Identification of the Intron 22 and Intron 1 Inversions of the Factor VIII Gene in Iraqi Kurdish Patients With Hemophilia A

F8 variants and their genotype-phenotype correlations in Thai patients with haemophilia A: a nationwide multicentre study

AIMS

Analysis of the F8 gene helps predict the risk of developing factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors and the depth of phenotype in haemophilia A (HA) patients. Since data in Southeast Asian countries remain scarce, we aim to study F8 variation correlated with HA phenotypes in Thailand.

METHODS

Thai patients with HA were enrolled from seven haemophilia treatment centres during 2022-2023. Using peripheral blood DNA, inverse shifting-polymerase chain reaction (IS-PCR) for F8-intron 22 inversion (Inv22) and F8-intron 1 inversion (Inv1) was performed. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was explored in cases without Inv22/Inv1.

RESULTS

Of 124 patients with HA, 91.9% were detected with a causative F8 variant, including Inv22 (30.6%), Inv1 (1.6%), missense (23.4%), nonsense (16.9%) and small insertion/deletion (16.1%) mutations. Inv22, small insertion/deletion and nonsense were associated with severe HA, compared with missense variants, by the ORs of 13.9 (95% CI, 4.2 to 56.7), 14.7 (95% CI, 3.4 to 104.7) and 15.6 (95% CI, 3.6 to 110.2), respectively. While nonsense variants affecting the light chain increased the risk of developing FVIII inhibitors (OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 32.6) compared with the low-risk (small insertion/deletion, missense and splice-site) variants. Twelve patients (9.7%) harboured novel F8 variants, comprising five missense (p.Pro540Leu, p.Ser564Pro, p.Leu668Pro, p.Ala1721Glu, p.His2024Pro), five small insertion/deletion (p.Val502SerfsTer13, p.Ile522PhefsTer13, p.Phe992LysfsTer11, p.Leu1223PhefsTer18, c.6427_6429+3delATGGTA) and one nonsense mutations (p.Glu1292Ter).

CONCLUSIONS

IS-PCR followed by WES successfully assesses F8 alterations in most HA cases. With several unique variants, severe HA in Thailand is considerably caused by Inv22, small insertion/deletion and nonsense, whereas missense variants are more responsible for nonsevere HA phenotypes.

Treatment of congenital coagulopathies, from biologic to biotechnological drugs: The relevance of gene editing (CRISPR/Cas)

Congenital coagulopathies have, throughout the history of medicine, been a focus of scientific study and of great interest as they constitute an alteration of one of the most important and conserved pathways of evolution. The first therapeutic strategies developed to address them were aimed at restoring the blood components lost during hemorrhage by administering whole blood or plasma. Later on, the use of cryoprecipitates was a significant breakthrough as it made it possible to decrease the volumes of blood infused. In the 1970' and 80', clotting factor concentrates became the treatment and, from the 1990's to the present day, recombinant factors -with increasingly longer half-lives- have taken over as the treatment of choice for certain coagulopathies in a seamless yet momentous transition from biological to biotechnological drugs. The beginning of this century, however, saw the emergence of new advanced (gene and cell) treatments, which are currently transforming the therapeutic landscape. The possibility to use cells and viruses as well as specific or bispecific antibodies as medicines is likely to spark a revolution in the world of pharmacology where therapies will be individualized and have long-term effects. Specifically, attention is nowadays focused on the development of gene editing strategies, chiefly those based on CRISPR/Cas technology. Rare coagulopathies such as hemophilia A and B, or even ultra-rare ones such as factor V deficiency, could be among those deriving the greatest benefit from these new developments.

Determining common variants in patients with haemophilia A in South Vietnam and screening female carriers in their family members

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine common variants in F8, including intron 22 inversion (Inv22), intron 1 inversion (Inv1) and point mutations, the transmission of these variants between patients with haemophilia A (HA) and their family members.

METHODS

Genetic analysis was conducted in 71 patients who were clinically diagnosed with HA and 152 related female members in South Vietnam by a combination of inversion PCR (I-PCR), multiplex PCR and direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Variants in F8, including Inv22, point mutations (with 37 genotypes) and two novel variants, occupied 60 patients with HA. Among severe patients, the rate of Inv22 was 44%. Missense was the common point mutation of over 50% in patients with moderate HA and mild HA. Inv1 was absent in all patients. F8 variants were also found in 119 female carriers (FCs) (78.3%) from families related to patients with HA. There were 56 mothers (93.3%) carrying F8 variants and passing the same variants to their sons.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings were the first to provide important information about the presence of Inv22 and point mutation in Vietnamese patients with HA, the mothers and their female family members. It demonstrated that genetic diagnosis and counselling for HA carriers were essential factors for future improvements in comprehensive and equitable healthcare polices for patients with HA and FCs in Vietnam.

Genomic alterations in the F8 gene correlating with severe hemophilia A in Egyptian patients

Background

Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X‐linked recessive coagulation disorder caused by factor VIII (F8) deficiency. F8 rearrangements involving intron 22 (int22) and intron 1 (int1) account for almost half of severe HA phenotype also a hotspot exon 14 provides numerous mutational patterns. This study aims to identify F8 gene mutations among Egyptian HA patients.

Methods

DNA samples from 60 HA patients were screened for int22 and int1 rearrangements using simplified inverse shifting PCR (IS‐PCR) followed by exon 14 sequencing. Also, four uncharacterized patients were studied by targeted exome sequencing.

Results

In 33.3% of the studied patients, we identified three int22 rearrangements, three exon 14 mutations (two frameshift; one novel (NM_000132.3:c.2734_2735delAA, p.(N912Ffs*6)), a second reported mutation (NM_000132.3:c.3091_3094delAGAA, p.(K1031Lfs*9)), and one nonsense mutation (NM_000132.3:c.2440C>T, p.(R814*)). All identified mutations were detected in patients with severe HA phenotype. Targeted exome sequencing could not detect any known pathogenic variants.

Conclusion

Intron 22 rearrangement and exon 14 mutations correlate with most severe hemophilia A Egyptian patients.

Factor VIII Intron 22 Inversion in Severe Hemophilia A Patients in Palestine

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by mutations in FVIII gene with an incidence of 1 in 5,000 to 10,000 live born males. The Inv22 mutation is a major cause of the disease worldwide, accounting for up to 40%-50% of severe FVIII mutations. The aim of the present study was to screen Inv22 of the FVIII gene in Palestinian patients with severe HA and reveal its role as a predisposing factor for the development of inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 77 HA individuals including 5 carrier females from 52 unrelated families registered at governmental hemophilia centers in the West Bank area of Palestine was investigated. The demographic data and the clinical history were retrieved from medical files. Molecular analysis of Inv22 mutation in severe HA (30 cases) from Palestine was performed using the subcycling polymerase reaction (S-PCR). FVIII coagulant activities were carried out on an aPTT-based 1-stage clotting assay. FVIII inhibitors were quantified using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay.

RESULT

Overall, 41.7% (30/72) of the studied cases were classified as having severe HA, 22.2% (16/72) had moderate HA, and 36.1% (26/72) had mild HA. Five randomly selected carrier mothers were screened for the Inv22 mutation to confirm its transmission to their sons. The Inv22 mutation was detected in 11 severe HA patients (36.6%). Among the severe HA patients with positive Inv22, 45.5% (5/11) had developed inhibitors. The current study showed that there was no association (p=0.53) between inhibitor development and the Inv22 mutation.

CONCLUSION

Findings on Inv22 are in agreement with worldwide reports, being a major genetic mutation in severe HA. The S-PCR is a simple, rapid, and cost-effective method for the diagnosis of Inv22 in severe HA patients. Although the Inv22 mutation was associated with 36.6% of severe HA phenotype cases, it was not a major predisposing factor for inhibitor formation.