Hypercoagulable state testing and malignancy screening following venous thromboembolic events

Mounting interest in hypercoagulability, increased availability of hypercoagulable state test 'panels' and enhanced ability to identify abnormalities in tested patients have prompted widespread testing. Testing for acquired and inherited hypercoagulable states uncovers an abnormality in over 50% of patients presenting with an initial venous thromboembolic event (VTE) but may have minimal actual impact on management in most of these patients. Such laboratory screening should be reserved for patients in whom the results of individual tests will significantly impact the choice of anticoagulant agent, intensity of anticoagulant therapy, therapeutic monitoring, family screening, family planning, prognosis determination, and most of all duration of therapy. Testing 'just to know' is neither cost-effective nor clinically appropriate. The most important testing in patients following acute VTE may be age- and gender-specific cancer screening. Cancer screening following VTE seems most prudent in older individuals and in those with idiopathic VTE and no laboratory evidence for an inherited hypercoagulable state. Cancer screening should focus on identification of treatable cancers and those where diagnosis in an early stage favorably impacts patient survival. Extensive searches for occult malignancy employing whole-body computed tomography and serum tumor markers may identify more cancers but without affecting patient outcome. We advocate that physicians should focus their attention more on VTE prophylaxis and proper treatment and less on costly and, at times, invasive testing of questionable value.

Inherited thrombophilia and gestational venous thromboembolism

Thromboembolic disease is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality during pregnancy and the puerperium. To reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and improve outcomes, an individual risk stratification based on probability of thrombosis as a rationale for an individual risk-adapted prophylaxis is required. Within the past 10 years, a significant improvement in risk estimation has been achieved due to the identification of new genetic risk factors of thrombosis. In women without prior thrombosis, the presence of a heterozygous factor V Leiden or heterozygous G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene is associated with a pregnancy-associated thrombotic risk of approximately 1 in 400. Thus, in pregnant carriers of either one of these mutations the risk of venous thromboembolism is low--indicating that pregnancy-associated thrombosis is multicausal, resulting from the interaction of combined defects. A combination of the two genetic risk factors can increase the risk to a modest level (risk 1 in 25). In women with a single episode of prior thrombosis associated with a transient risk factor, for example, surgery or trauma, and no additional genetic risk factor, the probability of a pregnancy-associated thrombosis appears also to be low. In contrast, in women with a prior idiopathic venous thrombosis who carry an additional hereditary risk factor or who have a positive family history of thrombosis, a high risk (>10%) can be expected, supporting the indication for active antepartum and postpartum heparin prophylaxis. Despite the remarkable progress in risk stratification, the absolute magnitude of risk in many cases is unknown and current recommendations remain empirical.

Guidelines for the laboratory investigation of inherited thrombophilias. Recommendations for the first level clinical laboratories

Recent advances in the laboratory diagnostic approach to inherited thrombophilia call for an update on laboratory strategies and organization. The present paper therefore deals in particular with: the panel test choice, timing and test appropriateness, and analytical methods in several clinical conditions. Specific recommendations are supported by the state-of-the-art in this branch.

Laboratory evaluation of hypercoagulability with venous or arterial thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for hypercoagulation testing for patients with venous, arterial, or neurovascular thrombosis, as reflected in the medical literature and the consensus opinion of recognized experts in the field.

DATA SOURCES, EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS

The authors extensively examined the literature and current practices, and prepared a draft manuscript with preliminary recommendations. The draft manuscript was circulated to each of the expert participants (n = 30) in the consensus conference prior to the convening of the conference. The manuscript and recommendations were then presented at the conference for discussion. Recommendations were accepted if a consensus of the 28 experts attending the conference was reached. The discussions were also used to revise the manuscript into its final form.

CONCLUSIONS

The resulting article provides 17 recommendations for hypercoagulation testing in the setting of venous, arterial, or neurovascular thrombosis. The supporting evidence for test selection is analyzed and cited, and consensus recommendations for test selection are presented. Issues for which a consensus was not reached at the conference are also discussed.

Management of patients with hereditary hypercoagulable disorders

The inherited hypercoagulable states can be divided into those that are common and associated with a modest risk of thrombosis (i.e. factor V Leiden and G20210A prothrombin gene) and those that are uncommon but associated with a high risk of thrombosis. There is no convincing evidence that, independent of other clinical factors, the presence of factor V Leiden or the prothrombin gene mutation should influence the use of primary prophylaxis or the duration of anticoagulant therapy following an episode of thrombosis. Indirect evidence suggests that the presence of antithrombin, protein C deficiency, or protein S deficiency justifies avoiding additional risk factors for thrombosis, such as estrogen therapy, and justifies use of more aggressive primary prophylaxis when additional risk factors cannot readily be avoided (e.g. pregnancy). The presence of one of these three abnormalities also favors more prolonged anticoagulant therapy following venous thrombosis. However, their presence or absence appears to have less influence on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism than whether thrombosis was provoked by a major reversible risk factor, such as surgery.

Combined heterozygous plasminogen deficiency and factor V Leiden defect in the same kindred

Combined plasminogen deficiency and resistance to activated protein C defect (factor V Leiden) have been described in a few families and associated with a variable occurrence of thrombotic events. Here we describe a new family with thrombophilia and the presence of hypoplasminogenemia and factor V Leiden mutation. In addition, a brief review of the literature is presented. Nine patients belonging to this kindred underwent coagulation study for hereditary thrombophilia, which included plasminogen antigen and activity assays, an activated protein C resistance test, and genetic analysis for factor V Leiden mutation and for prothrombin variant 20210A. The proposita, a 40-year-old asymptomatic female with a family history of thrombotic diathesis, was affected by heterozygous plasminogen deficiency. Hypoplasminogenemia was found also in her two sisters, in one instance associated with factor V Leiden mutation. The mother was the putative carrier of hypoplasminogenemia, but she refused to be studied. The symptomatic father was heterozygous for factor V Leiden mutation, but presented with normal plasminogen levels. Among the available siblings investigated from the paternal side, resistance to activated protein C due to factor V Leiden mutation was found in three patients, one of whom experienced venous thromboembolism. Another uncle with a history of thrombotic disease showed no coagulation abnormalities. These findings together with the data from literature confirm the role of factor V Leiden as an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism, whereas isolated hypoplasminogenemia does not seem to increase the risk for thrombosis. There is no clear evidence that the coinheritance of these two defects may be associated with an additional risk for thrombosis compared with the presence of factor V Leiden mutation alone.

Familial association of hypoplasminogenemia and heterozygous factor V deficiency

The coinheritance of hypoplasminogenemia and heterozygous factor V deficiency in a relative with thrombotic disease and no hemorrhagic tendency is described. The proposita, a 28-year-old woman, suffered from neurologic disturbances due to two ischemic cerebral lesions confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance scan. She was found to be affected with heterozygous plasminogen deficiency in a coagulation study for inherited thrombophilia. Moreover, she disclosed a prolongation of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time, which was compatible with heterozygous factor V deficiency. Her father, with a history of deep vein thrombosis, was also affected with plasminogen deficiency, as well as three brothers and one sister who were asymptomatic. The mother of the proposita showed borderline or slightly decreased factor V levels and normal plasminogen levels; she was therefore considered to be heterozygous for factor V deficiency. Heterozygous factor V deficiency was also found in one brother and one sister of the proposita, and they were both asymptomatic. Among the other available family members, one brother and one sister of the proposita, all asymptomatic for either thrombotic or bleeding events, showed a normal clotting and fibrinolytic profile. To our knowledge, this is the first case of combined heterozygous plasminogen and factor V deficiency in the same family. Two of six patients with hypoplasminogenemia showed thrombotic events, and in one of these symptomatic cases the coexistence of factor V deficiency did not prevent the occurrence of thrombosis. As expected, no hemorrhagic tendency was observed in patients with heterozygous factor V deficiency, who may be mildly symptomatic only in 10% of cases.