Bleeding Symptoms and von Willebrand Factor Levels: 30-Year Experience in a Tertiary Care Center

The Role of the von Willebrand Factor Collagen-Binding Assay (VWF:CB) in the Diagnosis and Treatment of von Willebrand Disease (VWD) and Way Beyond: A Comprehensive 36-Year History

The von Willebrand factor (VWF) collagen binding (VWF:CB) assay was first reported for use in von Willebrand diagnostics in 1986, by Brown and Bosak. Since then, the VWF:CB has continued to be used to help diagnose von Willebrand disease (VWD) (correctly) and also to help assign the correct subtype, as well as to assist in the monitoring of VWD therapy, especially desmopressin (DDAVP). However, it is important to recognize that the specific value of any VWF:CB is predicated on the use of an optimized VWF:CB, and that not all VWF:CB assays are so optimized. There are some good commercial assays available, but there are also some "not-so-good" commercial assays available, and these may continue to give the VWF:CB "a bad reputation." In addition to VWD diagnosis and management, the VWF:CB found purpose in a variety of other applications, from assessing ADAMTS13 activity, to investigation into acquired von Willebrand syndrome (especially as associated with use of mechanical circulatory support or cardiac assist devices), to assessment of VWF activity in disease states in where an excess of high-molecular-weight VWF may accumulate, and lead to increased (micro)thrombosis risk (e.g., coronavirus disease 2019, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura). The VWF:CB turns 37 in 2023. This review is a celebration of the utility of the VWF:CB over this nearly 40-year history.

Genetic variations of type 2 and type 3 von Willebrand diseases in Thailand

AIMS

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an inherited haemostatic disorder with a wide range of bleeding phenotypes based on von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels. Multiple assays including VWF gene analysis are employed to correctly diagnose VWD and its subtypes. However, data on VWF mutations among Southeast Asian populations are lacking. We, therefore, aimed to explore genetic variations in Thai patients with type 2 and type 3 VWD by whole exome sequencing (WES).

METHODS

In this multicentre study, Thai patients with type 2 and type 3 VWD, according to the definitions and VWF levels recommended by the international guidelines, were recruited. WES was performed using DNA extracted from peripheral blood in all cases. The novel variants were verified by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (73% females; median age at diagnosis 3.0 years) with type 2 (n=12) and type 3 VWD (n=3) from 14 families were enrolled. All patients harboured at least one VWF variant. Six missense (p.Arg1374Cys, p.Arg1374His, p.Arg1399Cys, p.Arg1597Trp, p.Ser1613Pro, p.Pro1648Arg) and one splice-site (c.3379+1G>A) variants in the VWF gene were formerly described. Notably, six VWF variants, including three missense (p.Met814Ile, p.Trp856Cys, p.Pro2032Leu), one deletion (c.2251delG) and two splice-site (c.7729+4A>C, c.8115+2delT) mutations were novelly identified. Compound heterozygosity contributed to type 2 and type 3 VWD phenotypes in two and one patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 and type 3 VWD in Thailand demonstrate the mutational variations among VWF exons/introns with several unique variants. The WES-based approach potentially provides helpful information to verify VWD diagnosis and facilitate genetic counselling in clinical practice.