Pregnancy Loss, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Thrombophilia, Hypofibrinolysis, Enoxaparin, Metformin

Thrombophilia, hypofibrinolysis, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are associated with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and spontaneous abortion (SAB) alone and concurrently. The efficacy and safety of combined enoxaparin-metformin was prospectively assessed in women with PCOS with one or more previous SAB, thrombophilia, and/or hypofibrinolysis. Twenty-four white women with PCOS were studied; 23 with previous pregnancies, seven with RPL of unknown etiology (≥ three consecutive pregnancy losses <20 weeks’ gestation), two with two consecutive SABs, 13 with one SAB, and one with one live birth (HELLP syndrome). Prospectively, metformin (1.5 to 2.55 g/day) was administered before and throughout gestation, with concurrent enoxaparin (60 mg/day) throughout gestation. The 24 cases differed from 93 normal white female controls for the factor V Leiden mutation, 17% vs. 2%, Fisher’s p [pf] = .016, and for the 4G4G mutation of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) gene (46% vs. 24%, Chi-square 4.63, p =. 031). The patients also differed from 44 normal white female controls for high levels (> 21.1 U/mL) of the PAI-1 gene product, plasminogen activator inhibitor activity (PAI-Fx) (33% vs. 8%, pf =. 018), and for high factor VIII (>150%) (22% vs. 0%, pf = .037). Of the 24 women, 23 had 65 previous pregnancies without metformin or enoxaparin, with 18 live births, 46 SAB (71%), and one elective abortion. On metforminenoxaparin, the same 23 women had 26 current pregnancies (28 fetuses), with 20 live births, two normal pregnancies 13 weeks or longer, and six SAB (21%), 3.4-fold lower than previous gestations (McNemar’s S = 33.6, p <. 0001). There were no adverse maternal or fetal therapy effects. Enoxaparin-metformin reduces pregnancy loss in women with PCOS with one or more previous SAB, who also have thrombophilia and/or hypofibrinolysis.

Can Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A testing in women with recurrent pregnancy loss result in improved pregnancy outcomes?: Results from a targeted evidence-based review

Women with recurrent pregnancy loss are offered Factor V Leiden (F5) and/or prothrombin G20210A (F2) testing to identify candidates for anticoagulation to improve outcomes. A systematic literature review was performed to estimate test performance, effect sizes, and treatment effectiveness. Electronic searches were performed through April 2011, with review of references from included articles. English-language studies addressed analytic validity, clinical validity, and/or clinical utility and satisfied predefined inclusion criteria. Adequate evidence showed high analytic sensitivity and specificity for F5 and F2 testing. Evidence for clinical validity was adequate. The summary odds ratio for association of recurrent pregnancy loss with F5 in case-controlled studies was 2.02 (95% confidence interval, 1.60-2.55), with moderate heterogeneity and suggestion of publication bias. Longitudinal studies in women with recurrent pregnancy loss or unselected cohorts showed F5 carriers were more likely to have a subsequent loss than noncarriers (odds ratios: 1.93 and 2.03, respectively). Results for F2 testing were similar. For clinical utility, evidence was adequate that anticoagulation treatments were ineffective (except in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome) and had treatment-associated harms. The certainty of evidence is moderate (high, moderate, and low) that anticoagulation of women with recurrent pregnancy loss and F5/F2 variants would currently lead to net harms.

The Relationship of the Factor V Leiden Mutation and Pregnancy Outcomes for Mother and Fetus

OBJECTIVE

We sought to estimate the frequency of pregnancy-related thromboembolic events among carriers of the factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation without a personal history of thromboembolism, and to evaluate the impact of maternal and fetal FVL mutation carriage or other thrombophilias on the risk of adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Women with a singleton pregnancy and no history of thromboembolism were recruited at 13 clinical centers before 14 weeks of gestation from April 2000 to August 2001. Each was tested for the FVL mutation, as was the resultant conceptus after delivery or after miscarriage, when available. The incidence of thromboembolism (primary outcome), and of other adverse outcomes, was compared between FVL mutation carriers and noncarriers. We also compared adverse outcomes in a secondary nested carrier-control analysis of FVL mutation and other coagulation abnormalities. In this secondary analysis, we defined carriers as women having one or more of the following traits: carrier for FVL mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, antithrombin III deficiency, activated protein C resistance, or lupus anticoagulant-positive, heterozygous for prothrombin G20210A or homozygous for the 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations. Carriers of the FVL mutation alone (with or without activated protein C resistance) were compared with those having one or more other coagulation abnormalities and with controls with no coagulation abnormality.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four FVL mutation carriers were identified among 4,885 gravidas (2.7%), with both FVL mutation status and pregnancy outcomes available. No thromboembolic events occurred among the FVL mutation carriers (0%, 95% confidence interval 0-2.7%). Three pulmonary emboli and one deep venous thrombosis occurred (0.08%, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.21%), all occurring in FVL mutation noncarriers. In the nested carrier-control analysis (n = 339), no differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed between FVL mutation carriers, carriers of other coagulation disorders, and controls. Maternal FVL mutation carriage was not associated with increased pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, placental abruption, or small for gestational age births. However, fetal FVL mutation carriage was associated with more frequent preeclampsia among African-American (15.0%) and Hispanic (12.5%) women than white women (2.6%, P = .04), adjusted odds ratio 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.0-5.2, P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Among women with no history of thromboembolism, maternal heterozygous carriage of the FVL mutation is associated with a low risk of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Neither universal screening for the FVL mutation, nor treatment of low-risk carriers during pregnancy is indicated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-2.

Polycystic ovary syndrome, the G1691A factor V Leiden mutation, and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity: associations with recurrent pregnancy loss

Our specific aim was to assess associations of thrombophilia, hypofibrinolysis, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) (>/=3 consecutive pregnancy losses < 20 weeks gestation). Prospective studies were performed in 33 Caucasian women referred for diagnosis and treatment of PCOS who were subsequently found to have RPL and in 16 Caucasian women referred for diagnosis and treatment of RPL, who did not have PCOS. Cases (PCOS-RPL, RPL without PCOS) were compared with controls (116 healthy Caucasian females) for the G1691A Factor V Leiden, G20210A prothrombin, C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), plasminogen activator inhibitor 4G/5G, and platelet glycoprotein PL A1A2 gene mutations. Cases were compared with controls (44 healthy adult Caucasian females) for serologic coagulation tests including homocysteine, proteins C, S, free S, antithrombin III, anticardiolipin antibodies IgG and IgM, dilute Russel's viper venom time, activated partial thromboplastin time, Factor VIII, Factor XI, lipoprotein (Lp)(a), and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity (PAI-Fx). The 33 Caucasian women with PCOS subsequently found to have RPL were 10% of a cohort of 322 Caucasian women who had >/= 1 previous pregnancy and had been referred for diagnosis and therapy of PCOS over a 4.3-year period. The Factor V Leiden G1691 mutation was present in 6 of 33 women (18%) with PCOS-RPL and in 3 of 16 women with RPL without PCOS (19%) versus 2 of 116 (1.7%) female controls, Fisher's P (p(f)) =.0016, p(f) =.013. The 33 PCOS-RPL cases also differed from the 44 female controls for high PAI-Fx (>21.1 U/mL), 38% versus 8%, p(f) =. 004. The thrombophilic G1691A Factor V Leiden mutation is associated with RPL in women with and without PCOS; hypofibrinolysis (high PAI-Fx) is also associated with RPL in women with PCOS.

Factor V Leiden and acquired activated protein C resistance among 1000 women with recurrent miscarriage

Activated protein C (APC) resistance, both in its congenital form, due to the factor V Leiden mutation, and in its acquired form, are important risk factors for systemic venous thrombosis. In view of the suspected thrombotic aetiology of some cases of recurrent miscarriage, the prevalence of APC resistance was determined among 1111 consecutive Caucasian women with a history of either recurrent early miscarriage (three or more consecutive pregnancy losses at <12 weeks gestation; n = 904) or a history of at least one late miscarriage (>12 weeks gestation; n = 207). A control group of 150 parous Caucasian women with no previous history of adverse pregnancy outcome was also studied. Acquired APC resistance was significantly more common among both women with recurrent early miscarriage (8.8%: 80/904; P = 0.02) and those with late miscarriage (8.7%: 18/207; P = 0.04) compared with controls (3.3%: 5/150). In contrast, the frequency of the factor V Leiden allele was similar among (i) women with recurrent early miscarriage (3.3%:60/1808; 58 heterozygotes and one homozygote), (ii) those with late miscarriage (3.9%:16/414; 14 heterozygotes and one homozygote) and (iii) the control group (4.0%:12/300; 12 heterozygotes). Acquired but not congenital APC resistance (due to the factor V Leiden mutation) is associated with both early and late miscarriage.

Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage

Human reproduction is extraordinarily wasteful. The reasons for this have taxed all of the contributors to this book. As we move into the 21st century it is sobering to reflect on the fact that we have failed to harness the power of the evolving revolution in molecular medical biology to answer the fundamental question: why is the fate of a fertilized egg so hazardous and so unsuccessful? The following account summarizes our limited knowledge of the epidemiology of miscarriage and then moves on to consider some of the medical causes of miscarriage. The contribution of genetic abnormalities to the problem of pregnancy wastage is discussed elsewhere in this volume.

Interaction of the protein C/protein S anticoagulant system, the endothelium and pregnancy

Normal pregnancy is associated with significant changes in haemostasis, lipid metabolism and endothelial function. This suggests that maternal adaptation in these systems is required for successful pregnancy outcome. A number of acquired and heritable prothrombotic abnormalities are associated with complications in pregnancy. A common feature of these abnormalities is their ability to alter endothelial function or the protein C/protein S system and increase thrombin generation. In this review the normal function of the endothelium and the protein C/protein S system is detailed. The changes which characterize normal and complicated pregnancies are outlined and the evidence for the impact of heritable and acquired disorders of the protein C/protein S system on pre-eclampsia and fetal loss are discussed.

Hypercoagulable state mutation analysis in white patients with early first-trimester recurrent pregnancy loss

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) and other coagulation abnormalities have been associated with an increased risk of venous, arterial, and placental thrombosis and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Factor V Leiden (a point mutation [1691G-->A] in the factor V gene), the prothrombin 20210G-->A mutation, and homozygosity for a common polymorphism in the methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene (677C-->T) have been associated with arterial and venous thrombosis and arterial occlusive disease. We explored an association between these markers of thrombophilic states and RPL.

DESIGN

Prospective case-control evaluation.

SETTING

University-associated private practice.

PATIENT(S)

Fifty nonpregnant women with three or more pregnancy losses and 50 healthy, nonpregnant controls.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Anticardiolipin and antiphosphatidylserine antibodies were detected in serum by ELISA. Polymerase chain reaction was performed to identify the factor V Leiden (1691G-->A) mutation, the thermobile MTHFR (677C-->T) mutation, and the prothrombin 20210G-->A mutation.

RESULT(S)

The following were identified by restriction fragment-linked polymorphism analyses: 1 (2%) factor V Leiden heterozygosity; 1 (2%) prothrombin 20210G-->A heterozygosity; and 4 (8%) thermolabile MTHFR homozygosity. None of these mutation frequencies in women with RPL were statistically significantly different from controls.

CONCLUSION(S)

These data suggest that factor V Leiden, thermolabile MTHFR (677C-->T), and prothrombin 20210G-->A are not found at an increased frequency in women with a history of early RPL.

The factor V Leiden mutation is not a common cause of recurrent miscarriage

Some investigators suggest that placental thrombosis and infarction can cause recurrent miscarriage. We have shown that the common missense mutation in the factor V gene, the Leiden mutation, which renders factor Va resistant to cleavage inactivation by activated protein C, predisposes to placental thrombosis and spontaneous miscarriage. Our objective was to determine the frequency of the Leiden mutation in a population with well-characterized idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. DNA was extracted from whole blood of 40 couples with a history of idiopathic recurrent miscarriage and 25 couples with a history of proven fertility (seven or more live births). The polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify exon 10 of the factor V gene followed by allele-specific restriction with Mnl1 for mutation detection. Results were analyzed with a chi 2 contingency table. None of the 40 women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage carried the mutation and only one of their reproductive partners was heterozygous for the mutation. Similarly, none of the control women carried the mutation, and only one of the 25 control male partners was heterozygous for the mutation. In our referral population, the factor V Leiden mutation which predisposes to thrombosis is not a common cause of recurrent miscarriage.