Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia Type II in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: Incidence and Complications

OBJECTIVE:

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Type II (HIT II) is the autoimmune-mediated severe form of the disease characterized by a significant reduction in platelets, and it carries a high risk of “paradoxical” serious thrombotic complications. Although HIT II has been studied in several different patient populations, the incidence of HIT II and the rate of thrombotic complications have never been reported in a neurosurgical patient population. Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients, among neurosurgical patient populations, have a high exposure to heparin because they are in critical care units and have indwelling vascular catheters. In addition, the increase in neuroendovascular procedures with the associated use of heparinization will increase the exposure of SAH patients to heparin.

METHODS:

During a 3.5-year period (January 2000–June 2003), 389 consecutive SAH patients were treated at our center. We retrospectively reviewed their laboratory data and medical records and used accepted clinical criteria for the diagnosis of HIT II to determine the incidence of HIT II, thrombotic complications, management, and outcome.

RESULTS:

Fifty-nine patients (15%) met the clinical diagnostic criteria for HIT II. The average platelet count nadir in the HIT II patients was 68,600 ± 25,300/μl (mean ± standard deviation). Female patients and patients with Fisher Grade 3 were more likely to develop HIT II (P < 0.01). Thirty-six patients (61%) underwent a neuroendovascular procedure. The rate of systemic thrombotic complications in the HIT II patients was 37 versus 7% in SAH patients without HIT II (P < 0.001), and the rate of new hypodensities on head computed tomographic scans was 66% in the HIT II patients versus 40% in the SAH patients without HIT II (P < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were worse in the HIT II patients. The outcome was favorable for 38% in the HIT II patients versus 52% in all SAH patients (P < 0.05), and deaths were more common (29%) in the HIT II patients than in all SAH patients (12%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The incidence of HIT II in SAH patients at a single center was 15%. The SAH patients with HIT II had significantly higher rates of thrombotic complications, new hypodensities on head computed tomographic scans, more deaths, and significantly less favorable outcomes. This is the first report of the incidence of HIT II in a neurosurgical patient population.

Risk factors for thrombosis in patients with immune mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

As reported by major clinical series in the literature, about 2% of patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) develop immune-mediated (type II) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) that may be complicated in 30-75% of cases by a paradoxical thrombotic syndrome (HITTS), either arterial or venous. HITTS carries relevant rates of mortality and morbidity, amongst which cerebral and/or myocardial infarction and limb amputations. It is unclear as yet why some patients suffer from isolated thrombocytopenia (HIT), whilst others have HITTS. The aim of the present study was to look for clinical and laboratory features related to the occurrence of HITTS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the clinical records of 56 patients with proven HIT, as diagnosed on clinical grounds and by in vitro demonstration of immunoglobulin (IgG)/IgM against the PF4/heparin complex. Thirty-four patients (61%) had HITTS (19 venous thrombosis, seven arterial thrombosis, five arterial and venous thrombosis, two skin necrosis, one diffuse intravascular coagulation), whereas 22 had uncomplicated HIT. Amongst HITTS patients, two had limb amputation, five had recurrent thrombosis and seven died. Amongst HIT patients three died from causes unrelated to HIT.

RESULTS

No significant difference in sex, age, previous exposure to heparin, UFH route of administration or dose, duration of therapy, time of onset of thrombocytopenia and platelet count recovery, nor antiheparin/PF4 antibodies subtype (IgG or IgM) was detected when comparing HIT and HITTS. In contrast, in the HITTS group a higher prevalence of orthopaedic surgery (15 of 34 vs. 2/22; P=0.01), a significantly lower platelet count nadir (43 +/- 32 vs. 75 +/- 63 x 109/L; P=0.01) and a significantly higher titre of antiheparin/PF4 antibodies, expressed as optical density of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); (1989 +/- 1024 vs. 1277 +/- 858; P=0.009), were observed in comparison with the HIT group. Amongst HITTS patients, the prevalence of venous thrombosis was significantly higher in orthopaedic patients and in those being treated for venous thromboembolism (18/24 vs. 1/9 patients, chi2 8.4, P=0.004), whilst arterial thrombosis (ART) occurred more often in heparin treatment for arterial disease (3/4 vs. 4/29 patients, chi2 4.6, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopaedic surgery, the severity of thrombocytopenia and high antiheparin/PF4 antibodies titre are adverse prognostic or concurrent factors in the development of HITTS.

Pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Clinical and diagnostic implications--a review

OBJECTIVE

This review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the most frequent and dangerous side effect of heparin exposure, covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease syndrome.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Current consensus of opinion is given based on literature reports, as well as new information where available. A comprehensive analysis of the reasons for discrepancies in incidence numbers is given. The currently known mechanism is that HIT is mediated by an antibody to the complex of heparin->platelet factor 4, which binds to the Fc receptor on platelets. New evidence suggests a functional heterogeneity in the anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies generated to heparin, and a "superactive" heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody that does not require the presence of heparin to promote platelet activation or aggregation has been identified. Up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory markers, as well as preactivation of platelets/endothelial cells/leukocytes, are also considered to be related to the pathophysiology of HIT. Issues related to the specificity of currently available and new laboratory assays that support a clinical diagnosis are addressed in relation to the serotonin-release assay. Past experience with various anticoagulant treatments is reviewed with a focus on the recent successes of thrombin inhibitors and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to combat the platelet activation and severe thrombotic episodes associated with HIT.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathophysiology of HIT is multifactorial. However, the primary factor in the mediation of the cellular activation is due to the generation of an antibody to the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. This review is written as a reference for HIT research.

Platelet count, anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies and tissue factor pathway inhibitor plasma antigen level in chronic dialysis

We studied 50 chronic dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease. Mean platelet count was within normal limits. An inverse linear correlation was observed between pre-dialysis platelet count and serum creatinine (r=0.304, p=0.038). Dialysis caused a decrease in platelet count (216+/-80x10(9)/L, pre; 198+/-68, post; p=0.0001), and the higher the pre-dialysis platelet count, the greater the decrease (r=0.623, p=0.0001). Post-dialysis triglyceride decreased (1.67+/-1.27 mmol/L, pre; 1.23+/-0.96, post; p=0.0001). Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) antigen plasma level was higher in uremic patients than in controls (114+/-42 ng/ml vs. 64+/-12, p=0.0001). TFPI increased 2.3 times following dialysis and such an increase was directly correlated with post-dialysis plasma heparin concentration (r=0.571, p=0.0002) and inversely correlated with post-dialysis triglyceride variation (r=0.407, p=0.005). Six of fifty patients (12%) had anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies (Hab), 3 IgG, and 3 IgM. Female sex and the use of cuprophane membranes were more frequent among Hab-positive patients (p=0.0001), while a lower percentage of them were on anti-aggregating drugs as compared to Hab-negative patients (p=0.002). Only one Hab-positive patient was slightly thrombocytopenic and none showed bleeding or thrombotic manifestations. Serum albumin and y globulin decreased following dialysis in Hab-positive patients, while the opposite was seen in those Hab-negative (-2.47+/-1.72 g/L, vs. 0.21+/-1.77, p=0.001 and -0.48+/-0.60 g/L vs. 0.64+/-0.97, p=0.007, respectively). In vivo factors other than Hab are involved in the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Besides a blunted immunological response, increased levels of TFPI, the use of anti-aggregating drugs, and the observed behavior of serum proteins might play a role in this regard.