Hemostatic profile detailing in apparent VWD cases: A cross sectional study

The von willebrand disease (vWD) accounts to be one of the most common hereditary bleeding ailment that amounts its incidence to almost 1.5% of normal population. It is mostly associated with a defect in primary hemostasis as well as secondary defect in coagulation factor VIII as diagnosis of vwd happened to be challenging with earlier diagnostic criteria's. Testing Vwd in menorrhagia patients was not at ease. A cross-sectional study was conducted in female patients who have visited obstetrics and gynecology clinic at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The inclusion criteria consist of adult female patients between 16 and 45 years old with menorrhagia. A sample of 45 patients were screened and selected for the above-mentioned study. The SPSS Statistical analysis package was performed to analyze the data's. The fisher's exact test was conducted to compare the demographic variables. The independent samples t-test was conducted to compare the means of subjects. The P value of ≤0.05 considered as statistically significant. The cases manifested with a history of bleeding during periods stretching from 7 to 90 days. The vWD was reported in 6.6 % (n = 3) women out of the total 45 patients. The vWF: Ac mean ± SD (51.4 ± 6.3) and vWF: Ag Mean ± SD (93 ± 67) were significantly lesser in vWD patients with that of non-vWD (98.7 ± 22.6) vs (116 ± 42.4) (p = 0.027) (p = 0.032) respectively. WBC, ESR, MCV, MCH, Hemoglobin, PLT count, INR, PT, APTT and FVIII showed no significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05).

Platelet Aggregation Assays Do Not Reliably Diagnose Platelet Delta Granule Storage Pool Deficiency

Background

Patients with platelet dysfunction disorders present with a variety of mucocutaneous bleeding symptoms including easy bruising, frequent epistaxis, bleeding gums upon tooth brushing and for women, heavy menstrual bleeding. Available laboratory assays to evaluate platelet function include the platelet function analyzer (PFA) and in larger centers with coagulation laboratories, light transmission platelet aggregometry (LTA) analyses. Both assays are known to have a number of limitations, especially in the diagnosis of platelet delta granule storage pool deficiency (δ-SPD). δ-SPD is an underdiagnosed condition caused by decreased numbers of platelet dense granules (DGs) and is best diagnosed by electron microscopy (EM). Patients with platelet δ-SPD have a decreased response to low levels of the agonist adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the second wave of light transmittance with LTA or decreased ADP secretion by fluorescence lumiaggregometry. There are few reports that have evaluated patients with δ-SPD and their respective LTA results. One report published in 1987 described normal LTA assays in 23% of patients with δ-SPD; a more recent report described LTA as having the sensitivity to detect only about 52% of patients with δ-SPD. The purpose of our study was intended to review the LTA and EM results of patients suspected of having a platelet function disorder at our institution for comparison with previously published studies.

Methods

Our study included 344 patients who had been evaluated by both LTA and whole mount EM. Aggregometry utilized five agonists: ADP, epinephrine, collagen, arachidonic acid, and ristocetin. DGs were enumerated in 100 whole-mounted platelets to determine a mean number of dense granules per platelet (DGs/PL).

Results

Seventy-seven percent of our patients were found to have δ-SPD (264/344); 68% (179/264) of these subjects had an abnormal platelet LTA. Thirty-two percent (85/264) of our patients had normal LTA results but were found to have δ-SPD with a mean of 2.54 ± 0.15 DG/PL (normal = 4 - 6 DG/PL).

Conclusion

These data confirm previous reports suggesting the utilization of LTA alone in patients with histories of unexplained bleeding may miss the diagnosis of platelet δ-SPD. It is, therefore, prudent to assess platelet DG number by EM, especially if platelet LTA assessment is normal.

Pictorial methods to assess heavy menstrual bleeding in research and clinical practice: a systematic literature review

Background

Pictorial blood loss assessment charts (PBACs) represent the most widely used method to assess menstrual blood loss (MBL) in clinical trials. The aims of this review were to: (1) determine the diagnostic accuracy of PBACs that have been validated against the reference alkaline hematin technique; (2) categorize the pitfalls of using obsolete and nonvalidated charts; (3) provide guidelines for development of a new PBAC or use of an existing chart to measure MBL in clinical trials; and (4) consider the feasibility of using pictorial charts in primary care.

Methods

A literature review was conducted using Embase and MEDLINE databases. The review identified reports of women with self-perceived or actual heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), bleeding disorders, abnormal uterine bleeding, leiomyomata (uterine fibroids) or endometriosis, and women undergoing treatment for HMB, as well as those with normal menstrual periods. Data were reviewed from studies that focused on the development and validation of PBACs and from those that used derivative noncertified charts to assess HMB.

Results

Nine studies reported validation of PBAC scoring systems against the alkaline hematin technique. Across these studies, the sensitivity was 58–97%, the specificity was 7.5–95.5%, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.1–13.8 and 0.14–0.56, respectively, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 2.6–52.4. The cut-off score above which the diagnosis of HMB was made ranged from 50 to 185. Several modifications of these PBACs were used in other studies; however, objective confirmation of their validity was not reported. Overall, there was widespread inconsistency of chart design, scoring systems, diagnostic cut-off limits and post-treatment outcome measures.

Conclusions

PBACs are best suited to the controlled and specific environment of clinical studies, where clinical outcome parameters are defined. The current lack of standardization precludes widespread use of the PBAC in primary care.

Review registration number

PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews: CRD42016030083.

Women and inherited bleeding disorders - A review with a focus on key challenges for 2019

The area of women and inherited bleeding disorders has undergone quick expansion in recent years. More patients are being identified and expertise to diagnose and manage these patients is now essential for practising physicians. Programs to help educate and empower patients and caregivers are now in place. Common inherited bleeding disorders affecting women include von Willebrand disease (VWD), inherited platelet disorders, and rare inherited bleeding disorders such as factor VII (FVII) deficiency and factor XI (FXI) deficiency. Specific clinical tools have been developed to help clinicians and patients screen for the presence of these bleeding disorders in both adult and pediatric populations. Affected women can experience heavy menstrual bleeding and resulting iron deficiency anemia, postpartum hemorrhage, and hemorrhagic ovarian cysts which need to be properly managed. Excessive bleeding can adversely affect quality of life in these women. Front line therapy for bleeding in mild cases focuses on the use of non-specific hemostatic agents such as DDAVP ®, tranexamic acid and hormonal agents but specific factor replacement and/or blood products may be required in more severe cases, in severe bleeding or as second line treatment when bleeding is not responsive to first line agents. Iron status should be optimised in these women especially in pregnancy and use of an electronic app can now help clinicians achieve this. These patients should ideally be managed by a multidisciplinary team whenever possible even remotely. Although clinical research has closed some knowledge gaps regarding the diagnosis and management of these women, there remains significant variation in practise and lack of evidence-based guidelines still exists in many spheres of clinical care in which caregivers must rely on expert opinion. Ongoing efforts in education and research will continue to improve care for these women and restore quality of life for them.

A systematic review of methods to measure menstrual blood loss

Background

Since the publication over 50 years ago of the alkaline hematin method for quantifying menstrual blood loss (MBL) many new approaches have been developed to assess MBL. The aim of this systematic review is to determine for methods of measuring MBL: ability to distinguish between normal and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB); practicalities and limitations in the research setting; and suitability for diagnosing HMB in routine clinical practice.

Methods

Embase®™, MEDLINE®, and ClinicalTrials.gov were screened for studies on the development/validation of MBL assessment methods in women with self-perceived HMB, actual HMB or uterine fibroids, or patients undergoing treatment for HMB. Studies using simulated menstrual fluid and those that included women with normal MBL as controls were also eligible for inclusion. Extracted data included study population, results of validation, and advantages/disadvantages of the technique.

Results

Seventy-one studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and/or specificity of diagnosing HMB were calculated in 16 studies of methods involving self-perception of MBL (11 pictorial), and in one analysis of the menstrual-fluid-loss (MFL) method; in 13 of these studies the comparator was the gold standard alkaline hematin technique. Sensitivity and specificity values by method were, respectively: MFL model, 89, 98%; pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC), 58–99%, 7.5–89%; menstrual pictogram, 82–96%, 88–94%; models/questionnaires, 59–87%, 62–86%, and complaint of HMB, 74, 74%. The power of methods to identify HMB was also assessed using other analyses such as comparison of average measurements: statistical significance was reported for the PBAC, MFL, subjective complaint, and six questionnaires. In addition, PBAC scores, menstrual pictogram volumes, MFL, pad/tampon count, iron loss, and output from three questionnaires correlated significantly with values from a reference method in at least one study. In general, pictorial methods have been more comprehensively validated than questionnaires and models.

Conclusions

Every method to assess MBL has limitations. Pictorial methods strike a good balance between ease of use and validated accuracy of MBL determination, and could complement assessment of HMB using quality of life (QoL) in the clinical and research setting.

Trial registration

PRISMA registration number: CRD42016032956.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-018-0627-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.