Nanotechnology-Based Strategies to Evaluate and Counteract Cancer Metastasis and Neoangiogenesis

Cancer metastasis is the major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. It represents one of the greatest challenges in cancer therapy, both because of the ability of metastatic cells to spread into different organs, and because of the consequent heterogeneity that characterizes primary and metastatic tumors. Nanomaterials can potentially be used as targeting or detection agents owing to unique chemical and physical features that allow tailored and tunable theranostic functions. This review highlights nanomaterial-based approaches in the detection and treatment of cancer metastasis, with a special focus on the evaluation of nanostructure effects on cell migration, invasion, and angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment.

Sulfated non-anticoagulant low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of cancer and non-cancer associated thrombosis without compromising hemostasis

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) accounts for about 20% of all cases of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). Tissue factor (TF) is documented to be highly expressed on cancer cells and pathological angiogenic endothelial cells. Here, we used a novel oxidized sulfated ultra-LMWH, S-NACH, which is devoid of anti-factor Xa and IIa activities with limited to no systemic anticoagulant effects. This sulfated form has enhanced binding to vascular endothelial cells (EC) and releases and potentiates the action of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI). S-NACH binds with high affinity to EC, releases and binds to EC TFPI, and promotes vascular antithrombotic effect with limited to no risk of bleeding complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the effects of S-NACH on clot kinetics in vitro and in vivo. Also, we investigated the effects of S-NACH on CAT mediated by human acute leukemia cells (K562) and human pancreatic cancer cells (SUIT2).

RESULTS

S-NACH was associated with ~3-fold increase of TFPI 2 levels within 3 h. Also, S-NACH reversed the hypercoagulability state that is associated with cancer cells in vitro. In vivo, S-NACH at 20 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC) had no effect on bleeding time compared to both tinzaparin and enoxaparin at 5 mg/kg SC. S-NACH did not show any anti-IIa or anti-Xa activities in comparison to tinzaparin and enoxaparin (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Data suggest the importance of S-NACH through its EC binding, EC TFPI release and its interaction with TFPI in enhancing its activity in the prevention of cancer and non-cancer associated thrombosis with limited to no bleeding complications.

Effects of heparin and derivatives on podocytes: An in vitro functional and morphological evaluation

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular heparin derivatives (LMWH) display numerous biological properties in addition to their anticoagulant effects. However, due to the physicochemical heterogeneity of these drugs, a better understanding concerning their effects on human cells is clearly needed. Considering that heparins are mainly excreted by the kidney, we focused our attention on the effect of UFH and LMWH on human podocytes by functional and morphological/phenotypic in vitro analyses. We demonstrated that these products differentially modulate the permeability of podocyte monolayer to albumin. The functional perturbations observed were correlated to significant cellular morphological and cytoskeletal changes, as well as a decrease in the expression of proteins involved in podocyte adherence to the extracellular matrix or intercellular interactions. This point confirms that UFH and the different LMWHs exert specific effects on podocyte permeability and underlines the need of in vitro tests to evaluate new biological nonanticoagulant properties of LMWH.

Low molecular weight heparin and direct oral anticoagulants influence tumour formation, growth, invasion and vascularisation by separate mechanisms

The bidirectional association between coagulation and cancer has been established. However, anticoagulant therapies have been reported to have beneficial outcomes by influencing the vascularisation of the tumours. In this study the influence of a set of anticoagulants on tumour formation, invasion and vascularisation was examined. WM-266-4 melanoma and AsPC-1 pancreatic cancer cell lines were treated with LMWH (Tinzaparin and Dalteparin), and DOAC (Apixaban and Rivaroxaban) and the rate of tumour formation, growth and invasion were measured in vitro. In addition, the influence of these anticoagulants on vascularisation was examined using the chorioallantoic membrane assay (CAM) model and compared to the outcome of treatment with Bevacizumab. Using this model the influence of pharmacological concentrations of the anticoagulant on the growth, invasion and vascularisation of tumours derived from WM-266-4 and AsPC-1 cells was also measured in vivo. Tinzaparin and Daltepain reduced tumour formation and invasion by the cell lines in vitro, but with dissimilar potencies. In addition, treatment of CAM with LMWH reduced the local vascular density beyond that achievable with Bevacizumab, particularly suppressing the formation of larger-diameter blood vessels. In contrast, treatment with DOAC was largely ineffective. Treatment of CAM-implanted tumours with LMWH also reduced tumour vascularisation, while treatment of tumours with Apixaban reduced tumour growth in vivo. In conclusion, LMWH and DOAC appear to have anti-cancer properties that are exerted through different mechanisms.

Sulodexide inhibits angiogenesis via decreasing Dll4 and Notch1 expression in mouse proepicardial explant cultures

Sulodexide (SDX) is a mixed drug containing low-molecular-weight heparin sulfate and dermatan sulfate. It exerts mild anticoagulant action but can also affect leukocytes, macrophages, and cell-cell adhesion and may interact with growth factors although its direct influence on endothelial cells is not well described. Clinically, SDX is used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, where it exerts anti-inflammatory and endothelial protective effects. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of SDX on tubule formation and angiogenesis-related proteins' mRNA expression in endothelial cell line C166 and mouse proepicardial explants. C166 cells and explants were stimulated with a proangiogenic cocktail containing bFGF/VEGF-A₁₂₀ /VEGF-A₁₆₄ enriched with SDX. After stimulation, the number and morphology of tubules stained with anti-CD31 antibody were examined under confocal microscope and expression of mRNA for VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, bFGF, IGF-1, Dll4, and Notch1 was measured with real-time PCR. In C166 cell line, there was no difference in tubule formation and mRNA expression, but in proepicardial explants, we observed reduction in tubule number and in mRNA level for DLL4 and Notch1 after SDX administration. In conclusion, SDX indirectly inhibits angiogenesis in mouse proepicardial explant cultures but has no direct effect on the C166 endothelial cell line.

Non-anticoagulant effects of low molecular weight heparins in inflammatory disorders: A review

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are produced by chemical or enzymatic depolymerization of unfractionated heparin (UFH). Besides their well-known anticoagulant effects, LMWHs have also been reported to exhibit numerous anti-inflammatory properties. Previous studies have, however, shown that different production processes result in unique structural characteristics of LMWHs. The structural variations may help explain the different therapeutic spectrums in disease treatment for non-anticoagulant effects. In the present review, we summarize major advances in understanding and exploiting the anti-inflammatory disorder activities of LMWHs, based on mechanistic studies, preclinical experiments and clinical trials. We highlight differences in these activities of commercially available LMWHs produced using different manufacturing processes. We stress the importance of structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies on the non-anticoagulant effects of LMWHs and discuss strategies for exploring new clinical indications.

Anti-metastasis efficacy and safety of non-anticoagulant heparin derivative versus low molecular weight heparin in surgical pancreatic cancer models

Heparin and its derivatives are known to attenuate cancer metastasis in preclinical models, but have not been used clinically due to adverse bleeding effects. This study compared the efficacy of S-NACH (a sulfated non-anticoagulant heparin) versus tinzaparin (a low molecular weight heparin) in inhibiting metastasis of a growing primary tumor and following surgical excision of primary tumor in a pancreatic cancer mouse model. The efficacy of S-NACH versus tinzaparin on metastasis of the primary tumor was evaluated in each experiment using IVIS imaging. Athymic female mice were treated with S-NACH or tinzaparin, and 30 min later luciferase-transfected pancreatic cancer cells (Mpanc96) were implanted into the spleen; treatment was continued daily until termination. Next we studied the effect of S-NACH versus tinzaparin on metastasis after surgical excision of the primary tumor after 3 weeks of daily treatment with S-NACH or tinzaparin. S-NACH reduced surgically induced metastasis (p<0.01) and tumor recurrence (p<0.05) relative to control. Histopathological studies demonstrated significant increase in tumor necrosis mediated by S-NACH and to lesser extent by tinzaparin as compared to control group. Furthermore, either S-NACH or tinzaparin upregulated the expression of the junctional adhesion molecule E-cadherin in pancreatic cancer cells where its low expression enhances cancer cell migration and invasion. In terms of bleeding time (BT), S-NACH did not affect BT as compared to tinzaparin, which doubled BT. These data suggest that S-NACH is an effective and safe anti-metastatic agent and warrants further clinical evaluation.