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Despite several prophylactic strategies, postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the search for modifiable preoperative risk factors is crucial. Few reports have explored this issue but the direct relationship between preoperative steroid use and postoperative VTE in surgical patients remains unexplored.

METHODS

We used The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database in our study. After analyzing patient characteristics, we used multivariate logistic regression to assess the crude and adjusted effect of steroids on VTE, our primary outcome.

RESULTS

Data was obtained for 1,921,901 patients, 58,667 of whom were on glucocorticoids for at least 30days preoperatively. VTE was higher in patients on steroids with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-1.64. The adjusted odds ratio for the secondary outcomes: mortality, urinary tract occurrences, wound occurrences, sepsis, cardiac and respiratory adverse events were 1.42 (CI 1.35-1.49), 1.40 (CI 1.30-1.50), 1.58 (CI 1.51-1.66), 1.51 (CI 1.42-1.60), 1.19 (CI 1.11-1.29) and 1.302 (CI 1.301-1.303) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that surgical patients with prolonged preoperative glucocorticoid intake are at a higher risk of developing postoperative VTE as well as other secondary outcomes including: all-cause mortality, urinary tract occurrences, sepsis, wound occurrences, cardiac and respiratory adverse events. These are important findings since preoperative glucocorticoid use is a modifiable factor.

Assessment of characteristics associated with pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis use in hospitalized patients: a cohort study of 10,016 patients

The aim of the study was to evaluate patient characteristics associated with pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (PTP) use/nonuse in a general tertiary hospital cohort. Eligible patients were classified according to venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk category by trained nurses. Either standard or low-molecular weight heparin was recommended to intermediate or high-risk VTE patients. Adopting the recommended PTP was at the physician's discretion. At discharge, PTP use was recorded. PTP was recommended to 10,016 patients, of whom 2165 (21.6%) received the recommended thromboprophylaxis. In the multivariate logistic regression, PTP use/nonuse remained independently associated with female sex [odds ratio (OR) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.84], age (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.03-1.04), being admitted to the Gynecology-Obstetrics (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.25-0.39) or surgery (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.12-1.42), thrombophilia (OR 5.15; 95% CI 2.04-12.98), previous VTE event (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.78-4.98), diabetes (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.61-2.10), acute myocardial infarction (OR 5.87; 95% CI 4.81-7.17), and admission to a major orthopedic surgery (OR 3.03; 95% CI 1.98-4.64). PTP in this hospital population was grossly underused. Eight independent variables predicted use/nonuse of PTP. Targeting variables related to the use and nonuse of PTP is important to direct the application of thromboprophylaxis.

Practices to prevent venous thromboembolism: a brief review

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of preventable harm for hospitalised patients. Over the past decade, numerous intervention types have been implemented in attempts to improve the prescription of VTE prophylaxis in hospitals, with varying degrees of success. We reviewed key articles to assess the efficacy of different types of interventions to improve prescription of VTE prophylaxis for hospitalised patients.

Methods

We conducted a search of MEDLINE for key studies published between 2001 and 2012 of interventions employing education, paper based tools, computerised tools, real time audit and feedback, or combinations of intervention types to improve prescription of VTE prophylaxis for patients in hospital settings. Process outcomes of interest were prescription of any VTE prophylaxis and best practice VTE prophylaxis. Clinical outcomes of interest were any VTE and potentially preventable VTE, defined as VTE occurring in patients not prescribed appropriate prophylaxis.

Results

16 articles were included in this review. Two studies employed education only, four implemented paper based tools, four used computerised tools, two evaluated audit and feedback strategies, and four studies used combinations of intervention types. Individual modalities result in improved prescription of VTE prophylaxis; however, the greatest and most sustained improvements were those that combined education with computerised tools.

Conclusions

Many intervention types have proven effective to different degrees in improving VTE prevention. Provider education is likely a required additional component and should be combined with other intervention types. Active mandatory tools are likely more effective than passive ones. Information technology tools that are well integrated into provider workflow, such as alerts and computerised clinical decision support, can improve best practice prophylaxis use and prevent patient harm resulting from VTE.

Venous thromboembolism: annualised United States models for total, hospital-acquired and preventable costs utilising long-term attack rates

Healthcare reform is upon the United States (US) healthcare system. Prioritisation of preventative efforts will guide necessary transitions within the US healthcare system. While annual deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) costs have recently been defined at the US national level, annual pulmonary embolism (PE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) costs have not yet been defined. A decision tree and cost model were developed to estimate US health care costs for total PE, total hospital-acquired PE, and total hospital-acquired "preventable" PE. The previously published DVT cost model was modified, updated and combined with the PE cost model to elucidate the same three categories of costs for VTE. Direct and indirect costs were also delineated. For VTE in the base model, annual cost ranges in 2011 US dollars for total, hospital- acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" costs and were $13.5-$27.2, $9.0-$18.2, and $4.5-$14.2 billion, respectively. The first sensitivity analysis, with higher incidence rates and costs, demonstrated annual US total, hospital-acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" VTE costs ranging from $32.1-$69.3, $23.7-$51.5, and $11.9-$39.3 billion, respectively. The second sensitivity analysis with long-term attack rates (LTAR) for recurrent events and post-thrombotic syndrome and chronic pulmonary thromboembolic hypertension demonstrated annual US total, hospital-acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" VTE costs ranging from $15.4-$34.4, $10.3-$25.4, and $5.1-$19.1 billion, respectively. PE costs comprised a majority of the VTE costs. Prioritisation of effective VTE preventative strategies will reduce significant costs, morbidity and mortality within the US healthcare system. The cost models may be utilised to estimate other countries' costs or VTE-specific disease states.

Improving prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism: clinical trial results

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incurs considerable socioeconomic costs, partly owing to the fact that the treatment and prevention of VTE via effective thromboprophylaxis remains suboptimal in the inpatient and outpatient settings of many healthcare systems. A number of organizations-including the National Quality Forum, The Joint Commission, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-have established measures to assess and reduce the healthcare burden of VTE. These improvement strategies focus on increasing the use of thromboprophylaxis, implementing existing guidelines, and improving awareness.

FINDINGS

Based on clinical trial results, the oral anti-coagulants rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran etexilate have been approved in many countries for the prevention of VTE in patients after elective hip or knee replacement surgery. Recently, dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban have also been approved in the US for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In addition, rivaroxaban is currently the only newer anti-coagulant that has been approved in Europe for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and for the long-term prevention of recurrent VTE. These oral anti-coagulants have several advantages over established anti-coagulants, including no need for routine coagulation monitoring and only minimal food and drug interactions. These characteristics, together with convenient oral administration, may improve adherence and quality of life for patients, which could result in reductions in the rate of VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

These three oral agents have several advantages over established anti-coagulants and could, therefore, address the unmet needs of patients, physicians, and healthcare systems, with the potential to reduce the burden of anti-coagulant management and the occurrence of VTE.