Medication decisions--right and wrong

Impact of reducing dosing frequency on adherence to oral therapies: a literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of reduced frequency of oral therapies from multiple-dosing schedules to a once-daily (OD) dosing schedule on adherence, compliance, persistence, and associated economic impact.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed based on relevant articles identified from a comprehensive literature review using MEDLINE® and Embase®. The review included studies assessing adherence with OD, twice-daily (BID), thrice-daily (TID), and four-times daily (QID) dosing schedules and costs associated with optimal/suboptimal adherence among patients with acute and chronic diseases. Effect estimates across studies were pooled and analyzed using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies met inclusion criteria, and meta-analyzable data were available from 13 studies. The overall results indicated that OD schedules were associated with higher adherence rates (odds ratio [OR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-5.23; P < 0.001 for OD versus > OD dosing) and compliance rates (OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.73-7.08; P < 0.001 for OD versus > OD dosing); persistence rates showed the same direction but were not statistically significant (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.62-3.29; P = 0.405 for OD versus BID dosing). Results for each of the conditions were consistent with those observed overall with respect to showing the benefits of less frequent dosing. From a health economic perspective, higher adherence rates with OD relative to multiple dosing in a number of conditions were consistently associated with corresponding lower costs of health care resources utilization.

CONCLUSION

Current meta-analyses suggested that across acute and chronic disease states, reducing dosage frequency from multiple dosing to OD dosing may improve adherence to therapies among patients. Improving adherence may result in subsequent decreases in health care costs.

Let's talk about medication: concordance in rating medication adherence among multimorbid patients and their general practitioners

BACKGROUND

Medication adherence can be essential for improving health outcomes. Patients with multiple chronic conditions, often receiving multiple medications, are at higher risk for medication nonadherence. Previous research has focused on concordance between patients and providers about which medication should be taken. However, the question of whether patients and providers are concordant in rating actual medication intake has not been answered as yet. This study aimed to explore the extent and predictors of patient - provider concordance in rating medication adherence in patients with multiple chronic conditions.

METHODS

Overall medication adherence was measured by self-report (Medication Adherence Report Scale, MARS-D) in a sample of 92 patients with multiple chronic conditions. Twelve treating primary care physicians were asked to rate medication adherence in these patients using a mirrored version of the MARS-D. Concordance between external rating and self-reported medication adherence was analyzed descriptively. Predictors of concordance in rating medication adherence were explored in a multilevel analysis.

RESULTS

Patients rate their medication adherence markedly higher than their general practitioner. Accordingly, the percentage of concordance ranges between 40% (forgot to take medication) and 61% (deliberately omitted a dose). In multilevel analysis, concordance in rating medication adherence was positively associated with being the single primary care provider (β 2.24, P < 0.0001) and frequent questioning about medication use (β 0.66, P = 0.0031). At the patient level, "not [being] married" (β -0.81, P = 0.0064) and "number of prescribed medications" (β -0.10, P = 0.0203) were negative predictors of patient - provider concordance in rating medication adherence.

CONCLUSION

Concordance for rating medication adherence between general practitioners and their patients was low. Talking about medication on a regular basis and better continuity of care may enhance patient - provider concordance in rating medication adherence as a prerequisite for shared decisions concerning medication in patients with multiple chronic conditions.

Incident use and outcomes associated with potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults

BACKGROUND

Most studies of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older adults have focused on prevalence rather than incidence.

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to determine the 1-year incidence of PIM use among elderly Indiana Medicaid residents of nursing homes and to examine associations between incident PIM use and hospitalization and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using Indiana Medicaid enrollment and administrative claims files. Individuals were included if they were Medicaid eligible and aged ≥65 years as of January 2003 and received nursing home services in each month of 2003 or until death in 2003. Individuals also had to receive nursing home services from October 2002 through December 2002 for inclusion in the sample. To focus analysis on incident PIM use, individuals who received any PIM prescription medication from October 2002 through December 2002 were excluded from the sample, as were those not prescribed any new medication in 2003. PIMs were identified using the 2003 Beers criteria. Associations between incident PIM use and hospitalization and mortality were assessed using logistic regression models after controlling for other risk factors. Potential selection bias was examined using bivariate probit models.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 7594 individuals (mean age, 83.07 years). A majority of the sample was female (76.5%), white (89.7%), and widowed (58.8%). Most individuals received care in nursing homes located in urban areas (5306 [69.9%]) and in the central region of Indiana (2838 [37.4%]). One-year incidence of PIM use was 42.1%. Incident PIM users were more likely to be hospitalized (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-C1.46) and more likely to die (OR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.31-C1.62) in the 12 months after first receiving a PIM than nonusers, even after adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Incident PIM use was high among these elderly Indiana Medicaid residents of nursing homes. Individuals who began use of a PIM were at a higher risk of hospitalization and of dying.

Potentially inappropriate drug prescriptions and risk of hospitalization among older, Italian, nursing home residents: the ULISSE project

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medications in older patients increase the risk of adverse drug events, which are an important cause of hospital admission and death among hospitalized patients. Little information is available about the prevalence of potentially inappropriate drug prescriptions (PIDPs) and the related health adverse outcomes among nursing home (NH) residents.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of PIDPs and the association with adverse outcomes in NH residents.

METHODS

A total of 1716 long-term residents aged >or=65 years participating in the ULISSE (Un Link Informatico sui Servizi Sanitari Esistenti per l'anziano [A Computerized Network on Health Care Services for Older People]) project were evaluated using a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment instrument, i.e. the interResident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set. A thorough evaluation of residents' drug use, medical diagnoses and healthcare resource utilization was performed. A PIDP was defined according to the most recent update of the Beers criteria.

RESULTS

Almost one out of two persons (48%) had at least one PIDP and almost one out of five had two or more PIDPs (18%). Residents with a higher number of PIDPs had a higher likelihood of being hospitalized. Compared with residents without PIDPs, those with two or more PIDPs at baseline had a higher probability of being hospitalized (hazard ratio 1.73; 95% CI 1.14, 2.60) during the following 12 months. Risk of PIDP was positively associated with the total number of drugs and diseases, but negatively with age. PIDPs defined according to specific conditions (n = 780; 55%) were slightly more frequent than PIDPs based on single medications irrespective of specific indication (n = 639; 45%).

CONCLUSIONS

PIDP is a significant problem among Italian NH residents. There is an urgent need for intervention trials to test strategies to reduce inappropriate drug use and its associated adverse health outcomes.

Inappropriate drug prescriptions among older nursing home residents: the Italian perspective

Older people take up a large proportion of health care, including drugs, and evidence shows that drug prescribing to this group is often inappropriate. Negative consequences of potential inappropriate drug prescription (PIDP) include adverse drug events, high healthcare service utilization and high costs for the patients and society. Although nursing home residents are the most vulnerable persons exposed to PIDP, few observational studies have investigated the prevalence, the factors associated with and the consequences of PIDP. Epidemiological studies assessing PIDP mainly based on the Beers' criteria showed that approximately half of US and Canadian nursing home residents have at least one PIDP in this setting. The most frequent inappropriate prescriptions concern neuroleptics and long-term benzodiazepines. Nursing home residents aged 80 years or more, those taking a low number of drugs, cognitive or communication problems are less exposed to PIDP compared with residents younger than 80 years, living in facilities with a high number of beds and a lower registered nurse-to-resident ratio. In European countries, the prevalence of PIDP among older nursing home residents was comparable to or higher than that observed in US and Canadian nursing homes. To date, the issue of PIDP has never been investigated in a representative sample of Italian nursing home residents. In a preliminary study performed by our group in 496 nursing home residents randomly selected from 40 nursing homes in Umbria, the prevalence of residents taking at least one or two inappropriate medications was 28% and 7%, respectively. The prevalence of PIDP considering diagnosis (18%) as well as those regardless of diagnosis (17%), as determined by Beers' criteria, were equally distributed in older Italian nursing home residents and no difference was found between sexes. Overall, this review reveals that the prevalence of PIDP is high in both North American and European nursing homes and highlights the urgent need for intervention trials testing strategies to reduce the health and social burden of PIDP.

Perceptions of nurses in nursing homes on the usage of benzodiazepines

AIM

This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study on how nurses perceive their own role in the use of benzodiazepines in nursing homes and to identify the factors that have an impact on the nurses' role in the use of benzodiazepines.

BACKGROUND

The use of benzodiazepines in nursing homes is of particular concern, as nursing-home residents receive considerably more benzodiazepines than non-institutionalised older persons. Evidence of their long-term effectiveness is lacking. Nurses are important partners in the decision-making process of starting and discontinuation of benzodiazepines.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive.

METHOD

Three focus group interviews and 10 additional semi-structured interviews were used with 33 registered nurses. The interviews were thematically analysed.

FINDINGS

Nurses' main concern is to work towards the comfort of the patient. Benzodiazepines are an easy option with not too many side effects and administration of benzodiazepines is experienced as a routine action. When prescribed they will almost automatically lead to chronic usage as there is no evaluation of their effect. There are three aspects that have an impact on nurse's perceptions of their role in benzodiazepine usage: their own individual attitude and perceptions, their knowledge and organisational factors.

CONCLUSION

Nurses do not see benzodiazepines as a problem drug and once a prescription is initiated it will almost automatically lead to chronic usage. Nurses should work towards a pro-active promotion of addressing sleeping problems and they can play a key role in non-pharmacological interventions.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses can play a key role in suggesting non-pharmacological alternatives. Education to provide more insight into the problems of insomnia and anxiety may positively influence their attitudes and behaviour. All caregivers in nursing homes should be informed about the relevance of this issue.

Potentially inappropriate medication prescriptions among elderly nursing home residents: their scope and associated resident and facility characteristics

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the scope of potentially inappropriate medication prescriptions (PIRx) among elderly residents in U.S. nursing homes (NHs), and to examine associated resident and facility characteristics.

DATA SOURCES

The 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Nursing Home Component (MEPS NHC), a survey of a nationally representative sample of NHs and residents.

STUDY DESIGN

The PIRx, defined by Beers's consensus criteria (1991, 1997), was identified using up to a year's worth of NH prescribed medicine data for each resident. The study sample represented 1.6 million NH residents (n=3,372).

RESULTS

At a minimum, 50 percent of all residents aged 65 or older, with an NH stay of three months or longer received at least one PIRx in 1996. The most common PIRx involved propoxyphene, diphenhydramine, hydroxyzine, oxybutynin, amitriptyline, cyproheptadine, iron supplements, and ranitidine. Resident factors associated with greater odds of PIRx were Medicaid coverage, no high school diploma, and nondementia mental disorders. Facility factors were more beds and lower RN-to-resident ratio. Factors associated with lower odds of PIRx were fewer medications, residents with communication problems, and being in an accredited NH. Onsite availability of pharmacists or mental health providers was not related.

IMPLICATIONS

With quality of care and patient safety as major public health concerns, effective policies are needed to avoid PIRx occurrences and improve the quality of prescribing among elderly residents in NHs. Additional studies are needed to determine the impact of PIRx on this NH population.