Recombinant human thrombopoietin alleviates infection-associated thrombocytopenia: a retrospective study in senile patients

Impact of Platelet Transfusion Thresholds on Outcomes of Patients With Sepsis: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database

BACKGROUND

The benefits of platelet thresholds for transfusion remain unclear. This study assessed the effect of two transfusion thresholds on the survival outcomes of patients with sepsis and thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data of patients with sepsis admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and who had received platelet transfusion were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Patients were classified into the lower-threshold group (below 20,000/μL) and higher-threshold group (20,000-50,000/μL), based on thresholds calculated from their pretransfusion platelet count. The endpoints included 28- and 90-day mortality, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, ICU-free days, and hospital-free days.

RESULTS

There were 76 and 217 patients in the lower-threshold and higher-threshold groups, respectively. The higher-threshold group had a higher rate of surgical ICU admission (35.0% vs. 9.2%) and lower quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score than the lower-threshold group. In the higher-threshold group, 94 (43.3%) and 132 (60.8%) patients died within 28 and 90 days, compared to 51 (67.1%) and 63 (82.9%) patients in the lower-threshold group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 3.03; P = 0.012; adjusted odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 3.57; P = 0.012, respectively). After stratification by mortality risk, the subgroup analysis showed a consistent trend favoring higher-threshold transfusion but reached statistical significance only in the low-risk group. There were no differences in red blood cell transfusion, ICU-free days, and hospital-free days between the groups. The E-value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with sepsis and thrombocytopenia, platelet transfusion at a higher threshold was associated with a greater reduction in the 28- and 90-day mortalities than that at a lower threshold.

Platelet Transfusion in Patients With Sepsis and Thrombocytopenia: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Using a Large ICU Database

Purpose

Sepsis with thrombocytopenia is highly prevalent in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is associated with adverse outcomes. Platelet transfusion is the primary treatment of choice. However, evidence for the beneficial effects of platelet transfusion in patients with sepsis and thrombocytopenia is scarce and low in quality. This study aimed to evaluate the association between platelet transfusion and mortality among ICU patients with sepsis and thrombocytopenia.

Patients and Methods

Using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database (v. 1.4), the outcomes of sepsis patients with platelet counts of ≤ 150,000/μL were compared between those who did and did not receive platelet transfusion. The primary outcomes were 28- and 90-day all-cause mortalities. The secondary outcomes were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, ICU-free days, and hospital-free days. Propensity score matching was employed to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics.

Results

Among 7,765 eligible patients, 677 received platelet transfusion and were matched with 677 patients who did not receive platelet transfusion according to propensity scores. Platelet transfusion, as compared with no platelet transfusion, was associated with an increased risk of 28-day all-cause mortality [36.9 vs. 30.4%, odds ratio (OR), 1.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01–1.46; p = 0.039], increased risk of 90-day all-cause mortality (50.8 vs. 44.6%, OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00–1.31; p = 0.048), fewer mean (standard deviation) 28-day ICU-free days (15.88 ± 8.97 vs. 18.64 ± 8.33 days, p < 0.001), and fewer hospital-free days (10.29 ± 8.49 vs. 11.43 ± 8.85 days, p = 0.017). The rate of RBC transfusion was not significantly different between the platelet transfusion and non-transfusion groups (p = 0.149). The results were maintained across several subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

In this study, platelet transfusion was associated with higher 28- and 90-day all-cause mortalities. These results suggest the potential hazards of platelet transfusion in ICU patients with sepsis and thrombocytopenia.

Administration of recombinant human thrombopoietin is associated with alleviated thrombocytopenia in adult intensive care unit patients with pneumonia: A single-center retrospective study

Background: Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) is reported to stimulate platelet production and increase peripheral platelet counts; it is primarily used to manage chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. However, the effect of rhTPO in patients with pneumonia and thrombocytopenia remains uncertain. Objective: To assess the association of rhTPO and platelet counts in ICU patients with pneumonia and thrombocytopenia. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in the ICU department, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. From January 2016 to April 2021, patients with pneumonia and thrombocytopenia were allocated to two groups-the rhTPO and no-rhTPO groups-according to whether they received rhTPO treatment or not during their ICU stay. Demographical and clinical data were collected and analyzed using statistical software; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 327 patients, 149 were in the rhTPO group and 178 were in the no-rhTPO group. Within the first 7 days, platelet counts increased more for patients in the rhTPO group compared with those in the no-rhTPO group (99.21 ± 102.613 vs. 2.08 ± 43.877, p = 0.000). The clinical recovery rate of platelets increased within 7 days (65.8 vs. 18.5%, p = 0.000) and, after 7 days of enrollment, hemorrhagic scores decreased more apparently in the rhTPO group (2.81 ± 2.856 vs. 1.16 ± 2.123, p = 0.000). Further, bleeding events ceased in 66.7% of the patients in the rhTPO group compared with 37.3% of the patients in the no-rhTPO group (p = 0.000). Less red-blood-cells transfusions were needed in the rhTPO group (3.639 ± 4.630 vs. 5.818 ± 6.858, p = 0.009). Furthermore, through logistic regression, rhTPO administration was found to be an independent indicator that affected the platelet recovery rate within 7 days. Conclusion: This study finds that rhTPO administration is associated with increased platelet counts, alleviated bleeding, and reduced blood transfusion. For patients with pneumonia and thrombocytopenia, rhTPO may be an effective therapeutic drug; however, more RCT trails are needed to confirm our observation.

Prognosis and rescue therapy for sepsis-related severe thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients

Sepsis is the most common critical disease with high mortality in intensive care unit. Platelet count (PC) frequently altered in sepsis patients and implicated in the pathogenesis of multi-organ failure. It is also worth mentioning that thrombocytopenia was closely associated with poor outcomes in sepsis patients. However, whether drug intervention aimed at correcting thrombocytopenia would improve the prognosis of sepsis patients and which kind of sepsis patients could benefit from this therapy is still unclear. This study aims to explore the effect of severe thrombocytopenia on the prognosis of sepsis and the impact of a platelet-elevating drug (recombinant human thrombopoietin, rhTPO) for these sepsis patients. In this study, we included 249 sepsis patients diagnosed by sepsis 3.0, and these patients were classified into the three groups based on PC: normal (PC ≥ 100 × 10⁹/L), mild-moderate thrombocytopenia (50 × 10⁹/L ≤ PC < 100 × 10⁹/L), and severe thrombocytopenia (PC < 50 × 10⁹/L). We found that patients with severe thrombocytopenia had more blood transfusion, shorter days free from organ support, and worse outcomes as compared with the normal group. However, there was no significant difference between normal and mild-moderate thrombocytopenia groups. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis showed that rescue therapy with rhTPO could rapidly lead to a recovery of the PC, prolong days free from organ support, increase survival days, and reduce the 28-day mortality in sepsis patients with severe thrombocytopenia. These results suggested that sepsis patients with severe thrombocytopenia, not mild-moderate thrombocytopenia, had a poorer prognosis. RhTPO, probably as effective rescue therapy, could quickly recover PC and improve the prognosis in these sepsis patients.

The effect of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) on sepsis patients with acute severe thrombocytopenia: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RESCUE trial)

Background

Sepsis is still a common critical disease with high morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit. Despite published guidelines for sepsis, development of antibiotic therapy and advanced organ support technologies, the mortality of sepsis patients is still 25% or more. It is necessary to distinguish the subtypes of sepsis, and the targeted therapy for the patients need to be explored. Platelets have various biological functions in hemostasis and thrombosis, host defense, inflammatory/immune responses and tissue repair/regeneration. Moreover, severe thrombocytopenia or sustained thrombocytopenia was closely associated with multiply organ dysfunction and higher mortality in sepsis patients. The clinical therapies for thrombocytopenia are platelet transfusion and platelet-elevating drugs. However, platelet transfusion has many defects in clinical practice in sepsis patients, and the impact of platelet-elevating drugs for sepsis patients is still unclear. RESCUE trial is aim to explore the effect of a platelet-elevating drug, recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), as an effective rescue therapy on sepsis patients with acute severe thrombocytopenia.

Methods

It is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, controlled trial in 5 tertiary academic hospitals including medical, surgical or general ICUs. In this study, a total of 200 sepsis patients with severe thrombocytopenia will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the control and rhTPO group. The patients will be followed up to 28 days after randomization. All patients in two groups receive the same treatment based on the guideline of Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Primary outcome is 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes are the changes of PCs, blood transfusion, biomarkers of infection and organ function, days free from advanced organ support, drug-related adverse events, the length of ICU and hospital stay.

Discussion

RESCUE trial is the first randomized controlled trial to explore the impact of rhTPO for severe thrombocytopenia in sepsis patients diagnosed by sepsis-3.0 standard. Furthermore, RESCUE trial results will be of significant clinical value on the targeted therapy and add clinical evidence that rhTPO is an effective rescue therapy for these sepsis patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02707497. Registered Date: March 3rd, 2016. Protocol Version 3. Protocol Date: January 25th, 2019.